Mediating the Relationship Between Parental Control/Support and Offspring Delinquency: Self-Efficacy for a Conventional Lifestyle Versus Self-Efficacy for Deviance

Abstract

This study sought to determine whether self-efficacy for a conventional lifestyle mediated the relationship between parental control/support and offspring delinquency using longitudinal data supplied by 2,252 (1,145 boys, 1,107 girls) high school students surveyed in the 10th, 11th, and 12th grades. The results of a three-regression negative binomial analysis revealed that self-efficacy for a conventional lifestyle mediated the relationships between Wave 1 parental monitoring and attachment, on one hand, and Wave 3 delinquency, on the other hand. Comparison pathways mediated by self-efficacy for deviance, consistent with predictions, did not achieve significance. These results indicate that a social cognitive variable, self-efficacy for a conventional lifestyle, may be partially responsible for the delinquency-inhibiting effects of parental control (monitoring) and support (attachment).

Keywords

parental monitoring parental attachment self-efficacy mediation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1993). Why do they do it? An examination of the intervening mechanisms between “social control” variables and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 245-266.

Agnew

(2011). Toward a unified criminology: Integrating assumptions about crime, people, and society. New York: New York University Press.

Allison

P. D.

(2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood (SAS Global Forum 2012, Paper 312-2012). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

Bachman

J. G.

O’Malley

P. M.

Johnston

(1978). Youth in Transition: Vol. VI. Adolescence to adulthood—Change and stability in the lives of young men. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

Bachman

Schutt

R. K.

(2016). The practice of research in criminology and criminal justice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Baumrind

(1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 56-95.

Bernard

T. J.

Snipes

J. B.

(1996). Theoretical integration in criminology. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 20, 301-348.

Cole

D. A.

Maxwell

S. E.

(2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558-577.

10.

Dodge

K. A.

Price

J. M.

Bachorowski

J. A.

Newman

J. P.

(1990). Hostile attribution biases in severely aggressive adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 385-392.

11.

Elliott

D. S.

Voss

H. L.

(1974). Delinquency and dropout. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

12.

Ericson

Carriere

(1994). The fragmentation of criminology. In Nelken

(Ed.), The futures of criminology (pp. 89-109). London, England: Sage.

13.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

15.

Hirschi

(1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

16.

Hoeve

Dubas

J. S.

Eichelsheim

V. I.

van der Lann

P. H.

Smeenk

Gerris

J. R. M.

(2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 749-775.

17.

Imai

Keele

Tingley

(2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15, 309-334.

18.

Janssen

H. J.

Eichelsheim

V. I.

Deković

Bruinsma

G. J. N.

(2016). How is parenting related to adolescent delinquency? A between- and within-person analysis of the mediating role of self-control, delinquent attitudes, peer delinquency, and time spent in criminogenic settings. European Journal of Criminology, 13, 169-194.

19.

Kempf

L. K.

(1993). The empirical status of Hirschi’s control theory. In Adler

Laufer

W. S.

(Eds.), New directions in criminological theory (Vol. 4, pp. 143-185). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

20.

Kenny

D. A.

(2013). Mediation: Sensitivity analysis [Webinar]. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html

21.

Kenny

D. A.

Judd

C. M.

(2014). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 25, 334-339.

22.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Lockwood

C. M.

Williams

(2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.

23.

Muthén

(1998-2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

24.

Özbay

Ö.

Özcan

Y. Z

. (2006). A test of Hirschi’s social bonding theory: Juvenile delinquency in the high schools of Ankara, Turkey. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50, 711-726.

25.

Paternoster

(2001). Youths and deterrence: Columbia, South Carolina, 1979-1981 [Computer file]. 2nd ICPSR version. College Park: University of Maryland [producer], 1985. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].

26.

Peyre

Leplége

Coste

(2011). Missing data methods for dealing with missing items in quality of life questionnaires: A comparison by simulation of personal mean score, full information maximum likelihood, multiple imputation, and hot deck techniques applied to the SF-36 in the French 2003 decennial health survey. Quality of Life Research, 20, 287-300.

27.

Piquero

A. R.

Farrington

D. P.

Welsh

B. C.

Tremblay

Jennings

W. G.

(2009). Effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 83-120.

28.

Piquero

A. R.

Jennings

W. G.

Farrington

D. P.

(2009). On the malleability of self-control: Theoretical and policy implications regarding a general theory of crime. Campbell Collaboration. Retrieved from www.campbellcollaboration.org/lib/download/669

29.

Pratt

T. C.

Cullen

F. T.

(2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.

30.

Preacher

K. J.

(2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 825-852.

31.

Preacher

K. J.

Selig

J. P.

(2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 77-98.

32.

Schroeder

R. D.

Mowen

T. J.

(2014). Parenting style transitions and delinquency. Youth & Society, 46, 228-254.

33.

Selig

J. P.

Preacher

K. J.

(2008, June). Monte Carlo method forassessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org/

34.

Shadish

W. R.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

35.

Simons

R. L.

Simons

L. G.

Chen

Y.-F.

Brody

G. H.

Lin

K.-H.

(2007). Identifying the psychological factors that mediate the association between parenting practices and delinquency. Criminology, 45, 481-517.

36.

Walters

G. D.

(2015). Proactive criminal thinking and the transmission of differential association: A cross-lagged multi-wave path analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 1128-1144.

37.

Walters

G. D.

(2016). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1055-1079.

38.

Walters

G. D

. (2017). Getting specific about psychological inertia: Mediating the past crime–future crime relationship with self-efficacy for a conventional lifestyle. Criminal Justice Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0734016817704697

39.

A. D.

Zumbo

B. D.

(2008). Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research, 87, 367-392.