There is a dearth of knowledge concerning statutes and practices designed to protect younger children from formal juvenile court petitions. This case study examines minimum age laws and related statutes in the six largest U.S. states and explores implementation of these policies and practices in major metropolitan areas within these states. The primary study methods included legal analysis and stakeholder interviews. Legal analysis identified diverse minimum age laws across states and complex statutes related to children’s capacity to stand trial and competency. Stakeholders across the six cases agreed that the state should protect young children from formal delinquency petitions when possible. Discretionary statutes and practices appeared to play a key yet inconsistent role in excluding younger children from juvenile court.
AbramsL. S. (2013). Juvenile justice at a crossroads: Science, evidence, and twenty-first century reform. Social Service Review, 87, 725-752. doi:10.1086/674074
2.
AbramsL. S.BarnertE. S.MizelM. L.BryanI.LimL.BedrosA.. . . HarrisM. (2018). Is a minimum age of juvenile court jurisdiction a necessary protection? A case study in the State of California. Crime & Delinquency, 65, 1976-1996. doi:10.1177/0011128718770817
3.
BarnertE. S.DudovitzR.NelsonB. B.CokerT. R.BielyC.LiN.ChungP. J. (2017). How does incarcerating young people affect their adult health outcomes?Pediatrics, 139, e20162624. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2624
4.
BathE.GerringJ. (2014). National trends in juvenile competency to stand trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 265-268. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.11.015
5.
BishopD. M.FrazierC. E. (1995). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 392-414.
6.
BishopD. M.LeiberM.JohnsonJ. (2010). Contexts of decision making in the juvenile justice system: An organizational approach to understanding minority overrepresentation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 213-233.
CrossT. L.BazronB. J.DennisK. W.IsaacsM. R. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care: A monograph on effective services for minority children who are severely emotionally disturbed. CASSP Technical Assistance Center, Georgetown University Child Development Center. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED330171
11.
Dusky v. United States, No. 362 (United States Supreme Court 1960).
12.
FeldB. C. (1998). Abolish the juvenile court: Youthfulness, criminal responsibility, and sentencing policy. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 68-136.
13.
FeldB. C. (2017). The evolution of the juvenile court: Race, politics, and the criminalizing of juvenile justice. New York: New York University Press.
14.
Fla. R. Juv. Proc. §8.095(a)(7).
15.
Fla. Stat. §39.01(12).
16.
Fla. Stat. §985.0301.
17.
Fla. Stat. §985.19(1)(b).
18.
42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6302.
19.
GrissoT. (2006). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
20.
Illinois Public Act 098-0061. (2013).
21.
In Interest of EV, No. 190 Ill.App.3d 1079, 1081. (1989).
22.
In re Gault, No. 387 (United States Supreme Court 1967).
23.
In re Gladys R., No. 3d 855 (1 Cal. 1970).
24.
In re Paul C., No. 43, 53 (221 Cal.App.3d 1990).
25.
In re Timothy J., No. 847 (150 Cal.App.4th 2007).
26.
J.W. v. State No. WL 5295301. (2012).
27.
Kempf-LeonardK. (2007). Minority youths and juvenile justice: Disproportionate minority contact after nearly 20 years of reform efforts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 71-87. doi:10.1177/1541204006295159
28.
McCarthyP.SchiraldiV.SharkM. (2016). The future of youth justice: A community-based alternative to the youth prison model (New Thinking in Community Corrections Bulletin; No. NCJ 250142). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
PetrosinoA. J.GuckenburgS.Turpin-PetrosinoC. (2010). Formal system processing of juveniles: Effects on delinquency. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6. doi:10.4073/csr.2010.1
39.
ReddingR. E.FrostL. E. (2001). Adjudicative competence in the modern juvenile court. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 9, 353-410.
40.
RybaN. L.CooperV. G.ZapfP. A. (2003). Juvenile competence to stand trial evaluations: A survey of current practices and test usage among psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 499-507.
41.
SchlossmanM. B.WelshB. C. (2015). Searching for the best mix of strategies: Delinquency prevention and the transformation of juvenile justice in the “get tough” era and beyond. Social Service Review, 89, 622-652.
WoolardJ. L.FriedC. S.ReppucciN. D. (2013). Toward an expanded definition of adolescent competence in legal contexts. In CorradoR. R.DempsterR.RoeschR. (Eds.), Psychology in the courts: International advances in knowledge. London, England: Routledge.
