This study investigated the effects of supervisee characteristics (rejection attachment), the supervisory relationship (supervisory working alliance, role conflict), and Asian cultural values on supervisee nondisclosure (clinically related and supervision related nondisclosures) for South Korean and U.S. American supervisees. Participants were 474 predominantly female supervisees in counseling and clinical psychology programs (227 South Korean, 247 U.S. American). Three major findings emerged: (a) the four predictors collectively predicted both types of supervisee nondisclosure jointly in both countries, (b) the supervisory working alliance predicted the two types of supervisee nondisclosure jointly in both countries, and (c) post hoc tests suggested that the supervisory working alliance mediated the relations of role conflict and rejection attachment with supervisee nondisclosure in both countries, and the relation of Asian cultural values with supervisee nondisclosure for South Korean supervisees. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed.
AegisdóttirS.GersteinL. H.CinarbasD. C. (2008). Methodological issues in cross-cultural counseling research: Equivalence, bias, and translations. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(2), 188–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000007305384
3.
BahrickA. S. (1990). Role induction for counselor trainees: Effects on the supervisory working alliance [Doctoral. In The Ohio State University] Abstracts International (519014392, p. 1484B). University Microfilms No.
4.
BangK. (2006). A phenomenological investigation of counselors’ experience in supervision: An application of the grounded theory. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 18(2), 233–254.
5.
BangK.ParkJ. (2009). Korean supervisors’ experiences in clinical supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(8),1042–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009339341
6.
BernardJ. M.GoodyearR. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Pearson.
CaiL.Maydeu-OlivaresA.CoffmanD. L.ThissenD. (2006). Limited information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2p tables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59(1), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005X66419
10.
ChenJ. C.DanishS. J. (2010). Acculturation, distress disclosure, and emotional self-disclosure within Asian populations. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 1(3), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020943
11.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
CrowellJ. A.FraleyR. C.RoismanG. I. (2019). Measurement of individual differences in adult attachment. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd eds., pp. 598–635). The Guilford Press.
13.
EllisM. V.BergerL.HanusA. E.AyalaE. E.SwordsB. A.SiemborM. (2014). Inadequate and harmful clinical supervision: Testing a revised framework and assessing occurrence. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(4), 434–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000013508656
14.
EllisM. V.ColvinK. (2016, June). Supervisee non-disclosure in clinical supervision: Developing the construct and testing the psychometric properties of the SNDS [Paper presention]. 12th International Interdisciplinary Conference on Clinical Supervision,Adelphi University, GardenCity, NY, United States.
15.
EllisM. V.CreanerM.HutmanH.TimulakL. (2015). A comparative study of clinical supervision in the Republic of Ireland and the United States. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(4), 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000110
16.
EllisM. V.LadanyN. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In WatkinsC. E.Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). John Wiley & Sons.
17.
FalenderC. A. (2014). Supervision outcomes: Beginning the journey beyond the emperor’s new clothes. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8(3), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000066
18.
FitchJ. C.PistoleM. C.GunnJ. E. (2010). The bonds of development: An attachment-caregiving model of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 29(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325221003730319
19.
FoynesM. M.PlattM.HallG. C. N.FreydJ. J. (2014). The impact of Asian values and victim-perpetrator closeness on the disclosure of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6(2), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032098
20.
GibsonA. S.EllisM. V.FriedlanderM. L. (2019). Toward a nuanced understanding of nondisclosure in psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000295
GunnJ. E.PistoleM. C. (2012). Trainee supervisor attachment: Explaining the alliance and disclosure in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030805
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
25.
HessS. A.KnoxS.SchultzJ. M.HillC. E.SloanL.BrandtS.KelleyF.HoffmanM. A. (2008). Predoctoral interns’ nondisclosure in supervision. Psychotherapy Research, 18(4), 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300701697505
26.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.
27.
HollandB. S.CopenhaverM. D. (1988). Improved Bonferroni type multiple testing procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.145
28.
HulinC. L.DrasgowF.KomocarJ. (1982). Applications of item response theory to analysis of scale translation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 818–825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.6.818
29.
HutmanH.EllisM. V. (2020). Supervisee nondisclosure in clinical supervision: Cultural and relational considerations. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 14(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000290
30.
JakobM.WeckF.HöflingV.RichtbergS.BohusM. (2014). Nondisclosure during psychotherapy supervision: Validation of the German version of the Supervisory Questionnaire (SQ). Psychotherapy Research, 24(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.816883
31.
KangT.ChenT. T. (2011). Performance of the generalized S-X2 item fit index for the graded response model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1),89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9082-4
32.
KimB. S. K.LiL. C.NgG. F. (2005). The Asian American Values Scale-Multidimensional: Development, reliability, and validity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 11(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.11.3.187
33.
KimH. S.ShermanD. K. (2007). "Express yourself": Culture and the effect of self-expression on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.1
KnoxS.BurkardA. W.EdwardsL. M.SmithJ. J.SchlosserL. Z. (2008). Supervisors’ reports of the effects of supervisor self-disclosure on supervisees. Psychotherapy Research, 18(5), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300801982781
36.
LadanyN.HillC. E.CorbettM. M.NuttE. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisor. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.10
37.
LinacreJ. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale category utility. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103–122. http://jampress.org/JOM_V3N2.pdf
38.
LiuY.ThissenD. (2013). Comparing score tests and other local dependence diagnostics for the graded response model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12030
39.
MenefeeD. S.DayS. X.LopezF. G.McPhersonR. H. (2014). Preliminary development and validation of the Supervisee Attachment Strategies Scale (SASS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(2), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035600
40.
MehrK. E.LadanyN.CaskieG. I. L. (2015). Factors influencing trainee willingness to disclose in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000028
41.
NelsonM. L.BarnesK. L.EvansA. LTriggianoP. J. (2008). Working with conflict in clinical supervision: Wise supervisors’ perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.172
42.
OlkM. EFriedlanderM. L. (1992). Trainees’ experience of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(3), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.39.3.389
43.
ParkY. S.KimB. S. K. (2008). Asian and European American cultural values and communication styles among Asian American and European American college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority, 14(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.14.1.47
44.
ParkJ.YooM. (2011). The relationship between supervisee’s adult attachment and self-disclosure in play therapy supervision: The working alliance as a mediating variable. Korean Journal of Counseling, 12(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.12.1.201103.129
45.
SamejimaF. (1997). Graded response model. In van der LindenW. J.HambletonR. K. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). Springer.
46.
SchugJ.YukiM.MadduxW. (2010). Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1471–1478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382786
47.
ShinS.ParkY.KimY.ParkM. (2016). A development and validation of the Korean version of the supervisee attachment strategies scale. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 28(3), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2016.08.28.3.615
48.
SiemborM. J.EllisM. V. (2012, June). Validation of the Supervision Nondisclosure Scale.Paper presented at the 8th International Interdisciplinary Conference on Clinical Supervision,Adelphi University, GardenCity, NY.
49.
SohnS. (2005). Supervisees’ nondisclosure in counseling supervision. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 17(1), 57–74.
50.
SonE.EllisM. V. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison of clinical supervision in South Korea and the United States. Psychotherapy, 50(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033115
51.
SonE.EllisM. V.YooS. K. (2013). Clinical supervision in South Korea and the United States: A comparative descriptive study. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012442650
52.
TraceyT. J. G.BludworthJ.Glidden-TraceyC. E. (2012). Are there parallel processes in psychotherapy supervision? An empirical examination. Psychotherapy, 49(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026246
53.
WatkinsC. E.Jr.BudgeS. L.CallahanJ. L. (2015). Common and specific factors converging in psychotherapy supervision: A supervisory extrapolation of the Wampold/Budge psychotherapy relationship model. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 25(3), 214–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039561
54.
WebbA.WheelerS. (1998). How honest do counsellors dare to be in the supervisory relationship?: An exploratory study. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 26(4), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889808253860
55.
WeiM.SuJ. C.CarreraS.LinS.-P.YiF. (2013). Suppression and interpersonal harmony: A cross-cultural comparison between Chinese and European Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033413
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
