We analyze how victim perceptions of mandatory arrest policies, perpetrator substance use, and presence of children are related to decisions to invoke law enforcement assistance. Logistic regression was used on survey responses from women receiving care in domestic violence shelters. Results suggest that as victim support for mandatory arrest increases, the odds of law enforcement notification of the abuse also increase. Accordingly, mandatory arrest may simply be reducing the probability of reporting intimate partner violence (IPV) among those who do not support the policy, instead of reducing IPV. Results also suggest that perpetrator substance use plays a significant role in law enforcement notification.
AdamsM. E.CampbellJ. C. (2012). Being undocumented and intimate partner violence (IPV): Multiple vulnerabilities through the lens of feminist intersectionality. Women’s Health & Urban Life, 11, 15-34.
2.
AdlerP. A.AdlerP. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AkersC.KaukinenC. (2009). The police reporting behavior of intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 159-171.
4.
AndersonD.SaundersD. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 163-191.
5.
BarnettO. W. (2001). Why battered women do not leave, part 2: External inhibiting factors—Social support and internal inhibiting factors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2, 3-35.
6.
BarrettB. J.St. PierreM. (2011). Variations in women’s help seeking in response to intimate partner violence: Findings from a Canadian population-based study. Violence Against Women, 17, 47-70.
7.
BaumerE. P. (2002). Neighborhood disadvantage and police notification by victims of violence. Criminology, 40, 579-616.
8.
BenoitC.JanssonM.MillarA.PhillipsR. (2005). Community-academic research on hard-to-reach populations: Benefits and challenges. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 263-282.
9.
BerkR. A.CampbellA.KlapR.WesternB. (1992). The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 5, 689-708.
10.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
11.
BledsoeL. K.YankeelovP. A.BarbeeA. P.AntleB. F. (2004). Understanding the impact of intimate partner violence mandatory reporting law. Violence Against Women, 10, 534-560.
12.
BonomiA. E.HoltV. L.MartinD. P.ThompsonR. S. (2006). Severity of intimate partner violence and occurrence and frequency of police calls. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1354-1364.
13.
BtoushR.CampbellJ. C. (2009). Ethical conduct in intimate partner violence research: Challenges and strategies. Nursing Outlook, 57, 210-216.
14.
CatalanoS. (2007). Intimate partner violence in the U.S. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ipvus.pdf
15.
CattaneoL. B.GoodmanL. A. (2003). Victim reported risk factors for continued abusive behavior: Assessing the dangerousness of arrested batterers. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 349-369.
16.
Christi-McMullinK. (2005). Economic resources and woman abuse: Differences and similarities among African American, Hispanic, and White women. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 14, 103-123.
17.
ClarkeR. V.CornishD. B. (2001). Rational choice. In PaternosterR.BachmanR. (Eds.), Explaining criminals and crime (pp. 23-42). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.
18.
CohnE. G.ShermanL. W. (1986). Police policy on domestic violence, 1986: A national survey. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.
19.
DeBoard-LucasR. L.GrychJ. H. (2011). Children’s perceptions of intimate partner violence: Causes, consequences, and coping. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 343-354.
20.
DuganL. (2003). Domestic violence legislation: Exploring its impact on the likelihood of domestic violence, police involvement, and arrest. National Consortium on Violence Research, 2, 283-312.
21.
DunfordF. W. (1992). The measurement of recidivism in cases of spouse assault. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 120-136.
22.
FaganA. A.WrightE. M. (2011). Gender differences in the effects of exposure to intimate partner violence on adolescent violence and drug use. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 543-550.
23.
FederL.Holditch NiolonP.CampbellJ.WallinderJ.NelsonR.LarrouyH. (2011). The need for experimental methodology in intimate partner violence: Finding programs that effectively prevent IPV. Violence Against Women, 17, 340-358.
24.
Fleury-SteinerR. E.BybeeD.SullivanC. M.BelknapJ.MeltonH. C. (2006). Contextual factors impacting battered women’s intentions to reuse the criminal justice system. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 327-342.
25.
FoscoG. M.GrychJ. H. (2008). Emotional, cognitive, and family systems mediators of children’s adjustment to interparental conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 843-854.
26.
GallagherC. A. (2004). “White like me?” Methods, meaning and manipulation in the field of white studies. In Nagy Hesse-BiberS.LeavyP. (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice (pp. 203-223). New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
GjelsvikA.Verhoek-OftendahlW.PearlmanD. N. (2003). Domestic violence with children witnesses: Findings from Rhode Island surveillance data. Women’s Health Issues, 13, 68-72.
28.
HirschelD. J.HutchisonI. W. (1996). Realities and implications of the Charlotte Spousal Abuse Experiment. in BuzawaE. S.BuzawaC. G. (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work?(pp. 54-82) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
HirschelD. J.HutchisonI. W. (2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and re-victimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 313-336.
30.
HutchisonI. W. (2003). Substance use and abused women’s utilization of the police. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 93-106.
31.
JasinskiJ. L.MustaineE. E. (2001). Police response to physical assault and stalking victimization: A comparison of influential factors. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 23-41.
32.
JinseokK.GrayK. A. (2008). Leave or stay? Battered women’s decision after intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1465-1482.
33.
KasturiranganA.KrishnanS.RigerS. (2004). The impact of culture and minority status on women’s experience of domestic violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 318-332.
34.
KaukinenC. (2004). The help-seeking strategies of female violent crime victims: The direct and conditional effects of race and the victim-offender relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 967-990.
35.
LoflandJ.LoflandL. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36.
MartinS. L.GibbsD. A.JohnsonR. E.SullivanK.Clinton-SherrodM.Hardison WaltersJ. L.RentzD. (2010). Substance use by soldiers who abuse their spouses. Violence Against Women, 16, 1295-1310.
37.
McCorkelJ. A.MyersK. (2003). What difference does difference make? Position and privilege in the field. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 199-231.
38.
MeyerS. (2010). Seeking help to protect the children? The influence of children on women’s decisions to seek help when experiencing intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 713-725.
39.
MillerS. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339-1376.
40.
MillerS. L.SmolterN. L. (2011). Paper abuse: When all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence Against Women, 17, 637-650.
41.
MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L. (2008). Community responsibility for preventing sexual violence: A pilot study with campus Greeks and intercollegiate athletes. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 36, 23-38.
42.
NaplesN. A. (2003). Feminism and method. New York: Routledge.
43.
PateA. M.HamiltonE. E.AnnanS. (1994). Spouse abuse replication project in Metro-Dade County, Florida. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
44.
PeraltaR. L.RossJ. (2009). Understanding the complexity of alcohol-related intimate partner violence in the lives of Hispanic men who have sex with men: Methodological issues and considerations. Gender Issues, 26, 85-104.
45.
PeraltaR. L.TuttleL.SteeleJ. L. (2010). At the intersection of interpersonal violence, masculinity, and alcohol use: The experiences of heterosexual male perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 16, 387-409.
46.
RajanM.McCloskeyK. A. (2007). Victims of intimate partner violence: Arrest rates across recent studies. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 14, 27-52.
47.
RenzettiC. M. (2001). One strike and you’re out: Implications of a federal crime control policy for battered women. Violence Against Women, 7, 685-697.
48.
RhodesK. V.CerulliC.DichterM. E.KothariC. L.BargF. K. (2010). “I didn’t want to put them through that”: The influence of children on victim decision-making in intimate partner violence cases. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 485-493.
49.
RivettM.KellyS. (2006). From awareness to practice: Children, domestic violence, and child welfare. Child Abuse Review, 15, 224-242.
50.
ShermanL. W.BerkR. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
51.
ShermanL. W.SmithD. A. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680-690.
52.
StalansL. J.RitchieJ. (2008). Relationship of substance use/abuse with psychological and physical intimate partner violence: Variations across living situations. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 9-24.
53.
SutherlandC. A.SullivanC. M.BybeeD. I. (2001). Effects of intimate partner violence versus poverty on women’s health. Violence Against Women, 7, 1122-1143.
54.
TestaM.QuigleyB. M.LeonardK. E. (2003). Does alcohol make a difference? Within participants comparison of incidents of partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 735-743.
55.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
56.
TrumanJ. L. (2011). National Crime Victimization Survey: Criminal victimization, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
57.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. (1984). Attorney general’s task force on family violence: Final report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
58.
WolfM. E.LyU.HobartM. A.KernicM. A. (2003). Barriers to seeking police help for intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 121-129.
