On the premise that issues of fairness are important to voting behavior but often unrecognized, we explore how feelings of unfairness increase support for populist parties. We distinguish personal unfairness, the view that one’s own economic situation is unfair, from social unfairness, the view that the economic situation of others in society is unfair. Based on findings in psychology, we argue that uncertainties associated with the transition to a globalized knowledge economy heighten people’s feelings of personal unfairness and find empirical support for that contention. We develop arguments about why feelings of personal unfairness should increase support for the populist right and feelings about social unfairness should increase support for the populist left and find empirical support for them. Our results contribute to explanations for why people vote for the populist right rather than the left and underline the roles that uncertainty and issues of fairness play in electoral politics.
Abou-ChadiT.MittereggerR.MuddeC. (2021). Left behind by the working class? Social democracy’s electoral crisis and the rise of the radical right. Friederich Ebert Stiftung.
AlesinaA.GiulianoP. (2011). Preferences for redistribution. In BenhabibBisinJ. A.JacksonM. O. (Eds.), Handbook of social economics (1A, pp. 93–131). Elsevier.
4.
AnelliM.ColantoneI.StanigP. (2021). Individual vulnerability to industrial robot adoption increases support for the radical right. PNAS, 118(47), Article e2111611118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111611118
5.
AutorD. H.DornD.HansonG.MajlesiK. (2020). Importing polarization? The electoral Consequences of rising trade exposure. American Economic Review, 110(10), 3139–3183. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170011
BacciniL.WeymouthS. (2021). Gone for good: Deindustrialization, white voter backlash, and US presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 115(2), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000022
8.
Ballard-RosaC.MalikM.RickardS.ScheveK. (2021). The economic origins of authoritarian values: Evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom. Comparative Political Studies, 54(1), 2321–2353. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024296
9.
BegueL.BastounisM. (2003). Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 71(3), 435–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7103007
BetzH. G. (1993). The new politics of resentment: Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe. Comparative Politics, 25(4), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/422034
13.
BetzH-GOswaldM. (2022). Emotional mobilizaton: The affective underpinnings of right-wing populist support. In OswaldM (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Populism (pp. 115–143). Cham: Springer Nature.
BrozJ. L.FriedenJ.WeymouthS. (2021). Populism in place: The economic geography of the globalization backlash. International Organization, 75(2), 464–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000314
16.
BurgoonB.van NoortS.RooduijnM.UnderhillG. (2019). Positional deprivation and support for radical right and radical left parties. Economic Policy, 34(97), 49–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiy017
CavailléC. (2023). Fair enough? Support for redistribution in age of inequality. Cambridge University Press.
20.
CavailléC.TrumpK. (2015). The two facets of social policy preferences. Journal of Politics, 77(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1086/678312
21.
CenaL.RocatoM.RussonS. (2023). Relative deprivation, national GDP and right-wing populism: A multilevel, multinational study. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2636
22.
ColantoneI.StanigP. (2018). The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 936–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12358
23.
CramerK. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
24.
DalbertC. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scales’ validity. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022091609047
25.
DalbertC. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. Plenum.
26.
DamhuisK. (2020). Roads to the radical right. Oxford University Press.
27.
De CremerD.SedikidesC. (2005). Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of experimental social psychology, 41(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.010
28.
DemertzisN. (2006). Emotions and populism. In ClarkeS.HoggettP.ThompsonS. (Eds.), Emotions, politics and society (pp. 103–122). Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
DonovanT. (2019). Authoritarian attitudes and support for radical right populists. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29(4), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1666270
30.
DoosjeB.Van den BosK.LosemanA.FeddesA. R.MannL. (2012). “My in-group is superior!” Susceptibility for radical right-wing attitudes and behaviors in Dutch youth. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2012.00099.x
31.
DunnK. (2015). Preference for radical right-wing populist parties among exclusive-nationalists and authoritarians. Party Politics, 21(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472587
32.
ElchardusM.SpruytB. (2014). Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology. Government and Opposition, 51(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.27
33.
EnggistM.PinggeraM. (2022). Radical right parties and their welfare state stances – not so blurry after all?West European Politics, 45(1), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1902115
34.
EnyediZ.Deegan-KrauseK. (2018). Voters and parties in eastern europe. In FaganA.KopeckýP. (Eds.), The routledge handbook of East European politics (pp. 169–180). Routledge.
35.
EribonD. (2013). Returning to reims. MIT Press.
36.
FengerM. (2018). The social policy agenda of populist radical right parties in comparative perspective. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34(3), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2018.1483255
37.
FilsingerM. (2022). Perceived exclusionary disadvantages and populist attitudes: Evidence from comparative and longitudinal survey data in six European countries. Political Research Quarterly, (Online First), 106591292211230. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221123018
38.
FleckerJ. (Ed.), (2007). Changing working life and the appeal of the extreme right. Ashgate.
FukuyamaF. (2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
41.
GestJ.RenyT.MayerJ. (2018). Roots of the radical right: Nostalgic deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1694–1719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017720705
42.
GidronN.HallP. A. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S57–S84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12319
43.
GidronN.HallP. A. (2020). Populism as a problem of social integration. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7), 1027–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879947
GoosM.ManningA.SalomonsA. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509–2526. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2509
46.
GrahamJHaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
47.
HaferC. L.ChomaB. L. (2009). Belief in a just world, perceived fairness, and justification of the status quo. In JostJ. T.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 107–125). Oxford University Press.
48.
HaferC. L.SuttonR. (2016). Belief in a just world. In SabbaghC.SchmidtM. (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 145–160). Springer.
49.
HarteveldD.Van der BrugW.De LangeS.Van der MeerT. (2022). Multiple roots of the populist radical right: Support for the Dutch PVV in cities and the countryside. European Journal of Political Research, 61(2), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12452
50.
HäusermannS.KurerT.ZollingerD. (2021). Aspiration versus apprehension: Economic opportunities and electoral preferences. Paper presented to the seminar on the state and capitalism since 1800. Harvard University.
ImZ. J.MayerN.PalierB.RovnyJ. (2019). The “losers of automation”: A reservoir of votes for the radical right?Research and Politics, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822395
58.
ImZ. J.WassH.KantolaA.KauppinenT. M. (2023). With status decline in sight, voters turn radical right: How do experience and expectation of status decline shape electoral behavior. European Political Science Review, 15(1), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000406
59.
IvarsflatenE. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in western europe? Re-Examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294168
60.
JardinaA. (2019). White identity politics. Cambridge University Press.
61.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
62.
KimS. I.HallP. A. (2023). Replication data for: Fairness and support for populist parties. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/97BQXU
63.
KochC. M.MeléndezC.KaltwasserC. R. (2021). Mainstream voters, non-voters and populist voters: What sets them apart?Political Studies, (Online), 003232172110492. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211049298
64.
KriesiH.GrandeE.LachatR.DolezalM.BornschierS.FreyT. (Eds.), (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
65.
KurerT. (2020). The declining middle: Occupational change, social status, and the populist right. Comparative Political Studies, 53(10–11), 1798–1835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912283
66.
KurerT.Van StaalduinenB. (2022). Disappointed expectations: Downward mobility and electoral change. American Political Science Review, 116(4), 1340–1356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000077
67.
LasswellH. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. Whittlesey House.
68.
LernerM. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Springer.
69.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum.
70.
LipkusaI. M.DalbertC.SieglerI. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296227002
71.
MargalitY. (2019). Economic insecurity and the causes of populism, reconsidered. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.152
72.
MolsF.JettenJ. (2016). Explaining the appeal of populist right-wing parties in times of economic prosperity. Political Psychology, 37(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12258
73.
MoschonasG. (2001). In the name of social democracy. Verso.
MutzD. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115
76.
MutzD. C. (2021). Winners and losers: The psychology of foreign trade. Princeton University Press.
77.
NorrisP.InglehartR. F. (2019). Cultural backlash. Cambridge University Press.
78.
O’BrienN. (2011). Just desserts: Attitudes to fairness, poverty and welfare reform. Policy Exchange.
PappasT. S (2019). Populism and liberal democracy. Oxford University Press.
81.
ProtzerE. S. M. (2021). Social mobility explains populism, not inequality or culture. CID Research Fellow Working Paper Series 2021.118, Harvard University, 1–60. https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37366842
RooduijnM.AkkermanT. (2017). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in western europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815596514
87.
RooduijnM.BurgoonB.Van ElsasE. J.Van de WerfhorstH. G. (2017). Radical distinction: Support for radical left and radical right parties in Europe. European Union Politics, 18(4), 536–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517718091
88.
RooduijnM.Van KesselS.FroioC.PirroA.De LangeS.HalikiopoulouD.LewisP.MuddeC.TaggartP. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. www.popu-list.org.
89.
RovnyJ. (2014). Communism, federalism and ethnic minorities: Explaining party competition patterns in Eastern Europe. World Politics, 66(4), 669–708. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887114000227
90.
RuncimanW. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
SalmelaM.von ScheveC. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419
SandelM. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
95.
Schulte-CloosJ.LeiningerA. (2022). Electoral participation, political disaffection, and the rise of the populist radical right. Party Politics, 28(3), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820985186
96.
SedikidesC.De CremerD.HartC. M.BrebelsL. (2013). Procedural fairness responses in the context of self-uncertainty. In ArkinR. M.OlesonK. C.CarrollP. J. (Eds.), The uncertain self: A handbook of perspectives from social and personality psychology (pp. 142–159). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
97.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
98.
SpruytB.KeppensG.Van DroogenbroeckF. (2016). Who supports populism and what attracts people to it. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639138
99.
SuttonR. M.DouglasK. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 637–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.010
100.
TajfelH. (Ed.), (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
101.
Van den BosK. (2009a). Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20(4), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903333411
102.
Van den BosK. (2009b). The social psychology of uncertainty management and system justification. In JostJ. T.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 185–209). Oxford University Press.
103.
Van den BosK.LindE. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (34, pp. 1–60). Academic Pres.
104.
Van den BosK.PoortvlietP. M.MaasM.MiedemaJ.Van den HamE.-J. (2005). An enquiry concerning the principles of cultural norms and values: The impact of uncertainty and mortality salience on reactions to violations and bolstering of cultural worldviews. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.001
105.
Van HauwaertS. M.Van KesselS. (2018). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12216
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
