A large literature expects that as protests unfold in electoral autocracies, voters who supported the ruling regime in the past will withdraw support and shift to supporting its opponents. Yet there are only a few empirical tests of how opposition protests influence voter defections in these regimes. To gain empirical traction on this question, I draw on evidence from Russia. Tying together evidence from a protest-event dataset and a panel survey of voters conducted prior to and during the 2011-2012 protest wave, I examine how voters who supported the ruling regime in the past respond to anti-regime mobilization. Results reveal differentiation in defections. While opposition protests dampen support for the ruling regime and depress engagement, they do not necessarily translate into greater support for the regime’s challengers. Findings, which have implications for debates on defection cascades in autocracies, speak to the literatures on authoritarian endurance and the legacies of (attempted) revolutions.
AlvarezR. M.NaglerJ. (1998). When politics and models collide: Estimating models of multiparty elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 55-96.
AtkesonL. R.MaestasC. D. (2012). Catastrophic politics: How extraordinary events redefine perceptions of government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AytaçS. E.ShiumeriniL.StokesS. (2018). Why do people join backlash protests?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62, 1205-1228.
5.
BeissingerM. R. (2007). Structure and example in modular political phenomena: The diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 259-276.
6.
BirchS. (2010). Perceptions of electoral fairness and voter turnout. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 1601-1622.
7.
BrantonR.Martinez-EbersV.CareyT. E.Jr.MatsubayashiT. (2015). Social protest and policy attitudes: The case of the 2006 immigrant rallies. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 390-412.
8.
BrattonM.Van de WalleN. (1994). Neopatrimonial regimes and political transitions in Africa. World Politics, 46, 453-489.
9.
ChaistyP.WhitefieldS. (2013). Forward to democracy or back to authoritarianism? The attitudinal bases of mass support for the Russian election protests of 2011–2012. Post-Soviet Affairs, 29, 387-403.
10.
ChongA.De La OA. L.KarlanD.WantchekonL. (2015). Does corruption information inspire the fight or quash the hope? A field experiment in Mexico on voter turnout, choice and party identification. The Journal of Politics, 77, 55-71.
11.
ColtonT. J.HaleH. E. (2014). Putin’s uneasy return and hybrid regime stability. Problems of Post-Communism, 61, 3-22.
12.
ColtonT. J.HaleH. E.KosolapovM.TonisE.PrudnikovaA. (2014). RES technical report_2012_final.doc. In Russian Post-Presidential Election Survey in 2012. doi:10.7910/DVN/24202/I3WXOQ
13.
CrokeK.GrossmanG.LarreguyH. A.MarshallJ. (2016). Deliberate disengagement: How education can decrease political participation in electoral authoritarian regimes. American Political Science Review, 110, 579-600.
14.
DeNardoJ. (1985). Power in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
DomínguezJ.McCannJ. (1996). Democratizing Mexico. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
FryeT.GehlbachS.MarquardtK. L.ReuterO. J. (2016). Is Putin’s popularity real?Post Soviet Affairs, 33, 1-15.
19.
GamsonW. (2004). Bystanders, public opinion and the media. In SnowD.SouleS.KriesiH. (Eds.), Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 242-261). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
20.
Gel’manV. (2015). Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing post-soviet regime changes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21.
GreeneS. A. (2013). Beyond Bolotnaia: Bridging old and new in Russia’s election protest movement. Problems of Post-Communism, 60(2), 40-52.
22.
GurievS.TreismanD. (2015). How modern dictators survive: An informational theory of the new authoritarianism. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21136
23.
HaleH. E.ColtonT. J. (2017). Who defects? Unpacking a defection cascade from Russia’s dominant party 2008–12. American Political Science Review, 111, 322-337.
24.
HollyerJ. R.Peter RosendorffB.VreelandJ. R. (2015). Transparency, protest, and autocratic instability. American Political Science Review, 109, 764-784.
25.
KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
KarklinsR. (1986). Soviet elections revisited: Voter abstention in noncompetitive voting. American Political Science Association, 80, 449-470.
27.
KuranT. (1991). Now out of never: The element of surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989. World Politics, 44, 7-48.
28.
KuranT. (1997). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
LankinaT.VoznayaA. (2015). New data on protest trends in Russia’s regions. Europe-Asia Studies, 67, 327-342.
30.
LasnierV. (2017). Demobilisation and its consequences: After the Russian MovementZa chestnye vybory. Europe-Asia Studies, 67, 771-793.
31.
LasnierV. (2018). Russia’s opposition movement five years after Bolotnaia: The electoral trap?Problems of Post-Communism, 65, 359-371.
32.
Levada Analytical Centre. (2012). Russian public opinion: 2010-2011. Moscow, Russia: Author.
33.
LohmannS. (1994). The dynamics of informational cascades: The Monday demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91. World Politics, 47, 42-101.
34.
MadestamA.ShoagD.VeugerS.Yanagizawa-DrottD. (2013). Do political protests matter? Evidence from the tea party movement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128, 1633-1685.
35.
MagaloniB. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
MagaloniB. (2010). The game of electoral fraud and the ousting of authoritarian rule. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 751-765.
37.
McAdamD.SuY. (2002). The war at home: Antiwar protests and congressional voting, 1965 to 1973. American Sociological Review, 67, 696-721.
38.
McAdamD.TarrowS. (2010). Ballots and barricades: On the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 529-542.
39.
McCannJ. A.DomínguezJ. I. (1998). Mexicans react to electoral fraud and political corruption: An assessment of public opinion and voting behavior. Electoral Studies, 7, 483-503.
40.
MeirowitzA.TuckerJ. A. (2013). People power or a one-shot deal? A dynamic model of protest. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 478-490.
41.
MorgensternS.ZechmeisterE. (2001). Better the devil you know than the saint you don’t? Risk propensity and vote choice in Mexico. Journal of Politics, 63, 93-119.
42.
NikolayenkoO. (2015). Do contentious elections depress turnout? In NorrisP.FrankR. W.ComaF. M. i (Eds.), Contentious elections: From ballots to barricades (pp. 25-44). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
OnuchO. (2015). EuroMaidan protests in Ukraine: Social media versus social networks. Problems of Post-communism, 62, 217-235.
44.
PetrovN.TitkovA. (2013). Reiting Demokratichnosti Regionov Moskovskogo Tsentra Karnegi: 10 let v stroyu [Democracy ratings of Russian regions by the Carnegie Moscow Center: 10 years in Service]. Moscow, Russia: Moscow Carnegie Center.
45.
PosnerD. N.SimonD. J. (2002). Economic conditions and incumbent support in Africa’s new democracies: Evidence from Zambia. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 313-336.
46.
ReuterO. J.RobertsonG. (2015). Legislatures, cooptation, and social protest in contemporary authoritarian regimes. The Journal of Politics, 77, 235-248.
47.
ReuterO. J.SzakonyiD. (2015). Online social media and political awareness in authoritarian regimes. British Journal of Political Science, 45, 29-51.
48.
ReuterO. J.SzakonyiD. (2018, September). Electoral manipulation and regime support: Survey evidence from Russia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Boston, MA.
49.
RitterE. H.ConradC. R. (2016). Preventing and responding to dissent: The observational challenges of explaining strategic repression. American Political Science Review, 110, 85-99.
50.
RobertsonG. (2013). Protesting Putinism. Problems of Post-Communism, 60(2), 11-23.
51.
RobertsonG. (2017). Political orientation, information and perceptions of election fraud: Evidence from Russia. British Journal of Political Science, 47, 589-608.
52.
RosenfeldB. (2017). Reevaluating the middle-class protest paradigm: A case-control study of democratic protest coalitions in Russia. American Political Science Review, 111, 637-652.
53.
RossC. (2015). Systemic and non-systemic opposition in the Russian federation: Civil society awakens?Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
54.
SakwaR. (2014). Whatever happened to the Russian opposition?London, England: Chatham House.
55.
SmythR. (2014). The Putin Factor: Personalism, protest, and regime stability in Russia. Politics & Policy. 42, 567-592.
56.
SmythR.SobolevaI. (2016). Navalny’s gamesters: Protest, opposition innovation, and authoritarian stability in Russia. Russian Politics, 1, 347-371.
57.
SpaiserV.ChadefauxT.DonnayK.RussmannF.HelbingD. (2017). Communication power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 14, 132-153.
58.
Steinert-ThrelkeldZ. C. (2017). Spontaneous collective action: Peripheral mobilization during the Arab spring. American Political Science Review, 111, 379-403.
59.
StockmannD.GallagherM. E. (2011). Remote control: How the media sustain authoritarian rule in China. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 436-467.
60.
SvolikM. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
TarrowS. G. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
TertytchnayaK.LankinaT. (2020). Electoral protests and political attitudes under electoral authoritarianism. The Journal of Politics, 82(1), 285-299. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/90262/
63.
TruexR. (2019). Focal points, dissident calendars, and preemptive repression. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63, 1032-1052.
64.
TuckerJ. A. (2007). Enough! Electoral fraud, collective action problems, and post-communist colored revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 535-551.
65.
VolkovD. (2012). The protesters and the public. Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 55-62.
66.
WallaceS. J.Zepeda-MillánC.Jones-CorreaM. (2014). Spatial and temporal proximity: Examining the effects of protests on political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 433-448.
67.
WeylandK. (2012). The Arab spring: Why the surprising similarities with the revolutionary wave of 1848?Perspectives on Politics, 10, 917-934.
68.
WhiteS. (2015). Authoritarian elections: The Russian case, 2011-2012 [Data collection]. Colchester, UK: Data Archive.
69.
YoungL. (2019). The psychology of state repression: Fear and dissent decisions in Zimbabwe. American Political Science Review, 113, 140-155.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
