Using a qualitative research design, this study investigated how three supervision groups, each led by a counseling supervisor with a feminist theoretical orientation, understood process variables of feminist group supervision. Participants each completed one semi-structured individual interview and engaged in one of three respective focus groups to talk about their experiences in group supervision. Data from these interviews were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory; standards of trustworthiness were accounted for using multiple tools. A supervision model emerged from the data, representing various clusters of process variables that affected how the participants understood the process and outcome of their supervision experiences. Implications of the model on theory, research, practice, and advocacy are discussed.
BangK.ParkJ. (2009). Korean supervisors’ experiences in clinical supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(8), 1042–1075.
2.
BernardJ. M.GoodyearR. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
3.
BogoM.GlobermanJ.SussmanT. (2004). The field instructor as group worker: Managing trust and competition in group supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(1), 13–26.
4.
BrabenderV. (2002). Introduction to group therapy. New York: Wiley.
5.
BurnesT. R.ManeseJ. E. (2008). Social justice in an accredited internship in professional psychology: Answering the call. Journal of Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2(3), 176–181.
6.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist models. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
EnnsC. Z. (2004). Feminist theories and feminist psychotherapies: Origins, themes, and diversity (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.
9.
EnyedyK. C.ArcinueF.PuriN. N. (2003). Hindering phenomena in group supervision: Implications for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 312–317.
10.
FalenderC. A.CornishJ.A.E.GoodyearR.HatcherR.KaslowN. J.LeventhalG.. . . GrusC. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(7), 771–785. doi:10.1002/jclp.20013
11.
FalenderC. A.EllisM. V.BurnesT. R. (2013). Multicultural clinical supervision and benchmarks: Empirical support informing supervision practice and supervisor training. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 6–25.
12.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
FassingerR. E. (2005). Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: Grounded theory in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(5), 156–166.
14.
FouadN. A.GrusC. L.HatcherR. L.KaslowN. J.HutchingsP. S.MadsonM. B.. . . CrossmanR. E. (2009). Competency benchmarks: A model for understanding and measuring competence in professional psychology across training levels. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4 Suppl.), S4–S26. doi:10.1037/a0015832
15.
HayesR. L.BlackmanL. S.BrennanC. (2001). Group supervision. In BradleyL.LedanyN. (Eds.), Counselor supervision: Principles, process and practice (3rd ed., pp. 183–206). Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.
16.
KaduvettoorA.O’ShaughnessyT.MoriY.BeverlyC.WeatherfordR. D.LedanyN. (2009). Helpful and hindering events in group supervision: Climate and multicultural competence. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(6), 786–820.
17.
LadanyN.InmanA. G. (2008). Developments in counseling skills training and supervision. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (4th ed., pp. 338–354). New York: Wiley.
18.
LavalleeP. (2007). Indirect sampling. New York: Springer.
19.
LintonJ.HedstromS. (2006). An exploratory qualitative investigation of group processes in group supervision: Perceptions of master’s-level practicum students. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 31(1), 51–72.
20.
MarcusH. E.KingD. A. (2003). A survey of group psychotherapy training during predoctoral psychology internship. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 203–209.
21.
McIlvriedE. J.WallJ. R.KohoutJ.KeysS.GorecznyA. (2010). Graduate training in clinical psychology: Student perspectives on selecting a program. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(2), 105–115.
22.
MorrowS. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 1–11.
23.
OrgrenE. C.SundinM. (2006). Supervisees’ and supervisors’ experiences of group climate in group supervision in psychotherapy: Effects of admission procedure. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2), 226–240.
24.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
PutneyM. W.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.McCulloughM. E. (1992). Effects of supervisor and supervisee theoretical orientation and supervisor–supervisee matching on interns’ perceptions of supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 258–265.
26.
RivaM. T.CornishJ.A.E. (1995). Group supervision practices at psychology predoctoral internship programs: A national survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 523–525.
27.
RivaM. T.CornishJ.A.E. (2008). Group supervision practices at psychology predoctoral internship programs: 15 years later. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2(1), 18–25.
28.
SinghA. A.BurnesT. R. (2011). Feminist therapy and street-level activism: Revisiting our roots and “acting up” for a new tomorrow. Special Issue on 21st Century Feminism: Women & Therapy, 34, 129–142. doi:10.1080/02703149.2011.532457
29.
SinghA. A.ChunK.Y.S. (2010). “From the margins to the center”: Moving towards a resilience-based model of supervision for queer people of color supervisors. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(1), 36–46.
30.
SpeightS. L.VeraE. M. (2008). Social justice and counseling psychology: A challenge to the profession. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (4th ed., pp. 54–67). New York: Wiley.
31.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
SzymanskiD. (2005). Feminist identity and theories as correlates of feminist supervision practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 729–747.
33.
WorellJ.RemerP. (2003). Feminist perspectives in therapy: Empowering diverse women (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
34.
YalomI. D. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York: Basic.
