The professional literature related to social justice has increased, but there has been little discussion of the practical issues and implications associated with social advocacy. However, adding new roles will result in new considerations for counseling psychologists. The need to be attuned to how the practical aspects of advocacy intersect with the context of psychological work may be especially present in rural areas where practitioners may be more involved in the community and thus their actions highly visible. Because the data indicate that rural communities may have few resources, a limited number of mental health professionals, and higher rates of mental illness, psychologists practicing in these areas may feel compelled to engage in advocacy. Yet there is little practical guidance for these psychologists. Therefore, the authors present considerations for social justice advocacy in rural areas, using the American Counseling Association advocacy competencies as an organizing framework.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). Available at http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
2.
BlusteinD. L. (2006). The psychology of working: A new perspective for career development, counseling, and public policy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BlusteinD. L.McWhirterE. H.PerryJ. C. (2005). An emancipatory communitarian approach to vocational development theory, research, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(2), 141-179.
4.
CampbellC.RichieS. D.HargroveD. S. (2003). Poverty and rural mental health. In StammB. H. (Ed.), Rural behavioral health care: An interdisciplinary guide (pp. 41−51). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
DeanJ. (2009). Quantifying social justice advocacy competency: Development of the social justice advocacy scale (doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 69, 4638.
6.
DeLeonP.WakefieldM.SchultzA.WilliamsJ.VandenBosG. (1989). Rural America: Unique opportunities for health care delivery and health services research. American Psychologist, 44, 1298-1306.
7.
FouadN. A.GersteinL. H.ToporekR. L. (2006). Social justice and counseling psychology in context. In ToporekR. L.GersteinL. H.FouadN. A.RoysircarG.IsraelT. (Eds.), Handbook for social justice in counseling psychology: Leadership, vision, and action (pp. 17−34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
FouadN.McPhersonR.GersteinL.BlusteinD.ElmanN.HelledyK.. (2004). Houston, 2001: Context and Legacy. The Counseling Psychologist, 32(1), 15-77.
9.
GoodmanL. A.LiangB.HelmsJ. E.LattaR. E.SparksE.WeintraubS. R. (2004). Training counseling psychologists as social justice agents: Feminist and multicultural principles in action. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 793-937.
10.
HargroveD. S. (1986). Ethical issues in rural mental health practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 20-23.
11.
HartL. G.LarsonE. H.LishnerD. M. (2005). Rural definitions for health policy and research. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1149-1155.
12.
HelbokC. (2003). The practice of psychology in rural communities: Potential ethical dilemmas. Ethics & Behavior, 13, 367-384.
13.
HelbokC. M.MarinelliR. P.WallsR. T. (2006). National survey of ethical practices across rural and urban communities. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 36-44.
14.
IveyA. E.CollinsN. M. (2003). Social justice: A long-term challenge for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 290-298.
15.
KellerP.MurrayJ.HargroveD.DengerinkH. (1983). Issues in training psychologists for rural settings. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, 4, 11-23.
16.
KnappS.VandeCreekL. (2007). When values of different cultures conflict: Ethical decision making in a multicultural context. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 660-666.
17.
LarsonJ. E.CorriganP. W. (2010). Psychotherapy for self-stigma among rural clients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 524-546.
MurrayJ. D.KellerP. A. (1991). Psychology in rural America: Current status and future directions. American Psychologist, 46, 220-231.
20.
PalmerL. K. (2004). The call to social justice: A multidisciplinary agenda. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 879-885.
21.
PieterseA. L.EvansS. A.Risner-ButnerA.CollinsN. M.MasonL. B. (2009). Multicultural competence and social justice training in counseling psychology and counselor education: A review and analysis of a sample of multicultural course syllabi. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 93-115.
22.
PipesR. B.HolsteinJ. E.AguirreM. G. (2005). Examining the personal-professional distinction: Ethics codes and the difficulty of drawing a boundary. American Psychologist, 60, 325-334.
23.
PopeK. S. (1990). Ethics and malpractice: Identifying and implementing ethical standards for primary prevention. Prevention in Human Services, 8(2), 43-64.
24.
PullmanM. D.VanHooserS.HoffmanC.HeflingerC. A. (2010). Barriers to and supports of family participation in a rural system of care for children with serious emotional problems. Community Mental Health Journal, 46, 211-220.
25.
RobertsL. W.BattagliaJ.EpsteinR. S. (1999). Frontier ethics: Mental health care needs and ethical dilemmas in rural communities. Psychiatric Services, 50, 497-503.
26.
SchankJ. (1994). Ethical dilemmas of rural and small-community psychologists (doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 871.
27.
SchankJ. A.HelbokC. A.HaldemanD. C.GallardoM. E. (2010). Challenges and benefits of ethical small-community practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41, 502-510.
28.
SchankJ. A.SkovholtT. M. (2006). Ethical practice in small communities: Challenges and rewards for psychologists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
SinghA. A.HofsessC. D.BoyerE. M.KwongA.LauA. S.M.McLainM.. (2010). Social justice and counseling psychology: Listening to the voices of doctoral trainees. The Counseling Psychologist, 38, 766-795.
30.
SlamaK. (2004, January). Rural culture as a diversity issue. The Minnesota Psychologist, 53(1), 9-13.
31.
SpeightS. L.VeraE. M. (2004). A social justice agenda: Ready, or not?The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 109-118.
32.
StammB. H.MetrickS. L.KenkelM. B.DavenportJ. A.DavenportJ.IIIHudnallA. C.. (2003). Introduction. In StammB. H. (Ed.), Rural behavioral health care: An interdisciplinary guide (pp. 3-10). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
ToporekR. L.GersteinL. H.FouadN. A.RoysircarG.IsraelT. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook for social justice in counseling psychology: Leadership, vision, and action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
ToporekR. L.WilliamsR. A. (2006). Ethics and professional issues related to the practice of social justice in counseling psychology. In ToporekR. L.GersteinL. H.FouadN. A.RoysircarG.IsraelT. (Eds.), Handbook for social justice in counseling psychology: Leadership, vision, and action (pp. 17-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
TurchikJ. A.KarpenkoV.HammersD.McNamaraJ. R. (2007). Practical and ethical assessment issues in rural, impoverished, and managed care settings. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 158-168.
VeraE. M.SpeightS. L. (2003). Multicultural competence, social justice, and counseling psychology. Expanding our roles. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 253-272.
WagenfieldM. O. (2003). A snapshot of rural and frontier America. In StammR. L. (Ed.), Rural behavioral health care: An interdisciplinary guide (pp. 33-40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
WattsR. J. (2004). Integrating social justice and psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 855-865.
41.
WerthJ. L.Jr.BorgesN. J.McNallyC. J.MaguireC. P.BrittonP. J. (2008). The intersections of work, health, diversity, and social justice: Helping people living with HIV disease. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(1), 16-41.
42.
WerthJ. L.Jr.HastingsS. L.Riding-MalonR. (2010). Ethical challenges of practicing in rural areas. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 66, 537-548.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
