This study applied the psychology of working theory to examine how ambivalent sexism predicts perceptions of decent work and occupational engagement via work volition and career adaptability among female science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) university students in South Korea (N = 397). Results showed good fit for the measurement and structural models. Hostile sexism negatively affected work volition, which mediated its relationships with decent work and occupational engagement. Work volition and career adaptability jointly mediated the relationship between hostile sexism and occupational engagement. Unexpectedly, benevolent sexism was positively associated with both outcomes, suggesting suppression effects. These findings highlight the complex ways sexism constrains women’s career development while underscoring the importance of supporting women’s agency, pursuit of decent work, and sustained engagement in STEM. Future research should examine broader psychological and contextual variables that may interact with psychology of working theory (PWT) constructs to shape female STEM students’ long-term engagement and access to decent work.
AhmedW.MudreyR. R. (2019). The role of motivational factors in predicting STEM career aspirations. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2017.1401499
2.
AhnJ. (2022). Gender microaggression, decent work, withdrawal intention among Korean women employees: Examining the psychology of working theory. The Journal of Career Education Research, 35(2), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.32341/JCER.2022.6.35.2.89
AhnS. S.KimH. S.AhnM. Y. (2005). A study on the development and validation of Korean Ambivalent Sexism Inventory. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 19(2), 39–66. https://kiss.kstudy.com/Detail/Ar?key=2498172
5.
AliA.SichelC. E. (2014). Structural competency as a framework for training in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(7), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000014550320
6.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
7.
AutinK. L.DouglassR. P.DuffyR. D.EnglandJ. W.AllanB. A. (2017). Subjective social status, work volition, and career adaptability: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.11.007
8.
BernsteinB. L.RussoN. F. (2008). Explaining too few women in STEM careers: A psychosocial perspective. In PaludiM. A. (Ed.), The psychology of women at work: Challenges and solutions for our female workforce, Vol. 2. Obstacles and the identity juggle (pp. 1–33). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
9.
CheryanS.ZieglerS. A.MontoyaA. K.JiangL. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
10.
ChoiJ. H.HongH. Y. (2023). The effects of planned happenstance skills on life satisfaction in college students: The mediating effects of career adaptability and occupational engagement and the moderated mediating effects of job-seeking anxiety. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 20(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.16983/kjsp.2023.20.1.27
11.
ChoiJ. Y. (2008). Female scientists’ expertise development: Individual & environmental factors. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 13(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2008.13.2.005
CoxD. W.KrieshokT. S.BjornsenA. L.ZumboB. D. (2015). Occupational engagement scale–student: Development and initial validation. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714523090
14.
DavidE. J. R. (Ed.). (2013). Internalized oppression: The psychology of marginalized groups. Springer Publishing Company.
15.
DavidE. J. R.SchroederT. M.FernandezJ. (2019). Internalized racism: A systematic review of the psychological literature on racism’s most insidious consequence. Journal of Social Issues, 75(4), 1057–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12350
De GioannisE.PasinG. L.SquazzoniF. (2023). Empowering women in STEM: A scoping review of interventions with role models. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 13(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2162832
18.
DennehyT. C.DasguptaN. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 5964–5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114
19.
DiekmanA. B.BrownE. R.JohnstonA. M.ClarkE. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342
20.
DiemerM. A.RapaL. J.VoightA. M.McWhirterE. H. (2016). Critical consciousness: A developmental approach to addressing marginalization and oppression. Child Development Perspectives, 10(4), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12193
21.
DuffyR. D.AllanB. A.EnglandJ. W.BlusteinD. L.AutinK. L.DouglassR. P.FerreiraJ.SantosE. J. R. (2017). The development and initial validation of the Decent Work Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000191
22.
DuffyR. D.BlusteinD. L.DiemerM. A.AutinK. L. (2016). The psychology of working theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000140
23.
DuffyR. D.ChoiY.KimH. J.ParkJ. (2024). Recommendations for conceptualizing and measuring constructs within psychology of working theory. Journal of Career Assessment, 32(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727231179196
24.
DuffyR. D.DiemerM. A.JadidianA. (2012). The development and initial validation of the Work Volition Scale–Student Version. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(2), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000011417147
25.
DuffyR. D.DiemerM. A.PerryJ. C.LaurenziC.TorreyC. L. (2012). The construction and initial validation of the Work Volition Scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.002
26.
DuffyR. D.GensmerN.AllanB. A.KimH. J.DouglassR. P.EnglandJ. W.AutinK. L.BlusteinD. L. (2019). Developing, validating, and testing improved measures within the psychology of working theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.02.012
27.
DuffyR. D.KimH. J.AllanB. A.PrietoC. G. (2020). Predictors of decent work across time: Testing propositions from psychology of working theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 123, 103507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103507
28.
EnglandJ. W.DuffyR. D.GensmerN. P.KimH. J.Buyukgoze-KavasA.Larson-KonarD. M. (2020). Women attaining decent work: The important role of workplace climate in psychology of working theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000411
29.
FinchJ. F.WestS. G.MacKinnonD. P. (1997). Effects of sample size and nonnormality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519709540063
30.
FischerA. R.GoodG. E. (2004). Women’s feminist consciousness, anger, and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(4), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.437
31.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
34.
FrenchB. H.LewisJ. A.MosleyD. V.AdamesH. Y.Chavez-DueñasN. Y.ChenG. A.NevilleH. A. (2019). Toward a psychological framework of radical healing in communities of color. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(1), 14–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000019843506
35.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
36.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
37.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
38.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
39.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
40.
HanJ. H. (2022). The issue of gender sensitivity and youth feminism in South Korea. Lingua Humanitatis, 24(2), 199–237. https://doi.org/10.16945/inahsl.24.2.8
41.
HeoC.-r.LeeK.-H. (2025). The relationship between economic constraints, work volition, and occupational engagement among undergraduate students: The moderating effect of perceived external employability. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 25(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2025.25.3.223
42.
HuL.-t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
International Labor Organization (2020). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) occupations. https://www.datawrapper.de/_/GYfnm/
45.
JenkinsD. L.XiaoS. X.MartinC. L. (2023). Does the gender of your friends matter for sexist attitudes about women?Emerging Adulthood, 11(2), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968221121165
KiN. H.YooG. S. (2019). The effects of ambivalent sexism on acceptance of abortion perceived by male and female college students and the mediating effect of marriage intention. The Women’s Studies, 102(3), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.33949/tws.2019.102.3.004
48.
KimE.KimH. (2023). Institutional marriage value of the young generation in the mixture of Korean familism and individualism. Kookmin Social Science Revies, 35(2), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.54711/KSSR.35.2.04
49.
KimH. J.DuffyR. D.LeeS.LeeJ.LeeK.-H. (2019). Application of the psychology of working theory with Korean emerging adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(6), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000368
50.
KimH. J.KimS. Y.DuffyR. D.NguyenN. P.WangD. (2020). A cross-cultural comparison of psychology of working theory among U.S. and Korean college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(5), 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000408
51.
KimH. J.McNeil-YoungV. A.WangD.DuffyR. D.UnderillB. D. (2022). Women of color and decent work: An examination of psychology of working theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 70(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12291
52.
KimK. H.KimE. H. (2019). Priming to ambivalent sexism on self-objectification and appearance management intention of college women student: With an emphasis on benevolent sexism. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 24(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2019.24.4.001
53.
KimM. S.KohE. y. (2020). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale Short-Form validation study. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2020.36.4.261
54.
KimN. R. (2013). The mediating effects of career decision self-efficacy and occupational engagement on the relation between internal locus of control and career adaptability in college students [Master’sdissertation, Yonsei University]. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/detail?nodeId=T13283345
55.
KimN. R.LeeK. H. (2014). Career volition and constraints of the college students: The Korean Validation Study of the Work Volition Scale–Student Version (WVS-SV). The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 33(2), 41–58. https://UCI:G704-000975.2014.33.2.004
56.
KimN. R.LeeK. H. (2016). The moderating effects of cultural self-construal in the relationship between work volition and career satisfaction. The Journal of Career Education Research, 29(1), 47–64. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE06651516.
KoufterosX.BabbarS.KaighobadiM. (2009). A paradigm for examining second-order factor models employing structural equation modeling. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(2), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.04.010
63.
KuchynkaS. L.SalomonK.BossonJ. K.El-HoutM.KiebelE.CoopermanC.ToomeyR. (2018). Hostile and benevolent sexism and college women’s STEM outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317741889
64.
LeeG. W.ChoiB. (2020). The effects of psychological and environmental career barriers on career preparation behavior of engineering majors undergraduates: Hope and career identity as mediating variables. The Journal of Career Education Research, 33(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.32341/JCER.2020.03.33.1.109
65.
LeeS.-r.LeeK.-h. (2021). The relationship between sex discrimination and job and life satisfaction in female employees: The mediating effects of ‘work freedom’ and ‘decent job.’ Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 33(1), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2021.02.33.1.539
66.
MaY.HuangG.AutinK. L. (2021). Linking decent work with academic engagement and satisfaction among first-generation college students: A psychology of working perspective. Journal of Career Assessment, 29(1), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072720943153
67.
MacKinnonD. P.KrullJ. L.LockwoodC. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371
68.
MaggioriC.RossierJ.SavickasM. L. (2017). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale–Short Form (CAAS-SF): Construction and validation. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(2), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714565856
MitchellK. E.LevinS. A.KrumboltzJ. D. (1999). Planned happenstance: Constructing unexpected career opportunities. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02431.x
72.
MoradiB.HuangY.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
73.
NadalK. L.KingR.SissokoD. R. G.FloydN.HinesD. (2021). The legacies of systemic and internalized oppression: Experiences of microaggressions, imposter phenomenon, and stereotype threat on historically marginalized groups. New Ideas in Psychology, 63, 100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100895
74.
NamJ. S.KimS. Y. (2019). Decent work in South Korea: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.05.006
75.
NewcombM. E.MustanskiB. (2010). Internalized homophobia and internalizing mental health problems: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(8), 1019–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.003
76.
NguyenH.-H. D.RyanA. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012702
77.
OhJ. R. (2019). The effects of ambivalent sexism on perceptions of sexual offences: The moderating effects of social dominance orientation. [Master’s dissertation, Sookmyung Women’s University].
78.
ParkG. B. (2017). The mediating effect of discrepancy due to career compromise between career adaptability and career satisfaction, career engagement. [Master’s dissertation, Korea University].
79.
ParkH. J.KimM. S. (2022). The relationship between gender-microaggression and job burnout in women working in natural sciences and engineering: The moderated mediating effect of self-compassion via self-silencing and loneliness. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 34(3), 819–849. https://doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2022.08.34.3.819
80.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
81.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
82.
RattsM. J.SinghA. A.Nassar-McMillanS.ButlerS. K.McCulloughJ. R. (2016). Multicultural and social justice counseling competencies: Guidelines for the counseling profession. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 44(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12035
83.
RottinghausP. J.DayS. X.BorgenF. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270271
84.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239
85.
RudmanL. A.PhelanJ. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
86.
SavickasM. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42–70). John Wiley & Sons.
87.
SavickasM. L.PorfeliE. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
88.
SeoM. J. (2018). The influence of career barriers that undergraduates perceive on the career preparation behavior: The mediation effect of the work volition and the career decision making self-efficacy[Master’s dissertation, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies].
89.
SettlesI. H.CortinaL. M.MalleyJ.StewartA. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00261.x
90.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
91.
SoperD. S. (2023). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models[Computer software].
92.
SteeleJ.JamesJ. B.BarnettR. C. (2002). Learning in a man’s world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00042
93.
StelterR. L.KupersmidtJ. B.StumpK. N. (2021). Establishing effective STEM mentoring relationships through mentor training. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1483(1), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14470
94.
SueD. W.RasheedM. N.RasheedJ. M. (2019). Multicultural social work practice: A Competency-based approach to diversity and social justice (2nd ed.). Wiley.
95.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L. (2009). Sexism. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 407–430). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781841697772
96.
SzymanskiD. M.GuptaA.CarrE. R.StewartD. (2009). Internalized misogyny as a moderator of the link between sexist events and women’s psychological distress. Sex Roles, 61(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9611-y
97.
ThomasJ. J.NewellE. E. (2023). What motivates action for gender equality among emerging adult women? The importance of critical reflection, efficacy, and feminist identity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 184(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2022.2115337
98.
Verdugo-CastroS.Sánchez-GómezM. C.García-HolgadoA. (2018, October). Gender gap in the STEM sector in pre and university studies of Europe associated with ethnic factors. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 984–990. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284348
99.
WestonR.GoreP. A.Jr. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
100.
YangN.YaungH.NohH.JangS. H.LeeB. (2017). The change of planned happenstance skills and its association with career-related variables during school-to-work transition. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 17(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9332-z
101.
YooK.KimJ.LeeK. H. (2025). The serial mediation effect of career adaptability and proactive career behavior on the relationship between optimism and career identity in korean undergraduates: Based on the career construction theory model of adaptation. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 22(1), 43–63. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE12502385.
102.
YooK.LeeK. H. (2015). The influence of optimism on occupational engagement: Testing the mediated moderation effect of career adaptability and illusion of control. The Journal of Career Education Research, 28(2), 65–86. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE06505277.
103.
ZawadzkiM. J.DanubeC. L.ShieldsS. A. (2012). How to talk about gender inequity in the workplace: Using WAGES as an experiential learning tool to reduce reactance and promote self-efficacy. Sex Roles, 67(11–12), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0181-z
