Despite stalking as a risk factor for intimate partner homicide, few studies have explored officer decision making in domestic violence (DV) complaints that involve stalking. This study employs the focal concerns perspective to identify the legal and extra-legal factors associated with officers' identification of, and arrest for, stalking in DV complaints. Using a statewide sample of 230 DV complaints from Rhode Island, findings indicated that nearly one in four suspects were arrested for stalking in DV complaints (25.2%). Stalking acknowledgment was associated with the location of the offense, prior police involvement, and the total number of offenses committed. Officers were more likely to arrest suspects for stalking in DV complaints if the victim was willing to cooperate. Support for the focal concerns perspective varied according to the type of decision. Avenues for future research, as well as theoretical and practical implications, are discussed.
AlbonettiC. A. (1986).
Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of discretionary decision making in felony case processings. Criminology,
24, 623–644.
2.
AlbonettiC. A. (1987).
Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review,
21, 291–313.
3.
BaumK.CatalanoS.RandM.RoseK. (2009). Stalking victimization in the United States (NCJ 224527).
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
4.
BradyP. Q.HayesB. E. (2018).
The intersection of stalking and the severity of intimate partner abuse.Violence and Victims,
33(2), 218–238.
5.
BradyP. Q.NoblesM. R. (2017).
The dark figure of stalking: Examining law enforcement response.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,
32(20), 3149–3173.
6.
BrownR. A. (2005).
Black, white, and unequal: Examining situational determinants of arrest decisions from police–suspect encounters.Criminal Justice Studies,
18(1), 51–68.
7.
BuzawaE. S.AustinT. (1993).
Determining police response to domestic violence victims: The role of victim preference. American Behavioral Scientist,
36(5), 610–623.
8.
BuzawaE. S.HotalingG. (2000). The police response to domestic violence calls for assistance in three Massachusetts towns: Final report.
National Institute of Justice.
9.
CampbellJ.MooreR. (2011).
Self-perceptions of stalking victimization and impacts on victim reporting. Police Practice and Research,
12(6), 506–517.
10.
CampbellJ. C.WebsterD.Koziol-McLainJ.BlockC.CampbellD.CurryM. A.GaryF.GlassN.McFarlaneJ.SachsC.SharpsP.UlrichY.WiltS. A.ManganelloJ.XuX.SchollenbergerJ.FryeV.LaughonK. (2003).
Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health,
93(7), 1089–1097.
11.
CrowM. S.AdrionB. (2011).
Focal concerns and police use of force: Examining the factors associated with Taser use. Police Quarterly,
14(4), 366–387.
12.
DawsonM.DinovitzerR. (2001).
Victim cooperation and the prosecution of domestic violence in a specialized court. Justice Quarterly,
18(3), 593–622.
13.
Dietz, N. A., & Martin, P. Y. (2007). Women who are stalked: Questioning the fear standard. Violence Against Women, 13(7), 750–776.
14.
DurfeeA.FetzerM. D. (2016).
Offense type and the arrest decision in cases of intimate partner violence. Crime & Delinquency,
62(7), 954–977.
15.
Englebrecht, C. M., & Reyns, B. W. (2011). Gender differences in acknowledgment of stalking victimization: Results from the NCVS stalking supplement. Violence and Victims, 26(5), 560–579.
16.
FarrellG.WyckoffL.WeisburdD. (2002). Process evaluation of the implementation of an anti-stalking protocol by the Philadelphia Police Department. In Creating an effective stalking protocol (pp. 75–98). Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
17.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics.
Sage Publications.
18.
FoxK. A.NoblesM. R.FisherB. S. (2011).
Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior,
16(1), 74–84.
19.
FranklinC. A.GoodsonA.GarzaA. D. (2019).
Intimate partner violence among sexual minorities: Predicting police officer arrest decisions. Criminal Justice and Behavior,
46, 1181–1199.
20.
FrohmannL. (1991).
Discrediting victims’ allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems,
38(2), 213–226.
21.
FrohmannL. (1997).
Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decision-making. Law and Society Review,
31, 531–556.
22.
GerbrandijJ.RosenfeldB.Nijdam-JonesA.GaliettaM. (2018).
Evaluating risk assessment instruments for intimate partner stalking and intimate partner violence. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management,
5(2), 103.
23.
HartleyR. D.MaddanS.SpohnC. C. (2007).
Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective—A research note.Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice,
4(1), 58–78.
24.
HawkinsD. F. (1981).
Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior,
2(3), 207–230.
25.
Higgins, G. E., Vito, G. F., & Grossi, E. L. (2012). The impact of race on the police decision to search during a traffic stop: A focal concerns theory perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 28(2), 166–183.
26.
HosmerD. W.HosmerT.Le CessieS.LemeshowS. (1997).
A comparison of goodness‐of‐fit tests for the logistic regression model. Statistics in Medicine,
16(9), 965–980.
27.
HotalingG. T.BuzawaE. (2001). An analysis of assaults in rural communities: Final report (Federal Grant #MA0095-400).
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing.
28.
HuebnerB. M.BynumT. S. (2006).
An analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders: A focal concerns perspective. Criminology,
44(4), 961–991.
29.
IshoyG. A.DabneyD. A. (2018).
Policing and the focal concerns framework: Exploring how its core components apply to the discretionary enforcement decisions of police officers. Deviant Behavior,
39(7), 878–895.
30.
JasinskiJ. L.MustaineE. E. (2001).
Police response to physical assault and stalking victimization: A comparison of influential factors. American Journal of Criminal Justice,
26(1), 23–41.
31.
JohnsonR. R.KlahmC. F.MaddoxH. G. (2015).
An exploratory analysis of time lapses in serving arrest warrants: A focal concerns and disproportionate contact approach. Criminal Justice Review,
40(4), 470–487.
32.
JordanC. E.LoganT. K.WalkerR.NigoffA. (2003).
Stalking: An examination of the criminal justice response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,
18(2), 148–165.
33.
KaiserK. A.O’NealE. N.SpohnC. (2017).
“Victim refuses to cooperate”: A focal concerns analysis of victim cooperation in sexual assault cases. Victims & Offenders,
12(2), 297–322.
34.
KleinA.SalomonA.HuntingtonN.DuboisJ.LangD. (2009). Statewide study of stalking and its criminal justice response. National Institution of Justice.
35.
KleinA.WilsonD.CroweA.DeMicheleM. (2005). Evaluation of the Rhode Island probation specialized domestic violence supervision unit.
U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
36.
KramerJ.H.UlmerJ.T. (2002).
Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local court “corrections” to Pennsylvania’s sentencing guidelines. Criminology,
40, 897–932.
37.
LeeJ.ZhangY.HooverL. T. (2013).
Police response to domestic violence: Multilevel factors of arrest decision. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management,
36(1), 157–174.
38.
LoganT. K.ShannonL.ColeJ. (2007).
Stalking victimization in the context of intimate partner violence.Violence and Victims,
22(6), 669–683.
39.
LoganT. K.ShannonL.ColeJ.SwanbergJ. (2007).
Partner stalking and implications for women’s employment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,
22(3), 268–291.
40.
LoganT. K.WalkerR. (2009a).
Civil protective order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,
24(4), 675–692.
41.
LoganT. K.WalkerR. (2009b).
Partner stalking: Psychological dominance or “business as usual”?. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,
10(3), 247–270.
42.
Logan, T. K. (2010). Research on partner stalking: Putting the pieces together. Lexington: Department of Behavioral Science & Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky.
43.
LoganT. K.WalkerR. (2010).
Toward a deeper understanding of the harms caused by partner stalking. Violence and Victims,
25(4), 440–455.
44.
Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2017). Stalking: a multidimensional framework for assessment and safety planning. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 200–222.
45.
LynchK. R.LoganT. K. (2015).
Police officers’ attitudes and challenges with charging stalking.Violence and Victims,
30(6), 1037–1048.
46.
McFarlaneJ.CampbellJ. C.WatsonK. (2002).
Intimate partner stalking and femicide: Urgent implications for women’s safety.Behavioral Sciences & the Law,
20(1–2), 51–68.
47.
MeltonH. C. (2012).
Stalking, intimate partner abuse, and the police. Open Criminology Journal,
5, 1–7.
48.
MohandieK.MeloyJ. R.McGowanM. G.WilliamsJ. (2006).
The RECON typology of stalking: Reliability and validity based upon a large sample of North American stalkers. Journal of Forensic Sciences,
51(1), 147–155.
49.
National Center for Victims of Crime. (2007). The model stalking code revisited: Responding to the new realities of stalking.
50.
NgoF. T. (2018).
Stalking: An examination of the correlates of subsequent police responses. Policing: An International Journal,
42, 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-12-2017-0157
51.
Ngo, F. T. (2019). Stalking: an examination of the correlates of subsequent police responses. Policing: An International Journal, 42(3).
52.
NovakK. J.FrankJ.SmithB. W.EngelR. S. (2002).
Revisiting the decision to arrest: Comparing beat and community officers. Crime & Delinquency,
48(1), 70–98.
53.
O’NealE. N.SpohnC. (2017).
When the perpetrator is a partner: Arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assault cases—A focal concerns analysis. Violence Against Women,
23(6), 707–729.
54.
OwensJ. G. (2016).
Why definitions matter: Stalking victimization in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,
31(12), 2196–2226.
55.
Palarea, R. E., Zona, M. A., Lane, J. C., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1999). The dangerous nature of intimate relationship stalking: Threats, violence, and associated risk factors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17(3), 269–283.
56.
PierceM. B. (2012).
Continuing the conversation—The operationalization of focal concerns perspective: Assessing sentencing decisions for criminal neglect. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice,
8(2), 17–45.
57.
ReynsB. W.EnglebrechtC. M. (2010).
The stalking victim’s decision to contact the police: A test of Gottfredson and Gottfredson’s theory of criminal justice decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice,
38(5), 998–1005.
58.
ReynsB. W.EnglebrechtC. M. (2014).
Informal and formal help-seeking decisions of stalking victims in the United States. Criminal Justice and Behavior,
41(10), 1178–1194.
59.
RobinsonA. L.ChandekM. S. (2000).
The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables. Crime & Delinquency,
46(1), 18–37.
60.
RobinsonA. L.MyhillA.WireJ. (2017).
Practitioner (mis) understandings of coercive control in England and Wales. Criminology & Criminal Justice,
18, 1–21.
61.
RomainD. M.FreiburgerT. L. (2013).
Prosecutorial discretion for domestic violence cases: An examination of the effects of offender race, ethnicity, gender, and age. Criminal Justice Studies,
26(3), 289–307.
62.
RosenfeldB. (2004). Violence risk factors in stalking and obsessional harassment: A review and preliminary meta-analysis. Criminal justice and behavior, 31(1), 9–36.
63.
ScottA. J.NixonK.SheridanL. (2013).
The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking: A comparison of laypersons, nonspecialist police officers, and specialist police officers.Criminal Justice and Behavior,
40(12), 1434–1448.
64.
SmithD. A.VisherC. A. (1981).
Street-level justice: Situational determinants of police arrest decisions. Social Problems,
29(2), 167–177.
65.
SmithS. G.ZhangX.BasileK. C.MerrickM. T.WangJ.KresnowM.ChenJ. (2018). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief—Updated release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
66.
Spencer, C. M., & Stith, S. M. (2018). Risk factors for male perpetration and female victimization of intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, Advanced online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018781101.
67.
SpohnC.TellisK. (2019).
Sexual assault case outcomes: Disentangling the overlapping decisions of police and prosecutors. Justice Quarterly,
36(3), 383–411.
68.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StreifelC. (1993).
Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology,
31(3), 411–446.
69.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998).
The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology,
36(4), 763–798.
70.
Taylor-DunnH.BowenE.GilchristE. A. (2018). Reporting harassment and stalking to the police: A qualitative study of victims’ experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518811423
71.
TillyerR.HartleyR. D. (2010).
Driving racial profiling research forward: Learning lessons from sentencing research. Journal of Criminal Justice,
38(4), 657–665.
72.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey.
U.S. Department of Justice.
73.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000).
The role of stalking in domestic violence crime reports generated by the Colorado Springs Police Department.Violence and Victims,
15(4), 427–441.
74.
VisherC. A. (1983).
Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry. Criminology,
21(1), 5–28.
75.
VitoA. G.GrossiE. L.HigginsG. E. (2018).
Analyzing racial profiling from traffic searches: Using focal concerns theory and propensity score matching. Policing: An International Journal,
41(6), 721–733.
76.
WellerM.HopeL.SheridanL. (2013).
Police and public perceptions of stalking: The role of prior victim–offender relationship.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,
28(2), 320–339.
77.
WoodroofK. (2010). An analysis of the police response to intimate partner stalking (Paper No. 783) [Master’s thesis]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.
78.
Woodlock, D. (2017). The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23(5), 584–602.
