Traditional mandated community service (CS) typically consists of picking up trash or performing manual labor, distanced from the community. Some juvenile justice programs have begun to implement restorative community service (RCS) programs that enable youth to complete meaningful CS projects in a shame-free manner alongside community members. This study compared RCS with a standard community service (SCS) program in two counties in Washington State on psychosocial outcomes, including attitudes, peer relationships, school conduct, academic performance, and substance use. Recidivism was also examined. RCS was associated with reduced substance use and fewer school conduct difficulties compared with SCS, and also positively influenced peer relationships and attitudes. These findings suggest that adding a restorative component to CS may improve psychosocial outcomes for justice-involved youth, but there was no evidence that adding a restorative component to CS led to reduced recidivism. Additional systematic studies are needed to determine whether these findings replicate.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.
2.
AsscherJ. J.Van der PutC. E.StamsG. J. J. M. (2015). Gender differences in the impact of abuse and neglect victimization on adolescent offending behavior. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9668-4
3.
AstinA. W.SaxL. J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Service Participation, 39(3), 251–263.
4.
AustinP. C. (2009). Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 3083–3107. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3697
5.
BarnoskiR. (2004). Washington State juvenile court assessment manual, version 2.1. Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
6.
BazemoreG.KarpD. (2004). A civic justice corps: Community service as a means of reintegration. Justice Policy Journal, 1, 1–35.
7.
BazemoreG.MaloneyD. (1994). Rehabilitating community service: Toward restorative service sanctions in a balanced justice system. Federal Probation, 58(1), 24–35.
8.
BazemoreG.McLeodC. (2012). Restorative justice and the future of diversion and informal social control. In WeitekampE.KernerH.-J. (Eds.), Restorative justice: Theoretical foundations (pp. 143–176). Willan.
9.
BazemoreG.SchiffM. (2015). Restorative community justice: Repairing harm and transforming communities. Routledge. (Original work published 2001)
10.
BazemoreG.StinchcombJ. (2004). A civic engagement model of reentry: Involving community through service and restorative justice. Federal Probation, 68(2), 14–24.
11.
BishopD. M.LeiberM.JohnsonJ. (2010). Contexts of decision making in the juvenile justice system: An organizational approach to understanding minority overrepresentation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204009361177
12.
BouffardJ. A.MuftićL. R. (2006). Program completion and recidivism outcomes among adult offenders ordered to complete a community service sentence. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v43n02_01
13.
BouffardJ. A.MuftićL. R. (2007). The effectiveness of community service sentences compared to traditional fines for low-level offenders. The Prison Journal, 87(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507303741
14.
BugbeeB. A.BeckK. H.FryerC. S.ArriaA. M. (2019). Substance use, academic performance, and academic engagement among high school seniors. Journal of School Health, 89(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12723
15.
CaldwellL. L.SmithE. A. (2006). Leisure as a context for youth development and delinquency prevention. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(3), 398–418.
16.
ChassinL. (2008). Juvenile justice and substance use. The Future of Children, 18(2), 165–183.
17.
ChouhyC.CullenF. T.LeeH. (2020). A social support theory of desistance. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 6(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-020-00146-4
DishionT. J.McCordJ.PoulinF. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54(9), 755–764.
20.
DishionT. J.TipsordJ. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 189–214.
21.
ElonheimoH.SouranderA.NiemeläS.NuutilaA. M.HeleniusH.SillanmäkiL.RistkariT.ParkkolaK. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of police-registered youth crime. A Finnish population-based study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 63(4), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100412
22.
FarringtonD. P.LoeberR.TtofiM. M. (2012). Risk and protective factors for offending. In WelshB.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 46–69). Oxford University Press.
23.
FlanaganC. A.KimT.ColluraJ.KopishM. A. (2015). Community service and adolescents’ social capital. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12137
24.
GellerJ. D. (2011). Probing the relationship between volunteering and substance abuse in adolescence: A test of two explanations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Vanderbilt University.
25.
GelsthropeL.RexS. (2004). Community service as reintegration: Exploring the potential. In MairG. (Ed.), What matters in probation (pp. 229–254). Willan.
26.
Gifford-SmithM.DodgeK. A.DishionT. J.McCordJ. (2005). Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3563-7
27.
HansenT.UmbreitM. S. (2018). State of knowledge: Four decades of victim-offender mediation research and practice: The evidence. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 36(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21234
28.
HarderV. S.StuartE. A.AnthonyJ. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019623
29.
HawkinsJ. D.CatalanoR. F.MillerJ. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64
30.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl013
31.
JobV.FrieseM.BerneckerK. (2015). Effects of practicing self-control on academic performance. Motivation Science, 1(4), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000024
32.
KaddenR. M.LittM. D. (2011). The role of self-efficacy in the treatment of substance use disorders. Addictive Behaviors, 36(12), 1120–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.032
33.
KhanL.ParsonageM.StubbsJ. (2015). Investing in children’s mental health. A review of evidence on the costs and benefits of increased service provision. Center for Mental Health.
34.
KnothL.WannerP.HeL. (2019). Washington state’s aggression replacement training for juvenile court youth: Outcome evaluation (Document Number 19-06-1201). Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
35.
KristjanssonA. L.JamesJ. E.AllegranteJ. P.SigfusdottirI. D.HelgasonA. R. (2010). Adolescent substance use, parental monitoring, and leisure-time activities: 12-year outcomes of primary prevention in Iceland. Preventive Medicine, 51(2), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.05.001
36.
LatimerJ.DowdenC.MuiseD. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505276969
37.
LeiberM. J.PeckJ. H. (2012). Race in juvenile justice and sentencing policy: An overview of research and policy recommendations. Law & Inequality, 31(2), 331–339.
38.
LutzW.SchiefeleA. K.WucherpfennigF.RubelJ.StulzN. (2016). Clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in routine care: A propensity score based comparison between randomized controlled trials and clinical practice. Journal of Affective Disorders, 189(1), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.072
39.
MackinnonS. P. (2012). Perceived social support and academic achievement: Cross-lagged panel and bivariate growth curve analyses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(4), 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9691-1
40.
McIvorG. (2016). What is the impact of community service? In McNeillF.DurnescuI.ButterR. (Eds.), Probation: 12 essential questions (pp. 107–128). Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
MillerM.FumiaD.HeL. (2015). The King County Education and Employment Training (EET) program: Outcome evaluation and benefit-cost analysis (Doc. No. 15-12-3901). Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
42.
MorrisN.TonryM. (1991). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. Oxford University Press.
43.
MurrayJ.FarringtonD. P. (2010). Risk factors for conduct disorder and delinquency: Key findings from longitudinal studies. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(10), 633–642.
44.
O’NeillM. E.MathewsK. (2000). Theory & methods: A weighted least squares approach to Levene’s test of homogeneity of variance. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 42(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-842X.00109
45.
PetersonA. (2017). Functional Family Therapy in a probation setting: Outcomes for youths starting treatment January 2010–September 2012. Center for Court Research, Administrative Office of the Courts.
46.
PhelpsM. S. (2018). Ending mass probation. The Future of Children, 28(1), 125–146.
47.
RubinD.ThomasN. (1996). Matching using estimated propensity scores: Relating theory to practice. Biometrics, 52(1), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533160
48.
RutherfordA. (2001). Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA: A GLM approach. SAGE.
ShaT. (2006). Optimism, pessimism and depression; the relations and differences by stress level and gender. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38(6), 886–901.
51.
SpenglerM.DamianR. I.RobertsB. W. (2018). How you behave in school predicts life success above and beyond family background, broad traits, and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 620–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000185
52.
StrangH.BraithwaiteJ. (Eds.). (2017). Restorative justice: Philosophy to practice. Routledge.
53.
SuzukiM.WoodW. R. (2018). Is restorative justice conferencing appropriate for youth offenders?Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817722188
54.
Tanner-SmithE. E.WilsonS. J.LipseyM. W. (2013). The comparative effectiveness of outpatient treatment for adolescent substance abuse: A meta-analysis. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.05.006
55.
TaylorA. S.LoSciutoL.FoxM.HilbertS. M.SonkowskyM. (1999). The mentoring factor: Evaluation of the across ages’ intergenerational approach to drug abuse prevention. Child and Youth Services, 20(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1300/J024v20n01_07
56.
TolanP. H.HenryD. B.SchoenyM. S.LovegroveP.NicholsE. (2014). Mentoring programs to affect delinquency and associated outcomes of youth at risk: A comprehensive meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9181-4
57.
ValdebenitoS.EisnerM.FarringtonD. P.TtofiM. M.SutherlandA. (2019). What can we do to reduce disciplinary school exclusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 253–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-09351-0
58.
Van der PutC. E.CreemersH. E.HoeveM. (2014). Differences between juvenile offenders with and without substance use problems in the prevalence and impact of risk and protective factors for criminal recidivism. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 134(1), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.10.012
59.
WattsA. S. (2016). Probation in-depth: The length of probation sentences. Robina Institute of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice.
60.
WoodW. R. (2012). Correcting community service: From work crews to community work in a juvenile court. Justice Quarterly, 29(5), 684–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.576688
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
