Applying the relational humility model to address gaps in the clinical supervision literature, we tested the interpersonal constructs of relational humility, supervisory working alliance, and relational behavior as predictors of supervisee nondisclosure (i.e., clinically-related and supervision-related nondisclosure). We hypothesized that relational humility moderates the relation between supervisory working alliance and supervision-related nondisclosure and that the supervisory working alliance and relational behavior each uniquely predicts supervisee nondisclosure. Self-report data from 312 trainees in the United States receiving clinical supervision across training settings found relational humility, supervisory working alliance, and relational behavior explained over a quarter of the variance in the multivariate construct of supervisee nondisclosure. Relational humility significantly moderated (and amplified) the inverse relation between the supervisory working alliance and supervision-related nondisclosure. The supervisory working alliance and relational behavior did not uniquely predict clinically-related or supervision-related nondisclosure. Results are discussed for their practical, theoretical, and research implications.
AmerikanerM.RoseT. (2012). Direct observation of psychology supervisees' clinical work: A snapshot of current practice.The Clinical Supervisor, 31(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2012.671721
2.
BahrickA. S. (1989) Role induction for counselor trainees: Effects on the supervisory workingalliance [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University.
3.
BamblingM.KingR.RaueP.SchweitzerR.LambertW. (2006). Clinical supervision: Its influence on client-rated working alliance and client symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression. Psychotherapy Research, 16(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300500268524
4.
BernardJ. M.GoodyearR. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Pearson.
BurkardA. W.JohnsonA. J.MadsonM. B.PruittN. T.Contreras-TadychD. A.KozlowskiJ. M.HessS. A.KnoxS. (2006). Supervisor cultural responsiveness and unresponsiveness in cross-cultural supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.288
7.
BurkardA. W.KnoxS.ClarkeR. D.PhelpsD. L.InmanA. G. (2014). Supervisors’ experiences of providing difficult feedback in cross-ethnic/racial supervision.The Counseling Psychologist, 42(3), 314–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012461157
8.
CaiL.ThissenD.du Toit. (2011). IRTPRO for Windows 2.1 [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
9.
ChurchI. M.BarrettJ. L. (2017). Intellectual humility. In WorthingtonE. L.DavisD. E.HookJ. N. (Eds.), Handbook of humility: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 62–75). Routledge.
10.
DavisD. E.HookJ. N.WorthingtonE. L.Van TongerenD. R.GartnerA. L.JenningsD. J.EmmonsR. A. (2011). Relational humility: Conceptualizing and measuring humility as a personality judgment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.558871
11.
DavisD. E.WorthingtonE. L.HookJ. N. (2010). Humility: Review of measurement strategies and conceptualization as personality judgment. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439761003791672
12.
DavisD. E.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.HookJ. N.EmmonsR. A.HillP. C.BollingerR. A.Van TongerenD. R. (2013). Humility and the development and repair of social bonds: Two longitudinal studies. Self and Identity, 12(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.636509
13.
EllisM. V.BergerL.HanusA. E.AyalaE. E.SwordsB. A.SiemborM. (2014). Inadequate and harmful clinical supervision: Testing a revised framework and assessing occurrence. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(4), 434–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000013508656
14.
EllisM. V.ColvinK. (2016, June). Supervisee non-disclosure in clinical supervision: Developing the construct and testing the psychometric properties of the SNDS. [Paper presentation]International Interdisciplinary Conference on Clinical Supervision 12th Annual Meeting,Adelphi University, GardenCity, NY, United States.
15.
EllisM. V.LadanyN.KrengelM.SchultD. (1996). Clinical supervision research from 1981 to 1993: A methodological critique. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.35
16.
EllisM. V.RussinA.DeihlL. M. (2003). Dimensionality of the supervision working alliance: Supervisees’ perceptions. [Paper presentation] Convention of the AmericanPsychological Association 111th Annual Meeting,Toronto, Canada.
17.
FarrellJ. E.HookJ. N.RamosM.DavisD. E.Van TongerenD. R.RuizJ. M. (2015). Humility and relationship outcomes in couples: The mediating role of commitment. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 4(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000033
18.
GibsonA. S.EllisM. V.FriedlanderM. L. (2019). Toward a nuanced understanding of nondisclosure in psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000295
GunnJ. E.PistoleM. C. (2012). Trainee supervisor attachment: Explaining the alliance and disclosure in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030805
HookJ. N.WatkinsC. E.JrDavisD. E.OwenJ.Van TongerenD. R.RamosM. J. (2016). Cultural humility in psychotherapy supervision. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 70(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2016.70.2.149
26.
HutmanH.EllisM. V. (2020). Supervisee nondisclosure in clinical supervision: Cultural and relational considerations. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 14(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000290
27.
JakobM.WeckF.HöflingV.RichtbergS.BohusM. (2014). Nondisclosure during psychotherapy supervision: Validation of the German version of the Supervisory Questionnaire (SQ). Psychotherapy Research, 24(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.816883
28.
JerniganM. M.GreenC. E.HelmsJ. E.Perez-GualdronL.HenzeK. (2010). An examination of people of color supervision dyads: Racial identity matters as much as race. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018110
29.
KangT.ChenT. T. (2011). Performance of the generalized S-X2 item fit index for the graded response model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 89–96. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9082-4
LadanyN.FriedlanderM. L.NelsonM. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision: An interpersonal approach. American Psychological Association.
32.
LadanyN.HillC. E.CorbettM. M.NuttE. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.10
33.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
34.
LinacreJ. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103–122. http://jampress.org/JOM_V3N2.pdf
35.
LiuY.ThissenD. (2014). Comparing score tests and other local dependence diagnostics for the graded response model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12030
36.
MehrK. E.LadanyN.CaskieG. I. (2010). Trainee nondisclosure in supervision: What are they not telling you?Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 10(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733141003712301
37.
NonterahC. W.GartheR. C.ReidC. A.WorthingtonE. L.JrDavisD. E.HookJ. N.Van TongerenD. R.GriffinB. J. (2016). The impact of stress on fluctuations in relational humility as couples transition to parenthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.016
38.
PieterseA. L. (2018). Attending to racial trauma in clinical supervision: Enhancing client and supervisee outcomes. The Clinical Supervisor, 37(1), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2018.1443304
39.
Rodriguez-MenendezG.DempseyJ. P.AlbizuT.PowerS.WilkersonM. C. (2017). Faculty and student perceptions of clinical training experiences in professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 11(1), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tep0000137
ShafferK. S.FriedlanderM. (2017). What do “interpersonally sensitive” supervisors do and how do supervisees experience a relational approach to supervision?Psychotherapy Research, 27(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1080877
42.
SiemborM. J.EllisM. V. (2012, June). Validation of the Supervision Nondisclosure Scale. [Paper presentation]International Interdisciplinary Conference on Clinical Supervision 8th Annual Meeting,Adelphi University, GardenCity, NY, United States.
43.
ThrowerS. J.HelmsJ. E.ManosalvasK. (2020). Exploring the role of context on racially responsive supervision: The racial identity social interaction model. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 14(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000271
44.
WampoldB. E.DavisB.GoodR. H.III (1990). Hypothesis validity of clinical research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X/58.3.360
45.
WatkinsC. E.Jr. (Ed.). (1997). Handbook of psychotherapy supervision. Wiley.
46.
WatkinsC. E.Jr.HookJ. N.DeBlaereC.DavisD. E.Van TongerenD. R.OwenJ.CallahanJ. L. (2019). Humility, ruptures, and rupture repair in clinical supervision: A simple conceptual clarification and extension. The Clinical Supervisor, 38(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2019.1624996
47.
WatkinsC. E.Jr.HookJ. N.MosherD. K.CallahanJ. L. (2019). Humility in clinical supervision: Fundamental, foundational, and transformational. The Clinical Supervisor, 38(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2018.1487355
48.
WatkinsC. E.Jr.HookJ. N.RamaekerJ.RamosM. (2016). Repairing the ruptured supervisory alliance: Humility as a foundational virtue in clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2015.1127190
49.
WebbA.WheelerS. (1998). How honest do counsellors dare to be in the supervisory relationship? An exploratory study. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 26(4), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889800760431
50.
WorthingtonE. L.Jr.DavisD. E.HookJ. N. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of humility: Theory, research, and applications. Taylor & Francis.
51.
YourmanD. B.FarberB. A. (1996). Nondisclosure and distortion in psychotherapy supervison. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 33(4), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.33.4.567
