Since clinical supervision has become recognized as a distinct professional practice, competency-based supervision has gained considerable traction internationally. Competency-based supervision enhances accountability and is compatible with evidence-based approaches. Competency-based supervision is defined by supervisor and supervisee collaboratively and explicitly identifying the knowledge, skills and attitudes comprising each clinical competency, determining specific learning strategies, and monitoring and evaluating the development of those. Recommendations for supervision practice are described based on the growing evidence base for practice and responsive to emerging ethical and legal issues.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
2.
AsplandH.LleweylenS.HardyG.BarkhamM.StilesW. (2008). Alliance ruptures and rupture resolution in cognitive-behavioral therapy: A preliminary task analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 699–710. doi:10.1080/10503300802291463
Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2013, July7–9). Definitions of competence. Day 2, 5th International Congress on Licensure, Certification and Credentialing in Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
5.
Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (in press). ASPPB supervision guidelines.
BernardJ. M.GoodyearR. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
8.
Board of Educational Affairs, American Psychological Association. (2013). Proposed guidelines for competency-based clinical supervision in health service psychology education and training programs (Task Force on Supervision Guidelines draft). Washington, DC: Author.
BordinE. S. (1983). Supervision in counseling: II. Contemporary models of supervision: A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42. doi:10.1177/0011000083111007
11.
British Psychological Society. (2003). Policy guidelines on supervision in the practice of clinical psychology. Leicester, UK: Author.
12.
British Psychological Society. (2006). Continued supervision. Leicester, UK: Author.
13.
BrosanL.ReynoldsS.MooreR. G. (2008). Self-evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy performance: Do therapists know how competent they are?Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 581–587. doi:10.1017/S1352465808004438
Crook-LyonR. E.PresnellJ.SilvaL.SuyamaM.StickneyJ. (2011). Emergent supervisors: Comparing counseling center and non-counseling center interns’ supervisory training experiences. Journal of College Counseling, 14, 34–49. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2011.tb00062.x
18.
DeCampM.KoenigT. W.ChisolmM. S. (2013). Social media and physicians’ online identity crisis. JAMA, 310, 581–582. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.8238
19.
DeJongS. M.BenjaminS.MeyerA. J.NadvahJ.BolandR. J.LomaxJ.RostainA. L. (2012). Professionalism and the Internet in psychiatry: What to teach and how to teach it. Academic Psychiatry, 36, 356–362. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.11050097
20.
DiLilloD.GaleE. B. (2011). To Google or not to Google: Graduate students’ use of the Internet to access personal information about clients. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 5, 160–166. doi:10.1037/a0024441
21.
DunningD.HeathC.SulsJ. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
22.
EllisM. V.BergerL.HanusA.RingE. E.SiemborM. J.SwordsB. A. (in press). Inadequate and harmful clinical supervision: Revising the framework and assessing occurrence. The Counseling Psychologist.
23.
FalenderC. A.BurnesT.EllisM. (2013). Introduction to major contribution: Multicultural clinical supervision and benchmarks: Empirical support informing practice and supervisor training. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 8–27. doi:10.1177/0011000012438417
24.
FalenderC. A.CornishJ. A. E.GoodyearR.HatcherR.KaslowN. J.LeventhalG.…SigmonS. T. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 771–785. doi:10.1002/jclp.20013
25.
FalenderC. A.EllisM. V.BurnesT. (2013). Response to reactions to major contribution: Multicultural clinical supervision and Benchmarks. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 140–151. doi:10.1177/0011000012464061
26.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).
27.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2007). Competence in competency-based supervision practice: Construct and application. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 232–240. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.3.232
28.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (Eds.). (2008). Casebook for clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).
29.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2012a). Getting the most out of clinical training and supervision: A guide for practicum students and interns. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).
30.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2012b). The importance of competency-based clinical supervision and training in the twenty-first century: Why bother?Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 129–137. doi:10.1007/s10879-011-9198-9
31.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2014). Supervision. In W. B.JohnsonN. J.Kaslow (Eds.), Oxford handbook of education and training in professional psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P.FalicovC. (Eds.). (2014). Multiculturalism and diversity in clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).
33.
FarnanJ. N.PettyL. A.GeorgitisE.MartinS.ChiuE.ProchaskaM.AroraV. M. (2012). A systematic review: The effect of clinical supervision on patient and residency education outcomes. Academic Medicine, 87, 428–442. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824822cc
34.
FouadN. A.GrusC. L.HatcherR. L.KaslowN. J.HutchingsP. S.MadsonM. B.…CrossmanR. E. (2009). Competency benchmarks: A model for understanding and measuring competence in professional psychology across training levels. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, S5–S26. doi:10.1037/a0015832
35.
Frawley-O’DeaM. G.SarnatJ. E. (2001). The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychodynamic approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
GottliebM. C.RobinsonK.YounggrenJ. N. (2007). Multiple relations in supervision: Guidance for administrators, supervisors, and students. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 241–247. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.3.241
37.
GrusC. L.KaslowN. J. (2014). Professionalism: Professional values and attitudes in psychology. InJohnsonW. B.KaslowN. J. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of education and training in professional psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
HadjistavropoulosH.KelherM.HadjistavropoulosT. (2010). Training graduate students to be clinical supervisors: A survey of Canadian professional psychology programmes. Canadian Psychology, 51, 206–212. doi:10.1037/a0020197
39.
HansenN. D.RandazzoK. V.SchwartzA.MarshallM.KalisD.FrazierR.…NorvigG. (2006). Do we practice what we preach? An exploratory survey of multicultural psychotherapy competencies. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 66–74. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.1.66
40.
HatcherR. L.FouadN. A.GrusC. L.CampbellL. F.McCutcheonS. R.LeahyK. L. (2013). Competency benchmarks: Practical steps toward a culture of competence. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7, 84–91. doi:10.1037/a0029401
41.
HoffmanM. A.HillC. E.HolmesS. E.FreitasG. F. (2005). Supervisor perspective on the process and outcome of giving easy, difficult, or no feedback to supervisees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 3–13. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.3
42.
HunsleyJ.BarkerK. K. (2011). Training for competency in professional psychology: A Canadian perspective. Australian Psychologist, 46, 142–145. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00027.x
43.
InmanA. G.LadanyN. (2008). Research: The state of the field. In HessA. K.HessK. D.HessT. H. (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 500–520). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
44.
JainS. H. (2009). Practicing medicine in the age of Facebook. New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 649–651. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0901277
45.
JerniganM. M.GreenC. E.HelmsJ. E.Perez-GualdronL.HenzeK. (2010). An examination of people of color supervision dyads: Racial identity matters as much as race. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4, 62–73. doi:10.1037/a0018110
46.
KaslowN. J.BordenK. A.CollinsF. L.ForrestL.Illfelder-KayeJ.NelsonP. D.…WillmuthM. E. (2004). Competencies conference: Future directions in education and credentialing in professional psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 699–712. doi:10.1002/jclp.20016
47.
KaslowN. J.GrusC. L.CampbellL. F.FouadN. A.HatcherR. L.RodolfaE. R. (2009). Competency assessment toolkit for professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, S27–S45. doi:10.1037/a0015833
48.
KaslowN. J.RubinN. J.BebeauM. J.LeighI. W.LichtenbergJ. W.NelsonP. D.…SmithI. L. (2007). Guiding principles and recommendations for the assessment of competence. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 441–451. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.5.441
49.
KavanaghD. J.SpenceS.SturkH.StrongJ.WilsonJ.WorrallL.…SkerrettR. (2008). Outcomes of training in supervision: Randomised controlled trial. Australian Psychologist, 43, 96–104. doi:10.1080/0005006080205056534
50.
KoocherG. P.Keith-SpiegelP. (2008). Ethics in psychology and the mental health professions: Standards and cases (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
LadanyN.Lehrman-WatermanD.MolinaroM.WolgastB. (1999). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the supervisory working alliance, and supervisee satisfaction. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 443–475. doi:10.1177/0011000099273008
52.
MagnusonS.WilcoxonS. A.NoremK. (2000). A profile of lousy supervision: Experienced counselors’ perspectives. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 189–202. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2000.tb01231.x
53.
MilneD.ReiserR. P. (2012). A rationale for evidence-based clinical supervision. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 139–149. doi:10.1007/s10879-011-9199-8
54.
MyersS. B.EndresM. A.RuddyM. E.ZelikovskyN. (2012). Psychology graduate training in the era of online social networking. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6, 28–36. doi:10.1037/a0026388
55.
New Zealand Psychologists Board. (2010). Guidelines on supervision. Wellington, New Zealand: Author. Retrieved from http://www.psychologistsboard.org.nz
56.
PorterN. (2014). Women, culture, and social justice: Supervision across the intersections. In FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P.FalicovC. J. (Eds.), Multiculturalism and diversity in clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).
57.
PorterN.VasquezM. (1997). Covision: Feminist supervision, process, and collaboration. In WorellJ.JohnsonN. (Eds.), Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, research, and practice (Psychology of women book series, pp. 155–171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).
RodolfaE.GreenbergS.HunsleyJ.Smith-ZoellerM.CoxD.SammonsM.…SpivakH. (2013). A competency model for the practice of psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7, 71–83. doi:10.1037/a0032415
Shen-MillerD. S.ForrestL.BurtM. (2012). Contextual influences on faculty diversity conceptualizations when working with trainee competence problems. The Counseling Psychologist, 40, 1181–1219. doi:10.1177/0011000011431832
64.
WalfishS.McAlisterB.O’DonnellP.LambertM. J. (2012). An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers. Psychological Reports, 110, 639–644. doi:10.2466/02.07.17.PR0.110.2.639-644
65.
WallA. (2009). Psychology interns’ perceptions of supervisor ethical behavior (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3359934)
66.
WesterS. R.DanforthL.OlleC. (2013). Social networking sites and the evaluation of applicants and students in applied training programs in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7, 145–154. doi:10.1037/a0032376
