This study monitors group supervision for students’ field training in a Bachelor’s Degree in Social Work (BSW) program and compares it with the experience of the students receiving the traditional individual supervision. The experimental group supervision model is implemented in two consecutive years. Students’ experiences are compared at three points in time: before pilot study began; at the end of the 1st year of the pilot study; and at the end of the 2nd year. Findings indicate that in most areas, and at all points in time, students receiving group supervision do not differ from their colleagues in the traditional individual supervision group. However, students receiving group supervision are less satisfied at all points in time with various aspects of the supervision they receive. These findings generally broaden our understanding of group supervision in social work field training and provide evidence to support future decisions on the nature of supervision in fieldwork training in BSW programs.
Bernard, J.M., & Goodyear, R.K. (1992). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
Bogo, M. ( 1993). The student/field instructor relationship: The critical factor of field education. The Clinical Supervisor, 11, 23-36.
3.
Bogo, M. ( 2005). Field instruction in social work: A review of the research literature. The Clinical Supervisor, 24, 163-193.
4.
Bogo, M., Globerman, J., & Sussman, T. ( 2004a). Field instructor competence in group supervision: Students’ views. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24, 199-216.
5.
Bogo, M., Globerman, J., & Sussman, T. ( 2004b). The field instructor as group worker: Managing trust and competition in group supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 13-26.
6.
Bogo, M., & McKnight, K. ( 2005). Clinical supervision in social work: A review of the research literature. The Clinical Supervisor, 24, 49-67.
7.
Coch, L., & French, J.R. ( 1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 4, 512-532.
8.
Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H.G. ( 2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66, 168-176.
9.
Fortune, A.E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J.S. (2001). Student learning process in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 111-124.
10.
Geller, C. ( 1994). Group supervision as a vehicle for teaching group work to students: Field instruction in a senior center. The Clinical Supervision, 12, 199-214.
11.
Gambrill, E. ( 2001). Evaluating the quality of social work education: Options galore. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 418-429.
12.
Holden, G., Anastas, J., Meenaghan, T., & Metrey, G. ( 2002). Outcomes of social work education: The case for social work self-efficacy. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 115-133.
13.
Jenkins, L.E., & Sheafor, B.W. ( 1982). An overview of social work field instruction: Quality field instruction in social work. In B. W. Sheafor & L. E. Jenkins (Eds.), Quality of field instruction in social work (pp. 3-20). New York: Longman.
14.
Kadushin, A. ( 1992). What’s wrong, what’s right with social work supervision? The Clinical Supervisor, 10, 3-19.
15.
Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. ( 2002). Supervision in social work. NYColumbia University Press
16.
O’Hare, T., & Collins, P. ( 1997). Development and validation of a scale for measuring social work practice skills. Research on Social Work Practice, 7, 228-238.
17.
Orgen, M.L., Jonsson, C.O., & Sundin, E.C. ( 2005). Group supervision in psychotherapy: The relationship between focus, group climate, and perceived attained skill. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 373-388.
18.
Ray, D., & Altekruse, M. ( 2000). Effectiveness of group supervision versus combined group and individual supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision , 40, 19-30.
19.
Rosenthal-Gelman, C. ( 2004). Anxiety experienced by foundation-year MSW students entering field placement: Implications for admissions, curriculum, and field education . Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 39-54.
20.
Schiff, M., & Katz, K. ( 2007). The Impact of Ethnicity and Phase in Training on Israeli Social Work Students’ Satisfaction with the Field Instruction. Social Work Education, 26, 794 -809.
21.
Sherer, M. and N. Peleg-Oren ( 2001). Analysis of tasks and activities of Israeli social work students in the field work training program. Society and Welfare , 21, 443-466. (Hebrew)
22.
Spiro, S.E. ( 2001). Social work education in Israel: Trends and issues. Social Work Education, 20, 89-99.
23.
Sussman, T., Bogo, M., & Globerman, J. ( 2007). Field instructor perceptions in group supervision: Establishing trust through managing group dynamics. The Clinical Supervisor , 26, 61-80.
24.
Tebb, S., Manning, D.W., & Klaumann, T.K. (1996). A renaissance of group supervision in practicum. Clinical Supervision, 14, 39-51.
25.
Valentine, D.P. ( 2004). Field education: Exploring the future, expanding the vision. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 3-12.
26.
Walter, C.A., & Young, T.M. ( 1999). Combining individual and group supervision in education for the social work profession. The Clinical Supervisor, 18, 73-89.
27.
Zeira, A., & Rosen, A. ( 2000). Unraveling "tacit knowledge": What social workers do and why they do it. Social Service Review, 74, 103-123.
