Although the bulk of work on peer influence focuses on socialization, theory and research also document situational peer effects. Yet, the temporal bounds of such situational peer effects are unclear. The effect may be tied to the immediate context, but it may also endure for a short time after leaving a peer context. This study attempts to specify the temporal bounds of the situational peer effect on substance use.
Methods
We use fixed-effects linear probability models with hourly space-time budget information to determine whether amplified risks of substance use endure in the hours after adolescents leave a peer context, operationalized both as the presence of peers and as unstructured, unsupervised socializing with peers.
Results
We observe that being in the immediate presence of peers and that being engaged in unstructured, unsupervised socializing with peers increases the risk of substance use. We also document preliminary evidence of residual risk in the hours after exposure to peers.
Conclusion
Our findings support the contention that situational peer effects are meaningful and raise questions about a possible transitional period of elevated risk when adolescents leave the peer context.
AnwarS.LoughranT. A.. 2011. “Testing a Bayesian Learning Theory of Deterrence among Serious Juvenile Offenders.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal49(3):667–98.
4.
ApelR.2013. “Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime: Implications for Criminal Deterrence.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology29(1):67–101.
5.
AugustynM. B.McGloinJ. M.. 2013. “The Risk of Informal Socializing with Peers: Considering Gender Differences Across Predatory Delinquency and Substance use.” Justice Quarterly30(1):117–43.
6.
BaiS.RoblesT. F.ReynoldsB. M.RepettiR. L.. 2017. “Children's Diurnal Cortisol Responses to Negative Events at School and Home”. Psychoneuroendocrinology83:150-58.
7.
BarnumT. C.PogarskyG.. 2022. “Situational Peer Dynamics and Crime Decisions.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency59(5):535–73.
8.
BeckN.2020. “Estimating Grouped Data Models with a Binary-Dependent variable and Fixed-Effects via a Logit Versus a Linear Probability Model: The Impact of Dropped Units.” Political Analysis28(1):139–45.
9.
BernascoW.RuiterS.BruinsmaG. J.PauwelsL. J.WeermanF. M.. 2013. “Situational Causes of Offending: A Fixed-Effects Analysis of Space–Time Budget Data.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal51(4):895–926.
10.
BlackhartG. C.EckelL. A.TiceD. M.. 2007. “Salivary Cortisol in Response to Acute Social Rejection and Acceptance by Peers.” Biological Psychology75(3):267–76.
11.
BlackhartG. C.WilliamsonJ.NelsonL.. 2015. “Social Anxiety in Relation to Self-Control Depletion Following Social Interactions.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology34(9):747–73.
12.
BriarS.PiliavinI.. 1965. “Delinquency, Situational Inducements, and Commitment to Conformity.” Social Problems13:35–45.
13.
BucciR. 2024. “Addressing the ‘Dirty Little Secret’ of Deterrence: Testing the Effects of Increased Police Presence on Perceptions of Arrest Risk”. Journal of Quantitative Criminology40(2):311-42.
14.
BuelowM. T.WirthJ. H.. 2016. “Decisions in the Face of Known Risks: Ostracism Increases Risky Decision-Making”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology69:210-17.
15.
CheinJ.AlbertD.O’BrienL.UckertK.SteinbergL.. 2011. “Peers Increase Adolescent Risk Taking by Enhancing Activity in the Brain’s Reward Circuitry.” Developmental Science14(2):F1–F10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01035.x
16.
ClarkD. M.WellsA.. 1995. “A Cognitive Model of Social Phobia.” Pp. 69-93 in Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment, edited by R. G. Heimberg et al., New York: Guilford Press.
17.
CohenL. E.FelsonM.. 1979. “On Estimating the Social Costs of National Economic Policy: A Critical Examination of the Brenner Study.” Social Indicators Research6(2):251–9.
18.
CohenG. L.PrinsteinM. J.. 2006. “Peer Contagion of Aggression and Health Risk Behavior among Adolescent Males: An Experimental Investigation of Effects on Public Conduct and Private Attitudes.” Child Development77(4):967–83.
19.
CollinsR.2008. Violence: A Micro-Sociological Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
de JongE.BernascoW.LammersM.. 2020. “Situational Correlates of Adolescent Substance use: An Improved Test of the Routine Activity Theory of Deviant Behavior.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology36:823–50.
21.
DewallC. N.TwengeJ. M.BushmanB.ImC.WilliamsK.. 2010. “A Little Acceptance Goes a Long Way: Applying Social Impact Theory to the Rejection-Aggression Link”. Social Psychological and Personality Science1(2):168-74.
22.
DienerEdwardFraserScott C.BeamanArthur L.KelemRoger T.. 1976. “Effects of Deindividuation Variables on Stealing among Halloween Trick-or-Treaters.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology33:178–83.
23.
EngelC.2023. “How Little Does It Take to Trigger a Peer Effect? An Experiment on Crime as Conditional Rule Violation.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency60(4):455-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278231152625
24.
FelsonM.PoulsenE.. 2003. “Simple Indicators of Crime by Time of day.” International Journal of Forecasting19(4):595–601.
FestingerL.GerardH. B.HymovitchB.KelleyH. H.RavenB.. 1952. “The Influence Process in the Presence of Extreme Deviates.” Human Relations5(4):327–46.
27.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K.BrunellA. B.DaltonA. N.ScarbeckS. J.ChartrandT. L.. 2006. “High-Maintenance Interaction: Inefficient Social Coordination Impairs Self-Regulation”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology91(3):456.
28.
FrijdaN. H.2007. The Laws of Emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
GallupeO.NguyenH.BouchardM.SchulenbergJ. L.ChenierA.CookK. D.. 2016. “An Experimental Test of Deviant Modeling.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency53(4):482–505.
30.
GardnerM.SteinbergL.. 2005. “Peer Influence on Risk Taking, Risk Preference, and Risky Decision Making in Adolescence and Adulthood: An Experimental Study.” Developmental Psychology41(4):625.
31.
GerstnerD.OberwittlerD.. 2018. “Who’s Hanging out and What’s Happening? A Look at the Interplay Between Unstructured Socializing, Crime Propensity and Delinquent Peers Using Social Network Data.” European Journal of Criminology15(1):111–29.
32.
GoldM.1970. Delinquent Behavior in an American City. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
33.
GordonD. V.LinZ.OsbergL.PhippsS.. 1994. “Predicting Probabilities: Inherent and Sampling Variability in the Estimation of Discrete-Choice Models.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics56(1):13–31.
34.
HaggerM. S.WoodC.StiffC.ChatzisarantisN. L.. 2010. “Ego Depletion and the Strength Model of Self-Control: A Meta-Analysis”. Psychological Bulletin136(4):495-525.
35.
HaynieD. L.OsgoodD. W.. 2005. “Reconsidering Peers and Delinquency: How do Peers Matter?” Social Forces84(2):1109–30.
36.
HellevikO.2009. “Linear Versus Logistic Regression When the Dependent variable is a Dichotomy.” Quality and Quantity43:59–74.
37.
HoebenE. M.BernascoW.WeermanF. M.PauwelsL.van HalemS.. 2014. “The Space-Time Budget Method in Criminological Research.” Crime Science3:1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-014-0012-3
38.
HoebenE. M.CateM. A.WeermanF. M.McgloinJ. M.. 2025. “What Adolescents Do or Say to Actively Influence Peers: Compliance-Gaining Tactics and Adolescent Deviance”. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency60(2):239-84.
39.
HoebenE. M.MeldrumR. C.WalkerD. A.YoungJ. T.. 2016. “The Role of Peer Delinquency and Unstructured Socializing in Explaining Delinquency and Substance Use: A State-of-the-art Review.” Journal of Criminal Justice47:108–22.
40.
HoebenE. M.ThomasK. J.. 2019. “Peers and Offender Decision-Making.” Criminology & Public Policy18(4):759–84.
41.
HoebenE. M.WeermanF. M.. 2016. “Why Is Involvement in Unstructured Socializing Related to Adolescent Delinquency?”. Criminology54(2):242-81.
42.
JepmaM.SchaafJ. V.VisserI.HuizengaH. M.. 2022. “Impaired Learning to Dissociate Advantageous and Disadvantageous Risky Choices in Adolescents”. Scientific Reports12(1):6490.
43.
JohnsonR. E.MarcosA. C.BahrS. J.. 1987. “The Role of Peers in the Complex Etiology of Adolescent Drug Use.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal25(2):323–40.
44.
JusterT. F.OnoH.StaffordF. P.. 2003. “An Assessment of Alternative Measures of Time Use.” Sociological Methodology33(1):19–54.
45.
KahnemanD.2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan.
46.
KingG.ZengL.. 2001. “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.” Political Analysis9(2):137–63.
47.
KoperC. S.TaylorB. G.WoodsD. J.. 2013. “A Randomized Test of Initial and Residual Deterrence from Directed Patrols and Use of License Plate Readers at Crime Hot Spots”. Journal of Experimental Criminology9:213-44.
48.
KübelS. L.DeitzerJ. R.FrankenhuisW. E.RibeaudD.EisnerM. P.Van GelderJ. L.. 2024. “Beyond the Situation: Hanging Out with Peers Now Is Associated with Short-Term Mindsets Later”. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology10(1):51-72.
49.
LaubJ. H.NaginD. S.SampsonR. J.. 1998. “Trajectories of Change in Criminal Offending: Good Marriages and the Desistance Process.” American Sociological Review63(2):225–38.
50.
LehmanB. J.RepettiR. L.. 2007. “Bad Days Don't End When the School Bell Rings: The Lingering Effects of Negative School Events on Children's Mood, Self-Esteem, and Perceptions of Parent-Child Interaction”. Social Development16(3):596-618.
51.
LoewensteinG. F.WeberE. U.HseeC. K.WelchN.. 2001. “Risk as Feelings.” Psychological Bulletin127(2):267–86.
52.
MallottM. A.ManerJ. K.DewallN.SchmidtN. B.. 2009. “Compensatory Deficits Following Rejection: The Role of Social Anxiety in Disrupting Affiliative Behavior”. Depression and Anxiety26(5):438-46.
53.
MatzaD.1964. Delinquency and Drift. New York: Wiley.
54.
McCarthyB.2002. “New Economics of Sociological Criminology.” Annual Review of Sociology28:417–42.
55.
McGloinJ. M.AugustynM. B.. 2023. “The Measurement Lens Matters: Considering the Sensitivity of the Gang Effect to Coding Across Samples.” Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology9(4):617–47.
56.
McGloinJ. M.RowanZ. R.. 2015. “A Threshold Model of Collective Crime.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal53(3):484–512.
57.
McGloinJ. M.SullivanC. J.PiqueroA. R.BloklandA.NieuwbeertaP.. 2011. “Marriage and Offending Specialization: Expanding the Impact of Turning Points and the Process of Desistance.” European Journal of Criminology8(5):361–76.
58.
McGloinJ. M.ThomasK. J.. 2016. “Incentives for Collective Deviance: Group Size and Changes in Perceived Risk, Cost, and Reward.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal54(3):459–86.
59.
McGloinJ. M.ThomasK. J.. 2019. “Peer Influence and Delinquency.” Annual Review of Criminology2:241–64.
60.
MeldeC.EsbensenF. A.. 2014. “The Relative Impact of Gang status Transitions: Identifying the Mechanisms of Change in Delinquency.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51(3):349–76.
61.
MercerN.CrocettiE.MeeusW.BranjeS.. 2018. “An Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Deviant Peers on Own Deviancy: A Replication Study.” Journal of Experimental Criminology14:429–38.
62.
MintzA.1951. “Non-adaptive Group Behavior.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology46(2):150–9.
63.
NemesS.JonassonJ. M.GenellA.SteineckG.. 2009. “Bias in Odds Ratios by Logistic Regression Modelling and Sample Size.” BMC Medical Research Methodology9(56):1-5.
64.
NussenbaumK.HartleyC. A.. 2019. “Reinforcement Learning Across Development: What Insights Can We Draw from a Decade of Research?”. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience40:100733.
65.
NussenbaumK.VelezJ. A.WashingtonB. T.HamlingH. E.HartleyC. A.. 2022. “Flexibility in Valenced Reinforcement Learning Computations Across Development”. Child Development93(5):1601-15.
66.
OatenM.WilliamsK. D.JonesA.ZadroL.. 2008. “The Effects of Ostracism on Self-regulation in the Socially Anxious”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology27(5):471-504.
67.
O'BrienL.AlbertD.CheinJ.SteinbergL.. 2011. “Adolescents Prefer More Immediate Rewards When in the Presence of Their Peers.” Journal of Research on Adolescence21(4):747–53.
68.
OsgoodD. W.WilsonJ. K.O'MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.JohnstonL. D.. 1996. “Routine Activities and Individual Deviant Behavior.” American Sociological Review61(4):635–55.
69.
PaternosterR.McGloinJ. M.NguyenH.ThomasK. J.. 2013. “The Causal Impact of Exposure to Deviant Peers: An Experimental Investigation.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency50(4):476–503.
70.
PauwelsL. J. R.WeermanF. M.BruinsmaG. J. N.BernascoW.. 2015. “How Much Variance in Offending, Self-Control and Morality can be Explained by Neighbourhoods and Schools? An Exploratory Cross-Classified Multi-Level Analysis.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research21:523–37.
71.
PogarskyG.PiqueroA. R.PaternosterR.. 2004. “Modeling Change in Perceptions About Sanction Threats: The Neglected Linkage in Deterrence Theory”. Journal of Quantitative Criminology20:343-69.
72.
PogarskyG.RocheS. P.PickettJ. T.. 2017. “Heuristics and Biases, Rational Choice, and Sanction Perceptions.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal55(1):85–111.
73.
RajchertJ.WiniewskiM.. 2016. “The Behavioral Approach and Inhibition Systems' Role in Shaping the Displaced and Direct Aggressive Reaction to Ostracism and Rejection”. Personality and Individual Differences88:272-79.
74.
RepettiR. L.1996. “The Effects of Perceived Daily Social and Academic Failure Experiences on School-Age Children's Subsequent Interactions with Parents”. Child Development67(4):1467-82.
75.
RossH. L.1981. Deterring the Drinking Driver: Legal Policy and Social Control. Lexington, MA: Heath.
76.
RowanZ. R.KanE.FrickP. J.CauffmanE.. 2022. “Not (Entirely) Guilty: The Role of Co-Offenders in Diffusing Responsibility for Crime.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency59(4):415–48.
77.
RustichiniA.DomenechP.CivaiC.DeYoungC. G.. 2023. “Working Memory and Attention in Choice.” Plos one18(10):e0284127.
78.
SchapiroK.JosićK.KilpatrickZ. P.GoldJ. I.. 2022. “Strategy-dependent Effects of Working-Memory Limitations on Human Perceptual Decision-Making.” Elife11:e73610.
79.
SchneidersJ.NicolsonN. A.BerkhofJ.FeronF. J.DevriesM. W.Van OsJ.. 2007. “Mood in Daily Contexts: Relationship with Risk in Early Adolescence”. Journal of Research on Adolescence17(4):697-722.
80.
SebastianC. L.TanG. C.RoiserJ. P.VidingE.DumontheilI.BlakemoreS.-J.. 2011. “Developmental Influences on the Neural Bases of Responses to Social Rejection: Implications of Social Neuroscience for Education.” NeuroImage57(3):686–94.
81.
SebastianC.VidingE.WilliamsK. D.BlakemoreS. J.. 2010. “Social Brain Development and the Affective Consequences of Ostracism in Adolescence.” Brain and Cognition72(1):134–45.
82.
ShermanL. W.1990. “Police Crackdowns: Initial and Residual Deterrence”. Crime and Justice12:1-48.
83.
ShermanL. W.RoganD. P.. 1995. “Effects of Gun Seizures on Gun Violence: 'Hot Spots' Patrol in Kansas City”. Justice Quarterly12(4):673-93.
84.
ShortJ. F.StrodtbeckF. L.. 1965. Group Process and Gang Delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
SilkJ. S.StroudL. R.SiegleG. J.DahlR. E.LeeK. H.NelsonE. E.. 2012. “Peer Acceptance and Rejection Through the Eyes of Youth: Pupillary, Eyetracking and Ecological Data from the Chatroom Interact Task”. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience7(1):93-105.
86.
SilvaK.CheinJ.SteinbergL.. 2016. “Adolescents in Peer Groups Make More Prudent Decisions When a Slightly Older Adult Is Present”. Psychological Science27(3):322-30.
87.
SomervilleL. H.2013. “The Teenage Brain: Sensitivity to Social Evaluation”. Current Directions in Psychological Science22(2):121-27.
88.
SomervilleL. H.JonesR. M.RuberryE. J.DykeJ. P.GloverG.CaseyB. J.. 2013. “The Medial Prefrontal Cortex and the Emergence of Self-Conscious Emotion in Adolescence”. Psychological Science24(8):1554-62.
89.
StaffordM. C.WarrM.. 1993. “A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence”. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30(2):123-35.
90.
SutherlandE. H.1947. Principles of Criminology. 4th ed.Chicago: Lippincott.
91.
TeunissenH. A.SpijkermanR.LarsenH.KremerK. A.KuntscheE.GibbonsF. X.EngelsR. C.. 2012. “Stereotypic Information About Drinkers and Students’ Observed Alcohol Intake: An Experimental Study on Prototype–Behavior Relations in Males and Females in a Naturalistic Drinking Context.” Drug and Alcohol Dependence125(3):301–6.
92.
TimonedaJ. C.2021. “Estimating Group Fixed-Effects in Panel Data with a Binary Dependent variable: How the LPM Outperforms Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.” Social Science Research93:102486.
93.
TopelS.MaI.SleutelsJ.Van SteenbergenH.De BruijnE. R.Van DuijvenvoordeA. C.. 2023. “Expecting the Unexpected: A Review of Learning Under Uncertainty Across Development”. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience23(3):718-38.
94.
TwengeJ. M.ZhangL.CataneseK. R.Dolan-PascoeB.LycheL. F.BaumeisterR. F.. 2007. “Replenishing Connectedness: Reminders of Social Activity Reduce Aggression After Social Exclusion”. British Journal of Social Psychology46(1):205-24.
95.
van den BosE.De RooijM.MiersA. C.BokhorstC. L.WestenbergP. M.. 2014. “Adolescents' Increasing Stress Response to Social Evaluation: Pubertal Effects on Cortisol and Alpha-Amylase During Public Speaking”. Child Development85(1):220-36.
96.
Van GelderJ. L.2013. “Beyond Rational Choice: The hot/Cool Perspective of Criminal Decision Making.” Psychology, Crime & Law19(9):745–63.
97.
Van GelderJ. L.2017 “Dual-process Models of Criminal Decision Making.” Pp. 166–80 in The Oxford Handbook of Offender Decision Making, edited by BernascoW.ElffersH.van GelderJ. L.. New York: Oxford University Press.
98.
Van HalemS.HoebenE. M.BernascoW.Ter BogtT. F. M.. 2016. “Measuring Short and Rare Activities: Time Diaries in Criminology.” Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research13(1):1–33.
99.
Van HoornJ.CroneE. A.Van LeijenhorstL.. 2017. “Hanging out with the Right Crowd: Peer Influence on Risk-Taking Behavior in Adolescence.” Journal of Research on Adolescence27(1):189–200.
100.
Van HoornJ.Van DijkE.MeuweseR.RieffeC.CroneE. A.. 2016. “Peer Influence on Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence.” Journal of Research on Adolescence26(1):90–100.
101.
Van SleeuwenS. E. M.SteenbeekW.RuiterS.. 2021. “When do Offenders Commit Crime? An Analysis of Temporal Consistency in Individual Offending Patterns.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology37:863–89.
102.
VerduynP.DelaveauP.RotgéJ.-Y.FossatiP.Van MechelenI.. 2015. “Determinants of Emotion Duration and Underlying Psychological and Neural Mechanisms.” Emotion Review7(4):330–5.
103.
VerduynP.DelvauxE.Van CoillieH.TuerlinckxF.Van MechelenI.. 2009. “Predicting the Duration of Emotional Experience: Two Experience Sampling Studies.” Emotion9(1):83–91.
104.
VerduynP.LavrijsenS.. 2015. “Which Emotions Last Longest and why: The Role of Event Importance and Rumination.” Motivation and Emotion39(1):119–27.
105.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F.CiaroccoN. J.. 2005. “Self-Regulation and Self-Presentation: Regulatory Resource Depletion Impairs Impression Management and Effortful Self-Presentation Depletes Regulatory Resources”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88(4):632-57.
106.
Vohs et al. 2021. “A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the ego-Depletion Effect.” Psychological Science32(10):1566–81.
107.
WarrM.2002. Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
108.
WeermanF. M.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. J.PauwelsL. J.. 2015. “When is Spending Time with Peers Related to Delinquency? The Importance of Where, What, and with Whom.” Crime & Delinquency61(10):1386–413.
109.
WeigardA.CheinJ.AlbertD.SmithA.SteinbergL.. 2014. “Effects of Anonymous Peer Observation on Adolescents' Preference for Immediate Rewards”. Developmental Science17(1):71-78.
110.
WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P.. 2009. “Public Area CCTV and Crime Prevention: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Justice Quarterly26(4):716–45.
111.
WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P.DouglasS.. 2022. “The Impact and Policy Relevance of Street Lighting for Crime Prevention: A Systematic Review Based on a Half-Century of Evaluation Research.” Criminology and Public Policy21(3):739-65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12585
112.
WikströmP. O. H.TreiberK.HardieB.. 2012 “Examining the Role of the Environment in Crime Causation: Small-Area Community Surveys and Space-Time Budgets.” Pp. 111–27 in The SAGE Handbook of Criminological Research Methods, edited by GaddD.MessnerS. F.KarstedtS.. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
113.
WrightR.DeckerS.. 1994. Burglars on the Job: Streetlife and Residential Break-Ins. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
114.
XuJ.WangH.LiuS.HaleM. E.WengX.AhemaitijiangN.HanZ. R.. 2023. “Relations Among Family, Peer, and Academic Stress and Adjustment in Chinese Adolescents: A Daily Diary Analysis”. Developmental Psychology59(7):1346-58.
