Although a common practice in many legal systems, plea bargaining (PB) tends to be held in low esteem by the public at large. In the present study, which was based on a survey of a national sample of Israeli respondents, a factorial design methodology was used to examine public attitudes toward varied PB scenarios. It was hypothesized that opening up PB procedures to parties other than the traditionally involved “insiders” would enhance public support for PB. The findings of the study generally confirmed this hypothesis, albeit not completely: The effect of decreased covertness was minimal. This article concludes with a discussion of the policy implications of the findings.
Alschuler, A.
(1968). The prosecutor’s role in plea bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review, 36, 50-112.
2.
Alschuler, A.
(1976). The trial judge’s role in plea bargaining, Part 1. Columbia Law Review, 76, 1059-1154.
3.
Applegate, B.
, Cullen, F., Link, B., Richards, P., & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1996). Determinants of public punitiveness toward drunk driving: A factorial survey approach. Justice Quarterly, 13(1), 57-79.
4.
Ashworth, A.
(1993). Victim impact statements and sentencing. Criminal Law Review, 7, 498-509.
5.
Ashworth, A.
(1998). The criminal process: An evaluative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 97 (1977).
7.
Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 360-5 (1978).
8.
Central Bureau of Statistics
. (2002). Statistical abstract of Israel. Jerusalem: Author.
9.
Cohen, A.
, & Abman-Muller, E. (2001). Passive judge or active judge? A suggestion for a judicial involvement in plea bargaining. Mishpatim, 31(3), 745-765.
10.
Cohen, S.
, & Doob, A. (1989). Public attitudes to plea bargaining. Criminal Law Quarterly, 32(1), 85-109.
11.
Cullen, F.
, Fisher, B., & Applegate, B. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1-79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Daudistel, H.
(1980). On the elimination of plea bargaining: The El Paso experiment. In W. McDonald & J. Cramer (Eds.), Plea bargaining (pp. 57-74). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
13.
Emmelman, D.
(1996). Trial by plea bargain: Case settlement as a product of recursive decision-making. Law and Society Review, 30(2), 335-360.
14.
Erez, E.
(1994). Victim participation in sentencing: And the debate goes on...International Review of Victimology, 3, 17-32.
15.
Fagan, R.
(1981). Public support for the courts: An examination of alternative explanations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9(6), 403-417.
16.
Flanagan, T.
(1987). Change and influence in popular criminology: Public attributions of crime causation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15(2), 231-243.
17.
Flanagan, T.
, & Caufield, S. (1984). Public opinion and prison policy: A review. Prison Journal, 64: 39-59.
18.
Flanagan, T.
, McGarrell, E., & Brown, E. (1985). Public perceptions and criminal courts: The role of demographic and related attitudinal data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(1), 66-82.
19.
Gifford, D.
(1983). Meaningful reform of plea bargaining: The control of prosecutorial discretion. University of Illinois Law Review, pp. 37-98.
20.
Golash, D.
, & Lynch, J. (1995). Public opinion, crime seriousness, and sentencing policy. American Journal of Criminal Law, 22(3), 703-732.
21.
Haberfeld, M.
, & Herzog, S. (2000). The criminal justice system in Israel. In O. Ebbe (Ed.), Comparative and international criminal justice systems: Policing, judiciary and corrections (pp. 55-78). New York: Butterworth-Heinemman.
22.
Hall, D.
(1991). Victim voices in criminal court: The need for restraint. American Criminal Law Review, 28, 233-266.
23.
Harnon, E.
(1997). Plea bargaining in Israel: The adequate distribution of roles between prosecution and court and the status of the victim. Mishpatim, 27(3), 543-604.
24.
Heller, N.
, & McEwen, T. (1975). Applications of crime seriousness information in a police department. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 44-50.
25.
Herman, G.
(1997). Plea bargaining. Charlottesville, VA: Lexis Law.
26.
Heumann, M.
, & Loftin, C. (1979). Mandatory sentencing and the abolition of plea bargaining: The Michigan felony firearm statute. Law and Society Review, 13(2), 393-430.
27.
Jacoby, J.
, & Cullen, F. (1999). The structure of punishment norms: Applying the Rossi-Berk model. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89(1), 245-312.
28.
LaFree, G.
(1985). Adversarial and nonadversarial justice: A comparison of guilty pleas and trials. Criminology, 23(2), 289-312.
29.
Marenin, O.
(1995). The state of plea bargaining in Alaska. Journal of Crime and Justice, 18(1), 167-197.
30.
McCorkle, R.
(1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes toward six common crimes. Crime & Delinquency, 39(2), 240-252.
31.
McCoy, C.
(1993). Politics and plea bargaining: Victim’s rights in California. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
32.
Nasheri, H.
(1998). Betrayal of due process: A comparative assessment of plea bargaining in the United States and Canada. New York: University Press of America.
33.
Odegard, E.
(1995). Legality and legitimacy: On attitudes to drugs and social sanctions. British Journal of Criminology, 35(4), 525-542.
34.
Rich, R.
, & Sampson, R. (1990). Public perceptions of criminal justice policy: Does victimization make a difference?Violence and Victims, 5(2), 109-118.
35.
Roberts, J.
(1992). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 16, pp. 99-180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Rosett, A.
, & Cressey, D. (1976). Justice by consent. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
37.
Rossi, P.
, & Anderson, A. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In P. Rossi & S. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach (pp. 15-78). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
Rossi, P.
, & Berk, R. (1997). Just punishments: Federal guidelines and public views compared. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
39.
Rossi, P.
, Simpson, J., & Miller, J. (1985). Beyond crime seriousness: Fitting the punishment to the crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1(1), 59-89.
40.
Rossi, P.
, Waite, E., Bose, C., & Berk, R. (1974). The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences. American Sociological Review, 39(2), 224-237.
41.
Rubel, H.
(1986). Victim participation in sentencing proceedings. Criminal Law Quarterly, 28, 226-250.
42.
Sanborn, J.
(1993). Philosophical, legal, and systemic aspects of juvenile court plea bargaining. Crime & Delinquency, 39(4), 509-527.
43.
Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 260-1 (1971).
44.
Sarat, A.
(1975). Support for the legal system: An analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. American Politics Quarterly, 3(1), 3-24.
45.
Schlesinger, J.
, & Malloy, D. (1981). Plea bargaining and the judiciary: An argument for reform. Drake Law Review, 30, 581-597.
46.
Scott, R.
, & Stuntz, W. (1992). Plea bargaining as contract. Yale Law Journal, 101, 1909-1968.
47.
Sellin, T.
, & Wolfgang, M. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. New York: John Wiley.
48.
Thomson, D.
, & Ragona, A. (1987). Popular moderation versus governmental authoritarianism: An interactionist view of public sentiments toward criminal sanctions. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 337-357.
49.
Tyler, T.
(1990). Why people obey the law. London: Yale University Press.
50.
Victim Support.
(1995). The rights of victims of crime. London: Author.
51.
Warr, M.
(1989). What is the perceived seriousness of crimes?Criminology, 27(4), 795-821.
52.
Welling, S.
(1987). Victim participation in plea bargains. Washington University Law Quarterly, 65(2), 301-356.
53.
Wolfgang, M.
, Figlio, R., Tracy, P., & Singer, S. (1985). The national survey of crime severity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
54.
Wundersitz, J.
, Naffine, N., & Gale, F. (1991). The production of guilt in the juvenile justice system: The pressures to “plead.”Howard Journal, 30(3), 192-206.
