This article examines whether potentially criminogenic places (including bars, liquor stores, restaurants, public transport hubs, drug markets, and more), located within a 1,240-feet radius of parolees’ residences (the home “node”), predict their rearrest or revocation. Taking these features into account, in addition to individual traits and behaviors, might pave the way for more accurate risk assessment that could help make supervision sensitive to place-based risks. However, multivariate survival analysis of 1,632 parolees released to Newark during July 2007 to June 2009 found little evidence that these factors increased the risk of failure. Successful operationalization of environmental risk will probably need to incorporate more detailed measures of parolees’ routine activities, including the settings and paths they frequent beyond their home environment.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (1995). The level of service inventory-revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi Health Systems.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
4.
AndrewsD. A.RobinsonD. (1984). The level of supervision inventory: Second report. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services.
5.
BeccariaC. (1995). On crimes and punishments (DaviesR., Trans.). In BellamyR. (Ed.), On crimes and punishments and other writings (pp. 1-113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217.
7.
BelleraC. A.MacGroganG.DebledM.de LaraC. T.BrousteV.Mathoulin-PélissierS. (2010). Variables with time-varying effects and the Cox model: Some statistical concepts illustrated with a prognostic factor study in breast cancer. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 20-32.
8.
BernascoW.BlockR. (2011). Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 48, 33-57.
9.
BichlerG.Christie-MerrallJ.SechrestD. (2011). Examining juvenile delinquency within activity space: Building a context for offender travel patterns. Journal of Research in & and Delinquency, 48, 472-506.
10.
BlockR.BlockC. R. (1995). Space, place and crime: Hot spot areas and hot spot places of liquor-related crime. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 145-183). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
11.
BontaJ. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In HarlandA. T. (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety Canada.
13.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (1981). Notes on the geometry of crime. In BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 27-54). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
14.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (2008). Crime pattern theory. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 78-93). London, England: Willan Publishing.
15.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (1993). Environment, routine and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In ClarkeR. V.FelsonM. (Eds.), Advances in criminological theory (pp. 259-294). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
16.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 5-26.
17.
BriscoeS.DonnellyN. (2001). Temporal and regional aspects of alcohol-related violence and disorder. Alcohol Studies Bulletin, 1, 1-16.
18.
BullockH. A. (1955). Urban homicide in theory and fact. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 45, 565-575.
19.
BurgessE. W. (1928). Factors determining success or failure on parole. In BruceA. A.BurgessE. W.HarnoA. J. (Eds.), The workings of the indeterminate sentence law and the parole system in Illinois (pp. 221-234). Springfield: Illinois State Board of Parole.
20.
CaplanJ. M.KennedyL. W.MillerJ. (2011). Risk terrain modeling: Brokering criminological theory and GIS methods for crime forecasting. Justice Quarterly, 28, 360-381.
21.
ChajewskiM.MercadoC. C. (2009). An evaluation of sex offender residency restriction functioning in town, county, and city-wide jurisdictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 44-61.
22.
ClarkT. G.BradburnM. J.LoveS. B.AltmanD. G. (2003). Survival analysis part IV: Further concepts and methods in survival analysis. British Journal of Cancer, 89, 781-786.
23.
ClarkeR. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention: Achievements and challenges. In TonryM.FarringtonD. (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention. Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 136-147). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
24.
ClarkeR. V. (2009). Situational crime Prevention: Theoretical background and current practice. In KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.HallG. P. (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 259-276). New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
25.
ClarkeR. V.EckJ. (2005). How to become a problem solving analyst in 60 small steps. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
26.
ClearT. R. (2005). Places not cases? Rethinking the probation focus. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 172-184.
27.
ClearT. R.LatessaE. J. (1993). Probation officers’ roles in intensive supervision: Surveillance versus treatment. Justice Quarterly, 10, 441-462.
28.
ClearT. R.WassonB. F.RowlandJ. (1988). Statistical prediction in corrections. Research in Corrections, 1, 1-52.
29.
ClevesM. A.GouldW.GutierezR. (2002). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata (1st ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
30.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 488-608.
31.
CornishT. (2010). The many purposes of location monitoring. Federal Probation, 74, 12-13.
32.
CoxD. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34, 187-220.
33.
CozensP. (2008). Crime prevention through environmental design. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 21-47). London, England: Willan Publishing.
34.
CullenF. (2011). Beyond adolescence-limited criminology: Choosing our future—The American Society of Criminology 2010 Sutherland address. Criminology, 49, 287-330.
35.
CullenF.EckJ.LowenkampC. (2002). Environmental Corrections: A new paradigm for effective supervision. Federal Probation, 66, 2828-2837.
36.
DickeyW.KlingeleC. (2004, May12-13). Promoting public safety: A problem oriented approach to prisoner reentry. In Reentry roundtable meeting, Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
37.
diZeregaM.VerdoneJ. (2011). Setting an agenda for family-focused justice reform. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
38.
DunworthT.SaigerA. (1994). Drugs and crime in public housing: A three-city analysis. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
39.
DuweG.DonnayW.TewksburyR. (2008). Does Residential Proximity Matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 484-504.
40.
EckJ. E. (1995). Examining routine activity theory: A review of two books. Justice Quarterly, 12, 783-797.
41.
EckJ. E.ChaineyS.CameronJ. G.LeitnerM.WilsonR. W. (2005). Mapping crime: Understanding hot spots. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
42.
EckJ. E.ClarkR. V.GueretteR. (2007). Risky facilities: Crime concentration in homogeneous sets of facilities. In FarrellG.BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D.TownsleyM. (Eds.), Imagination for crime prevention: Essays in honour of Ken Pease (Crime prevention studies, Vol. 21, pp. 225-264). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
43.
FelsonM. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 53-66). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
44.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works. Criminology, 34, 575-608.
45.
GibbsJ. P.MartinW. T. (1962). Urbanization, technology, and the division of labor. American Sociological Review, 27, 667-677.
46.
GlueckS.GlueckE. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
GottfredsonS. D.MoriartyL. J. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 178-200.
48.
GriffithsE.TitaG. (2009). Homicide in and around public housing: Is public housing a hotbed, a magnet, or a generator of violence for the surrounding community?Social Problems, 56, 474-493.
49.
GroffE. R.McCordE. (2012). The role of neighborhood parks as crime generators. Security Journal, 25, 1-24.
50.
HarriesK. (1999). Mapping crime: Principle and practice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
51.
HarriesK. (2002). Applications of geographic analysis in parole and probation. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
52.
HippJ.PetersiliaJ.TurnerS. (2010). Parolee recidivism in California: The effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology, 48, 947-979.
53.
HootonE. A. (1939). Crime and the man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Infogroup. (2010). Enhanced business and residential data: The importance of coverage, accuracy and recency for GIS data sets. Papillion, NE: Infogroup/Government Division.
55.
JonesD. A.JohnsonS.LatessaE.TravisL. F. (1999). Case classification in community corrections: Preliminary findings from a national survey. Topics in Community Corrections Annual Issue: Classification and Risk Assessment: 4-10. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
KellingG. L.ColesC. M. (1998). Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. New York, NY: Touchstone.
58.
KlockarsC. (1972). A theory of probation supervision. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 64, 549-557.
59.
KubrinC. E.StewartE. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44, 165–197.
60.
LaGrangeT. (1999). The impact of neighborhoods, schools, and malls on the spatial distribution of property damage. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 36, 393-422.
61.
LombrosoC. (1876). On criminal man. Milan, Italy: Hoepli.
62.
LowenkampC. T.BechtelK. (2007). Predictive validity of the LSI-R on a sample of offenders drawn from the records of the Iowa Department of Corrections data management system. Federal Probation, 71, 25-29.
63.
MillerJ.LinJ. (2007). Applying a generic juvenile risk assessment to a local context: Some practical and theoretical lessons. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 552-580.
64.
MillieA. (2008). Vulnerability and risk: Some lessons from the UK Reducing Burglary Initiative. Police Practice & Research, 9, 183-198.
65.
MorenoffJ. D. (2011). Neighborhoods, recidivism, and employment among returning prisoners. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
66.
MulfordC.WilsonR.ParmleyA. (2009). Geographic aspects of sex offender residency restrictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 3-12.
67.
NewtonA. (2004). Crime and disorder on buses: Toward an evidence base for effective crime prevention (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
68.
Pew Center on the States. (2007). What works in community corrections: An interview with Dr. Joan Petersilia. Washington, DC: Author.
69.
PizaE.CaplanJ. M.KennedyL. W. (2011, November). Camera placement: An analysis of micro-level environmental features. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
70.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2004). Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18, 61-72.
71.
Re-Entry Policy Council. (2005). Report of the re-entry policy council: Charting the safe and successful return of prisoners to the community. New York, NY: Council of State Governments.
72.
Reinventing Probation Council. (2000). Transforming probation through leadership: The “broken windows” model. New York, NY: The Center for Civic Innovation at the Manhattan Institute.
73.
RengertG. F. (1996). The geography of illegal drugs. Boulder, CO: Westview.
RomanC. G. (2003). Schools as generators of crime: Routine activities and the sociology of place. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
76.
RomanC. G.ReidS. E.BhatiA. S.TereshchenkoB. (2008). Alcohol outlets as attractors of violence and disorder: A closer look at the neighborhood environment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
77.
RoncekD.LoboscoA. (1983). The effects of high schools on crime in their neighborhoods. Social Science Quarterly, 64, 598-613.
78.
RoncekD. W.MaierP. A. (1991). Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of hot spots. Criminology, 29, 725-753.
79.
RossmoD. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
80.
RossmoD. K.RomboutsS. (2008). Geographic profiling. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 136-149). London, England: Willan Publishing.
81.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighbourhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
82.
ScottM.DedelK. (2006). Assaults in and around bars: Problem oriented guides for police series (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing.
83.
ShawC. R.McKayH. H. (1931). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
84.
ShermanL. W. (1995). Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 35-65). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
85.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27-56.
86.
SkeemJ.ManchakS. (2008). Back to the future: From Klockars’ model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 220-247.
87.
SolomonA. L.JannettaJ.ElderbroomB.WinterfieldL.ElderbroomB.BurkeP.BurrellW. D. (2008). Putting public safety first: 13 parole supervision strategies to enhance reentry outcomes. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
88.
SpelmanW. (1995). Once bitten, then what? Cross-sectional and time-course explanations of repeat victimization. British Journal of Criminology, 35, 366-383.
89.
StevensonR. J.LindB.WeatherburnD. (1999). The relationship between alcohol sales and assault in New South Wales. Addiction, 94, 397-410.
90.
St. JeanP. K. B. (2007). Pockets of crime: Broken windows, collective efficacy, and the criminal point of view. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
91.
SutherlandE. H. (1939). Principles of criminology. Chicago, IL: J. B. Lippincott.
92.
TaxmanF. S. (2008). No illusions: Offender and organizational change in Maryland’s proactive community supervision model. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 275-302.
93.
TaxmanF. S.ShepardsonE.ByrneJ. M. (2004). Tools of the trade: A guide to incorporating science into practice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
94.
TaylorR. B. (1997). Social order and disorder of street-blocks and neighborhood: Ecology, microecology and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 24, 113-155.
95.
TaylorR. B.HarrellA. V. (1996). Physical environment and crime. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
96.
TitaG.CohenJ.EngbergJ. (2005). An ecological study of the location of gang set space. Social Problems, 52, 272-299.
97.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011a). American FactFinder. Available from factfinder.census.gov
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1999). Major management challenges and program risks. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
100.
U.S. Department of Justice, National Gang Intelligence Center. (2009). National gang threat assessment. Washington, DC: Author.
101.
Von HirschA.BottomsA. E.BurneyE.WickstromP. O. (1999). Criminal deterrence and sentence severity. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
102.
WeisburdD.BruinsmaG. J. N.BernascoW. (2009). Units of analysis in geographic criminology: Historical development, critical issues, and open questions. In WeisburdD.BeranscoW.BruinsmaG. J. N. (Eds.), Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology (pp. 3-31). New York, NY: Springer.
103.
WeisburdD.EckJ. E. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 145-183). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
104.
WilsonJ. Q.KellingG. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29-38.
105.
WortleyR.MazerolleL. (2008). Environmental criminology and crime analysis: Situating the theory, analytic approach and application. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 1-18). London, England: Willan Publishing.
106.
YuS. V. (2009). Bus stops and crime: Do bus stops increase crime opportunities in local neighborhoods? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
107.
ZgobaK. M. (2011). Residence restriction buffer zones and the banishment of sex offenders: Have we gone one step too far?Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 391-400.
108.
ZipfG. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
