How do residential moves influence movers’ engagement? Drawing on German household panel data, I demonstrate that moving leads to a temporary decline in local engagement but leaves national engagement unchanged. I theorize that this drop stems from weaker attachments to place, reduced local political knowledge, and disrupted social ties. Consistent with this interpretation, longer-distance moves—which tend to exacerbate these barriers—are especially disruptive to movers’ local engagement. I then use comprehensive administrative data on all moves in Germany to rule out an alternative mechanism: most moves occur between socio-politically similar environments, limiting opportunities for moves to influence engagement through contextual change. These findings depart from the prevailing focus in related scholarship on the United States, national engagement, and partisanship. By documenting the political consequences of domestic migration for local engagement, this study contributes to research on residential mobility and local democratic accountability.
AhearnC. E.BrandJ. E.ZhouX. (2023). How, and for whom, does higher education increase voting?Research in Higher Education, 64(4), 574–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09717-4
2.
AhlinL.AnderssonM.ThulinP. (2018). Human capital sorting: The ‘when’ and ‘who’ of the sorting of educated workers to urban regions. Journal of Regional Science, 58(3), 581–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12366
AllportG. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
5.
AppelbaumY. (2025). Stuck: How the privileged and the propertied broke the engine of American opportunity. Random House.
6.
ArtamonovaA.GillespieB. J.BrandénM. (2020). “Geographic mobility among older people and their adult children: The role of parents’ health issues and family ties.”. Population, Space and Place, 26, e2371. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2371
7.
AuerD.SchaubM. (2024). Mass emigration and the erosion of liberal Democracy. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), sqae026. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae026
8.
BehrA.BellgardtE.RendtelU. (2005). Extent and determinants of panel attrition in the European community household panel. European Sociological Review, 21(5), 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci037
9.
Ben-ShaharD.GabrielS.GolanR. (2020). Can’t get there from there: Affordability distance to a superstar city. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 80, Article 103357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.04.006
10.
BernardA.BellM.Charles-EdwardsE. (2014). Life-course transitions and the age profile of internal migration. Population and Development Review, 40(2), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00671.x
11.
BishopB. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Houghton Mifflin.
12.
BloklandT.ViefR.KrügerD.SchultzeH. (2023). Roots and routes in neighbourhoods. Length of residence, belonging and public familiarity in Berlin, Germany. Urban Studies, 60(10), 1949–1967. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221136960
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanL. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425
BriggsB.KuhnP. (2008). Paying for the relocation of welfare recipients: Evidence from the Kentucky relocation assistance program. UKCPR Discussion Paper 2008-01.
18.
BuchholzM. (2022). Priced out? Household migration out of “superstar” US city-regions. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(8), 1623–1640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x221118912
BussellH.ForbesD. (2002). Understanding the volunteer market: The what, where, who and why of volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.183
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
23.
CantoniE.PonsV. (2022). Does context outweigh individual characteristics in driving voting behavior? Evidence from relocations within the United States. The American Economic Review, 112(4), 1226–1272. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201660
24.
ChoW. K. T.GimpelJ. G.HuiI. S. (2019). Migration as an opportunity to register changing partisan loyalty in the United States. Population, Space and Place, 25(4), Article e2218. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2218
25.
ChynE. (2018). Moved to opportunity: The long-run effects of public housing demolition for children. The American Economic Review, 108(10), 3028–3056. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161352
26.
CollinsW. J.WanamakerM. H. (2014). Selection and economic gains in the great migration of African Americans: New evidence from linked census data. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.1.220
27.
DancygierR. M.DehdariS. H.LaitinD. D.MarbachM.VernbyK. (2025). Emigration and radical right populism. American Journal of Political Science, 69(1), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12852
28.
DangL.SeemannA.-K.LindenmeierJ.SalitererI. (2022). Explaining civic engagement: The role of neighborhood ties, place attachment, and civic responsibility. Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3), 1736–1755. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22751
DeBellM.HillygusD. S.ShawD. R.ValentinoN. A. (2024). Validating the ‘Genuine Pipleline’ to limit social desirability bias in survey estimates of voter turnout. Public Opinion Quarterly, 88(2), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfae007
Détang-DessendreC.Goffette-NagotF.PiguetV. (2008). Life cycle and migration to urban and rural areas: Estimation of a mixed logit model on French data. Journal of Regional Science, 48(4), 789–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00571.x
33.
EinolfC.ChambréS. (2011). Who volunteers? Constructing a hybrid theory. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.429
ErmischJ.MulderC. H. (2019). Migration versus immobility, and ties to parents. European Journal of Population, 35(3), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9494-0
36.
FlavinP.KeaneM. J. (2012). Life satisfaction and political participation: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9250-1
37.
FooteA.GroszM.StevensA. (2019). Locate your nearest exit: Mass layoffs and local labor market response. ILR Review, 72(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917753095
38.
GallegoA.BuschaF.SturgisP.OberskiD. (2014). Places and preferences: A longitudinal analysis of self-selection and contextual effects. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123414000337
GanongP.ShoagD. (2017). Why has regional income convergence in the U.S. declined?Journal of Urban Economics, 102(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.07.002
41.
GiesselmannM.BohmannS.GoebelJ.KrauseP.LiebauE.RichterD.SchachtD.SchröderC.SchuppJ.LiebigS. (2019). The individual in context(s): Research potentials of the socio-economic panel study (SOEP) in sociology. European Sociological Review, 35(5), 738–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz029
42.
GoebelJ.GrabkaM. M.LiebigS.KrohM.RichterD.SchröderC.SchuppJ. (2019). The German socio-economic panel study (SOEP). Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 239(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2018-0022
43.
GreenlandA.LoprestiJ.McHenryP. (2019). Import competition and internal migration. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00751
44.
HedrickS.GherghinaS. (2021). Why people vote in local level referendums: Comparing Germany and the United States. European Politics and Society, 22(5), 716–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1820703
45.
HightonB. (2000). Residential mobility, community mobility, and electoral participation. Political Behavior, 22(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006651130422
46.
HopkinsD. J. (2018). The increasingly United States: How and why American political behavior nationalized. Chicago University Press.
47.
HuckfeldtR.JohnsonP. E.SpragueJ. (2002). Political environments, political dynamics, and the survival of disagreement. The Journal of Politics, 64(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00115
KettlerJ. J.LyonsJ. (2021). The Fickle Financiers of elections? The impact of moving on individual contributions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 31(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1652620
52.
KimS-Y. S. (2023). Automatic voter registration as a housewarming gift: Quantifying causal effects on turnout using movers. American Political Science Review, 117(3), 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422000983
53.
KorpiM.ClarkW. A. V.MalmbergB. (2011). The urban hierarchy and domestic migration: The interaction of internal migration, disposable income and the cost of living, Sweden 1993-2002. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(6), 1051–1077. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq043
54.
KrishnaraanS.DoucetteJ.AndersenD. (2023). Early-adulthood economic experiences and the formation of democratic support. British Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000278
55.
KrupnikovY.RyanJ. B. (2022). The other divide: Polarization and disengagement in American politics. Cambridge University Press.
56.
LevitanL. C.VerhulstB. (2016). Conformity in groups: The effects of others’ views on expressed attitudes and attitude change. Political Behavior, 38(2), 277–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9312-x
57.
LimJ. (2023). The electoral consequences of international migration in sending countries: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 56(1), 36–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140221089646
LuedersH. (2025). Replication data for: The local costs of moving: How residential moves weaken local engagement. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LC1FA7
60.
MacDonaldJ. A.FrankoW. W. (2008). What moves partisanship? Migration, state partisan environment change, and party identification. American Politics Research, 36(6), 880–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x08319649
61.
MagréJ.VallbéJ. J.TomàsM. (2016). Moving to suburbia? Effects of residential mobility on community engagement. Urban Studies, 53(1), 17–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26146229.
62.
MarkowskiR.Żerkowska-BalasM.StanleyB. (2024). Participation in Polish local elections: Sheer rational choice or social embeddedness fate?East European Politics & Societies, 38(1), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254231177416
63.
MartinG. J.WebsterS. W. (2020). Does residential sorting explain geographic polarization?Political Science Research and Methods, 8(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.44
64.
MaxwellR. (2019). Cosmopolitan immigration attitudes in large European cities: Contextual or compositional effects?American Political Science Review, 113(2), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000898
65.
MorettiE. (2013). The new geography of jobs. Mariner Books.
66.
MotylM.IyerR.OishiS.TrawalterS.NosekB. A. (2014). How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.010
67.
MummoloJ.NallC. (2016). Why partisans do not sort: The constraints on political segregation. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/687569
68.
NotowidigdoM. J. (2020). The incidence of local labor demand shocks. Journal of Labor Economics, 39(3), 687–725. https://doi.org/10.1086/706048
69.
NowokB.van HamM.FindlayA. M.GayleV. (2013). Does migration make you happy? A longitudinal study of internal migration and subjective well-being. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(4), 986–1002. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45287
70.
OlneyW. W.ThompsonO. (2024). “The determinants of declining internal migration.”NBER Working Paper 32123.
71.
PatanaP. (2022). Residential constraints and the political geography of the populist radical right: Evidence from France. Perspectives on Politics, 20(3), 842–859. https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759272100219x
72.
PierskallaJ. H. (2019). The proliferation of decentralized governing units. In RoddenJ.WibbelsE. (Eds.), Decentralized governance and accountability: Academic research and the future of donor Programming. Cambridge University Press.
73.
PowellG. B. (1986). American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 80(1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957082
74.
PriorM. (2019). Hooked: How politics captures people’s interest. Cambridge University Press.
75.
RamosR. (2016). Gravity models: A tool for migration analysis. IZA World of Labor.
76.
RapeliL. (2014). Comparing local, national and EU knowledge: The ignorant public reassessed. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(4), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12032
77.
RapeliL.PapageorgiouA.MattilaM. (2023). When life happens: The impact of life events on turnout. Political Studies, 71(4), 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211064579
78.
RikerW. H.OrdeshookP. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953324
79.
RothJ.Sant’AnnaP. H. C.BilinskiA.PoeJ. (2024). What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 2218–2244.
80.
SchakelA. H. (2013). Congruence between regional and national elections. Comparative Political Studies, 46(5), 631–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011424112
ShakerL. (2012). Local political knowledge and assessments of citizen competence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs018
83.
SiaroffA.WesleyJ. J. (2015). Comparative voter turnout in the Canadian provinces since 1965: The importance of context. Canadian Political Science Review, 9(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.24124/c677/20151206
84.
SiegersR.SteinhauerH. W.SchüttJ. (2022). SOEP-core v37 - Documentation of sample sizes and panel attrition in the German socio-economic panel (SOEP) (1984 until 2020). Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
85.
SquireP.WolfingerR. E.GlassD. P. (1987). Residential mobility and voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 81(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960778
StedmanR. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001
88.
ThomasM. J. (2019). Employment, education, and family: Revealing the motives behind internal migration in Great Britain. Population, Space and Place, 25(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2233
89.
TimponeR. J. (1998). Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585934
90.
Toruńczyk-RuizS.MartinovićB. (2020). The bright and dark sides of length of residence in the neighborhood: Consequences for local participation and openness to newcomers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, Article 101383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envp.2019.101383
91.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
WongC. J. (2010). Boundaries of obligation in American politics. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
