This study utilized the routine activity perspective and incorporated measures of disability to examine the underexplored relationship between disability status and stalking victimization. Survey data from approximately 43,000 college students from across the United States were examined to explore these relationships. Results indicated that disability was a significant risk factor for victimization. Consistent with theoretical expectations, several measures of lifestyles and routine activities also were found to increase risk of stalking victimization, including volunteering, employment, and risk-taking behaviors such as alcohol and drug use. Collectively, the results suggest that measures of disability should be incorporated into future research testing the routine activities perspective for interpersonal victimization.
American College Health Association. (2012). American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Reference group executive summary Fall 2011. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association.
2.
American College Health Association. (2014). American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment, Fall 2011 and Fall 2012. Baltimore, MD: Author.
3.
BaumK.CatalanoS.RandM.RoseK. (2009). Stalking victimization in the United States. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
4.
BjörklundK.Häkkänen-NyholmH.SheridanL.RobertsK. (2010). The prevalence of stalking among Finnish university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 684-698.
5.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.. . . StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/summary_reports.html
6.
BreidingM. J.ArmourB. S. (2015). The association between disability and intimate partner violence in the United States. Annals of Epidemiology, 25, 455-457.
7.
BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.BasileK. C.WaltersM. L.ChenJ.MerrickM. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm?s_cid=ss6308a1_e
8.
BuhiE. R.ClaytonH.SurrencyH. H. (2009). Stalking victimization among college women and subsequent help-seeking behaviors. Journal of American College Health, 57, 419-425.
9.
CatalanoS. (2012). Stalking victims in the United States—Revised. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
10.
ChapmanD. E.SpitzbergB. H. (2003). Are you following me? A study of unwanted relationship pursuit and stalking in Japan: What behaviors are prevalent?Bulletin of Hijiyama University, 10, 89-117.
11.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
12.
DavisK. E.CokerA. L.SandersonM. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of being stalked for men and women. Violence and Victims, 17, 429-443.
13.
DietzN. A.MartinP. Y. (2007). Women who are stalked: Questioning the fear standard. Violence Against Women, 13, 750-776.
14.
DressingH.GassP.KuehnerC. (2007). What can we learn from the first community-based epidemiological study on stalking in Germany?International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 10-17.
15.
FelsonM. (1987). Routine activities and crime prevention in the developing metropolis. Criminology, 25, 911-932.
16.
FelsonM. (2008). Routine activity approach. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 70-77). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
17.
FelsonM.CohenL. E. (1980). Human ecology and crime: A routine activity approach. Human Ecology, 8, 389-406.
18.
FindleyP. A.PlummerS.McMahonS. (2015). Exploring the experiences of abuse of college students with disabilities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 2801-2823.
19.
FinkelhorD.AsdigianN. L. (1996). Risk factors for youth victimization: Beyond a lifestyles/routine activities theory approach. Violence and Victims, 11, 3-19.
20.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
21.
FisherB. S.CullenF. T.TurnerM. G. (2002). Being pursued: Stalking victimization in a national study of college women. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 257-308.
22.
FoxK. A.NoblesM. R.FisherB. S. (2011). Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 74-84.
23.
FoxK. A.NoblesM. R.FisherB. S. (2016). A multi-theoretical framework to assess gendered stalking victimization: The utility of self-control, social learning, and control balance theories. Justice Quarterly, 33, 319-347.
24.
HarrellE. (2016). Crime against persons with disabilities, 2009-2014—Statistical tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25.
HindelangM. J.GottfredsonM. R.GarofaloJ. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
26.
HossainM. B.MemiahP.AdeyinkaA. (2014). Are female college students who are diagnosed with depression at greater risk of experiencing sexual violence on college campus?Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 25, 1341-1359.
27.
JensenG. F.BrownfieldD. (1989). Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond routine activity. Violence and Victims, 1, 85-99.
28.
JonesS. E.LollarD. J. (2008). Relationship between physical disabilities or long-term health problems and health risk behaviors or conditions among US high school students. Journal of School Health, 78, 252-257.
29.
JordanC. E.WilcoxP.PritchardA. J. (2007). Stalking acknowledgment and reporting among college women experiencing intrusive behaviors: Implications for the emergence of a “classic stalking case.”Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 556-569.
30.
KennedyL. W.FordeD. R. (1990). Routine activities and crime: An analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology, 28, 137-152.
31.
MasseyJ. L.KrohnM. D.BonatiL. M. (1989). Property crime and the routine activities of individuals. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 26, 378-400.
32.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L.CrowellE. W. (2000). Learning disabilities and ADHD overlapping spectrum disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 417-424.
33.
McNamaraJ.VervaekeS. L.WilloughbyT. (2008). Learning disabilities and risk-taking behavior in adolescents: A comparison of those with and without comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 561-574.
34.
McNeeleyS. (2015). Lifestyle-routine activities and crime events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 30-52.
35.
MustaineE. E.TewksburyR. (1999). A routine activity theory explanation for women’s stalking victimizations. Violence Against Women, 5, 43-62.
36.
MustaineE. E.TewksburyR. (2002). Sexual assault of college women: A feminist interpretation of a routine activity analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 27, 89-123.
37.
NoblesM. R.FoxK. A. (2013). Assessing stalking behaviors in a control balance theory framework. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 737-762.
38.
NoblesM. R.FoxK. A.PiqueroN.PiqueroA. R. (2009). Career dimensions of stalking victimization and perpetration. Justice Quarterly, 26, 476-503.
39.
Office for National Statistics. (2014). Intimate personal violence and partner abuse (Crime Statistics: Focus on Violent Crime and Sexual Offenses, 2012/13). Newport, Wales: UK Statistics Authority.
40.
PrattT. C.TuranovicJ. J. (2016). Lifestyle and routine activity theories revisited: The importance of “risk” to the study of victimization. Victims & Offenders, 11, 335-354.
41.
PurcellR.PathéM.MullenP. E. (2002). The prevalence and nature of stalking in the Australian community. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 114-120.
42.
ReynsB. W. (2013). Online routines and identity theft victimization: Further expanding routine activity theory beyond direct-contact offenses. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 50, 216-238.
43.
ReynsB. W.EnglebrechtC. M. (2013). The fear factor: Exploring predictors of fear among stalking vicitms throughout the stalking encounter. Crime and Delinquency, 59, 788-808.
44.
ReynsB. W.EnglebrechtC. M. (2014). Informal and formal help-seeking decisions of stalking victims in the United States. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 1178-1194.
45.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2011). Being pursued online: Applying cyberlifestyle–routine activities theory to cyberstalking victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1149-1169.
46.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2012). Stalking in the twilight zone: Extent of cyberstalking victimization and offending among college students. Deviant Behavior, 33, 1-25.
47.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S.FoxK. A.NoblesM. R. (2016). A gendered lifestyle-routine activity approach to explaining stalking victimization in Canada. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 1719-1743.
48.
SacksS. Z.WolffeK. E.TierneyD. (1998). Lifestyles of students with visual impairments: Preliminary studies of social networks. Exceptional Children, 64, 463-478.
49.
SchererH. L.SnyderJ. A.FisherB. S. (2016). Intimate partner victimization among college students with and without disabilities: Prevalence of and relationship to emotional well-being. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 49-80.
50.
SloanJ. J.FisherB. S. (2010). The dark side of the Ivory tower: Campus crime as a social problem. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
51.
SnyderJ. A. (2015). The link between ADHD and the risk of sexual victimization among college women: Expanding the lifestyles/routine activities framework. Violence Against Women, 21, 1364-1384.
52.
SpanoR.FreilichJ. D. (2009). An assessment of the empirical validity and conceptualization of individual level multivariate studies of lifestyle/routine activities theory published from 1995 to 2005. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 305-314.
53.
SpitzbergB. H. (2002). The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3, 261-288.
54.
SpitzbergB. H.CupachW. R. (2007). The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 64-86.
55.
TjadenP. (2013). Stalking in America: Laws, research, and recommendations. In DavisR. C.LurigioA. J.HermanS. (Eds.), Victims of crime (4th ed., pp. 57-74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
57.
TjadenP.ThoennesN.AllisonC. J. (2000). Comparing stalking victimization from legal and victim perspectives. Violence and Victims, 15, 7-22.
58.
Van Der AaS.KunstM. (2009). The prevalence of stalking in The Netherlands. International Review of Victimology, 16, 35-50.
