During the course of the last decade, Israel’s Juvenile Probation Service (JPS) added Victim Offender Mediation (VOM), an important example of restorative justice, to its repertoire of diagnostic, therapeutic and caring practices for young offenders. The introduction of VOM represented a major shift from its traditional service orientation.
When first established by the British Mandate over Palestine in the 1930s, the primary beneficiaries of the probation services were His Majesty’s Courts and their British judges. Later, after the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the JPS specialized in assessing and supervising young offenders. The introduction of VOM meant the acknowledgement by the JPS of the victims of its young clientele. This acknowledgement blurred the boundaries of the JPS’s traditional mission, operations and clientele. This paper describes how this new orientation in the work of the JPS came about. In doing so it draws on some of the findings of a qualitative research study, findings that serve to highlight some of the main issues that arose along the way.
AbrahamsonERosenkopfL (1997) Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science8(3): 289–309.
2.
AcornA (2004) Compulsory Compassion: A Critique of Restorative Justice. Vancouver: UBC Press.
3.
AjzenstadtM (2002) Crime, social control, and the process of social classification: Juvenile delinquency/justice discourse in Israel, 1948–1970. Social Problems49(4): 585–604.
4.
AjzenstadtM (2005) Reactions to juvenile delinquency in Israel, 1950–1970: A social narrative. Journal of Policy History17(4): 404–424.
5.
AshworthA (1998) The Criminal Process: An Evaluative Study (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BecklandRPritchardW (1992) Changing the Essence: The Art of Creating and Leading Fundamental Change in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BeijerseJ uitVan SwaaningenR (2006) The Netherlands: Penal-welfarism and risk management. In MuncieJGoldsonB (eds) Comparative Youth Justice. London: Sage, 65–78.
8.
BorowskiAAjzenstadtM (2007) Achieving justice for children. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology51 (April): 191–211.
BrookesD (2004) Restorative justice in Scotland’s youth justice system. In: McGheeJMeltonMWhyteB (eds) Addressing Deeds: Working with Young People Who Offend. London: NCH.
11.
ChanJBL (ed.) (2005) Reshaping Juvenile Justice: The NSW Young Offenders Act 1997. University of Sydney Faculty of Law, Institute of Criminology Series, No. 22.
12.
ChristieN (1977) Conflict as property. British Journal of Criminology17(1): 1–15.
FeldBC (1999) Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
FenwickM (2006) Japan: From child protection to penal populism. In: MuncieJGoldsonB (eds) Comparative Youth Justice. London: Sage, 147–158.
20.
GalT (2011) Child Victims and Restorative Justice: A Needs-Rights Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
HancockMR (1997) Principles of Social Work Practice: A Generic Practice Approach. New York: Haworth Press.
22.
Henderson HurleyM (2009) Restorative practices in institutional settings and at release: Victim wrap around programs. Federal Probation73(1): 16–22.
23.
HudsonB (2002) Restorative justice and gendered violence. British Journal of Criminology42(3): 616–634.
24.
JonesTNewburnT (2007) Policy Transfer and Criminal Justice: Exploring US Influence over British Crime Control Policy. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
25.
KandelIArieYGlasnerS (2007) Criminal mediation for minors in Israel. The Scientific World Journal: Child Health and Human Development7; 336–340.
26.
KeeleyP (ed.) (2001) Restorative Justice: Challenges and Benefits for Irish Society. Dublin: National Conference on Restorative Justice.
27.
KingMSFreibergABatagolBHyamsR (2009) Non Adversarial Justice. Sydney: The Federation Press.
28.
KuhnTS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
LandauT (2004) How to put the community in community-based justice: Some views of participants in criminal court diversion. The Howard Journal43(2): 131–148.
30.
McAraL (2006) Welfare in crisis? Key developments in Scottish youth justice. In: MuncieJGoldsonB (eds) Comparative Youth Justice. London: Sage, 127–145.
31.
MiersD (2001) An International Review of Restorative Justice. Crime Reduction Research Series, paper 10. London: Home Office, Building a Safe Just and Tolerant Society.
32.
MiersDWillemsenJ (eds) (2004) Mapping Restorative Justice: Developments in 25 European Countries. Leuven: European Forum for Victim–Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice v.z.w.
33.
MarshallT (1999) Restorative Justice: An Overview. London; Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
O’ConnorI (1997) Models of juvenile justice. In: BorowskiAO’ConnorI (eds) Juvenile Crime, Justice and Corrections. South Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman, 229–253.
36.
RivkinDYdgarSS (2007) The Evaluation of the Family Group Conferencing Project. Jerusalem: Myers, JDC, Brookdale Institute (Ref. DM/491/07, in Hebrew).
37.
SegevT (2001) One Palestine Complete: Jews and Arabs under the British Mandate. New York: Owl Books.
38.
Shachaf-FriedmanETimorU (2008) Family group conferencing in Israel: The voices of victims following restorative justice proceedings. In: RonelNJaishankarKBenssimonM (eds) Trends and Issues in Victimology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 57–87.
39.
ShermanLWStrangH (2007) Restorative Justice: The Evidence. London: The Smith Institute.
40.
StoneD (2001) Learning lessons: Transfer and the international diffusion of policy ideas. Working Paper No 69/01. Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
41.
StrangDSouleSA (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology24: 265–290.
42.
UmbreitMS (2008) Family Group Conferencing: Implications for Crime Victims. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime.
43.
Von HirschARobertsJBottomsAERoachKSchiffM (eds) (2003) Restorative Justice & Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms?Oxford: Hart Publishing.
44.
WalderseeRGriffithsABLaiJ (2003) Predicting organizational change success: Matching organization type, change type and capabilities. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship8(1): 66–81.
45.
WalgraveL (2007) Integrating criminal justice and restorative justice. In: JohnstoneGVan NessDW (eds) Handbook of Restorative Justice. Oregon: Willan Publishing, 559–579.
WeissI (2001) The ideology, policy and practice of adult probation service in Israel. British Journal of Social Work31: 775–789.
48.
WilcoxAYoungRHoyleC (2004) An Evaluation of the Impact of Restorative Cautioning: Findings from a Reconviction Study. Home Office Research Findings255. London: Home Office.
49.
YanayUSharvitRGrabliS (2001) Victim–offender conferencing: A way to reconciliation and reducing crime in the community. Society and Welfare21(1): 27–50 (in Hebrew).
50.
YanayUGrabliS (2007) Victim Offender Conferencing: Evaluating the Process and Its Outcomes in the Israeli Youth Probation Services. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, The Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare and The Ministry of Welfare and Social Services, The Youth Probation Services (in Hebrew).
51.
ZlaticJMWilkersonDCMcAllisterSM (2010) Pretrial diversion: The overlooked pretrial services evidence based practice. Federal Probation74(1): 28–43.
