Leveraging comparisons within and across cases, this article investigates legal mobilization for social rights in Colombia and South Africa. This kind of rights contestation represents a new phenomenon, in which both ordinary citizens and judicial actors have come to view problems related to access to health care, housing, education, and social security through the lens of the law. Research on legal mobilization has tended toward one-sided examinations of this complex phenomenon, focusing primarily on either legal claims-making or judicial decision-making, and neglecting to fully theorize the relationship between the two. Drawing on an analysis of rights claims and 178 interviews, this article aims to correct these imbalances. In doing so, it offers a generalizable model that accounts for the social construction of legal grievances and the development of judicial receptivity to particular kinds of claims, and explains both the emergence and continuation of legal mobilization for social rights.
EppC. (1998). The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. University of Chicago Press.
11.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
12.
FeeleyM.RubinE. (1998). Judicial policy making and the modern state: How the courts reformed America’s Prisons. Cambridge University Press.
13.
FowkesJ. (2016). Building the constitution: The practice of constitutional interpretation in post-apartheid South Africa. Cambridge University Press.
14.
GalanterM. (1974). Why the “Haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9(1), 95–160.
15.
GallagherJ. (2017). The last mile problem: Activists, advocates, and the struggle for justice in domestic courts. Comparative Political Studies, 50(12), 1666–1698.
16.
GarayC. (2016). Social policy expansion in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
17.
GauriV.LiebermanE. (2006). Boundary institutions and HIV/AIDS policy in Brazil and South Africa. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41(3), 47–73.
18.
GauriV.BrinksD. (2008). Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world. Cambridge University Press.
González-OcantosE. (2016). Shifting legal visions: Judicial change and human rights trials in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
21.
HilbinkL.IngramM. (2019). Courts and rule of law in developing countries. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
22.
HilsonC. (2002). New social movements: The role of legal opportunity. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2), 238–255.
23.
HilsonC. (2010). Climate change litigation: An explanatory approach (or bringing grievance back in). In FracchiaF.OcchienaM. (Eds.), Climate change: La Riposta del Diritto (pp. 421–436). Editoriale Scientifica.
24.
HollandA. (2017). Forbearance as redistribution: The politics of informal welfare in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
25.
Hollis-BruskyA. (2015). Ideas with consequences: The federalist society and the conservative counterrevolution. Oxford University Press.
26.
HuberE.StephensJ. (2012). Democracy and the left: Social policy and inequality in Latin America. University of Chicago Press.
27.
IversenT. (2005). Capitalism, democracy, and welfare. Cambridge University Press.
28.
LampreaE. (2015). Derechos en la práctica: Jueces, litigantes y operadores de políticas de salud en Colombia (1991-2014). Ediciones Uniandes.
29.
LehoucqE.TaylorW. (2019). Conceptualizing legal mobilization: How should we understand the deployment of legal strategies?Law & Social Inquiry, 45(1): 166–193.
30.
LockeR.ThelenK. (1995). Apples and oranges revisited: Contextualized comparisons and the study of comparative labor politics. Politics & Society, 23(3), 337–367.
31.
MaresI. (2003). The politics of social risk: Business and welfare state development. Cambridge University Press.
32.
MayosiB.BenatarS. (2014). Health and health care in South Africa—20 years after Mandela. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(14), 1344–1353.
33.
McAdamD. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970. University of Chicago Press.
34.
McAdamD.TarrowS. (2019). The political context of social movements. In SnowD.SouleS.KriesiH.McCammonH. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (2nd ed.). John Wiley.
35.
McCannM. (1994). Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. University of Chicago Press.
36.
McCarthyJ.ZaldM. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
PedrianaN. (2006). From protective to equal treatment: Legal framing processes and transformation of the women’s movement in the 1960s. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1718–1761.
Ríos-FigueroaJ. (2016). Constitutional courts as mediators: Armed conflict, civil-military relations, and the rule of law in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
41.
RuedaP. (2010). Legal language and social change during Colombia’s economic crisis. In CousoJ.HuneeusA.SiederR. (Eds.), Cultures of legality: Judicialization and political activism in Latin America (pp. 25–50). Cambridge University Press.
42.
SimmonsE. (2016). Meaningful resistance: Market reforms and the roots of social protest in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
SwensonP. (2002). Capitalists against markets: The making of labor markets and welfare states in the United States and Sweden. Oxford University Press.
TarrowS. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
48.
TaylorW. (2018). Ambivalent legal mobilization: Perceptions of justice and the use of the Tutela in Colombia. Law & Society Review, 52(2), 337–367.
49.
UN-Habitat. (2013). Prosperity of cities. Routledge.
50.
UprimnyR. (2007). La judicializacion de la política en Colombia: Casos, potencialidades y riesgos. Sur Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, 4(6), 52–69.
VanhalaL. (2012). Legal opportunity structures and the paradox of legal mobilization by the environmental movement in the UK. Law & Society Review, 46(3), 523–556.
53.
VanhalaL. (2016). Legal mobilization under neo-corporatist governance: Environ-mental NGOs before the Conseil d’Etat in France, 1975–2010. Journal of Law and Courts, 4(1), 103–130.
54.
VanhalaL. (2018a). Is legal mobilization for the birds? Legal opportunity structures and environmental nongovernmental organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(3), 380–412.
55.
VanhalaL. (2018b). Shaping the structure of legal opportunities: Environmental NGOs bringing international environmental procedural rights back home. Law & Policy, 40(1), 110–127.
56.
WilsonB. (2009). Institutional reform and rights revolutions in Latin America: The cases of Costa Rica and Colombia. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 1(2), 59–85.
57.
WilsonB.Gianella-MalcaC. (2019). Overcoming the limits of legal opportunity structures: LGBT rights’ divergent paths in Costa Rica and Colombia. Latin American Politics and Society, 61(2), 138–163.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
