There are numerous studies of the effects of partisan cues in established party systems, but almost none on how they affect voting in new party systems. This lacuna might stem from untested assumptions that partisan cues are un-influential where parties lack multigenerational psychological bonds with citizens and long-standing records. Alternatively, we theorize that even in new party systems, voters use partisan cues to assess candidates’ capabilities, preferences, and electoral viability. We test this theory through an experiment in which we varied inclusion of party identifiers on mock ballots in Uganda, where the multiparty system was only 5 years old. We find that partisan cues increased selection of major-party candidates over independents, casting of straight-ticket ballots, and votes for copartisans. Our results challenge the common assumption that partisan labels are irrelevant in new party systems. Partisan cues can influence political decision making, even when party systems are young.
AchenC.BartelsL. (2004, September). Musical chairs: Pocketbook voting and the limits of democratic accountability. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
4.
AlesinaA.CohenG.RoubiniN. (1993). Electoral business cycles in industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Economy, 9, 1-24.
5.
ArriolaL. (2013). Multiethnic coalitions in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BaldwinK. (2013). Why vote with the chief?American Journal of Political Science, 57, 794-809.
7.
BirnirJ. (2007). Ethnicity and electoral politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BleckJ.van de WalleN. (2011). Parties and issues in francophone West Africa. Democratization, 18, 1125-1145.
9.
BleckJ.van de WalleN. (2013). Valence issues in African elections. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1394-1421.
10.
BraderT.TuckerJ. (2012). Following the party’s lead. Comparative Politics, 44, 403-420.
11.
BraderT.TuckerJ.DuellD. (2013). Which parties can lead opinion?Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1485-1517.
12.
BramborT.ClarkW.GolderM. (2007). Are African party systems different?Electoral Studies, 26, 315-323.
13.
BuckleyF.CollinsN.ReidyT. (2007). Ballot paper photographs and low-information elections. Politics, 27, 174-181.
14.
BullockJ. (2011). Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review, 105, 496-515.
15.
CalvoE.EscolarM.PomaresJ. (2009). Ballot design and split ticket voting in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 28, 218-231.
16.
CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW.StokesD. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
ChaikenS. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
ChhibberP. K.KollmanK. (1998). Party aggregation and the number of parties in India and the United States. American Political Science Review, 92, 329-342.
21.
Conroy-KrutzJ. (2013). Information and ethnic politics in Africa. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 345-373.
GerberA.GreenD. (1998). Rational learning and partisan attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 794-818.
34.
GorenP. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 882-897.
35.
GorenP.FedericoC.KittilsonM. (2009). Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 805-820.
36.
GraberD. (1996). Say it with pictures. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 85-96.
37.
GreenD.HaS.BullockJ. (2010). Enough already about “Black Box” experiments: Studying mediation is more difficult than most scholars suppose. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628, 200-208.
38.
GreenD.PalmquistB.SchicklerE. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
GreeneK. (2011). Campaign persuasion and nascent partisanship in Mexico’s new democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 398-416.
40.
HealyA.LenzG. (2014). Substituting the end for the whole: Why voters respond primarily to the election-year economy. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 31-47.
41.
HickenA.KuhontaE. (Eds.). (2014). Party system institutionalization in Asia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
HuckfeldtR.LevineJ.MorganW.SpragueJ. (1999). Accessibility and the political utility of partisan and ideological orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 888-911.
43.
IyengarS.KinderD. (1987). News that matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
IzamaA.WilkersonM. (2011). Museveni’s triumph and weakness. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 64-78.
45.
JenningsM. K.StokerL.BowersJ. (2009). Politics across generations. Journal of Politics, 71, 782-799.
46.
KamC. (2005). Who toes the party line?Political Behavior, 27, 163-182.
47.
KatzG.AlvarezR.EscolarM.PomaresJ. (2011). Assessing the impact of alternative voting technologies on multi-party elections. Political Behavior, 33, 1-24.
48.
KeeferP.VlaicuR. (2008). Democracy, credibility, and clientelism. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 24, 371-406.
49.
KiewietD. (1983). Macroeconomics and micropolitics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
KimballD. (2003). Decline in ticket splitting and the increasing salience of party labels by models of voting in presidential elections. In WeisbergH.WilcoxC. (Eds.), Models of voting in presidential elections (pp. 161-179). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
51.
KitscheltH.MansfeldovaZ.MarkowskiR.TokaG. (1999). Post-communist party systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
KleinD.BaumL. (2001). Ballot information and voting decisions in judicial elections. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 709-728.
53.
KoterD. (2013). King makers: Local leaders and ethnic politics in Africa. World Politics, 65, 187-232.
54.
KramerG. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior. American Political Science Review, 65, 131-143.
55.
KuenziM.LambrightG. (2001). Party system institutionalization in 30 African countries. Party Politics, 7, 437-468.
56.
LambrightG. (2011). Decentralization in Uganda. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
57.
LauR.AndersenD.RedlawskD. (2008). An exploration of correct voting in recent U.S. presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 395-411.
58.
LauR.RedlawskD. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951-971.
59.
LeBasA. (2011). From protest to parties. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
LenzG. (2009). Learning and opinion change, not priming. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 821-837.
61.
LindbergS. (2007). Institutionalization of party systems?Government & Opposition, 42, 215-241.
62.
LupuN.StokesS. (2010). Democracy, interrupted: Regime change and partisanship in twentieth-century Argentina. Electoral Studies, 29, 91-104.
63.
MagaloniB. (2006). Voting for autocracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64.
MainwaringS.ScullyT. (1995). Building democratic institutions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
McKelveyR.OrdeshookP. (1972). A general theory of the calculus of voting. In HerndonJ.BerndJ. (Eds.), Mathematical applications in political science VI (pp. 32-78). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
MerollaJ.StephensonL.ZechmeisterE. (2008). Can Canadians take a hint? The (in)effectiveness of party labels as information shortcuts in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 41, 673-696.
68.
MitchellA. A.OlsonJ. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 318-332.
69.
MoserR. G. (1999). Electoral systems and the number of parties in postcommunist states. World Politics, 51, 359-384.
70.
MozaffarS.ScarrittJ.GalaichG. (2003). Electoral institutions, ethnopolitical cleavages, and party systems in Africa’s emerging democracies. American Political Science Review, 97, 379-390.
71.
MuseveniY. K. (1997). Sowing the mustard seed. London, England: Macmillan.
72.
MwendaA.TangriR. (2005). Patronage politics, donor reforms, and regime consolidation in Uganda. African Affairs, 104, 449-467.
73.
NicholsonS. (2012). Polarizing cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 52-66.
74.
PettyR.CacioppoT. (1986). Communication and persuasion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
75.
PosnerD. (2005). Institutions and ethnic politics in Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
RahnW. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 472-496.
77.
ReynoldsA.SteenbergenM. (2006). How the world votes. Electoral Studies, 25, 570-598.
78.
RiedlR. (2014). Authoritarian origins of democratic party systems in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
79.
RobertsK. M.WibbelsE. (1999). Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America. American Political Science Review, 93, 575-590.
80.
RubongoyaJ. (2007). Regime hegemony in Museveni’s Uganda. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
81.
SamuelsD.ZuccoC.Jr. (2014). The power of partisanship in Brazil. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 212-225.
82.
SchaffnerB.StrebM. (2002). The partisan heuristic in low-information elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 559-581.
83.
SchaffnerB.StrebM.WrightG. (2007). A new look at the republican advantage in nonpartisan elections. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 240-249.
84.
SchillD. (2012). The visual image and the political image. Review of Communication, 12, 118-142.
85.
SmithB.LaskowskiS.LowryS. (2009). Implications of graphics on usability and accessibility for the voter. In RyanP.SchoenmakersB. (Eds.), E-Voting and identity (pp. 54-74). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
86.
SnyderJ.Jr.TingM. (2002). An informational rationale for political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 90-110.
87.
TrippA. M. (2010). Museveni’s Uganda. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
88.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
89.
van de WalleN. (2003). Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa’s emerging party systems. Journal of Modern African Studies, 41, 297-321.
90.
WelchS.BledsoeT. (1986). The partisan consequences of nonpartisan elections and the changing nature of urban politics. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 128-139.
91.
ZillmannD. (2006). Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication, 56(Suppl. 1), S221-S237.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
