The gender gap in offending is a robust finding, and this gap extends to violent offending. However, there is limited research that has explored mechanisms explaining this relationship in childhood and early adolescence. This is concerning because early onset of antisocial behavior like this may increase the risk for chronic engagement in such behavior. Cognitive development and parental monitoring both differ by gender, also indicating that these may present mediating mechanisms explaining the gender gap in violent offending during this period of the life-course. Cognitive development pertaining to the dual systems model was examined here, that is, the difference in the concurrent development of impulse control and sensation-seeking, or dual systems imbalance. The present study addresses this gap in the literature by examining the dual systems model imbalance and parental monitoring as mediators of the gender-violent offending relationship. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development-Social Development data were analyzed. This consists of a sample of 2,422 youth aged 9 to 10 years old at baseline (Boys = 52.31%; Girls = 47.69%). Generalized structural equation modeling was used to test for direct and indirect relationships of interest. Findings indicated that boys reported a greater risk for violent offending than girls. Dual systems imbalance significantly mediated this relationship, but parental monitoring did not. These results highlight the importance of fostering healthy cognitive development among young boys to prevent violent offending.
ArcherJ. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322.
2.
ArcherR.Jackson-JeffersonM.CelebiM.GrangerT. (2022). Understanding the role of unstructured socializing with peers and peer delinquency as mediators in the relationship of parental monitoring and delinquency. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(5), 588–608.
ArmstrongT. A.BoisvertD.WellsJ.LewisR. (2020). Extending Steinberg’s adolescent model of risk taking to the explanation of crime and delinquency: Are impulsivity and sensation seeking enough?. Personality and Individual Differences, 165, Article 110133.
5.
AustinJ.RosenfeldR. (2023). Forecasting US crime rates and the impact of reductions in imprisonment: 1960–2025. Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation.
6.
BennettS.FarringtonD. P.HuesmannL. R. (2005). Explaining gender differences in crime and violence: The importance of social cognitive skills. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(3), 263–288.
BloomB.CovingtonS. (2001, November). Effective gender-responsive interventions in juvenile justice: Addressing the lives of delinquent girls [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
9.
BoccioC. M.LealW. E. (2023). Does socializing in the virtual world impact victimization in the real world?. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3–4), 3756–3776.
10.
CarlssonC.SivertssonF. (2021). Age, gender, and crime in a Stockholm birth cohort to age 64. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 7(3), 359–384.
11.
CasoL.GrecoA.FlorioE.PalenaN. (2023). A re-examination of the Italian parental monitoring scale: Development, validation, gender, and school success measurement invariance. Psychology in the Schools, 60(8), 2953–2974.
12.
CauffmanE.FineA.ThomasA. G.MonahanK. C. (2017). Trajectories of violent behavior among females and males. Child Development, 88(1), 41–54.
13.
ChilcoatH. D.AnthonyJ. C. (1996). Impact of parent monitoring on initiation of drug use through late childhood. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(1), 91–100.
14.
ChoM.HaightW.ChoiW. S.HongS.PiescherK. (2019). A prospective, longitudinal study of risk factors for early onset of delinquency among maltreated youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 102, 222–230.
15.
DongB.MorrisonC. N.BranasC. C.RichmondT. S.WiebeD. J. (2020). As violence unfolds: A space–time study of situational triggers of violent victimization among urban youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 119–152.
16.
DuweG.ClarkV. (2015). Importance of program integrity: Outcome evaluation of a gender-responsive, cognitive-behavioral program for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 301–328.
17.
FrancoC.AmutioA.López-GonzálezL.OriolX.Martínez-TaboadaC. (2016). Effect of a mindfulness training program on the impulsivity and aggression levels of adolescents with behavioral problems in the classroom. Frontiers in psychology, 7, Article 1385.
18.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
19.
HannulaK. V. (2019). The development of impulsivity and sensation seeking: Sources of between-and within-individual differences over time and across sex [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University].
20.
HawkinsD. F.LaubJ. H.LauritsenJ. L.CothernL. (2000). Race, ethnicity, and serious and violent juvenile offending. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
21.
HeimerK.LauritsenJ. L.LynchJ. P. (2009). The national crime victimization survey and the gender gap in offending: Redux. Criminology, 47, 427.
22.
HoskinA. W.LiftawiS. (2022). Interest in physical danger: Does it mediate the relationship between gender and violent offending?. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 12(4), 61–73.
23.
IshoyG. A. (2017). Exploring morality as a mediator of the association between parenting practices and violent and property offending among a sample of juvenile delinquents. Crime & Delinquency, 63(2), 113–136.
24.
KentG.PitsiaV. (2018). Gender differences in cognitive development and school readiness. Children’s Research Digest, 5(3), 32–41.
25.
KimJ.HarrisM. N.LeeY. (2024). The relationships between mental health and violent offending among serious adolescent offenders: An examination of the mediating role of experienced and witnessed victimization. Crime & Delinquency, 70(10), 2622–2646.
26.
KokkaleraS. S.MarshallC. E.Haen MarshallI. (2018). The role of parental maltreatment and parental social control on self-reported violent offending in Indonesia and the US: Does gender make a difference?. Societies, 8(2), 33.
27.
LauritsenJ. L.HeimerK.LynchJ. P. (2009). Trends in the gender gap in violent offending: New evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminology, 47(2), 361–399.
28.
Le BlancM. (2020). On the future of the individual longitudinal age-crime curve. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 30(4), 183–195.
29.
LiuS. (2015). Is the shape of the age-crime curve invariant by sex? Evidence from a national sample with flexible non-parametric modeling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 93–123.
30.
LoeberR. (2012). Does the study of the age-crime curve have a future. In LoeberR.WelshB. C. (Eds.), The future of criminology (pp. 11–19).
31.
Lyndsey VealM.Thomson RossL. (2006). Gender, alcohol consumption, and parental monitoring. The Journal of Psychology, 140(1), 41–52.
32.
MamayekC.LoughranT.PaternosterR. (2015). Reason taking the reins from impulsivity: The promise of dual-systems thinking for criminology. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(4), 426–448.
33.
Martín-CriadoJ. M.CasasJ. A.Ortega-RuizR.Del ReyR. (2021). Parental supervision and victims of cyberbullying: Influence of the use of social networks and online extimacy. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), 26(2), 160–167.
34.
MillsR.MannM. J.SmithM. L.KristjanssonA. L. (2021). Parental support and monitoring as associated with adolescent alcohol and tobacco use by gender and age. BMC Public Health, 21, 1–10.
35.
MoffittT. E. (1993), Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy, Psychological Review, 100(4), 674.
36.
NofzigerS.KurtzD. (2005). Violent lives: A lifestyle model linking exposure to violence to juvenile violent offending. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42(1), 3–26.
37.
OgilvieJ. M.ThompsonC.LockwoodK.LittleS.AllardT.ThomsenL.DennisonS. (2024). Examining the characteristics of children who experience contact with the youth justice system in Queensland: Implications for the minimum age of criminal responsibility. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 36(4), 408–432.
38.
Patock-PeckhamJ. A.KingK. M.Morgan-LopezA. A.UlloaE. C.Filson MosesJ. M. (2011). Gender-specific mediational links between parenting styles, parental monitoring, impulsiveness, drinking control, and alcohol-related problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(2), 247–258.
39.
PiqueroA. R.ChungH. L. (2001). On the relationships between gender, early onset, and the seriousness of offending. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(3), 189–206.
40.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
41.
Puig-AntichJ.RyanN. (1986). Kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. Western Psychiatric Institute.
42.
SalisburyE. J. (2015). Program integrity and the principles of gender-responsive interventions. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 329.
43.
StalansL. J. (2009). Women's offending behavior: Evidence-based review of gender differences and gender responsive programs. Victims and Offenders, 4(4), 405–411.
44.
SteffensmeierD.SchwartzJ.SlepickaJ.ZhongH. (2023). Twenty-first century trends in girls’ violence and the gender gap: Triangulated findings from official and unofficial longitudinal sources. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(17–18), 9818–9844.
45.
SteffensmeierD.ZhongH.AckermanJ.SchwartzJ.AghaS. (2006). Gender gap trends for violent crimes, 1980 to 2003: A UCR-NCVS comparison. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 72–98.
46.
SteinbergL. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology: The Journal of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 216–224.
47.
SteinbergL.AlbertD.CauffmanE.BanichM.GrahamS.WoolardJ. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764.
48.
StrüberD.LückM.RothG. (2020). Sex, aggression and impulse control: An integrative account. Neuroscience and Crime, 93–121.
49.
SvenssonR. (2003). Gender differences in adolescent drug use: The impact of parental monitoring and peer deviance. Youth & Society, 34(3), 300–329.
50.
TärnhällA.BjörkJ.WalliniusM.GustafssonP.HofvanderB. (2023). Offending trajectories in violent offenders: Criminal history and early life risk factors. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(2–3), 270–290.
51.
Van VoorhisP. (2022). Defining and evaluating gender-responsive treatment. In BrownS. L.GelsthorpeL. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on what works with girls and women in conflict with the law: A critical review of theory, practice, and policy (pp. 135–156).
52.
VazsonyiA. T.KsinanA. J. (2017). Understanding deviance through the dual systems model: Converging evidence for criminology and developmental sciences. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 58–64.
53.
VironeM. L. (2023). The use of mindfulness to improve emotional regulation and impulse control among adolescents with ADHD. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 16(1), 78–90.
54.
WallaceL. N. (2021). Differences in social media monitoring practices based on child and parent gender. Family Relations, 70(5), 1412–1426.
55.
WallaceL. N. (2022). Associations between parental monitoring and parents’ social media use and social media perceptions. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), Article 100294.
56.
WalshA. (2009). Biology and criminology: The biosocial synthesis. Routledge.
57.
WaltersG. D. (2018). Unsupervised routine activities as a mediator of the parental knowledge–delinquency relationship. Justice Quarterly, 35(5), 871–894.
58.
WebbJ. A.BrayJ. H.GetzJ. G.AdamsG. (2002). Gender, perceived parental monitoring, and behavioral adjustment: Influences on adolescent alcohol use. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72(3), 392–400.
59.
WebbR. T.AntonsenS.MokP. L.AgerboE.PedersenC. B. (2015). National cohort study of suicidality and violent criminality among Danish immigrants. PLoS One, 10(6), Article e0131915.
60.
WhitesideS. P.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D.ReynoldsS. K. (2005). Validation of the UPPS impulsive behaviour scale: A four-factor model of impulsivity. European Journal of personality, 19(7), 559–574.
61.
WilsonL. C.ScarpaA. (2011). The link between sensation seeking and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Aggressive Behavior, 37(1), 81–90.
62.
WojciechowskiT. W. (2020). The relevance of the dual systems model of self-control for age-related deceleration in offending variety among juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 70, Article 101716.
63.
WojciechowskiT. W. (2023). Examining interactive effects of PTSD and deviant peer association for predicting violent offending risk. Crime & Delinquency, 69(8), 1511–1533.
64.
WojciechowskiT. W. (2024a). Dual systems imbalance as a mediator of the relationship between exposure to violence and violent offending risk: Delineating direct victimization and witnessed violence. Violence & Victims, 39(6), 663.
65.
WojciechowskiT. W. (2024b). Extending the marijuana gateway hypothesis beyond drug use to violent offending: Examining dual systems imbalance as a mediator. Crime & Delinquency, 70(6–7), 1592–1614.
66.
WuJ.FettermanJ. L.RossJ. C.HongT. (2024). Effects of message frames and sources in Tiktok videos for youth vaping cessation: Emotions and perceived message effectiveness as mediating mechanisms. Journal of Adolescent Health, 76(1), 122–130.
67.
YooJ. A. (2017). Effect of child gender on the bidirectional relationships between parental monitoring and delinquent behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 3452–3463.
