Adolescent socialization patterns have shifted toward less in-person socializing and more virtual socializing. Thus, it’s important to determine the association between virtual socializing and delinquency and whether virtual socializing represents a separate construct or a technological evolution of unstructured socializing. We explore this by using a modern virtual socializing scale on a nationally representative sample of eighth to 10th graders from the 2018 Monitoring the Future survey. Results indicate that virtual socializing is associated with delinquency, and unstructured socializing somewhat attenuates this relationship, but virtual socializing remains a significant predictor. Karlson-Holm-Breen method was used to assess the degree of attenuation produced by unstructured socializing, and demonstrates that unstructured socializing attenuates about 20% of the effect of virtual socializing on delinquency.
AndersonA. L.HughesL. A. (2009). Exposure to situations conducive to delinquent behavior: The effects of time use, income, and transportation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(1), 5–34.
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2018). Getting better all the time: Trends in risk behavior among American adolescents since 1990. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6(1), 87–95.
3.
AugustynM. B.McGloinJ. M. (2013). The risk of informal socializing with peers: Considering gender differences across predatory delinquency and substance use. Justice Quarterly, 30(1), 117–143.
4.
BarnesG. M.HoffmanJ. H.WelteJ. W.FarrellM. P.DintcheffB. A. (2007). Adolescents’ time use: Effects on substance use, delinquency and sexual activity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(5), 697–710.
5.
BaumerE. P.CundiffK.LuoL. (2021). The contemporary transformation of American youth: An analysis of change in the prevalence of delinquency, 1991–2015. Criminology, 59, 109–136.
6.
BernburgJ. G.ThorlindssonT. (2001). Routine activities in social context: A closer look at the role of opportunity in deviant behavior. Justice Quarterly, 18(3), 543–567.
7.
BoydC. J.VelizP. T.McCabeS. E. (2015). Adolescents’ use of medical marijuana: A secondary analysis of monitoring the future data. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(2), 241–244.
8.
BucciR.StaffJ. (2020). Pubertal timing and adolescent delinquency. Criminology, 58(3), 537–567.
9.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
HaynieD. L.OsgoodD. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–1130.
12.
HigginsG. E. (2004). Can low self-control help with the understanding of the software piracy problem?Deviant Behavior, 26(1), 1–24.
13.
HigginsG. E.MarcumC. D. (2011). Digital piracy: An integrated theoretical approach. Carolina Academic Press.
14.
HindujaS.IngramJ. R. (2009). Social learning theory and music piracy: The differential role of online and offline peer influences. Criminal Justice Studies, 22(4), 405–420.
15.
HoebenE. M.MeldrumR. C.WalkerD.YoungJ. T. N. (2016). The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 108–122.
16.
HoltT. J. (2009). Lone hacks or group cracks: Examining the social organization of computer hackers. In SchmallegerF.PittaroM. (Eds.), Crimes of the internet (pp. 336–355). Pearson.
17.
HoltT. J.BosslerA. M. (2008). Examining the applicability of lifestyle-routine activities theory for cybercrime victimization. Deviant Behavior, 30(1), 1–25.
18.
JacksonD. B.BoccioC. M.LealW. E.VaughnM. G. (2019). It’s all the rage! Exploring the nuances in the link between vaping and adolescent delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 63, 58–69.
19.
JacksonD. B.TestaA.VaughnM. G. (2020). Low self-control and legal cynicism among at-risk youth: An investigation into direct and vicarious police contact. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(6), 741–783.
20.
JacobsenW. C. (2019). The intergenerational stability of punishment: Paternal incarceration and suspension or expulsion in elementary school. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(5), 651–693.
21.
KarlsonK. B.HolmA. (2011). Decomposing primary and secondary effects: A new decomposition method. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29, 221–237.
22.
KarlsonK. B.HolmA.BreenR. (2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and Probit. Sociological Methodology, 42, 286–313.
23.
KomlosJ.BreitfelderA.SunderM. (2009). The transition to post-industrial BMI values among US children. Am J Hum Biol, 21(2), 151–160.
24.
MaimonD.BrowningC. R. (2010). Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violent behavior among urban youth. Criminology, 48(2), 443–474.
25.
McCuddyT. (2021). Peer delinquency among digital natives: The cyber context as a source of peer influence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58, 306–342.
26.
McCuddyT.VogelM. (2015). More than just friends: Online social networks and offending. Criminal Justice Review, 40(2), 169–189.
27.
MeldrumR. C.ClarkJ. (2015). Adolescent virtual time spent socializing with peers, substance use, and delinquency. Crime and Delinquency, 61(8), 1104–1126.
28.
MillerB.MorrisR. G. (2016). Virtual peer effects in social learning theory. Crime and Delinquency, 62(12), 1543–1569.
29.
MitchellJ. A.RodriguezD.SchmitzK. H.Audrain-McGovernJ. (2013). Greater screen time is associated with adolescent obesity: A longitudinal study of the BMI distribution from ages 14 to 18. Obesity, 21(3), 572–575.
30.
MorrisR. G.JohnsonM. C. (2014). Sedentary activities, peer behavior, and delinquency among American youth. Crime and Delinquency, 60(6), 939–968.
31.
NelsonM. C.Gordon-LarsenP. (2006). Physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns are associated with selected adolescent health risk behaviors. Pediatrics, 117(4), 1281–1290.
32.
OgdenC. L.CarrollM. D.KitB. K.FlegalK. M. (2012). Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 307(5), 483–490.
33.
OsgoodD. W.AndersonA. L. (2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42(3), 519–550.
34.
OsgoodD. W.WilsonJ. K.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.JohnstonL. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655.
35.
PyroozD. C.DeckerS. H.MouleR. K. (2015). Criminal and routine activities in online settings: Gangs, offenders, and the Internet. Justice Quarterly, 32(3), 471–499.
UnderwoodM. K.RosenL. H.MoreD.EhrenreichS. E.GentschJ. K. (2012). The BlackBerry project: Capturing the content of adolescents’ text messaging. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 295–302.
38.
WeermanF. M.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. J. N.PauwelsL. J. R. (2015). When is spending time with peers related to delinquency? The importance of where, what, and with whom. Crime and Delinquency, 61(10), 1386–1413.
39.
WiddowsonA. O.SiennickS. E.HayC. (2016). The implications of arrest for college enrollment: An Analysis of long-term effects and mediating mechanisms. Criminology, 54(4), 621–652.
