Beginning in 2014, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has been marked by the extensive use of social media, where governments and individuals circulate images, videos, and texts. The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, through its X/Twitter account with over 2 million followers, strategically uses the platform to communicate. This article argues that the visual construction of gender plays a central role in how Ukraine’s government has engaged with international audiences, including Western ones, during the first year of the full-scale war. Drawing on the theory of war as a gendered phenomenon the article examines how discourses of femininity as agentic and victimized are mobilized in Ukraine’s strategic war communication. Analyzing a dataset of 3386 visuals from the first year of the full-scale war, it contributes with unique empirical knowledge on the role of gender in the war in Ukraine. To develop a fine-grained understanding of how representations of femininity are strategically mobilized, the article identifies and analyzes four gendered generic visual icons; Suffering Old Lady, Marriage, Female Ukrainian Soldier, and Saint Javelin. Each icon provides a distinct perspective on the visual construction of gender and its strategic deployment.
Adler-NissenRAndersenKEHansenL (2020) Images, emotions, and international politics: The death of Alan Kurdi. Review of International Studies46(1): 75–95.
2.
AgiusC (2024) Weak, immoral, Naïve: Gendered representations of neutrality and the emotional politics of peace and security. Cooperation and Conflict59(2): 266–289.
3.
ÅhällL (2012) The writing of heroines: Motherhood and female agency in political violence. Security Dialogue43(4): 287–303.
4.
ÅhällL (2018) Gender. In: BleikerR (ed.) Visual Global Politics. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 150–156.
5.
ÅseC (2018) The gendered myth of protection. In: GentryCEShepherdLJSjobergG (eds) Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security. Routledge, pp. 273–283.
6.
AskinKD (2005) “Never again” Promise broken again. again and again. Cardozo Law Review27: 1723–1729.
7.
BakerC (ed) (2020) Making War on Bodies: Militarisation, Aesthetics and Embodiment in International Politics. Edinburgh University Press.
8.
BarthesR (1979[1977]) Image, Music, Text. William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd.
9.
BashamV (2013) War, Identity and the Liberal State: Everyday Experiences of the Geopolitical in the Armed Forces. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
10.
BashamVM (2018) Liberal militarism as insecurity, desire and ambivalence: Gender, race and the everyday geopolitics of war. Security Dialogue49(1–2): 32–43.
11.
BerentsH (2020) Politics, policy-making and the presence of images of suffering children. International Affairs96(3): 593–608.
12.
BettizaSKhomenkoS (2022) Babushka Z: The woman who became a Russian propaganda icon. BBC News, 15June. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61757667 (accessed 10 March 2025).
13.
BleikerR (ed.) (2018) Visual Global Politics. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
14.
BrassettJBrowningCS (2024) ‘Russian warship, go fuck yourself’: Humour and the (geo) political limits of vicarious war. Cooperation and Conflict59(3): 311–336.
15.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
16.
ButlerJ (2010) Frames of War: When Life Is Grievable?. Verso Books.
17.
CallahanWA (2020) Sensible Politics: Visualizing International Relations. Oxford University Press.
18.
CandelariaJL (2021) “Dainty hands do useful work”: Depicting Filipino women in Japanese wartime propaganda. Plaridel18(1): 111–145.
19.
CasoF (2016) Sexing the disabled veteran: The homoerotic aesthetics of militarism. Critical Military Studies3(3): 217–234.
20.
CohlerD (2016) Consuming. Army wives: Military domesticity and nationalist neoliberalism on TV. Critical Military Studies3(3): 235–251.
Cooper-CunninghamD (2022) Security, sexuality, and the Gay Clown Putin meme: Queer theory and international responses to Russian political homophobia. Security Dialogue53(4): 302–323.
23.
CousenBH (2009) Memory, power and place: where is Guernica?Journal of Romance Studies9(2): 47–64.
DamannTJKimDTavitsM, et al. (2024) Women and Men Politicians’ Response to War: Evidence from Ukraine. International Organization. 2024; 78(2): 321–340.
DrainvilleR (2018) Iconography for the Age of Social Media. Humanities7(12): 1–26.
32.
DuncansonC (2009) Forces for good? Narratives of military masculinity in peacekeeping operations. International Feminist Journal of Politics11(1): 63–80.
33.
DuncombeC (2020) Social media and the visibility of horrific violence. International Affairs96(3): 609–629.
FahmyS (2004) Picturing Afghan women: A content analysis of AP wire photographs during the Taliban regime and after the fall of the Taliban regime. Gazette66(2): 91–112.
GrayH (2022) The power of love: how love obscures domestic labour and shuts down space for critique of militarism in the autobiographical accounts of British military wives. Critical Military Studies9(3): 346–363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2022.2033915
45.
GraysonKMawdsleyJ (2019) Scopic regimes and the visual turn in International Relations: Seeing world politics through the drone. European Journal of International Relations25(2): 431–457.
HansenL (2001) Gender, Nation, Rape: Bosnia and the Construction of Security. International Feminist Journal of Politics3(1): 55–75.
48.
HansenL (2006) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Routledge.
49.
HansenL (2011) Theorizing the image for security studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis. European Journal of International Relations17(1): 51–74.
50.
HansenL (2015) How images make world politics: international icons and the case of Abu Ghraib. Review of International Studies41(2): 263–288.
51.
HansenLAdler-NissenRAndersenKE (2021) The visual international politics of the European refugee crisis: Tragedy, humanitarianism, borders. Cooperation and Conflict56(4): 367–393.
52.
HansenLSpannerJ (2021) National and post-national performances at the Venice biennale: Site-specific Seeing through the Photo Essay. Millennium:. Journal of International Studies49(2): 305–336.
53.
HarimanRLucaitesJL (2007) No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. University of Chicago Press.
54.
HeckASchlagG (2012) Securitizing images: The female body and the war in Afghanistan. European Journal of International Relations19(4): 891–913.
55.
HighfieldTLeaverT (2016) Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice2(1): 47–62.
HopkeJEHestresLE (2018) Visualizing the Paris climate talks on Twitter: Media and climate stakeholder visual social media during COP21. Social Media+ Society. Epub ahead of print 19 July 2018. DOI: 2056305118782687.
59.
HorbykROrlovaD (2023) Transmedia storytelling and memetic warfare: Ukraine’s wartime public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy19(2): 228–231.
60.
HutchisonE (2016) Affective Communities in World Politics: Collective Emotions after Trauma. Cambridge University Press.
JamesP (2009) “Images of femininity in American World War I Posters.” In: JamesP (2012) Sex, Race, and Class—the Perspective of Winning: A Selection of Writings, 1952–2011. Pm Press.
KratochvílPO’SullivanM (2023) A war like no other: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as a war on gender order. European Security32(3): 347–366.
68.
KrystalliR (2024) Good Victims: The Political as a Feminist Question. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69.
LokenM (2021) ‘Both needed and threatened’: Armed mothers in militant visuals. Security Dialogue52(1): 21–44.
70.
McBrideKWibbenATR (2012) The gendering of counterinsurgency in Afghanistan. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarism, and Development3(2): 199–215.
71.
MacKenzieM (2015) Beyond the Band of Brothers: The US Military and the Myth That Women Can’t Fight. Cambridge University Press.
72.
MacKenzieM (2023) Iconic war images and the myth of the “good American Soldier.”Media, War & Conflict16(2): 192–208.
73.
MakhortykhMSydorovaM (2017) Social media and visual framing of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Media, War & Conflict10(3): 359–381.
74.
ManorICrilleyR (2018) Visually framing the Gaza War of 2014: The Israel ministry of foreign affairs on Twitter. Media, War & Conflict11(4): 369–391.
75.
MarkussenHR (2023) Inscribing security: The case of Zelensky’s selfies. Review of International Studies, 1–19.
76.
MathersJ (2020) Ginger cats and cute puppies: Animals, affect, and militarisation in the crisis in Ukraine. In: BakerC (ed.) Making War on Bodies: Militarisation, Aesthetics and Embodiment in International Politics. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 148–169.
77.
MejovaYCapozziAMontiC, et al. (2023) Narratives of War: Ukrainian Memetic Warfare on Twitter. Epub ahead of print 23 Jan 2024. arXiv 2309.08363.
78.
MillarKM (2022) Support the Troops: Military Obligation, Gender, and the Making of Political Community. Oxford University Press.
NaletovaI (2009) Other-worldly Europe? Religion and the church in the orthodox area of Eastern Europe. Religion, State & Society37(4): 375–402.
81.
NelsonD (2015) “Women, minorities, and children in the war.” In: The posters that Won The War: The production, recruitment and War bond posters of WWII. Crestline
O’sullivanM (2024) Women, peace and security as deterrence? NATO and Russia’s war against Ukraine. International Affairs100(2): 549–568.
84.
OjalaMPanttiMKangasJ (2017) Whose war, whose fault? Visual framing of the Ukraine conflict in Western European newspapers. International Journal of Communication11(25): 474–498.
PapacharissiZ (2016) Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society19(3): 307–324.
87.
PatemanC (1989) The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism, and Political Theory. Stanford University Press.
88.
PerlmutterDD (2005) Photojournalism and foreign affairs. Orbis49(1): 109–122.
89.
PhillipsSDMartsenyukT (2023) Women’s agency and resistance in Russia's war on Ukraine: From victim of the war to prominent force. Women’s Studies International Forum98: 1–8.
90.
PrøitzL (2018) Visual social media and affectivity: The impact of the image of Alan Kurdi and young people’s response to the refugee crisis in Oslo and Sheffield. Information, Communication & Society21(4): 548–563.
SärmäS (2014) Junk Feminism and Nuclear Wannabes: Collaging Parodies of Iran and North Korea (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis; No. 1961). Tampere University Press.
95.
ShepherdLJ (2006) Veiled References: Constructions of Gender in the Bush Administration Discourse on the Attacks on Afghanistan Post-9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics8(1): 19–41.
96.
ShoverMJ (1975) Roles and images of women in World War I propaganda. Politics & Society5(4): 469–486.
97.
SjobergL (2007) Agency, militarized femininity and enemy others: Observations from the war in Iraq. International Feminist Journal of Politics9(1): 82–101.
98.
SjobergL (2014) Gender, War, and Conflict. John Wiley & Sons.
99.
SjobergLGentryCE (2007) Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. Zed Books.
100.
SjobergLViaSE (2010) Introduction. In: SjobergLViaSE (eds) Gender, War, and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives. Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 1–14.
WindfeldFCHvithamarMHHansenL (2024) Gothic visibilities and International Relations: Uncanny icons, critical comics, and the politics of abjection in Aleppo. Review of International Studies50(1): 3–34.
YoungIM (2003) The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society29(1): 1–25.
114.
ZarzyckaM (2017) Gendered Tropes in War Photography: Mothers, Mourners, Soldiers. Routledge.
