Focal concerns has utility for explaining criminal justice decisions, including among police. At present, there is no research that has examined focal concerns and arrest decisions in non-sexual, intimate partner violence (IPV) cases. This study used a stratified random sample of 776 IPV incidents from an urban police department in one of the five largest and most diverse US cities to assess the effect of focal concerns on arrest. A multivariate binary logistic regression model demonstrated victim injury, suspect IPV and general criminal history, evidence, witnesses, victim preference for formal intervention, women victims, and intoxicated suspects predicted arrest. When the suspect was on scene, this was the strongest predictor of arrest. Implications and future research are discussed.
AlbonettiC. A. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law and Society Review, 21, 291–313.
2.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247–266.
3.
BachmanR.CokerA. L. (1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive effects of victim injury, offender’s history of violence, and race. Violence and Victims, 10, 91–106.
4.
BakerN. L.BuickJ. D.KimS. R.MonizS.NavaK. L. (2013). Lessons from examining same-sex intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 69, 182–192.
5.
BelsleyD.KuhE.WelschR. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. John Wiley.
6.
BuzawaE. S.AustinT. (1993). Determining police response to domestic violence victims: The role of victim preference. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 610–623.
7.
BuzawaE.HotalingG.KleinA.ByrneJ. (1999). Response to domestic violence in a proactive court setting: Final report. National Institute of Justice.
8.
CampbellB. A.LapseyD. S.Jr.WellsW. (2020). An evaluation of Kentucky’s sexual assault investigator training: Results from a randomized three-group experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16, 625–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09391-0
9.
CrowM. S.AdrionB. (2011). Focal concerns and police use of force: Examining the factors associated with Taser use. Police Quarterly, 14, 366–387.
10.
DawsonM.DinovitzerR. (2001). Victim cooperation and the prosecution of domestic violence in a specialized court. Justice Quarterly, 18, 593–622.
11.
DichterM. E.MarcusS. C.MorabitoM. S.RhodesK. V. (2011). Explaining the IPV arrest decision: Incident, agency, and community factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 22–39.
12.
DickerR. C. (2008). A history of US feminisms. Seal Press.
13.
DurfeeA.FetzerM. D. (2016). Offense type and the arrest decision in cases of intimate partner violence. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 954–977.
14.
EitleD. (2005). The influence of mandatory arrest policies, police organizational characteristics, and situational variables on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 573–597.
15.
FearnN. E. (2005). A multilevel analysis of community effects on criminal sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 22, 452–487.
16.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics.
17.
FlemingJ. C.FranklinC. A. (2020). Predicting police endorsement of myths surrounding intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00178-w
18.
FranklinC. A.GarzaA.GoodsonA. GBouffardL. A. (2019). Police perceptions of crime victim behaviors: A trend analysis exploring mandatory training and knowledge of sexual and domestic violence survivors’ trauma responses. Crime & Delinquency, 66, 1055–1086.https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719845148
19.
FranklinC. A.GoodsonA.GarzaA. D. (2019). Intimate partner violence among sexual minorities: An exploration of police officer decision-making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46, 1181–1199.
20.
FranklinT. W. (2010). The intersection of defendants’ race, gender, and age in prosecutorial decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 185–192.
21.
FranklinT. W.HenryT. K. S. (2018). One day makes all of the difference: Denying federal offenders access to “good time” through sentencing. Crime & Delinquency, 64, 115–140.
22.
GarzaA. D.FranklinC. A.GoodsonA. (2020). The nexus between intimate partner violence and stalking: Examining the arrest decision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47, 1014–1031.
23.
GarzaA. D.GoodsonA.FranklinC. A. (Forthcoming). Policing nonfatal strangulation within the context of intimate partner violence. Policing: An International Journal.
24.
GlassN.LaughonK.CampbellJ.BlockC. R.HansonG.SharpsP. W.TaliaferroE. (2008). Non-fatal strangulation is an important risk factor for homicide. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 3, 329–225.
25.
HallD. L. (2005). Domestic violence arrest decision making: The role of suspect availability in the arrest decision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 390–411.
26.
HamiltonM.WorthenM. G. (2011). Sex disparities in arrest outcomes for domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1559–1578.
27.
HigginsG. E.VitoG. F.GrossiE. L. (2012). The impact of race on the police decision to search during a traffic stop: A focal concerns theory perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 28, 166–183.
28.
HirschelD.BuzawaE. S. (2013). The impact of offenders leaving the scene on the police decision to arrest in cases of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 19, 1079–1103.
29.
IshoyG. A.DabneyD. A. (2018). Policing and the focal concerns framework: Exploring how its core components apply to the discretionary enforcement decisions of police officers. Deviant Behavior, 39, 878–895.
30.
JohnsonA. G. (1997). The gender knot: Unraveling our patriarchal legacy. Temple University Press.
31.
JordanC. E. (2004). Intimate partner violence and the justice system: An examination of the interface. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1412–1434.
32.
KerstetterW. (1990). Gateway to justice: Police and prosecutorial response to sexual assaults against women. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 267–313.
33.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
34.
KossM. P.GoodmanL. A.BrowneA.FitzgeraldL. F.KeitaG. P.RussoN. F. (1994). No safe heaven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. American Psychological Association.
35.
LaFreeG. D. (1981). Official reactions to social problems: Police decisions in sexual assault cases. Social Problems, 28, 582–594.
36.
LallyW.DeMarisA. (2012). Gender and relational-distance effects in arrests for domestic violence. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 103–123.
37.
LaVioletteA. D.BarnettO. W. (2013). It could happen to anyone: Why battered women stay. Sage Publication.
38.
LeeJ.ZhangY.HooverL. T. (2013). Police response to domestic violence: Multilevel factors on arrest decision. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 36, 157–174.
39.
LutzeF. E.SymonsM. L. (2003). The evolution of domestic violence policy through masculine institutions: From discipline to protection to collaborative empowerment. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 319–328.
40.
LynchM. (2019). Focally concerned about focal concerns: A conceptual and methodological critique of sentencing disparities research. Justice Quarterly, 36, 1148–1175.
41.
MartinD. (1975). Battered wives. Volcano Press.
42.
McCormackP. D.HirschelD. (2018). Race and the likelihood of intimate partner violence arrest and dual arrest. Race and Justice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368718802352
McLaughryC.ChangB.KristenC.HirschelD.BuzawaE.PatavinaA.DoyleS.CullinaneD. (2013). Severity of injury and the decision to arrest in cases of intimate partner violence. Medicine, Science, and the Law, 53, 24–28.
45.
MeltonH. C. (2012). Stalking, intimate partner abuse, and the police. The Open Criminology Journal, 5, 1–7.
46.
MessingJ. T.Ward-LasherA.ThallerJ.Bagwell-GrayM. E. (2015). The state of intimate partner violence intervention: Progress and continuing challenges. Social Work, 60, 305–313.
47.
O’NealE. N.SpohnC. (2017). When the perpetrator is a partner: Arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assault cases—A focal concerns analysis. Violence Against Women, 23, 707–729.
48.
PattavinaA.BuzawaE.HirschelD.FaggianiD. (2007). Policy, place, and perpetrators: Using NIBRS to explain arrest practices in intimate partner violence. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 31–51.
49.
RoarkJ. (2016). Predictors of dual arrest for offenders involved in heterosexual domestic violence arrests. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39, 52–63.
50.
RobinsonA. L.ChandekM. S. (2000). The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 18–37.
51.
ShermanL. W.BerkR. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261–272.
52.
ShermerL. O. N.JohnsonB. D. (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in US federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 394–430.
53.
SmithS. G.ZhangX.BasileK. C.MerrickM. T.WangJ.KresnowM.ChenJ. (2018). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief – Updated release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
54.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798.
55.
TabachnickB.G.FidellL.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon.
56.
TatumK. M.PenceR. (2015). Factors that affect the arrest decision in domestic violence cases. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38, 56–70.
57.
TillyerR.HartleyR. D. (2010). Driving racial profiling research forward: Learning lessons from sentencing research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 657–665.
58.
TjadenP. G.ThoennesN. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women. Research report. Findings from the national violence against women survey. U.S. Department of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
59.
UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34, 383–408.
60.
von HirschA. (1976). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. Northeastern University Press.
61.
WestC. M. (1995). Mammy, Sapphire, and Jezebel: Historical images of Black women and their implications for psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 32, 458–466.
