Electoral turnout as an indicator of political participation, political equality and, thus, democratic performance is one of the most important variables in the study of elections. While numerous studies have contributed to the explanation of electoral turnout, the picture is still incomplete. Notably, a variable which pertains to the core of elections, the competitiveness of electoral races, is not fully understood yet. We contribute to filling this gap by accounting for different effects of competitiveness in democracies and autocracies, as well as against the background of varying institutional settings. Our analyses suggest that vote margins are a suitable measure of competitiveness, but only in democracies with plurality or majority electoral systems. Ex ante measures of competitiveness capture the concept of competitiveness more comprehensively and are applicable across electoral systems and regime types.
AngRP (1998) Use of the Jackknife Statistic to Evaluate Result Replicability. The Journal of General Psychology125 (3): 218–228.
2.
AshworthJGeysBHeyndelsB (2006) Everyone Likes a Winner: An Empirical Test of the Effect of Electoral Closeness on Turnout in a Context of Expressive Voting. Public Choice128 (3–4): 383–405.
3.
BirchS (2010) Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout. Comparative Political Studies43 (12): 1601–1622.
4.
BlaisA (2006) What Affects Voter Turnout?Annual Review of Political Science9: 111–125.
5.
BlaisADobrzynskaA (1998) Turnout in Electoral Democracies. European Journal of Political Research33 (2): 239–261.
6.
BlaisALagoI (2009) A General Measure of District Competitiveness. Electoral Studies28 (1): 94–100.
7.
BlaisARubensonD (2013) The Source of Turnout Decline: New Values or New Contexts?Comparative Political Studies46 (1): 95–117.
8.
BlaydesL (2006) Who Votes in Authoritarian Elections and Why? Determinants of Voter Turnout in Contemporary Egypt. In: 2006 Annual Meeting of the APSA, Philadelphia, 31 August–3 September 2006.
9.
BönischPGeysBMichelsenC (2019) David and Goliath in the Poll Booth: Group Size, Political Power and Voter Turnout. Local Government Studies45: 724–747.
10.
BrennanGHamlinA (1998) Expressive Voting and Electoral Equilibrium. Public Choice95 (1–2): 149–175.
11.
BrownleeJ (2009) Portents of Pluralism: How Hybrid Regimes Affect Democratic Transitions. American Journal of Political Science53 (3): 515–532.
12.
BunceVJWolchikSL (2010) Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. World Politics62 (1): 43.
13.
CancelaJGeysB (2016) Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-analysis of National and Subnational Elections. Electoral Studies42: 264–275.
De PaolaMScoppaV (2013) The Impact of Closeness on Electoral Participation Exploiting the Italian Double Ballot System. Public Choice160 (3–4): 467–479.
19.
DiamondL (2002) Thinking about Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy13 (2): 21–35.
20.
DonnoD (2012) Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 703–716.
21.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy65 (2): 135–150.
22.
DuvergerM (1951) Les Partis Politiques. Paris: Armand Colin.
23.
EndersbyJWKrieckhausJT (2008) Turnout around the Globe: The Influence of Electoral Institutions on National Voter Participation, 1972-2000. Electoral Studies27 (4): 601–610.
24.
FornosCAPowerTJGarandJC (2004) Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000. Comparative Political Studies37 (8): 909–940.
25.
FranklinMN (2004) Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
FrantzE (2018) Voter Turnout and Opposition Performance in Competitive Authoritarian Elections. Electoral Studies54: 218–225.
27.
GallegoARicoGAnduizaE (2012) Disproportionality and Voter Turnout in New and Old Democracies. Electoral Studies31 (1): 159–169.
28.
GeysB (2006) Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research. Electoral Studies25 (4): 637–663.
29.
GrofmanBSelbP (2009) A Fully General Index of Political Competition. Electoral Studies28 (2): 291–296.
30.
HelleS-E (2016) Defining the Playing Field: A Framework for Analysing Fairness in Access to Resources, Media and the Law. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft10 (1): 47–78.
31.
HermetG (1978) Elections without Choice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
HydeSDMarinovN (2012) Which Elections Can Be Lost?Political Analysis20 (2): 191–210.
JackmanRW (1987) Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. The American Political Science Review81 (2): 405–423.
37.
JackmanRWMillerRA (1995) Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies during the 1980s. Comparative Political Studies27 (4): 467–492.
38.
KayserMALindstädtR (2015) A Cross-National Measure of Electoral Competitiveness. Political Analysis23 (2): 242–253.
39.
KostadinovaT (2003) Voter Turnout Dynamics in Post-communist Europe. European Journal of Political Research42 (6): 741–759.
40.
LehoucqFWallDL (2004) Explaining Voter Turnout Rates in New Democracies: Guatemala. Electoral Studies23 (3): 485–500.
41.
LevitskySWayL (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War (Problems of International Politics). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
LijphartA (2008) Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma. In: LijphartA (ed.) Thinking about Democracy. Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, pp.201–231.
43.
LindbergSI (2006) Opposition Parties and Democratisation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies24 (1): 123–138.
44.
LuedersHCroissantA (2014) Wahlen, Strategien autokratischer Herrschaftssicherung und das Überleben autokratischer Regierungen. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft8: 329–355.
45.
Lust-OkarE (2009) Legislative Elections in Hegemonic Authoritarian Regimes. Competitive Clientelism and Resistance to Democracization. In: LindbergSI (ed.) Democratization by Elections. A New Mode of Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp.226–245.
46.
MartineziComaF (2016) Turnout Determinants in Democracies and in Non-democracies. Electoral Studies41: 50–59.
47.
MartineziComaFTrinhM (2017) How Electoral Integrity Affects Voter Turnout in Democracies. Australian Journal of Political Science52 (1): 53–74.
48.
MatsusakaJGPaldaF (1993) The Downsian Voter Meets the Ecological Fallacy. Public Choice77 (4): 855–878.
49.
MorgenbesserL (2014) Elections in Hybrid Regimes: Conceptual Stretching Revived: Elections in Hybrid Regimes. Political Studies62 (1): 21–36.
50.
NikolenyiC (2010) Concurrent Elections and Voter Turnout: The Effect of the De-Linking of State Elections on Electoral Participation in India’s Parliamentary Polls, 1971-2004. Political Studies58 (1): 214–233.
51.
NohlenD (2005) Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook: South America, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
NohlenDGrotzF (2004) Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook: Middle East, Central Asia, and South Asia, vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
NohlenDGrotzFHartmannC (eds) (2001) Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook: South East Asia, East Asia, and the South Pacific, vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
NorrisP (2013) The New Research Agenda Studying Electoral Integrity. Electoral Studies32 (4): 563–575.
55.
PepinskyT (2014) The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science44 (3): 631–653.
PintorRLGratschewM (eds) (2002) Compulsory Voting. In: Voter Turnout since: A Global Report 1945. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, pp.105–110.
58.
SchaufnagelSGowenP (2014) A Cross-National Comparison of Voter Turnout in 15 Sub-Saharan African States. Journal of Good Governance and Sustainable Development in Africa2 (3): 1–15.
59.
SchaufnagelSBuehlerMLowry-FritzM (2014) Voter Turnout in Democratizing Southeast Asia. A Comparative Analysis of Electoral Participation in Five Countries. Taiwan Journal of Democracy10 (1): 1–22.
60.
SchedlerA (2013) The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism (Oxford Studies in Democratization). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
SelbP (2008) A Deeper Look at the Proportionality-Turnout Nexus. Comparative Political Studies42 (4): 527–548.
62.
SimonovitsG (2012) Competition and Turnout Revisited: The Importance of Measuring Expected Closeness Accurately. Electoral Studies31 (2): 364–371.
63.
StockemerD (2015) When Do Close Elections Matter for Higher Turnout? Gauging the Impact of the Interaction Between Electoral Competitiveness and District Magnitude. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties25 (2): 178–194.
64.
StockemerD (2016) Is the Turnout Function in Democracies and Nondemocracies Alike or Different?Politics & Policy44 (5): 889–915.
65.
StockemerD (2017) Electoral Participation: How to Measure Voter Turnout?Social Indicators Research133: 943–962.
66.
TavitsM (2009) Direct Presidential Elections and Turnout in Parliamentary Contests. Political Research Quarterly62 (1): 42–54.
67.
WintrobeR (2007) Dictatorship: Analytical Approaches. In: BoixCStrokesSC (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.363–394.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
