Persons with disabilities face higher stalking risk than those without disabilities, yet formal reporting to law enforcement remains low. Using 2019 National Crime Victimization Survey Supplemental Victimization Survey (NCVS-SVS) data, this study examines stalking prevalence by disability status and type (N = 103,656). A subsample of stalking victims (n = 1,320) assesses reporting and consequences across four disability types (blind, deaf, cognitive, and physical). Results show higher stalking rates among persons with disabilities, especially cognitive disabilities. Despite elevated risk, persons with disabilities are not more likely to report victimization, and individuals with cognitive disabilities report the greatest fear of losing freedom. These findings suggest that routine activities increase exposure to motivated offenders while limiting access to capable guardianship, and that disability status reflects broader physical and social vulnerabilities emphasized in social vulnerability frameworks.
AlhabobyZ. A.BarnesJ.EvansH.ShortE. (2019). Cyber-victimization of people with chronic conditions and disabilities: A systematic review of scope and impact. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(3), 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017717743
BackesB. L.FedinaL.HolmesJ. L. (2020). The criminal justice system response to intimate partner stalking: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Family Violence, 35(7), 665–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00139-3
4.
BasileK. C.SwahnM. H.ChenJ.SaltzmanL. E. (2006). Stalking in the United States. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(2), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.028
5.
BaumK.CatalanoS.RandM. (2011). Stalking victimization in the United States. Diane Publishing.
6.
BlaauwE.WinkelF. W.ArensmanE.SheridanL.FreeveA. (2002). The toll of stalking: The relationship between features of stalking and psychopathology of victim. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(1), 50–63.
7.
BradyP. Q.NoblesM. R. (2017). The dark figure of stalking: Examining law enforcement response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(20), 3149–3173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515596979
8.
BradyP. Q.NoblesM. R.BouffardL. A. (2017). Are college students really at a higher risk for stalking? Exploring the generalizability of student samples in victimization research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.003
9.
BradyP. Q.ReynsB. W.DrekeR. (2020). A sign of the crimes: Examining officers’ identification of, and arrest for, stalking in domestic violence complaints. Police Quarterly, 23(4), 500–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611120923155
10.
BradyP. Q.ReynsB. W.LandhuisJ.GriffinV. W. (2023). APPlied stalking: What the next generation of stalking victims consider to be ‘stalking’ and why victims report their experiences to the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 84, Article 102028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.102028
11.
BradyP. Q.ReynsB. W. (2024). The focal concerns of stalking victims: Examining victims’ decisions to engage civil and criminal legal systems. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(8), 1181–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241238344
12.
BraultM.SternS.RaglinD. (2007). Evaluation report covering disability. US Census Bureau.
13.
BreidingM. J.ArmourB. S. (2015). The association between disability and intimate partner violence in the United States. Annals of Epidemiology, 25(6), 455–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.017
14.
CantorD.FisherB.ChibnallS.TownsendR.LeeH.BruceC.ThomasG. (2015). Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct (p. 288). The Association of American Universities.
15.
CastilloI. E. (2024). Disability’s dark figure of violence: Reporting variations across intersections of disability type, race, ethnicity, and sex. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(10), 1590–1609. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241262489
16.
CatalanoS. (2012). Stalking victims in the United States—Revised (NCJ 224527; p. 10). US Department of Justice.
ChenJ.WaltersM. L.GilbertL. K.PatelN. (2020). Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence by sexual orientation, United States. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000252
19.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
20.
DaigleL. E.HancockK. P.DaquinJ. C.KellyK. S. (2023). The intersection of disability and race/ethnicity on victimization risk. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 21(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2022.2164637
21.
EastgateG.DrielM. L. V.LennoxN.ScheermeyerE. (2011). Women with intellectual disabilities – A study of sexuality, sexual abuse and protection skills. Australian Family Physician, 40(4), 226–230.
22.
EdwardsK. M.CampE. E.LimS.LoganT. K.ShoreyR. C.BabchukW. (2022). Stalking among sexual and gender minorities: A systematic literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 66, Article 101777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2022.101777
23.
Fernández-CruzV. (2021). Formal coping strategies for victims of stalking: Factors associated with reporting to the police. Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine, 47(4), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remle.2021.02.001
24.
FinkelhorD.AsdigianN. L. (1996). Risk factors for youth victimization: Beyond a lifestyles/routine activities theory approach. Violence and Victims, 11(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.11.1.3
25.
FirthD. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27–38.
26.
FisherM. H.BairdJ. V.CurreyA. D.HodappR. M. (2016). Victimisation and social vulnerability of adults with intellectual disability: A review of research extending beyond Wilson and Brewer. Australian Psychologist, 51(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12180
27.
FogdenB. C.ThomasS. D.DaffernM.OgloffJ. R. P. (2016). Crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: A case linkage study. BMC Psychiatry, 16, Article 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0869-7
28.
FoxK. A.NoblesM. R.FisherB. S. (2011). Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.004
29.
GillespieL. K.HayesB. E.RichardsT. N. (2025). Experiencing and subsequently reporting sexual victimization among U.S. college students with disabilities. Law and Human Behavior, 49(2), 140–150.
30.
HarrellE. (2017). Crime against persons with disabilities, 2009-2015—Statistical tables (NCJ 250632; p. 17). US Department of Justice.
HauchD.ElklitA. (2023). The psychological consequences of stalking: Cross-sectional findings in a sample of Danish help-seeking stalking victims. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 14(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2023.2281749
33.
HayesB. E.DeKeseredyW.NolanJ. (2024). People with disabilities and violent victimization in the heartland: Results from the first phase of the West Virginia Community Quality of Life Survey. International Journal of Rural Criminology, 8(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.18061/ijrc.v8i2.9555
34.
HayesB. E.PowersR. A. (2022). Heterogeneity of Disabilities and the Consequences of Victimization: Findings from a Nationally Representative Sample. Justice Quarterly, 39(5), 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1960409
35.
HindelangM. J.GottfredsonM. R.GarofaloJ. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Ballinger.
36.
HughesK.BellisM. A.JonesL.WoodS.BatesG.EckleyL.McCoyE.MiktonC.ShakespeareT.OfficerA. (2012). Prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1621–1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61851-5
37.
Irvin-EricksonY. (2024). Consequences of identity theft victimization: Disabilities and mental distress. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241227926
38.
JorgensenC.WellsJ. (2022). Is marijuana really a gateway drug? A nationally representative test of the marijuana gateway hypothesis using a propensity score matching design. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18(3), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09464-z
39.
LagesonS. E.McElrathS.PalmerK. E. (2019). Gendered public support for criminalizing “revenge porn”. Feminist Criminology, 14(5), 560–583.
40.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202.
41.
LoganT. (2020). Examining stalking experiences and outcomes for men and women stalked by (ex)partners and non-partners. Journal of Family Violence, 35(7), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00111-w
42.
LoganT.WalkerR. (2009). Partner stalking: Psychological dominance or “business as usual”?Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(3), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334461
43.
LoganT.WalkerR. (2017). Stalking: A multidimensional framework for assessment and safety planning. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(2), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015603210
44.
LohrS. L.LiuJ. (1994). A comparison of weighted and unweighted analyses in the National Crime Victimization Survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221280
45.
LundE. M. (2011). Community-based services and interventions for adults with disabilities who have experienced interpersonal violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 12(4), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011416377
46.
MaherC. A.HayesB. E.PowersR. A. (2025). Vulnerable identities? Examining the association between disability with risk and consequences of identity theft. Journal of Criminal Justice, 96, Article 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102333
47.
McEwanT. E.DaffernM.MacKenzieR. D.OgloffJ. R. P. (2017). Risk factors for stalking violence, persistence, and recurrence. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 28(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2016.1247188
48.
MénardK. S.CoxA. K. (2016). Stalking victimization, labeling, and reporting: Findings from the NCVS Stalking Victimization Supplement. Violence Against Women, 22(6), 671–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215610862
MorganR. E. (2019). Stalking victimization, 2019 (NCJ 301735; p. 24). US Department of Justice.
51.
MurphyV.LaboyN. M.PerettiK.AbbottS. E. (2024). Stalking and autism. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 41(4), 510–511. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.30
52.
NoblesM. R.ReynsB. W.FoxK. A.FisherB. S. (2014). Protection against pursuit: A conceptual and empirical comparison of cyberstalking and stalking victimization among a national sample. Justice Quarterly, 31(6), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.723030
53.
OwensJ. G. (2016). Why definitions matter: Stalking victimization in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(12), 2196–2226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515573577
54.
PetersiliaJ. R. (2001). Crime victims with developmental disabilities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(6), 655–694.
55.
PetersonC.KearnsM. C.McIntoshW. L.EstefanL. F.NicolaidisC.McCollisterK. E.GordonA.FlorenceC. (2018). Lifetime economic burden of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(4), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049
56.
PlummerS.-B.FindleyP. A. (2012). Women with disabilities’ experience with physical and sexual abuse: A review of the literature and implications for the field. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011426014
57.
PowersR. A.BleekerK. (2023). Self-defense and police reporting of intimate partner violent victimization: A comparison of white, black, and Hispanic women victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3–4), 4189–4214. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221114304
58.
PowersR. A.HayesB. E. (2024). Victim and third-party reporting of violent victimization to the police in incidents involving victims with disabilities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 61(2), 268–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221131493
ReynsB. W.EnglebrechtC. M. (2010). The stalking victim’s decision to contact the police: A test of Gottfredson and Gottfredson’s theory of criminal justice decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 998–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.001
61.
ReynsB. W.EnglebrechtC. M. (2014). Informal and formal help-seeking decisions of stalking victims in the United States. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(10), 1178–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814541441
62.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2011). Being pursued online: Applying cyberlifestyle–routine activities theory to cyberstalking victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(11), 1149–1169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811421448
63.
ReynsB. W.SchererH. (2018). Stalking victimization among college students: The role of disability within a lifestyle-routine activity framework. Crime & Delinquency, 64(5), 650–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717714794
64.
ReynsB. W.SchererH. (2019). Disability type and risk of sexual and stalking victimization in a national sample: A lifestyle–routine activity approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(4), 628–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818809148
65.
SabinaC.HoL. Y. (2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: Disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521322
66.
Salas-EljatibC.Fuentes-RamirezA.GregoireT. G.AltamiranoA.YaitulV. (2018). A study on the effects of unbalanced data when fitting logistic regression models in ecology. Ecological Indicators, 85, 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.030
67.
ScottA. J.SheridanL. (2011). ‘Reasonable’ perceptions of stalking: The influence of conduct severity and the perpetrator–target relationship. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903203961
SheridanL. P.LyndonA. E. (2012). The influence of prior relationship, gender, and fear on the consequences of stalking victimization. Sex Roles, 66(5–6), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9889-9
70.
SheridanL. P.ScottA. J. (2010). Perceptions of harm: Verbal versus physical abuse in stalking scenarios. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(4), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809359743
71.
SherryM. (2016). Disability hate crimes: Does anyone really hate disabled people?Routledge.
72.
SmithD.BugejaL.CunninghamN.IbrahimJ. E. (2018). A systematic review of sexual assaults in nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 58(6), e369–e383. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx022
73.
SmithS. G.BasileK. C.KresnowM. (2022). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 report on stalking updated release. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
74.
SolonG.HaiderS. J.WooldridgeJ. M. (2015). What are we weighting for?Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.301
75.
SonE.ChoH.YunS. H.ChoiY. J.AnS.HongS. (2020). Intimate partner violence victimization among college students with disabilities: Prevalence, help-seeking, and the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and intimate partner violence victimization. Children and Youth Services Review, 110, Article 104741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104741
76.
SpitzbergB. H. (2002). The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3(4), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838002237330
77.
SpitzbergB. H.CupachW. R. (2007). The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001
78.
Taylor-DunnH.BowenE.GilchristE. A. (2021). Reporting harassment and stalking to the police: A qualitative study of victims’ experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), NP5965–NP5992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518811423
79.
ThurmA.FarmerC.SalzmanE.LordC.BishopS. (2019). State of the field: Differentiating intellectual disability from autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, Article 526. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00526
80.
TjadenP. G. (2009). Stalking policies and research in the United States: A twenty year retrospective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-009-9100-4
81.
United States Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2019). National Crime Victimization Survey: Supplemental Victimization Survey, [United States], 2019 [Dataset]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37950.v1
82.
World Health Organization. (2023). International classification of diseases (ICD-11).
