When Is Spending Time With Peers Related to Delinquency? The Importance of Where,What,and With Whom

Abstract

Research has shown that time spent with peers is related to delinquency, but little is known about the conditions under which spending time with peers is most related to delinquent behavior. In this study, we contrast different categories of time spent with peers, using detailed information about the activities and whereabouts of 843 adolescents in The Hague, the Netherlands. Our findings reveal substantial differences. Time spent with peers appears to be independently related with delinquency only when it combines at least two of the following risk-inducing conditions: just socializing, being in public, and being unsupervised.

Keywords

juvenile delinquency peers time use space–time budget unstructured socializing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29, 47-72.

Agnew

Peterson

D. M.

(1989). Leisure and delinquency. Social Problems, 36, 332-350.

Anderson

A. L.

Hughes

L. A.

(2009). Exposure to situations conducive to delinquent behavior: The effects of time use, income, and transportation. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 46, 5-34.

Anderson

(1999). The code of the street. Decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: Norton.

Battin

S. R.

Hill

K. G.

Abbott

R. D

Catalano

R. F.

Hawkins

J. D.

(1998). The contribution of gang membership to delinquency beyond delinquent friends. Criminology, 36, 93-115.

Bendixen

Endresen

I. M.

Olweus

(2006). Joining and leaving gangs: Selection and facilitation effects on self-reported antisocial behaviour in early adolescence. European Journal of Criminology, 3, 85-114.

Bernburg

J. G.

Thorlindsson

(2001). Routine activities in social context: A closer look at the role of opportunity in deviant behavior. Justice Quarterly, 18, 543-567.

Bernburg

J. G.

Thorlindsson

(2007). Community structure and adolescent offending in Iceland: A contextual analysis. Criminology, 45, 415-444.

Bruinsma

G. J. N.

(1992). Differential association theory reconsidered: An extension and its empirical test. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 8, 29-50.

10.

Cohen

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.

11.

Decker

S. H.

Van Winkle

(1996). Life in the gang: Family, friends, and violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Elliott

D. S.

Huizinga

Ageton

S. S.

(1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

13.

Ellis

Beaver

Wright

(2009). Handbook of crime correlates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

14.

Flannery

D. J.

Williams

L. L.

Vazsonyi

A. T.

(1999). Who are they with and what are they doing? Delinquent behavior, substance use, and early adolescents’ after-school time. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 247-253.

15.

Giordano

(2003). Relationships in adolescence. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 257-281.

16.

Grasmick

H. G.

Tittle

C. R.

Bursik

R. J.

Arneklev

B. J.

(1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 5-29.

17.

Haynie

D. L.

Osgood

D. W.

(2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109-1130.

18.

Hirschi

(1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

19.

Kerr

Stattin

(2003). Parenting of adolescents: Action or reaction. In Crouter

A. C.

Booth

(Eds.), Children’s influence on family dynamics: The neglected side of family dynamics (pp. 121-151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Klein

M. W.

Maxson

C. L.

(2005). Street gang patterns and policies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

21.

Meldrum

R. C.

Young

J. T. N.

Weerman

F. M.

(2009). Reconsidering the effects of self-control and delinquent peers: Implications of measurements for theoretical significance. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 46, 353-376.

22.

Miller

(2012). Individual offending, routine activities, and activity settings: Revisiting the routine activity theory of general deviance. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 50, 390-416.

23.

Osgood

D. W.

Anderson

A. L.

(2005). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42, 519-550.

24.

Osgood

D. W.

Finken

L. L.

McMorris

B. J.

(2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 319-347.

25.

Osgood

D. W.

Wilson

J. K.

O’Malley

P. M.

Bachman

J. G.

Johnston

L. D.

(1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635-655.

26.

Riley

(1987). Time and crime: The link between teenager lifestyle and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 339-354.

27.

Savin-Williams

R. C.

Berndt

T. J.

(1990). Friendship and peer relations. In Feldman

S. S.

Elliott

G. R.

(Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 277-307). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

28.

Short

J. F.

Jr. (1958). Differential association with delinquent friends and delinquent behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 20-25.

29.

Stoolmiller

(1994). Antisocial behavior, delinquent peer association, and unsupervised wandering for boys: Growth and change from childhood to early adolescence. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 263-288.

30.

Sutherland

E. H.

(1947). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.

31.

Svensson

Oberwittler

(2010). It’s not the time they spend, it’s what they do: The interaction between delinquent friends and unstructured routine activity on delinquency. Findings from two countries. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1006-1014.

32.

Thornberry

T. P.

Krohn

M. D.

(2003). Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.

33.

Thornberry

T. P.

Krohn

M. D.

Lizotte

A. J.

Chard-Wierschem

(1993). The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 55-87.

34.

Warr

(1993). Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology, 31, 17-40.

35.

Warr

(2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

36.

Weerman

F. M.

Smeenk

W. H.

(2005). Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology, 43, 499-524.

37.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

(2004). Crime as alternative. Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In McCord

(Ed.), Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime. Advances in criminological theory (pp. 1-37). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.

38.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

(2006). Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In Wikström

P.-O. H.

Sampson

R. J.

(Eds.), The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms, and development (pp. 61-107). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

39.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Butterworth

(2006). Adolescent crime: Individual differences and lifestyles. Devon, England: Willan Publishing.

40.

Wikström

P.-O. H

Ceccato

Hardie

Treiber

(2010). Activity fields and the dynamics of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 55-87.

41.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Oberwittler

Treiber

Hardie

(2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

42.

Wikström

P.-O. H.

Svensson

(2008). Why are English youths more violent than Swedish youths? A comparative study of the role of crime propensity, lifestyles and their interactions in two cities. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 309-330.