This article is an overview of the types and level of institutionalization of party systems in seven young democracies in East and Southeast Asia. By applying Alan Siaroff’s typology of party systems, the analysis demonstrates that the party systems in Asia do not converge on a single format. The party systems under consideration also differ in the level of institutionalization. Party systems in Thailand, the Philippines and especially South Korea are stuck in an inchoate state. Even though there is considerable variation among the cases, the party systems in Indonesia, Mongolia and Taiwan can be considered as well institutionalized relative to the rest of Asia and moderately institutionalized when compared to Latin America. Furthermore, weak institutionalization correlates with volatile structures of party competition and cooperation in Thailand, whereas in South Korea and the Philippines party systems seem to be paradoxically stabilizing in a situation of protracted under-institutionalization, as both cases combine more or less stable party system patterns with weak institutionalization.
BanksArthur S.MullerThomas C.OverstreetWilliam R. (eds) (2009) Political Handbook of the World 2009. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
2.
BartoliniStefanoMairPeter (1995) Identitá, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates, 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BartonGreg (2006) ‘Islam and Democratic Transition in Indonesia’, Religious Organizations and Democratization. Case Studies from Contemporary Asia, pp. 221–41. Armonk and London: M. E. Sharpe.
4.
StiftungBertelsmann (2009) Bertelsmann Transformation Index 2010. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
5.
BoscoAnnaMorlinoLeonardo (2006) Party Change in Southern Europe. London: Routledge.
6.
BuchananPaul G.NichollsKate (2003) ‘Labour Politics and Democratic Transition in South Korea and Taiwan’, Government and Opposition38: 203–37.
CaseWilliam (2009) ‘Low-Quality Democracy and Varied Authoritarianism: Elites and Regimes in Southeast Asia Today’, Pacific Review22: 255–69.
9.
Central Election Commission of Taiwan (CET) (2008) Summary of Second and Third Round of Electoral Counting 7th Legislative Yuan (Chinese).
10.
ChoiJungug (2001) ‘Philippine Democracies Old and New. Elections, Term Limits, and Party Systems’, Asian Survey41: 488–501.
11.
ChuYun-hanHuangMin-huaChangYu-tzung (2007) ‘Quality of Democracy and Regime Legitimacy in East Asia.’Paper presented at the conference ‘East Asia Barometer Conference on “Why Asians Support Democracy and Why Not?”’ on 9–12August2007. Taipei.
12.
ChuYun-hanLinJih-wen (2001) ‘Political Development in 20th Century Taiwan: State Building, Regime Transformation and the Construction of National Identity’, The China Quarterly165: 102–29.
13.
CoEdna E. A. (2005) Philippine Democracy Assessment. Free and Fair Elections and the Democratic Role of Political Parties. Manila: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
14.
CollierRuth BerinsCollierDavid (1991) Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
CroissantAurel (2004) ‘From Transition to Defective Democracy: Mapping Asian Democratization’, Democratization11: 156–78.
16.
CroissantAurel (2008) ‘The Perils and Promises of Democratization through United Nations Transitional Authority – Lessons from Cambodia and East Timor’, Democratization15: 649–68.
17.
CroissantAurelPojarDaniel J. (2006) ‘The Parliamentary Election in Thailand, February 2005’, Electoral Studies25: 184–91.
18.
CroissantAurelSchächterTeresa (2008) ‘Die Nationalisierung Politischer Parteiensysteme in Ostasien’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift49: 618–40.
19.
DaltonRussel J.ChuYun-hanShinDoh Chull (2007) ‘Introduction: Parties, Party Choice, and Partisanship in East Asia’, Journal of East Asian Studies7: 177–84.
20.
DaltonRussel J.TanakaAiji (2007) ‘The Patterns of Party Polarization in East Asia’, Journal of East Asian Studies7: 203–23.
21.
DuvergerMaurice (1954) Political Parties, Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London and New York: Methuen and Wiley.
22.
East Asia Barometer (2002–03) Survey Data Set. Available at:http://www.asianbarometer.org/(last accessed 10 December 2008).
23.
Election Commission of Thailand (2006) Results of the Legislative Election of2005(in Thai). Bangkok: CET.
24.
FishM. Steven (1998) ‘Mongolia: Democracy without Prerequisites’, Journal of Democracy9: 127–41.
25.
HouseFreedom (2009) Freedom in the World 2009: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
26.
GeertzClifford (1960) The Religion of Java. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
27.
GuntherRichardDiamondLarry (2003) ‘Types and Functions of Parties’,in GuntherRichardDiamondLarry (eds) Political Parties and Democracy, pp. 3–39. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
GuntherRichardRamon MonteroJoséPuhleHans-Jürgen (eds) (2007) Democracy, Intermediation, and Voting on Four Continents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
HermannsHeike (2009) ‘Political Parties in South Korea and Taiwan after Twenty Years of Democratization’, Pacific Focus24: 205–24.
30.
HickenAllen (2006) ‘Stuck in the Mud: Parties and Party Systems in Democratic Southeast Asia’, Taiwan Journal of Democracy2: 23–46.
31.
HickenAllen (2009) Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HsiehJohn Fuh-ShengNewmanDavid (2002) ‘Introduction’,in HsiehJohn Fuh-ShengNewmanDavid (eds) How Asia Votes, pp. 1–18. New York: Chatham House.
33.
HuntingtonSamuel P. (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
HuntingtonSamuel P. (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
35.
InoguchiTakashi. (2009) Asiabarometer Survey Data 2005–2007. Available at:http://www.asiabarometer.org/(last accessed 15 July 2009).
36.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (2009) Parline Database.
JaungHoon (2000) ‘Electoral Politics and Political Parties’,in DiamondLarryShinDoh Chull (eds) Institutional Reform and Democratic Consolidation in Korea, pp. 43–73. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
39.
JonesMark P. (2007) Political Parties and Party Systems in Latin America. Paper presented at the conference “Symposium ‘Prospects for Democracy in Latin America’”, in University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, April5–6, 2007.
40.
JonesMark P.MainwaringScott (2003) ‘The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems. An Empirical Measure and an Application to the Americas’, Party Politics9: 139–66.
41.
KatzRichard S.CrottyWilliam (2006) ‘Introduction’,in KatzRichard S.CrottyWilliam (eds) Handbook of Party Politics, pp. 1–5. London: Sage.
42.
KimHee MinChoiJun YoungChoJinman (2007) ‘Changing Cleavage Structure in New Democracies: An Empirical Analysis of Political Cleavages in Korea’, Electoral Studies27: 136–60.
43.
KimSunhyuk (2003) ‘Civil Society in Democratizing Korea’,in KimSamuel S. (ed.) Korea’s Democratization, pp. 81–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
KuenziMichelleLambrightGina (2001) ‘Party System Institutionalization in 30 African Countries’, Party Politics7: 437–68.
45.
KuhontaErik Martinez (2008) ‘The Paradox of Thailand’s 1997 “People’s Constitution”. Be Careful What You Wish For’, Asian Survey48: 373–92.
46.
LaaksoMarkkuTaageperaRein (1979) ‘“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies12: 3–27.
47.
LandéCarl H. (2001) ‘The Return of “People Power” in the Philippines’, Journal of Democracy12: 88–102.
48.
LaneJan-ErikErssonSvante O. (1991) Politics and Society in Western Europe. London: Sage.
49.
IndonesiaLembaga Survei (2007) Three Years of Political Parties: The Problems of Voter’s Aspiration Representation. Jakarta: LSI.
50.
LevitskyStevenWayLucian (2002) ‘Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism’, Journal of Democracy13: 51–65.
51.
LiddleR. William (2000) ‘Indonesia in 1999: Democracy Restored’, Asian Survey40: 32–42.
52.
LiddleR. WilliamMujaniSaiful (2005) ‘Indonesia in 2004: The Rise of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’, Asian Survey45: 119–26.
53.
LinzJuan J. (1994) ‘Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?’,in LinzJuan J.ValenzuelaArturo (eds) The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America, pp. 1–72. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
54.
LinzJuan J.StepanAlfred C. (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55.
LipsetSeymour MartinRokkanStein (1967) ‘Cleavage Structure, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction’,in LipsetSeymour MartinRokkanStein (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, pp. 1–64. New York: Free Press.
56.
MainwaringScott (1998) ‘Party Systems in the Third Wave’, Journal of Democracy9: 67–81.
57.
MainwaringScott (1999) Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
58.
MainwaringScottScullyTimothy R. (1995) ‘Party Systems in Latin America’,in MainwaringScottScullyTimothy R. (eds) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, pp. 1–34. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59.
MainwaringScottShugartMatthew S. (1997) ‘Conclusion: Presidentialism and the Party System’,in MainwaringScottShugartMatthew S. (eds) Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, pp. 394–439. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
MainwaringScottTorcalMariano (2006) ‘Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization’,in KatzRichard S.CrottyWilliam (eds) Handbook of Party Politics, pp. 204–27. London: Sage.
61.
MainwaringScottZocoEdurne (2007) ‘Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition: Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies’, Party Politics13: 155–78.
62.
MairPeter (1997) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
ManacsaRodelio CruzTanAlexander C. (2005) ‘Manufacturing Parties: Re-Examining the Transient Nature of Philippine Political Parties’, Party Politics11: 748–65.
64.
MarshallMonty G.JaggersKeith (2009) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2008. Arlington: Polity IV Project.
65.
McAllisterIan (2007) ‘Social Structure and Party Support in the East Asian Democracies’, Journal of East Asian Studies7: 225–49.
66.
McCargoDuncan (1997) ‘Thailand’s Political Parties: Real, Authentic and Actual’,in HewisonKevin (ed.) Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation, pp. 114–31. London: Routledge.
67.
MerkelWolfgang (1997) ‘Parteien Und Parteiensysteme Im Transformationsprozess: Ein Interregionaler Vergleich’,in MerkelWolfgangSandschneiderEberhard (eds) Systenwechsel 3: Parteien Im Transformationsprozeβ, pp. 337–73. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
68.
MerkelWolfgang (1998) ‘The Consolidation of Past-Autocratic Democracies: A Multi-Level Model’, Democratization5: 33–67.
69.
MietznerMarcus (2008) ‘Comparing Indonesia’s Party Systems of the 1950s and the Post-Suharto Era: From Centrifugal to Centripetal Inter-Party Competition’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies39: 431–53.
70.
MoonWoojin (2005) ‘Decomposition of Regional Voting in South Korea: Ideological Conflicts and Regional Interests’, Party Politics11: 579–99.
71.
MorlinoLeonardo (1998) Democracy between Consolidation and Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72.
MurrayDavid (1996) Angels and Devils: Thai Politics from February 1991 to September 1992 – a Struggle for Democracy?Bangkok: White Orchid Press.
73.
NiedermayerOskar (1997) ‘Das Gesamtdeutsche Parteiensystem’,in GabrielOscar W.NiedermayerOskarStössRichard (eds) Parteiendemokratie in Deutschland, pp. 106–30. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
74.
NohlenDieterGrotzFlorianHartmannChristof (eds) (2001) Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook, vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
NorrisPippa (2002) ‘Electoral Reform and Fragmented Multipartyism. The Mechanical and Psychological Effects of Electoral Systems on Party Systems.’Paper presented at the ‘International Conference Political Reform in Brazil in Comparative Perspective’ in 27–28June2002. Ipanema, Brazil.
76.
OckeyJames (2005) ‘Variations on a Theme: Societal Cleavages and Party Orientations through Multiple Transitions in Thailand’, Party Politics11: 728–47.
77.
PanebiancoAngelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78.
ParkChong-minLeeJaechul (2007) Are Associations the Schools of Democracy across Asia?Teipei: Asian Barometer Working Paper Series.
79.
PedersenMorgens N. (1979) ‘The Dynamics of European Party Systems. Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility’, European Journal of Political Research7: 1–26.
80.
PenningsPaulLaneJan-Erik (1998) ‘Introduction’,in PenningsPaulLaneJan-Erik (eds) Comparing Party System Change, pp. 1–19. London: Routledge.
81.
PongsudhirakThitinan (2008) ‘Thailand since the Coup’, Journal of Democracy19: 140–53.
82.
RaeDouglas W. (1968) ‘A Note on the Fractionalization of Some European Party Systems’, Comparative Political Studies1: 413–18.
83.
ReillyBenjamin (2006) Democracy and Diversity: Political Engineering in the Asia-Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84.
ReillyBenjamin (2007) ‘Democratization and Electoral Reform in the Asia–Pacific Region: Is There An “Asian Model” of Democracy?’, Comparative Political Studies40: 1350–71.
85.
RiggerShelley (1999) Politics in Taiwan. Voting for Democracy. London: Routhledge.
86.
RodanGarryJayasuriyaKanishka (2009) ‘Capitalist Development, Regime Transitions and New Forms of Authoritarianism in Asia’, Pacific Review22: 23–47.
87.
RossabiMorris (2009) ‘Mongolia: Transmogrification of a Communist Party’, Pacific Affairs82: 231–50.
88.
RülandJürgenJürgenmeyerClemensNelsonMichael H.ZiegenhainPatrick (eds) (2005) Parliaments and Political Change in Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
89.
SaldanhaJoao M. (2007) ‘Anatomy of Political Parties in Timor-Leste’,in RichRolandHamblyLukeMorganMichael G. (eds) Political Parties in the Pacific Islands, pp. 69–81. Canberra: Pandanus Books.
90.
SartoriGiovanni (1976) Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
91.
SartoriGiovanni (1994) Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Houndsmill: Macmillan.
92.
ShinDoh ChullTusalemRollin F. (2009) ‘East Asia’,in HaerpferChristian W.BernhagenPatrickInglehartRonald F.WelzelChristian (eds) Democratization, pp. 356–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93.
ShugartMatthew S.CareyJohn M. (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94.
SiaroffAlan (2000) Comparative European Party Systems. An Analysis of Parliamentary Elections since 1945. New York: Sage.
95.
SiripanNogsuan (2006a) ‘Party Elites in the Business Conglomerate Model of Thai Political Parties’,in NiyomRathamarit (ed.) Eyes on Thai Democracy. National and Local Issues, pp. 103–37. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
96.
SiripanNogsuan (2006b) Thai Political Parties in the Age of Reform. Bangkok: KAS.
97.
StocktonHans (2001) ‘Political Parties, Party Systems, and Democracy in East Asia: Lessons from Latin America’, Comparative Political Studies34: 94–119.
98.
TanAlexander C. (2005) ‘Emerging Party Systems: An Introduction’, Party Politics11: 651–3.
99.
TanPaige Johnson (2006) ‘Indonesia Seven Years after Soeharto: Party System Institutionalization in a New Democracy’, Contemporary Southeast Asia: Journal of International and Strategic Affairs28: 88–114.
100.
TeehankeeJulio (2006) ‘Consolidation or Crisis of Clientelistic Democracy? The 2004 Synchronized Elections in the Philippines’,in CroissantAurelMartinBeate (eds) Between Consolidation and Crisis. Elections and Democracy in Five Nations in Southeast Asia, pp. 215–76. Münster: LIT Verlag.
101.
ThompsonMark R. (1995) The Anti-Marcos Struggle: Personalistic Rule and Democratic Transition in the Philippines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
102.
UfenAndreas (2008a) ‘The Evolution of Cleavages in the Indonesian Party System’, GIGA Working Papers, 74.
103.
UfenAndreas (2008b) ‘Political Party and Party System Institutionalization in Southeast Asia: Lessons for Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand’, Pacific Review21: 327–50.
104.
van BiezenIngrid (2004) ‘Political Parties as Public Utilities’, Party Politics10: 701–22.
105.
WareAlan (1996) Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
106.
WolinetzSteven B. (2006) ‘Party Systems and Party System Types’,in KatzRichard S.CrottyWilliam (Eds) Handbook of Party Politics, pp. 51–62. London: Sage.
