In 1996, California provided funding to 14 county probation agencies to implement multiagency, comprehensive services to keep troubled youths from recommitting crime and progressing farther into the justice system. We report results of a randomized experiment used to evaluate Ventura County’s 4-year demonstration project called the South Oxnard Challenge Project (SOCP). We followed youths for more than 2 years after random assignment to SOCP or routine probation. We found no significant differences between SOCP and routine juvenile probationers on recidivism or other official-record outcomes. Although most youths were rearrested, most did not receive a sustained petition or incarceration. The modest additional services did not affect outcomes.
Altschuler, D. M. (1998). Intermediate sanctions and community treatment for serious and violent juvenile offenders. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 367-385). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
American Probation and Parole Association. (2000, September). Juvenile probation in the United States: A white paper (Prepared for the Probation Services Task Force of the California Administrative Office of the Courts). Available at www2.courtinfo.ca.gov/probation/reference.htm
3.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990).Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
4.
Austin, J., Joe, K., Krisberg, B., & Steele, P. A. (1990). The impact of juvenile court sanctions: A court that works. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
5.
Baird, C. (1991). Intensive supervision programs for high-risk juveniles: Critical issues for program evaluation. In T. L. Armstrong (Ed.), Intensive interventions with high risk youths: Promising approaches in juvenile probation and parole (pp. 295-315). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
6.
Barton, W. H., & Butts, J. A. (1990). Viable options: Intensive supervision programs for juvenile delinquents. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 238-256.
7.
Barton, W. H., & Butts, J. A. (1991). Intensive supervision alternatives for adjudicated juveniles. In T. L. Armstrong (Ed.), Intensive interventions with high risk youths: Promising approaches in juvenile probation and parole (pp. 317-340). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
8.
Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function of the juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 296-316.
9.
Bazemore, G., & Walgrave, L. (1999). Restorative juvenile justice: In search of fundamentals and an outline for systemic reform. In G. Bazemore & L. Walgrave (Eds.), Restorative juvenile justice: Repairing the harm of youth crime (pp.45-74). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
10.
Black, M. C. (2001). Juvenile delinquency probation caseload, 1989-1998. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
11.
Boruch, R. F. (1997). Randomized experiments for planning and evaluation: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. S. (1966, October 1). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
13.
Clear, T. R. (1996a). Community justice: Philosophy and strategy. Unpublished manuscript.
14.
Clear, T. R. (1996b). Toward a corrections of “place”: The challenge of “community” in corrections. National Institute of Justice Journal, 231, 52-56.
15.
Clear, T. R., & Corbett, R. P. (1998). The community corrections of place. In Crime and place: Plenary papers of the 1997 conference on criminal justice research and evaluation (pp. 69-80). Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
16.
Clear, T. R., & Corbett, R. P. (1999). Community corrections of place. Perspectives, 23, 24-32.
17.
Clear, T. R., & Karp, D. R. (1998). Community justice: An essay. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 49-60.
18.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
19.
Corbett, R. P., Jr. (1999). Juvenile probation on the eve of the next millennium. Federal Probation, 63, 78-86.
20.
Elrod, H. P., & Minor, K. I. (1992). Second wave evaluation of a multi-faceted intervention for juvenile court probationers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 36, 247-262.
21.
Fagan, J., & Reinarman, C. (1991). The social context of intensive supervision: Organizational and ecological influences on community treatment. In T. L. Armstrong (Ed.), Intensive interventions with high risk youths: Promising approaches in juvenile probation and parole (pp. 341-394). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
22.
Farrington, D. P. (2003). A short history of randomized experiments in criminology: A meager feast. Evaluation Review, 27, 218-227.
23.
Feinberg, N. (1991). Juvenile intensive supervision: A longitudinal evaluation of program effectiveness. In T. L. Armstrong (Ed.), Intensive interventions with high risk youths: Promising approaches in juvenile probation and parole (pp. 423-447). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
24.
Fox, J. A. (1996). Trends in juvenile violence: A report to the United States Attorney General on current and future rates of juvenile offending. Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25.
Greenwood, P. W. (1994). What works with juvenile offenders: A synthesis of the literature and experience. Federal Probation, 58, 63-67.
26.
Karp, D. R., Lane, J., & Turner, S. (2002). Ventura County and the theory of community justice. In D. R. Karp & T. R. Clear (Eds.), What is community justice? Case studies of restorative justice and community supervision (pp. 3-33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Krisberg, B., & Howell, J. C. (1998). The impact of the juvenile justice system and prospects for graduated sanctions in a comprehensive strategy. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious& violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp.346-366). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Krisberg, B., Rodriguez, O., Baake, A., Neuenfeldt, D., & Steele, P. (1989). Demonstration of post adjudication non-residential intensive supervision programs: Assessment report. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
29.
Lipsey, M. W. (1992).Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the ariability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, et al. (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
30.
Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Minor, K. I., & Elrod, H. P. (1990). The effects of a multi-faceted intervention on the offense activities of juvenile probationers. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation, 15, 87-108.
32.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2001). Juvenile crime and juvenile justice (Panel on Juvenile Crime: Prevention, Treatment and Control. J. McCord, C. S. Widom, & N. A. Crowell [Eds.], Committee on Law and Justice and Board on Children, Youth and Families). Washington DC: National Academy Press.
33.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1995). Guide for implementing the comprehensive strategy for serious, violent and chronic offenders. Washington DC: Author.
34.
Palmer, T. (1992). The re-emergence of correctional intervention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Palmer, T. (1994). A profile of correctional effectiveness and new directions for research. Albany: State University of New York Press.
36.
Palmer, T. (2002). Individualized intervention with young multiple offenders. New York: Routledge.
37.
Petersilia, J. (1993). Measuring the performance of community corrections. In Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 61-84). Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
38.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol.17. pp.281-336). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Presser, L., & Van Voorhis, P. (2002). Values and evaluation: Assessing processes and outcomes of restorative justice programs. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 162-188.
40.
Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
41.
Sontheimer, H., & Goodstein, L. (1993). An evaluation of juvenile intensive aftercare probation: Aftercare versus system response effects. Justice Quarterly, 10(2), 197-227.
42.
Torbet, P. M. (1996). Juvenile probation: The workhorse of the juvenile justice system. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
43.
Turner, S., Schroeder, A., Fain, T., Lane, J., & Petersilia, J., (2002). Evaluation of the South Oxnard Challenge Project, 1997-2001 (MR-1520-VC). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
44.
Weibush, R. G. (1993). Juvenile intensive supervision: The impact on felony offenders diverted from institutional placement. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 68-89.
45.
Whitehead, J. T., & Lab, S.P. (1989). A meta-analysis of juvenile correctional treatment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 276-295.
46.
Wilson, J. J., & Howell, J. C. (1995). Comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.), A sourcebook: Serious, violent, & chronic juvenile offenders (pp. 36-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Wooldredge, J. D. (1988). Differentiating the effects of juvenile court sentences on eliminating recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 264-300.
48.
Zhang, S. X. (1996). The efficiency of working under one roof: An evaluation of Los Angeles County juvenile justice centers. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 257-268.
