Given that at least half of supervisees (therapist trainees) never have their clinical work monitored or observed, supervisees who withhold salient information in clinical supervision compromise supervisors’ ability to monitor client welfare and promote supervisees’ professional development. Attempting to further understand the factors explaining supervisee nondisclosure, we tested the supervisory working alliance as a mediator of the hypothesized inverse relations of cultural humility and collaborative supervision with supervisee nondisclosure (supervision-related and clinically-related nondisclosure) among a diverse sample of 214 supervisees in applied psychology and allied mental health programs. Results supported the hypotheses that (a) descriptively, supervision-related nondisclosure was more prominent than clinically-related nondisclosure; (b) cultural humility substantially inversely predicted supervisee nondisclosure; and (c) the supervisory working alliance fully mediated the inverse relations of cultural humility and collaborative supervision with supervisee nondisclosure. Understanding the mechanisms underlying supervisee nondisclosure has broad implications for clinicians and researchers alike.
ArczynskiA. V.MorrowS. L. (2017). The complexities of power in feminist multicultural psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000179
BaimaT.SudeM. E. (2020). What white mental health professionals need to understand about whiteness: A Delphi study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12385
4.
BernardJ. M.GoodyearR. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Pearson.
5.
BordersL. D.GlosoffH. L.WelfareL. E.HaysD. G.DeKruyfL.FernandoD. M.PageB. (2014). Best practices in clinical supervision: Evolution of a counseling specialty. The Clinical Supervisor, 33(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2014.905225
CaiL.ThissenD.du ToitS. H. C. (2011). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT Modeling [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
8.
CohenP.CohenJ.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral analysis. Erlbaum.
9.
CookR. M.JonesC. T.WelfareL. E. (2020). Supervisor cultural humility predicts intentional nondisclosure by post-master's counselors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 59(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12173
10.
CookR. M.McKibbenW. B.WindS. A. (2018). Supervisee perception of power in clinical supervision: The Power Dynamics in Supervision Scale. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 12(3), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000201
11.
CookR. M.WelfareL. E. (2018). Examining predictors of counselor-in-training intentional nondisclosure. Counselor Education and Supervision, 57(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12111
12.
CrockettS.HaysD. G. (2015). The influence of supervisor multicultural competence on the supervisory working alliance, supervisee counseling self-efficacy, and supervisee satisfaction with supervision: A mediation model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 54(4), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12025
13.
EllisM. V.ColvinK. (2016, June). Supervisee nondisclosure in clinical supervision: Developing the construct and testing the psychometric properties of the SNDS. Paper presented at the 12th International Interdisciplinary Conference on Clinical Supervision, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY.
14.
EllisM. V.LadanyN. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In WatkinsC. E.Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). John Wiley & Sons.
15.
EllisM. V.RussinA.DeihlL. M. (2003, August). Dimensionality of the supervision working alliance: Supervisees’ perceptions. Paper presented at the 111th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
16.
EnlowP. T.McWhorterL. G.GenuarioK.DavisA. (2019). Supervisor-supervisee interactions: The importance of the supervisory working alliance. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(3), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000243
17.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2022). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
18.
FairchildA. J.MacKinnonD. P.TaborgaM. P.TaylorA. B. (2009). R2effect-size measures for mediation analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 486–498. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.486
19.
FukuiS.WuW.SalyersM. P. (2019). Impact of supervisory support on turnover intention: The mediating role of burnout and job satisfaction in a longitudinal study. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 46(4), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-019-00927-0
20.
GibsonA. S.EllisM. V.FriedlanderM. L. (2019). Toward a nuanced understanding of nondisclosure in psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000295
21.
GregusS. J.StevensK. T.SeivertN. P.TuckerR. P.CallahanJ. L. (2020). Student perceptions of multicultural training and program climate in clinical psychology doctoral programs. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 14(4), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000289
22.
GunnJ. E.PistoleM. C. (2012). Trainee supervisor attachment: Explaining the alliance and disclosure in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030805
HaaseR. F.MartensM. P.FerrierA. G.CorbettK. (2005). Some observations on a quarter of a century of magnitude of effects published in the Journal of Counseling Psychology: 1983–2002[Unpublished manuscript].
25.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.
26.
HookJ. N.DavisD. E.OwenJ.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.UtseyS. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032595
27.
HutmanH.EllisM. V. (2020). Supervisee nondisclosure in clinical supervision: Cultural and relational considerations. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 14(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000290
28.
JakobM.WeckF.HöflingV.RichtbergS.BohusM. (2014). Nondisclosure during psychotherapy supervision: Validation of the German version of the Supervisory Questionnaire (SQ). Psychotherapy Research, 24(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.816883
29.
JerniganM. M.GreenC. E.HelmsJ. E.Perez-GualdronL.HenzeK. (2010). An examination of people of color supervision dyads: Racial identity matters as much as race. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018110
30.
KangT.ChenT. T. (2011). Performance of the generalized S-χ2 item fit index for the graded response model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9082-4
KnudsenH. K.RomanP. M.AbrahamA. J. (2013). Quality of clinical supervision and counselor emotional exhaustion: The potential mediating roles of organizational and occupational commitment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(5), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.12.003
33.
LadanyN.Lehrman-WatermanD.MolinaroM.WolgastB. (1999). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the supervisory working alliance, and supervisee satisfaction. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(3), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000099273008
LaRoseR.TsaiH.-y. S. (2014). Completion rates and non-response error in online surveys: Comparing sweepstakes and pre-paid cash incentives in studies of online behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.017
36.
LiD.DuysD. K.LiuY. (2021). Working alliance as a mediator between supervisory styles and supervisee satisfaction. Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 3(3), 5. https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc030305
37.
LinacreJ. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103–122. http://jampress.org/JOM_V3N2.pdf
38.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157
39.
LiuY.ThissenD. (2014). Comparing score tests and other local dependence diagnostics for the graded response model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12030
40.
McKibbenW. B.CookR. M.FicklingM. J. (2019). Feminist supervision and supervisee nondisclosure: The mediating role of the supervisory relationship. The Clinical Supervisor, 38(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2018.1509756
41.
MehrK. E.LadanyN.CaskieG. I. L. (2010). Trainee nondisclosure in supervision: What are they not telling you?Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 10(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733141003712301
42.
MehrK. E.LadanyN.CaskieG. I. L. (2015). Factors influencing trainee willingness to disclose in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000028
43.
MosleyD. V.NevilleH. A.Chavez-DueñasN. Y.AdamesH. Y.LewisJ. A.FrenchB. H. (2020). Radical hope in revolting times: Proposing a culturally relevant psychological framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(1), e12512. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12512
44.
NevilleH. A.AwadG. H.BrooksJ. E.FloresM. P.BluemelJ. (2013). Color-blind racial ideology: Theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology. American Psychologist, 68(6), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033282
45.
O’DonovanA.KavanaghD. J. (2014). Measuring competence in supervisees and supervisors: Satisfaction and related reactions in supervision. The Wiley International Handbook of Clinical Supervision (pp. 458–467). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118846360.ch22
46.
ParkE. H.HaG.LeeS.LeeY. Y.LeeS. M. (2019). Relationship between the supervisory working alliance and outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling & Development, 97(4), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12292
47.
Rodriguez-MenendezG.DempseyJ. P.AlbizuT.PowerS.WilkersonM. C. (2017). Faculty and student perceptions of clinical training experiences in professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000137
48.
RousmaniereT. G.EllisM. V. (2013). Developing the construct and measure of collaborative clinical supervision: The supervisee’s perspective. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7(4), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033796
49.
SchlomerG. L.BaumanS.CardN. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082
50.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
51.
SiemborM. J.EllisM. V. (2012, June). Validation of the Supervision Nondisclosure Scale. Paper presented at the 8th International Interdisciplinary Conference on Clinical Supervision, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY.
Staples-BradleyL. K.DudaB.GettensK. (2019). Student self-disclosure in clinical supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(3), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000242
54.
SueD. W.AlsaidiS.AwadM. N.GlaeserE.CalleC. Z.MendezN. (2019). Disarming racial microaggressions: Microintervention strategies for targets, White allies, and bystanders. American Psychologist, 74(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000296
55.
UpshawN. C.LewisD. E.Jr.NelsonA. L. (2020). Cultural humility in action: Reflective and process-oriented supervision with Black trainees. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 14(4), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000284
56.
VandamentM. L.DuanC.LiS. (2022). Relationships among supervisee perceived supervisor cultural humility, working alliance, and supervisee self-efficacy among White supervisor and supervisee of color dyads. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 16(3), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000370
57.
WatkinsC. E.Jr.HookJ. N.MosherD. K.CallahanJ. L. (2018). Humility in clinical supervision: Fundamental, foundational, and transformational. The Clinical Supervisor, 38(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2018.1487355
58.
WongP. T. P.WongL. C. J. (2020). Assessing multicultural supervision competencies. In LonnnerW. J.DinnelD. L.ForgaysD. K.HayesS. A. (Eds.), Merging past, present, and future in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 510–519). Garland Science.
59.
WrapeE. R.CallahanJ. L.RuggeroC. J.WatkinsC. E.Jr. (2015). An exploration of faculty supervisor variables and their impact on client outcomes. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000014
60.
ZhangH.WatkinsC. E.Jr.HookJ. N.HodgeA. S.DavisC. W.NortonJ.WilcoxM. M.DavisD. E.DeBlaereC.OwenJ. (2021). Cultural humility in psychotherapy and clinical supervision: A research review. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 22(3), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12481
61.
ZlatevM. (2015). Collaborative supervision: A cross-validation assessment of the Collaborative Supervision Behavior Scale [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University at Albany/State University of New York, Albany.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
