Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Large-scale emergent decarceration efforts introduce challenges for time and resources that prohibit jurisdictions from employing best practices in release decisions. Best practice includes a structured professional judgment approach by paroling authorities to incorporate group-level predicted risk and individual-level assessment of current risk and suitability for release. Absent the ability to expand parole review, jurisdictions should ensure decisions are informed by risk assessment that incorporates recent behavior and potential mitigating factors to approximate parole practice. The Reduction in Capacity Evaluation (ReduCE) was created for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation following COVID-19 to inform prison population reduction efforts wherein empirically supported structured decision-making used by the Board of Parole Hearings cannot be employed. ReduCE is automatically scored, differentiates between lower risk groups, predicts any new return (AUC = .69) and new felony return (AUC = .75) across gender and race, and informs risk over and above the existing static instrument.

Keywords

decarceration risk assessment parole COVID prison reduction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abraham

L. A.

Brown

T. C.

Thomas

S. A.

(2020). How COVID-19’s disruption of the U.S. correctional system provides an opportunity for decarceration. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 780–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09537-1

Bird

Grattet

(2017). Policy change and recidivism: The effects of California’s realignment and local implementation strategies on rearrest and reconviction. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(6), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415604900

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2020, March 31). Monthly report of population: SOMS-TPOP-1. https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/research/wp-content/uploads/sites/174/2020/04/Tpop1d2003.pdf

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2021, December 31). Monthly report of population: SOMS-TPOP-1. https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/research/wp-content/uploads/sites/174/2020/04/Tpop1d2003.pdf

California Static Risk Assessment. California Code of Regs., 15§3768.1. (2010).

Clear

T. R.

(2021). Decarceration problems and prospects. Annual Review of Criminology, 4(1), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-052820-032924

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.

Epperson

M. W.

Wilson

A. B.

Fedock

(2021). The promise of research to advance smart decarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820977587

Gerlinger

Turner

S. F.

(2015). California’s public safety realignment: Correctional policy based on stakes rather than risk. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(8), 805–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414547044

10.

Gottlieb

Charles

McLeod

Kjellstrand

Bonsu

(2020). Were California’s decarceration efforts smart? A quasi-experimental examination of racial, ethnic, and gender disparities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(1), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820923384

11.

Hager

(2020). How Bill Barr’s COVID-19 prisoner release plan could favor white people. The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2020/03/28/how-bill-barr-s-covid-19-prisoner-release-plan-could-favor-white-people

12.

Hamilton

(2019). The sexist algorithm. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 37(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2406

13.

Hanson

R. K.

(2017). Assessing the Calibration of actuarial risk scales: A primer on the E/O Index. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816683956

14.

Hanson

R. K.

Bourgon

McGrath

R. J.

Kroner

D’Amora

D. A.

Thomas

S. S.

Tavarez

L. P.

(2017). A five-level risk and needs system: Maximizing assessment results in corrections through the development of a common language. Justice Center Council of State Governments. http://saratso.org/pdf/A_Five_Level_Risk_and_Needs_System_Report.pdf

15.

Hosmer

D. W.

Lemeshow

(2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). Wiley.

16.

LaPrade

Riddell

J. R.

Elliott

(2024). Decarceration and prison release effects on crime: A case study of Proposition 47. Journal of Crime & Justice, 47(5), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2024.2333950

17.

Nielson

K. R.

Zhang

Ingram

J. R.

(2022). The impact of COVID-19 on police officer activities. Journal of Criminal Justice, 82, 101943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101943

18.

Olver

M. E.

Stockdale

K. C.

(2020). Assessing and managing offense analogue and offense replacement behaviors in correctional settings. Advancing Corrections, 10(3), 42–55. https://icpa.org/resources/advancing-corrections-journal.html

19.

Ostermann

Hyatt

J. M.

DeWitt

S. E.

(2020). The influence of technical violation revocations on parole efficacy: Employing competing risks survival analyses to address methodological challenges. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2019.1676817

20.

Petersilia

Turner

(1992). An evaluation of intensive probation in California. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 82(3), 610–658.

21.

Renner

Bartos

(2022). Decarceration, sanction severity and crime: Causal analysis of Proposition 47 and property crime in Los Angeles. Justice Evaluation Journal, 5(2), 208–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2021.1996207

22.

Rice

M. E.

Harris

G. T.

(2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7

23.

Rieger

D. J.

(2024). Development and validation of an optimal method for early release decision-making for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation [Doctoral dissertation]. Carleton University. https://carleton.scholaris.ca/items/e94fcc4f-cc4d-43fe-967b-dba142aa86eb

24.

Rieger

D. J.

Serin

R. C.

Brown

S. L.

(2025). Optimized risk assessment in forensic practice: A comparison of machine learning and manual scoring approaches [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Psychology, Carleton University.

25.

Serin

R. C.

(2020). Risk decay: Implications for risk assessment. Advancing Corrections Journal, 10, 29–41. https://icpa.org/resource/advancing-corrections-journal-edition-10-understanding-assessing-managing-and-reducing-risk-acj10-a003.html

26.

Serin

R. C.

Chadwick

Lloyd

C. D.

(2016). Dynamic risk and protective factors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1–2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1112013

27.

Serin

R. C.

Rieger

D. J.

(2023). Structured decision-making framework: User guide. National Institute of Corrections.

28.

Serin

R. C.

Rieger

D. J.

Wardrop

(2022). Risk assessment in parole decision-making. National Institute of Corrections. https://nicic.gov/resources/nic-library/all-library-items/risk-assessment-parole-decision-making

29.

Singh

J. P.

(2018). Handbook of recidivism risk/needs assessment tools (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

30.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

31.

Turner

Fain

Hunt

(2015). Public safety realignment in twelve California counties. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR800/RR872/RAND_RR872.pdf

32.

Turner

Hess

Bradstreet

Chapman

Murphy

(2013). Development of the California Static Risk Assessment (CSRA): Recidivism risk prediction in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. UC Irvine Center for Evidence-Based Corrections. https://cpb-us-e2.wpmucdn.com/sites.uci.edu/dist/0/1149/files/2013/12/Development-of-the-CSRA-Recidivism-Risk-Prediction-in-the-CDCR.pdf

33.

Verma

Kubrin

Serin

(2016). A turning point in mass incarceration? Local imprisonment trajectories and decarceration under California’s Realignment. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 664(1), 108–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215614311

34.

Vincent

G. M.

Viljoen

J. L.

(2020). Racist algorithms or systemic problems? Risk assessments and racial disparities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(12), 1576–1584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820954501

35.

White

M. D.

Orosco

Terpstra

(2023). Investigating the impacts of a global pandemic and George Floyd’s death on crime and other features of police work. Justice Quarterly, 40(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.2022740

36.

Zhang

Zhao

J. S.

Lin

(2024). A link between the George Floyd incident and de-policing: Evidence from police arrests across three racial and ethnic groups. Police Quarterly, 27(4), 475–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111241232640

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

Informing Large-Scale Emergent Decarceration Efforts: Validation of the Reduction in Capacity Evaluation (ReduCE)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material