Do ministers face gender discrimination in their career paths after entering presidential cabinets? Departing from past studies, which find little evidence of gender discrimination in more established democracies in Europe and the Americas, we argue that political experience can have a gendered effect on cabinet careers in newer democracies outside the West. Using fixed effects and matching designs, we analyze original data on the careers of 1,374 ministers from all major presidential democracies in Asia. Investigating the patterns of “cabinet promotions,” where ministers transfer from their initial cabinet appointment to a higher-prestige post, we confirm the null direct effect of gender in this new context. However, we also find important gender differences based on political experience, which helps women’s upward mobility in cabinets more than men. The finding that pathways to higher office differ by gender adds to our understanding of women’s representation in society.
AlexiadouD. (2015). Ideologues, partisans, and loyalists: Cabinet ministers and social welfare reform in parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 48(8), 1051-1086.
2.
AlkadryM. G.TowerL. E. (2006). Unequal pay: The role of gender. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 888-898.
3.
Amorim NetoO. (2006). The presidential calculus: Executive policy making and cabinet formation in the Americas. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 415-440.
4.
ArriolaL. R.JohnsonM. C. (2014). Ethnic politics and women’s empowerment in Africa: Ministerial appointments to executive cabinets. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 495-510.
5.
AtchisonA.DownI. (2009). Women cabinet ministers and female‐friendly social policy. Poverty and Public Policy, 1(2), 1-23.
6.
BattoN. F. (2014). Was Taiwan’s electoral reform good for women? SNTV, MMM, gender quotas, and female representation. Issues and Studies, 50(2), 39-76.
7.
BauerG.TremblayM. (Eds.), (2011). Women in executive power: A global overview. Routledge.
8.
BishuS. G.HeadleyA. M. (2020). Equal employment opportunity: Women bureaucrats in male-dominated professions. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 1063-1074.
9.
BlondelJ. (1991). The post-ministerial careers. In BlondelJ.ThiebaultJ. (Eds.), The profession of government ministers in Western Europe. MacMillan.
10.
BorelliM.A. (2002). The president’s cabinet: Gender, power, and representation. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
11.
CamerloM.Martínez-GallardoC. (Eds.), (2018). Government formation and minister turnover in presidential cabinets: Comparative analysis in the Americas. Routledge.
12.
CamerloM.Pérez-LiñánA. (2015). The politics of minister retention in presidential systems: Technocrats, partisans, and government approval. Comparative Politics, 47(3), 315-333.
13.
ChaistyP.CheesemanN.PowerT. J. (2018). Coalitional presidentialism in comparative perspective: Minority presidents in multiparty systems. Oxford University Press.
14.
ClaveriaS.VergeT. (2015). Post-ministerial occupation in advanced industrial democracies: Ambition, individual resources and institutional opportunity structures. European Journal of Political Research, 54(4), 819-835.
15.
DassonnevilleR.McAllisterI. (2018). Gender, political knowledge, and descriptive representation: The impact of long‐term socialization. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 249-265.
16.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62-71.
17.
EaglyA. H.MakhijaniM. G.KlonskyB. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3-22.
18.
Escobar-LemmonM. C.Taylor-RobinsonM. M. (2005). Women ministers in Latin American government: When, where, and why?American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 829-844.
19.
Escobar-LemmonM. C.Taylor-RobinsonM. M. (2009). Getting to the top: Career paths of women in Latin American cabinets. Political Research Quarterly, 62(4), 685-699.
20.
Escobar‐LemmonM. C.Taylor‐RobinsonM. M. (2015). Sex, survival, and scandal: A comparison of how men and women exit presidential cabinets. Politics and Gender, 11(4), 665-688.
21.
FolkeO.RickneJ.SmithD. M. (2021). Gender and dynastic political selection. Comparative Political Studies, 54(2), 339-371.
22.
FraileM.GomezR. (2017). Why does Alejandro know more about politics than Catalina? Explaining the Latin American gender gap in political knowledge. British Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91-112.
23.
FranceschetS.PiscopoJ. M. (2014). Sustaining gendered practices? Power, parties, and elite political networks in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 47(1), 85-110.
24.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP. J. (2014). How the gender of US senators influences people’s understanding and engagement in politics. Journal of Politics, 76(4), 1017-1031.
25.
GailmardS.PattyJ. W. (2007). Slackers and zealots: Civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 873-889.
26.
GalassoV.NanniciniT. (2017). Political selection under alternative electoral rules. Public Choice, 171(3), 257-281.
27.
HuangC.-L. (2016). Reserved for whom? The electoral impact of gender quotas in Taiwan. Pacific Affairs, 89(2), 325-343.
28.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24.
29.
IndridasonI. H.KamC. (2008). Cabinet reshuffles and ministerial drift. British Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 621-656.
30.
JacobsonG. C. (1989). Strategic politicians and the dynamics of US house elections. American Political Science Review, 83(3), 773-793.
31.
JacobsonW. S.PalusC. K.BowlingC. J. (2010). A woman’s touch? Gendered management and performance in state administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 477-504.
32.
JalalzaiF. (2008). Women rule: Shattering the executive glass ceiling. Politics & Gender, 4(2), 205-231.
33.
JalalzaiF. (2013). Shattered, cracked, or firmly intact? Women and the executive glass ceiling worldwide. Oxford University Press.
34.
JalalzaiF.KrookM. L. (2010). Beyond Hillary and Benazir: Women’s political leadership worldwide. International Political Science Review, 31(1), 5-21.
35.
KamC. D.ZechmeisterE. J. (2013). Name recognition and candidate support. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 971-986.
36.
KlootL. (2004). Women and leadership in universities: A case study of women academic managers. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(6), 470-485.
37.
KrookM. L.O’BrienD. Z. (2012). All the president’s men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. Journal of Politics, 74(3), 840-855.
38.
LeeD. S. (2018a). Executive capacity to control legislatures and presidential choice of cabinet ministers in East Asian democracies. Governance, 31(4), 777-795.
39.
LeeD. S. (2018b). Portfolio allocation as the president's calculations: Loyalty, copartisanship, and political context in South Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18(3), 345-365.
40.
LeeD. S. (2020). Executive control of bureaucracy and presidential cabinet appointments in East Asian democracies. Regulation & Governance, 14(1), 82-101.
41.
LeeD. S.McCleanC. T. (2021). Replication data for breaking the cabinet’s glass ceiling: The gendered effect of political experience in presidential democracies. In Comparative political studies dataverseHarvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/qfvx6g.
42.
LeeD. S.ParkS. (2018). Democratization and women’s representation in presidential cabinets: Evidence from East and Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 161-180.
43.
LeeD. S.ParkS. (2020). Civil servants’ perceptions of agency heads’ leadership styles: The role of gender in public sector organizations. Public Management Review, 23(8), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730941.
44.
LeeD. S.SchulerP. (2020). Testing the “China model” of meritocratic promotions: Do democracies reward less competent ministers than autocracies?Comparative Political Studies, 53(3–4), 531-566.
45.
LeeH.ShinK.-Y. (2016). Gender quotas and candidate selection processes in South Korean political parties. Pacific Affairs, 89(2), 345-368.
46.
MainwaringS.ShugartM. S. (Eds.), (1997). Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
47.
MarianiM.MarshallB. W.Mathews-SchultzA. L. (2015). See Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Sarah Palin run? Party, ideology, and the influence of female role models on young women. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 716-731.
48.
NorrisP. (1997). Women, media, and politics. Oxford University Press.
49.
RiccucciN. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled?Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373-382.
50.
RyanM. K.HaslamS. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81-90.
51.
SabharwalM. (2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399-426.
52.
SchulerP. (2019). Female autocrats as role models? The effect of female leaders on political knowledge and engagement in Vietnam. Journal of Politics, 81(4), 1546-1550.
53.
Shair-RosenfieldS. (2019). Electoral reform and the fate of new democracies. University of Michigan Press.
54.
TrueJ.MintromM. (2001). Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 27-57.
55.
World Economic Forum (2021). Global gender gap report 2021. World Economic Forum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
