Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

What are the consequences of the militarization of public safety? Governments increasingly rely on militaries for policing, but the systematic study of this phenomenon’s consequences for human rights has been neglected. NGO and journalistic accounts point to widespread violations by the military, but these snapshots do not necessarily present evidence of systematic abuse. Based on unique data on military deployments and human rights complaints in Mexico, we conduct a systematic, country-wide study of the consequences of constabularization for human rights. Following matching and difference-in-difference strategies, we find that it leads to a 150% increase in complaints against federal security forces. We also leverage deployments for disaster-relief operations and complaints against non-security institutions to show that the increase is not due to underlying conditions or higher reporting in the military’s presence. The findings have important implications for our understanding of quality of democracy and the democratic ideals of civilian policing.

Keywords

Latin America human rights police militarization Mexico

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Basombrío

(1999). Crime: A Latin American challenge for human rights. Human Rights Dialogue, 2(1).

Beer

Mitchell

N. J.

(2004). Democracy and human rights in the Mexican states: Elections or social capital? International Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00302.x

Bergman

(2018). More money, more crime: Prosperity and rising crime in Latin America. Oxford University Press.

Blair

Weintraub

(2021). Military policing exacerbates crime and may increase human rights abuses: A randomized controlled trial in Cali, Colombia. Available at SSRN: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3925245

Bove

Gavrilova

(2017). Police officer on the frontline or a soldier? The effect of police militarization on crime. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150478

Brewer

(2009). Structural human rights violations: The true face of Mexico’s war on crime. Human Rights Brief, 16(2), 7. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/R22180.pdf

Calderón

Robles

Díaz-Cayeros

Magaloni

(2015). The beheading of criminal organizations and the dynamics of violence in Mexico. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(8), 1455–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715587053

Campbell

D. J.

Campbell

K. M.

(2010). Soldiers as police officers/police officers as soldiers: Role evolution and revolution in the United States. Armed Forces & Society, 36(2), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x09335945

Cornell

Roberts

(1990). Democracy, counterinsurgency, and human rights: The case of Peru. Human Rights Quarterly, 12(4), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.2307/762499

10.

Costa

A. T. M.

(2011). Police brutality in Brazil: Authoritarian legacy or institutional weakness? Latin American Perspectives, 38(5), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x10391631

11.

Cruz

J. M.

(2009). Police abuse in Latin America. Americas Barometer Insights (p. 11). Vanderbilt University.

12.

Cruz

J. M.

(2016). State and criminal violence in Latin America. Crime, Law and Social Change, 66(4), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9631-9

13.

Dahl

(1972). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.

14.

Dammert

Bailey

Chia

S. Y. A. A.

(2006). Police force reform and military participation against delinquency. Revista Fuerzas Armadas Y Sociedad, 1(se), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0717-14982006000100005

15.

De Bruin

(2021). Policing insurgency: Are more militarized police more effective? Small Wars & Insurgencies, 33(4–5), 742–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2021.1980186

16.

Defensoría de los Derechos Humanos del Pueblo de Oaxaca . (2017). Manual para policías: Resolución pacífica de conflictos [Handbook for police officers: Peaceful conflict resolution]. Gobierno del Estado de Oaxaca and Defensoría de los Derechos Humanos del Pueblo de Oaxaca.

17.

den Heyer

(2013). Mayberry revisited: A review of the influence of police paramilitary units on policing. Policing and Society, 24(3), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.784304

18.

Doss

(2018, November 15). How a military approach to training can improve police skills. PoliceOne.com Blog.

19.

Dube

García-Ponce

(2013). Cross-border spillover: US gun laws and violence in Mexico. American Political Science Review, 107(3), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055413000178

20.

Dunn

(2001). Border militarization via drug and immigration enforcement: Human rights implications. Social Justice, 28(2), 7–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29768073

21.

Durán-Martínez

(2018). The politics of drug violence: Criminals, cops, and politicians in Colombia and Mexico. Oxford University Press.

22.

Durán-Martínez

Soifer

H. D.

(2021). The drug trade and state violence in internal conflicts: Evidence from Peru. Latin American Politics and Society, 63(4), 96–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2021.39

23.

Flores-Macías

(2018). The consequences of militarizing anti-drug efforts for state capacity in Latin America: Evidence from Mexico. Comparative Politics, 51(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041518824414647

24.

Flores-Macías

Zarkin

(2021a). Explaining public support for militarizing law enforcement: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Mexico. British Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 1377–1397. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000259

25.

Flores-Macías

Zarkin

(2023). Replication data for: The consequences of militarized policing for human rights: Evidence from Mexico. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HB2CCD

26.

Flores-Macías

G. A.

Zarkin

(2021b). The militarization of law enforcement: Evidence from Latin America. Perspectives on Politics, 19(2), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592719003906

27.

Gan

(2020). Rule of law crisis, militarization of citizen security, and effects on human rights in Venezuela. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, (109), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.32992/erlacs.10577

28.

Gaussens

Jasso González

(2020). Militarization of public security and violation of human rights in Mexico (2000-2020). The Age of Human Rights Journal, (15), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v15.5783

29.

Genç Yilmaz

(2022). The missing piece of the puzzle. The EMASYA protocol and civil-military relations in Turkey. Armed Forces and Society. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X211066570

30.

González

(2006). La justicia social como fin primordial de los derechos humanos [Social justice as the ultimate goal of human rights]. Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco.

31.

González

Y. M.

(2020). Authoritarian police in democracy: Contested security in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

32.

González

Y. M.

(2022). Reforming to avoid reform: Strategic policy substitution and the reform gap in policing. Perspectives on Politics. FirstView. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722000135

33.

Goodman-Bacon

(2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014

34.

Gunderson

Cohen

Schiff

K. J.

Clark

T. S.

Glynn

A. N.

Owens

M. L.

(2021). Counterevidence of crime-reduction effects from federal grants of military equipment to local police. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00995-5

35.

Harig

(2020). Soldiers in police roles. Policing and Society, 30(9), 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1650745

36.

Harig

(2022). Militarisation by popular demand? Explaining the politics of internal military roles in Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 41(3), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13289

37.

Harris

M. C.

Park

Bruce

D. J.

Murray

M. N.

(2017). Peacekeeping force: Effects of providing tactical equipment to local law enforcement. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150525

38.

Heinz

Frühling

(1999). Determinants of gross human rights violations by state and state-sponsored actors in Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, and Argentina, 1960-1990. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

39.

Human Rights Watch . (2019). World Report. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019#

40.

Hunter

(1996). State and soldier in Latin America: Redefining the military’s role in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. US Institute of Peace.

41.

Imai

Kim

I. S.

Wang

E. H.

(2021). Matching methods for causal inference with time-series cross-sectional data. American Journal of Political Science. EarlyView https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12685

42.

Jarillo

Magaloni

Franco

Robles

(2016). How the Mexican drug war affects kids and schools? Evidence on effects and mechanisms. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.05.008

43.

Jaskoski

(2013). Military politics and democracy in the Andes. Johns Hopkins University Press.

44.

Jiménez

(2020, January 18). Aumenta capacitación a militares en DH [Military increases human rights training]. Reforma. https://www.reforma.com/aumenta-capacitacion-a-militares-en-dh/ar1855874

45.

Kold

(2013). New operations - new attitudes? Are soldiers’ attitudes influenced by the objectives of peace operations? Journal of International Peacekeeping, 17(1–2), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-1702002

46.

Kyle

B. J.

Reiter

A. G.

(2012). Dictating justice: Human rights and military courts in Latin America. Armed Forces & Society, 38(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x10390464

47.

Latinobarómetro . (2018). Latinobarómetro 2018. Corporación Latinobarómetro.

48.

Lessing

(2017). Making peace in drug wars: Crackdowns and cartels in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

49.

Ley

(2018). To vote or not to vote: How criminal violence shapes electoral participation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(9), 1963–1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717708600

50.

Loveman

(1998). High-risk collective action: Defending human rights in Chile, Uruguay, and Argentina. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 477–525. https://doi.org/10.1086/210045

51.

Lowande

(2021). Police demilitarization and violent crime. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00986-6

52.

Magaloni

Rodríguez

(2020). Institutionalized police brutality: Torture, the militarization of security, and the reform of inquisitorial criminal justice in Mexico. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000520

53.

Mayka

L. R.

(2016). Colombia’s surprising resilience. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0050

54.

Meyer

(2010). Abused and afraid in Ciudad Juárez: An analysis of human rights violations by the military in Mexico. WOLA.

55.

Moloeznik

M. P.

Suárez de Garay

M. E.

(2012). The militarization process of public security in Mexico (2006-2010). Frontera Norte, 24(48), 121–144. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S0187-73722012000200005&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en

56.

Moncada

(2009). Toward democratic policing in Colombia? Institutional accountability through lateral reform. Comparative Politics, 41(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041509x12911362972511

57.

Moore

(2017, February 2). President Rodrigo Duterte announces plan to draft military into war on drugs. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/rodrigo-duterte-bring-military-drug-war-vows-kill-more-551611

58.

Mummolo

(2018). Militarization fails to enhance police safety or reduce crime but may harm police reputation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(37), 9181–9186. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805161115

59.

Ortega

(2018, October 15). Patrones de actuación en detenciones: Ejército vs. autoridades civiles [behavior patterns during detentions: Military vs civilian authorities]. Nexos. https://seguridad.nexos.com.mx/patrones-de-actuacion-en-detenciones-ejercito-vs-autoridades-civiles/

60.

Osorio

(2015). The contagion of drug violence: Spatiotemporal dynamics of Mexico’s war on drugs. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(8), 1403–1432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715587048

61.

Passos

A. M.

(2021). Breaking the law to ensure order: The case of Tijuana (2007-2012). Bulletin of Latin American Research, 40(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13135

62.

Phillips

B. J.

(2015). How does leadership decapitation affect violence? The case of drug trafficking organizations in Mexico. The Journal of Politics, 77(2), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1086/680209

63.

Pion-Berlin

(1994). To prosecute or to pardon? Human rights decisions in the Latin American southern cone. Human Rights Quarterly, 16(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/762413

64.

Pion-Berlin

(2017). A tale of two missions: Mexican military police patrols versus high-value targeted operations. Armed Forces & Society, 43(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x16631084

65.

Pion-Berlin

(2019). Military use in public security operations: Is it ever advisable? IUS Revista del Instituto de Estudios Jurídicos de Puebla, 13(44), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.35487/rius.v13i44.2019.475

66.

Pion-Berlin

Arceneaux

(1998). Tipping the civil-military balance: Institutions and human rights policy in democratic Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies, 31(5), 633–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031005004

67.

Pion-Berlin

Carreras

(2017). Armed forces, police, and crimefighting in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 9(3), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x1700900301

68.

Rea

Ferri

(2019). La tropa: Por qué mata un soldado [The troop: Why a soldier kills]. Editorial Aguilar.

69.

Ríos-Figueroa

(2016). Constitutional courts and mediators: Armed conflict, civil-Military relations, and the rule of law in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

70.

Rosen

J. D.

(2021). Understanding support for tough-on-crime policies in Latin America: The cases of Mexico, El Salvador, and Honduras. Latin American Policy, 12(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12208

71.

Secretaría de la Defensa Nacional . (2012a). Informe de rendición de cuentas 2006-2012. Memoria documental. Los derechos humanos y derecho internacional humanitario en el ejército y fuerza área mexicanos [Accountability report 2006-2012. Historical memory. Human rights and international humanitarian law in the Armed Forces]. Ciudad de México: SEDENA.

72.

Secretaría de la Defensa Nacional . (2012b). Sexto informe de labores 2007-2012 [Sixth Annual Report 2007-2012]. SEDENA.

73.

Secretaría de Seguridad Pública . (2009). Manual básico del policía preventivo [Handbook for preventive police officers]. Gobierno Federal.

74.

Sinaga

D. A.

(2017, July 23). Indonesia to implement Duterte’s drug war approach, Jakarta Globe. https://jakartaglobe.id/news/indonesia-implement-dutertes-drug-war-approach/

75.

Snyder

Durán-Martínez

(2009). Does illegality breed violence? Drug violence and state-sponsored protection rackets. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 52(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-009-9195-z

76.

Storr

López Portillo

(2019). Seguridad pública enfocada en el uso de la fuerza e intervención militar: La evidencia en México 2006-2018 [Public safety centered on the use of force and military intervention: Evidence from Mexico 2006-2018]. Ciudad de México: Universidad Iberoamericana.

77.

Tecott

Plana

(2016, August 16). Maybe U.S. police aren’t militarized enough. Here’s what police can learn from soldiers. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/08/16/maybe-u-s-police-arent-militarized-enough-soldiers-are-better-trained-to-deescalate/

78.

Trejo

Ley

(2020). Votes, drugs, and violence: The political logic of criminal wars in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.

79.

Willits

D. W.

Nowacki

J. S.

(2014). Police organisation and deadly force: An examination of variation across large and small cities. Policing and Society, 24(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.784314

80.

Wood

(2015). The Ferguson consensus is wrong: What counterinsurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan teaches us about police militarization and community policing. Lawfare Research Paper Series, 3(1), 1–22. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/7276755/THE-FERGUSON-CONSENSUS-IS-WRONG-WHAT.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.68 MB

The Consequences of Militarized Policing for Human Rights: Evidence from Mexico

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material