Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Does gender-progressive value change prompt conservative backlash? This study combines survey-experimental and focus group data to examine how salient debates over gender-neutral language in Germany influence political alienation and voting intentions across different groups. Both studies consistently show widespread rejection of gender-neutral language. Despite aggressive public discourse, reactions remain surprisingly nonpolitical. Experimental exposure to a moralizing request to use gender-neutral language in a survey (n = 6100) elicits negative reactions but no alienation. The treatment does decrease, however, vote intentions for the gender-progressive Greens, particularly among men. Rejection of gender-neutral language without political blaming also prevails in the twelve group discussions (n = 64), regardless of gender or education. Polarizing conversation dynamics are rare. Hence, despite a conducive context of salience and politicization, there are no indications of crystallized backlash against progressive gender values. However, an intensification of negative attitudes over the one-year data collection period may signal early stages of backlash formation.

Keywords

elections,public opinion,and voting behavior gender sexuality and politics experimental research qualitative methods political parties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acke

(2019). Language change through feminist language critique. Gender equality in language use at Berlin’s Universities. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 49(2), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41244-019-00135-1

Adler

Plewnia

(2019). Die Macht der großen Zahlen. Aktuelle Spracheinstellungen in Deutschland. In Eichinger

Plewnia

(Eds.), Neues vom heutigen Deutsch (pp. 141–162). De Gruyter.

Ahrens

Ayoub

P. M.

Lang

(2022). Leading from behind? Gender equality in Germany during the Merkel era. German Politics, 31(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.1986009

Alexander

Charron

Off

(2024). For every action a reaction? The polarizing effects of women’s rights and refugee immigration: A survey experiment in 27 eu member states. European Journal of Political Research, 63(4), 1557–1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12664

Anduiza

Rico

(2024). Sexism and the far-right vote: The individual dynamics of gender backlash. American Journal of Political Science, 68(2), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12759

Antidiskriminierungsstelle des

Bundes.

(2024). Rechtliche einschätzung staatlicher “Genderverbote”. Retrieved September 15, 2024, from. https://www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/Standpunkte/05\text{\_}genderverbot.html

Barnes

M. J.

Karim

S. M.

(2025). The Manosphere and politics. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241312095

Barthels

Brandhofer

Callaghan

Lehrke

Meidinger

Lehmann

(2021). Der Genderwahn der AfD. Retrieved January 8, 2025, from. https://interaktiv.tagesspiegel.de/lab/der-genderwahn-der-afd/

Bekafigo

M. A.

Stepanova

E. V.

Eiler

B. A.

Noguchi

Ramsey

K. L.

(2019). The effect of group polarization on opposition to Donald trump. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12584

10.

Bishin

B. G.

Hayes

T. J.

Incantalupo

M. B.

Smith

C. A.

(2016). Opinion backlash and public attitudes: Are political advances in gay rights counterproductive? American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12181

11.

Borbáth

Hutter

Leininger

(2023). Cleavage politics, polarisation and participation in Western Europe. West European Politics, 46(4), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2161786

12.

Bornschier

Häusermann

Zollinger

Colombo

(2021). How “Us” and “Them” relates to voting behavior—social structure, social identities, and electoral choice. Comparative Political Studies, 54(12), 2087–2122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997504

13.

Boyer

M. M.

Aaldering

Lecheler

(2020). Motivated reasoning in identity politics: Group status as a moderator of political motivations. Political Studies, 70(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720964667

14.

Brandt

M. J.

Reyna

Chambers

J. R.

Crawford

J. T.

Wetherell

(2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510932

15.

Breyer

(2024). Backlash or progressive mobilization? Voter reactions to perceived trajectories of women’s representation. Comparative Political Studies, 57(13), 2193–2224. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231223745

16.

Broćić

Miles

(2021). College and the “Culture War”: Assessing higher education’s influence on moral attitudes. American Sociological Review, 86(5), 856–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224211041094

17.

Campbell

Manning

(2018). The rise of victimhood culture: Microaggressions, safe spaces, and the new culture wars. Palgrave Macmillan.

18.

Carlson

T. N.

Settle

J. E.

(2022). What goes without saying. Navigating political discussion in America. Cambridge University Press.

19.

Chen

M. K.

Rohla

(2018). The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties. Science, 360(6392), 1020–1024. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1433

20.

Coady

(2024). The gender-inclusive language debate in France: A battle to save the soul of the nation? In Pfalzgraf

(Ed.), Public attitudes towards gender-inclusive language (pp. 45–72). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111202280-003

21.

Collins

(2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press.

22.

Cramer

K. J.

(2016). The politics of resentment. Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.

23.

Cyr

(2019). Focus groups for the social science researcher. Cambridge University Press.

24.

Damhuis

Westheuser

(2024). Cleavage politics in ordinary reasoning: How common sense divides. European Societies, 26(4), 1195–1231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2300641

25.

Danbold

Onyeador

I. N.

Unzueta

M. M.

(2022). Dominant groups support digressive victimhood claims to counter accusations of discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98(1), Article 104233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104233

26.

Daub

(2024). The cancel culture panic: How an American obsession went global. Stanford University Press.

27.

Davis

Goodliffe

Hawkins

(2025). The two-way effects of populism on affective polarization. Comparative Political Studies, 58(1), 122–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241237453

28.

De Vries

C. E.

Hobolt

S. B.

(2020). Political entrepreneurs: The rise of challenger parties in Europe. Princeton University Press.

29.

Diabaté

Grunow

Braack

(2023). A step to the left? Gender ideologies and political party identification in Germany. European Sociological Review, 39(6), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad013

30.

Di Carlo

Hemerijck

Karremans

(2024). The continental social investment turn: Sequencing corrective and transformative welfare state change in The Netherlands, Germany, and Italy. Politics & Society, 53(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292241252261

31.

Druckman

J. N.

Levendusky

M. S.

McLain

(2018). No need to watch: How the effects of partisan media can spread via interpersonal discussions. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12325

32.

DWDS . (2024). Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Das Wortauskunftssystem zurdeutschen Sprache in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Retrieved June 19, 2024, from. https://www.dwds.de/

33.

El País . (2024). Out with the gender perspective: Javier Milei and Nayib Bukele are leading the extreme right’s latest crusade in Latin America. Retrieved August 13, 2024, from. https://english.elpais.com/international/2024-03-04/out-with-the-gender-perspective-javier-milei-and-nayib-bukele-are-leading-the-extreme-rights-latest-crusade-in-latin-america.html

34.

Fastenrath

Marx

(2025). The role of preference formation and perception in unequal representation. Combined evidence from elite interviews and focus groups in Germany. Comparative Political Studies, 58(3), 431–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241237470

35.

Frimer

J. A.

Brandt

M. J.

Melton

Motyl

(2019). Extremists on the left and right use angry, negative language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(8), 1216–1231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218809705

36.

Fukuyama

(2018). Identity: Contemporary identity politics and the struggle for recognition. Profile Books.

37.

Gamson

W. A.

(1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.

38.

Gest

(2016). The new minority: White working class politics in an age of immigration and inequality. Oxford University Press.

39.

Gethin

Martínez-Toledano

Piketty

(2022). Brahmin left versus merchant right: Changing political cleavages in 21 western democracies, 1948–2020. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab036

40.

Gibson

J. L.

Sutherland

J. L.

(2023). Keeping your mouth shut: Spiraling self-censorship in the United States. Political Science Quarterly, 138(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqad037

41.

Gidron

Hall

P. A.

(2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. British Journal of Sociology, 68(Suppl 1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12319

42.

Goldmacher

Haberman

Swan

(2024). How trump won, and how Harris lost. The New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2025, from. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/politics/trump-win-election-harris.html

43.

Google . (2024). Google Trends. Retrieved March 7, 2024, from. https://trends.google.de/trends/

44.

Graff

Korolczuk

(2021). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment. Routledge.

45.

Green

Shorrocks

(2023). The gender backlash in the vote for Brexit. Political Behavior, 45(1), 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09704-y

46.

Haidt

Lukianoff

(2018). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin.

47.

Halkier

(2010). Focus groups as social enactments: Integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348683

48.

Hartman

Hester

Gray

(2023). People see political opponents as more stupid than evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(7), 1014–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221089451

49.

Hobolt

S. B.

Lawall

Tilley

(2024). The polarizing effect of partisan echo chambers. American Political Science Review, 118(3), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001211

50.

Hochschild

(2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New Press.

51.

Hollander

J. A.

(2004). The social contexts of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33(5), 602–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241604266988

52.

Hooghe

Marks

(2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279

53.

Iyengar

Lelkes

Levendusky

Malhotra

Westwood

S. J.

(2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

54.

Jäckle

(2022). Per aspera ad astra – Eine politikwissenschaftliche Analyse der Akzeptanz des Gendersterns in der deutschen Bevölkerung auf Basis einer Online-Umfrage. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 63(3), 469–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00380-z

55.

Jankowski

Stecker

Blätte

Bräuninger

Debus

Kurella

A.-S.

Müller

Pickel

(2021). Open expert survey 2021. Retrieved September 16, 2024, from. https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/XIL6OW

56.

Jones

Willsher

Oltermann

Giuffrida

(2023). What’s in a word? How less-gendered language is faring across Europe. The Guardian. Retrieved August 13, 2024, from. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/04/whats-in-a-word-how-less-gendered-language-is-faring-across-europe

57.

Jost

J. T.

Baldassarri

D. S.

Druckman

J. N.

(2022). Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(10), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5

58.

Klar

(2014). Partisanship in a social setting. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12087

59.

Kuran

(1995). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Harvard University Press.

60.

Lankes

(2022). Argentina, one of the world’s first bans on gender-neutral language. The New York Times. Retrieved August 13, 2024, from. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/20/world/americas/argentina-gender-neutral-spanish.html

61.

Lee

(2021). Close relationships in close elections. Social Forces, 100(1), 400–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa101

62.

Le Monde . (2023). Ecriture inclusive: Emmanuel Macron estime qu’ “on n’a pas besoin d’ajouter des points au milieu des mots pour rendre la langue franaise lisible”. Retrieved August 13, 2024, from. https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2023/10/30/ecriture-inclusive-emmanuel-macron-estime-qu-on-n-a-pas-besoin-d-ajouter-des-points-au-milieu-des-mots-pour-rendre-la-langue-francaise-lisible\text{\_}6197361\text{\_}823448.html

63.

Lindsey

(2023). Social preferences: Measuring private, public, and group preferences through focus groups. Perspectives on Politics, 21(4), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722003218

64.

Marx

(2025). Replication data for: Is there a backlash against identity politics? Experimental and focus group evidence on the conflict over gender-neutral language in Germany. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/S9XCKE

65.

Matthes

Knoll

von Sikorski

(2018). The “spiral of silence” revisited: A meta-analysis on the relationship between perceptions of opinion support and political opinion expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217745429

66.

Menzner

Traunmüller

(2023). Subjective freedom of speech: Why do citizens think they cannot speak freely? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 64(1), 155–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00414-6

67.

Meuleneers

P. W.

(2024). On the “invention” of the Gendersprache in German media discourse. In Pfalzgraf

(Ed.), Public attitudes towards gender-inclusive language (pp. 159–182). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111202280-007

68.

Monath

(2018). Geschlechtergerechte Sprache: Justizministerin Barley unterstützt Genderstern im Duden. Tagesspiegel Online. Retrieved January 7, 2025, from. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/justizministerin-barley-unterstutzt-genderstern-im-duden-3953119.html

69.

Morgan

D. L.

(2018). Basic and advanced focus groups. Sage Publications.

70.

Müller-Spitzer

Ochs

(2023). Geschlechtergerechte Sprache auf den Webseiten deutscher, österreichischer, schweizerischer und Südtiroler Städte. Sprachreport, 39(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.14618/sr-2-2023\text_mue

71.

Mutz

D. C.

(2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), E4330–E4339. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115

72.

Nagourney

Nehamas

(2024). Harris loss has Democrats fighting over how to talk about transgender rights. The New York Times. Retrieved January 11, 2025, from. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/20/us/politics/presidential-campaign-transgender-rights.html

73.

Newman

B. J.

DeMora

S. L.

Reny

T. T.

(2021). Female empowerment and the politics of language: Evidence using gender-neutral amendments to subnational constitutions. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1761–1772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000332

74.

Noelle-Neumann

(1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x

75.

Noordzij

de Koster

van der Waal

(2021). “They don’t know what it’s like to be at the bottom”: Exploring the role of perceived cultural distance in less-educated citizens’ discontent with politicians. British Journal of Sociology, 72(3), 566–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12800

76.

Norris

(2023). Cancel culture: Myth or reality? Political Studies, 71(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211037023

77.

Norris

Inglehart

(2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

78.

Noury

Roland

(2020). Identity politics and populism in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033542

79.

Off

(2023). Gender equality salience, backlash and radical right voting in the gender-equal context of Sweden. West European Politics, 46(3), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2084986

80.

Off

(2024). Multidimensional and intersectional cultural grievances over gender, sexuality and immigration. European Journal of Political Research, 63(4), 1351–1373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12665

81.

Pfalzgraf

(2024a). Attitudes of the purist association Verein Deutsche Sprache (VDS) towards gender-inclusive use of German. A conceptual expansion of the term linguistic purism. In Pfalzgraf

(Ed.), Public attitudes towards gender-inclusive language (pp. 183–208). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111202280-008

82.

Pfalzgraf

(2024b). Introduction and findings: Public attitudes towards gender-inclusive language – a multilingual perspective. In Pfalzgraf

(Ed.), Public attitudes towards gender-inclusive language: A multilingual perspective (pp. 1–20). De Gruyter.

83.

Politico . (2021). Debate over gender-neutral language divides Germany. Retrieved March 19, 2024, from. https://www.politico.eu/article/debate-over-gender-inclusive-neutral-language-divides-germany/

84.

Renström

E. A.

Lindqvist

Klysing

Gustafsson Sendén

(2024). Personal pronouns and person perception – do paired and nonbinary pronouns evoke a normative gender bias? British Journal of Psychology, 115(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12686

85.

Roberts

Gilbert

Allum

Eisner

(2019). Satisficing in surveys: A systematic review of the literature. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(3), 598–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz035

86.

RTL . (2023). Mehrheit der Deutschen vom Gendern genervt und gegen Gender-Pflicht in der Verwaltung. Retrieved April 29, 2024, from. https://media.rtl.com/meldung/RTL-ntv-Trendbarometer-00206/

87.

Schäfer

(2022). Cultural backlash? How (Not) to explain the rise of authoritarian populism. British Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 1977–1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000363

88.

Shalaby

Wängnerud

(2024). Gender and authoritarian politics: Citizens and elites’ responses to gender reforms. Comparative Political Studies, 57(14), 2263–2280. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241283159

89.

Tavits

Pérez

E. O.

(2019). Language influences mass opinion toward gender and LGBT equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(34), 16781–16786. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908156116

90.

Wagenknecht

(2021). Die Selbstgerechten: Mein Gegenprogramm für Gemeinsinn und Zusammenhalt. Campus.

91.

Wagner

(2024). Affective polarization in Europe. European Political Science Review, 16(3), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000383

92.

Waldendorf

(2024). Words of change: The increase of gender-inclusive language in German media. European Sociological Review, 40(2), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad044

93.

Wallaschek

Verbalyte

Eigmüller

(2024). Cleavage theory meets gender equality: Examining party positions in Germany. European Politics and Society, 25(5), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2024.2304591

94.

Wells

Cramer

K. J.

Wagner

M. W.

Alvarez

Friedland

L. A.

Shah

D. V.

Bode

Edgerly

Gabay

Franklin

(2017). When we stop talking politics: The maintenance and closing of conversation in contentious times: Political talk in contentious times. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12280

95.

Westdeutscher Rundfunk . (2023). WDR-Studie: So gendern die Deutschen. Retrieved April 29, 2024, from. https://www1.wdr.de/nachrichten/gender-umfrage-infratest-dimap-100.html

96.

Wood

Antova

Flear

Hervey

(2023). What do “Left Behind communities” want? A qualitative study in the United Kingdom using photo elicitation. American Political Science Review, 117(4), 1173–1187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001186

97.

World Economic Forum . (2024). Global gender gap report 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2025, from. https://www.weforum.org/publications/_gender-gap-report-2024/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.46 MB

Is There a Backlash Against Identity Politics? Experimental and Focus Group Evidence on the Conflict Over Gender-Neutral Language in Germany

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material