Why are government jobs so attractive to talented individuals in many non-democratic countries? We identify state power as a key factor. We analyze the impact of China’s recent value-added tax reform, an expansion of taxation power, on citizens’ preferences for tax administration positions, as revealed by participation in the National Civil Service Exam. Using a difference-in-differences approach that leverages pre-reform subnational variation in tax composition and a dataset of 166,012 government job openings from 2010 to 2021, we find that the reform attracted more and higher-ability individuals to tax-related state positions. The effect is particularly strong for positions involving greater regulatory power or those located in prefectures with higher graft opportunities. An original survey reveals that exam takers perceive increased power and benefits in tax agencies after the reform. Evidence from Chinese General Social Surveys suggests the talent drawn to the state likely comes from the private sector.
AngY. Y. (2016). Co-optation & clientelism: Nested distributive politics in China’s single-party dictatorship. Studies in Comparative International Development, 51(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-015-9208-0
2.
AngY. Y. (2020). China’s gilded age: The paradox of economic boom and vast corruption. Cambridge University Press.
3.
BaiC.-E.JiaR.LiH.WangX. (2025). Entrepreneurial reluctance: Talent and firm creation in China. The Economic Journal, 135(667), 964–981. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae094
4.
BesleyT.PerssonT. (2009). The origins of state capacity: Property rights, taxation, and politics. The American Economic Review, 99(4), 1218–1244. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1218
5.
BlaydesL. (2010). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BoittinM.DistelhorstG.FukuyamaF. (2016). Reassessing the quality of government in China. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5181-16; MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2016-38, Available at SSRNhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2875244orhttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2875244
7.
BrierleyS. (2021). Combining patronage and merit in public sector recruitment. The Journal of Politics, 83(1), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1086/708240
8.
CalvoE.MurilloM. V. (2004). Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 742–757. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519931
9.
CaoJ.XuY.ZhangC. (2022). Clans and calamity: How social capital saved lives during China’s great famine. Journal of Development Economics, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102865
10.
CentenoM. A.KohliA.YasharD. J. (2017). Unpacking states in the developing world: Capacity, performance, and politics. In CentenoM. A.KohliA.YasharD. J.MistreeD. (Eds.), States in the developing world (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
11.
ChenL.ZhangH. (2021). Strategic authoritarianism: The political cycles and selectivity of China’s tax-break policy. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 845–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12648
12.
ChenZ.JinX.XuX. (2021). Is a corruption crackdown really good for the economy? Firm-level evidence from China. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 37(2), 314–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewaa014
13.
CoxG. W. (2016). Marketing sovereign promises: Monopoly brokerage and the growth of the English state. Cambridge University Press.
de MesquitaB. B.SmithA.SiversonR. M.MorrowJ. D. (2005). The logic of political survival. MIT press.
16.
DicksonB. (2016). The dictator’s dilemma: The Chinese communist Party’s strategy for survival. Oxford University Press.
17.
DinceccoM.KatzG. (2016). State capacity and long-run economic performance. The Economic Journal, 126(590), 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12161
18.
EggersA. C.HainmuellerJ. (2013). Capitol losses: The mediocre performance of congressional stock portfolios. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613000194
19.
EvansP.RauchJ. E. (1999). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 748–765. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657374
FengB.HeQ.JinX.XuX. (2026). Replication data for: State power expansion and talent attraction: Evidence from China’s civil servant fever. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BU06MH.
22.
FismanR. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.1095
23.
FryeT.ShleiferA. (1997). The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 354–358. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2950945.
FukuyamaF. (2014). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. Macmillan.
26.
GandhiJ.PrzeworskiA. (2007). Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies, 40(11), 1279–1301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007305817
27.
GerringJ.ThackerS. C. (2004). Political institutions and corruption: The role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 295–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123404000067
HaberS. (2006). Authoritarian government. In WeingastB.WittmanD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political economy (pp. 693–707). Oxford University Press.
30.
HassanM.LarreguyH.RussellS. (2023). Who gets hired? Political patronage and bureaucratic favoritism. American Political Science Review, 118(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001338
31.
HerbstJ. (2000). States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control (Vol. 149). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400852321
32.
HsuehR. (2011). China’s regulatory state. In China’s regulatory state. Cornell University Press.
HuangY. (2023). The rise and the fall of the east: Examination, autocracy, stability, and technology in Chinese history and today. Yale University Press.
35.
JacksonR. H.RosbergC. G. (1982). Why Africa’s weak states persist: The empirical and the juridical in statehood. World Politics, 35(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010277
36.
JiangJ. (2018). Making bureaucracy work: Patronage networks, performance incentives, and economic development in China. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 982–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12394
LaiW.LiX. (2024). China’s anticorruption campaign and civil servant fever. The Journal of Law and Economics, 67(2), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.1086/727780
41.
LandryP. F.LüX.DuanH. (2018). Does performance matter? Evaluating political selection along the Chinese administrative ladder. Comparative Political Studies, 51(8), 1074–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017730078
42.
LiH.MengL.XiongY.CookS. L. (2024). Job preferences and outcomes for China’s college graduates. The China Quarterly, 258, 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741023001510
43.
LiuH. (2023). Meritocracy as authoritarian co-optation: Political selection and upward mobility in China. American Political Science Review, 118(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305542300120x
44.
LiuZ.PengW.WangS. (2026). A few bad apples? Academic dishonesty, political selection, and institutional performance in China (no. w34747)(Tech. Rep.). National Bureau of Economic Research.
45.
LowiT. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009452
46.
MagaloniB. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico (Vol. 296). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511510274
ManionM. (2004). Corruption by design: Building clean government in mainland China and Hong Kong. Harvard University Press.
49.
MannM. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology, 25(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975600004239
50.
MigdalJ. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton University Press.
51.
NaughtonB. J. (2018). The Chinese economy: Adaptation and growth. MIT Press.
52.
NorthD. C.WeingastB. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700009451
53.
O’BrienK. J.LiL. (2006). Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge University Press.
PomeranzD. (2015). No taxation without information: Deterrence and self-enforcement in the value added tax. The American Economic Review, 105(8), 2539–2569. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130393
56.
QianY. (2017). How reform worked in China: The transition from plan to market. MIT Press.
57.
RosenfeldB. (2017). Reevaluating the middle-class protest paradigm: A case-control study of democratic protest coalitions in Russia. American Political Science Review, 111(4), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305541700034x
58.
SaieghS. M. (2005). Do countries have a “democratic advantage”? Political institutions, multilateral agencies, and sovereign borrowing. Comparative Political Studies, 38(4), 366–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273204
59.
ShihV.AdolphC.LiuM. (2012). Getting ahead in the communist party: Explaining the advancement of central committee members in China. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000566
60.
ShihV. C. (2008). Factions and finance in China: Elite conflict and inflation. Cambridge University Press.
61.
SlaterD. (2010). Ordering power: Contentious politics and authoritarian leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.
StasavageD. (2020). The decline and rise of democracy: A global history from antiquity to today. Princeton University Press.
64.
SvolikM. W. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge University Press.
65.
TeetsJ. C. (2009). Post-earthquake relief and reconstruction efforts: The emergence of civil society in China?The China Quarterly, 198, 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741009000332
66.
TillyC. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. In EvansP.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT. (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 121–139). Cambridge University Press.
67.
TocquevilleA. (2000). Democracy in America. University of Chicago Press. (Translated, edited, and with an introduction by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop).
68.
TreismanD. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418
69.
WangE. H. (2022). Frightened mandarins: The adverse effects of fighting corruption on local bureaucracy. Comparative Political Studies, 55(11), 1807–1843. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211060276
70.
WangY. (2022a). Blood is thicker than water: Elite kinship networks and state building in imperial China. American Political Science Review, 116(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421001490
WangY.DicksonB. J. (2022). How corruption investigations undermine regime support: Evidence from China. Political Science Research and Methods, 10(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.27
73.
WayL. A. (2005). Authoritarian state building and the sources of regime competitiveness in the fourth wave: The cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. World Politics, 57(2), 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0018
74.
WeberM. (1946). Politics as a vocation. In GerthH. H.Wright MillsC. (Eds.), From Max Webber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
WilenskyH. L. (2002). Rich democracies: Political economy, public policy, and performance. University of California Press.
76.
ZakharovA. V. (2016). The loyalty-competence trade-off in dictatorships and outside options for subordinates. The Journal of Politics, 78(2), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1086/684365
77.
ZhangC. (2021). Governing and ruling: The political logic of taxation in China. University of Michigan Press.
78.
ZhangL.LuM.LiuY. (2022). Tax incentives and supply structure of commercial and residential land. China Economic Quarterly (Chinese), 22(4), 1425–1446.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
