Legislative gridlock is often viewed as a uniquely democratic phenomenon. The institutional checks and balances that produce gridlock are absent from authoritarian systems, leading many observers to romanticize “authoritarian efficiency” and policy dynamism. A unique data set from the Chinese case demonstrates that authoritarian regimes can have trouble passing laws and changing policies—48% of laws are not passed within the period specified in legislative plans, and about 12% of laws take more than 10 years to pass. This article develops a theory that relates variation in legislative outcomes to the absence of division within the ruling coalition and citizen attention shocks. Qualitative analysis of China’s Food Safety Law, coupled with shadow case studies of two other laws, illustrates the plausibility of the theoretical mechanisms. Division and public opinion play decisive roles in authoritarian legislative processes.
BinderS. A. (1999). The dynamics of legislative gridlock, 1947-96. American Political Science Review, 93, 519-533.
6.
BinderS. A. (2003). Stalemate: Causes and consequences of legislative gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7.
BoixC. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BoixC.SvolikM. W. (2013). The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships. The Journal of Politics, 75, 300-316.
9.
Bueno de MesquitaB. (2005). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
CaiX. (2016). Understanding business responsibilities under the Special Equipment Safety Law [企业主体责任在特种设别安全法中的解读]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 10, 130-131.
11.
CaoK. (2010). A description of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China [关于《中华人民共和国食品安全法（草案）》的说明]. In Yearbook of the National People’s Congress [全国人民代表大会年鉴（2009年卷）] (2009th ed., pp. 185-186). Beijing: Chinese Democracy and Legal Press.
ChenJ. (1999). Chinese law: Towards an understanding of Chinese law, its nature and developments (Vol. 3). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
14.
ChenJ. (2000). Unanswered questions and unresolved issues: Comments on the law on law-making. In OttoJ. M. (Ed.), Law-making in the People’s Republic of China (pp. 235-257). The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
15.
ChenJ.PanJ.XuY. (2016). Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science, 60, 383-400.
ChiouF.-Y.RothenbergL. S. (2008). Comparing legislators and legislatures: The dynamics of legislative gridlock reconsidered. Political Analysis, 16, 197-212.
ClarkeD. C. (2005). How do we know when an enterprise exists-unanswerable questions and legal polycentricity in China. Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 19, 50.
21.
DeaconR. T. (2009). Public good provision under dictatorship and democracy. Public Choice, 139, 241-262.
22.
DesposatoS. W. (2001). Legislative politics in authoritarian Brazil. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 27, 287-317.
GandhiJ. (2008). Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GandhiJ.PrzeworskiA. (2007). Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 1279-1301.
29.
GerringJ.CojocaruL. (2016). Case-selection: A diversity of methods and criteria. Sociological Methods & Research, 45, 392-423.
30.
Haidian Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. (2013). Interpretation of Special Equipment Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China [《中华人民共和国特种设备安全法》解读]. Retrieved from http://hd.bjtsb.gov.cn/infoview.asp?ViewID=55483
KaufmanR. R. (1985). Democratic and authoritarian responses to the debt issue: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico. International Organization, 39, 473-503.
35.
KrehbielK. (2010). Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. lawmaking. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
36.
LakeD. A.BaumM. A. (2001). The invisible hand of democracy: Political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 587-621.
37.
LaxJ. R.PhillipsJ. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: Public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103, 367-386.
LieberthalK. G. (1992). Introduction: The “fragmented authoritarianism” model and its limitations. In Bureaucracy, politics, and decision making in post-Mao China (pp. 1-30). Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
LieberthalK. G.OksenbergM. (1988). Policy making in China: Leaders, structures, and processes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
LiuP. (2010). Tracing and periodizing China’s food safety regulation: A study on China’s food safety regime change. Regulation & Governance, 4, 244-260.
LiuX. (2010). Report on the drafting of the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China [关于《中华人民共和国食品安全法（草案）》修改情况的汇报]. In Yearbook of the National People’s Congress (2009th ed.) [全国人民代表大会年鉴（2009年卷） ] (pp. 190-191). Beijing: Chinese Democracy and Legal Press.
46.
LorentzenP. L. (2013). Regularizing rioting: Permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8, 127-158.
47.
LorentzenP. L. (2014). China’s strategic censorship. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 402-414.
48.
LorentzenP. L.FravelM. T.PaineJ. (2017). Qualitative investigation of theoretical models: the value of process tracing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 29, 467-491.
MagaloniB. (2008). Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 715-741.
53.
MaleskyE.AbramiR.ZhengY. (2011). Institutions and inequality in single-party regimes: A comparative analysis of Vietnam and China. Comparative Politics, 43, 409-427.
54.
MaleskyE.SchulerP.TranA. (2012). The adverse effects of sunshine: A field experiment on legislative transparency in an authoritarian assembly. American Political Science Review, 106, 762-786.
55.
ManionM. (2016). Information for autocrats: Representation in Chinese local congresses. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
56.
MartinL. W.VanbergG. (2011). Parliaments and coalitions: The role of legislative institutions in multiparty governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57.
MayhewD. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58.
MayhewD. R. (2005). Divided we govern: Party control, lawmaking and investigations, 1946-2002. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59.
McGuireM. C.OlsonM. (1996). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: The invisible hand and the use of force. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 72-96.
60.
MengT.PanJ.YangP. (2014). Conditional receptivity to citizen participation evidence from a survey experiment in China. Comparative Political Studies, 50, 399-433.
61.
MerthaA. (2009). “Fragmented authoritarianism 2.0”: Political pluralization in the Chinese policy process. The China Quarterly, 200, 995-1012.
62.
MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1963). Constituency influence in congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56.
MoravcsikA. (2014). Transparency: The revolution in qualitative research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47, 48-53.
65.
National People’s Congress. (Ed.). (2010). Group discussions of the revised Food Safety Law [分组审议食品安全法修订草案发言]. Beijing: Chinese Democracy and Legal Press.
NobleB. H. (2017). Amending budget bills in the Russian State Duma. Post-Communist Economies, 29, 505-522.
69.
O’BrienK. J. (1994). Agents and remonstrators: Role accumulation by Chinese people’s congress deputies. The China Quarterly, 138, 359-380.
70.
O’BrienK. J. (2008). Reform without liberalization: China’s National People’s Congress and the politics of institutional change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71.
O’BrienK. J.LiL. (1993). Chinese political reform and the question of” deputy quality.”China Information, 8(3), 20-31.
O’donnellG. A. (1973). Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: Studies in South American politics (No. 9). Berkeley: University of California.
74.
OksenbergM. (2001). China’s political system: Challenges of the twenty-first century. The China Journal, 45, 21-35.
75.
PalerL. (2005). China’s legislation law and the making of a more orderly and representative legislative system. The China Quarterly, 182, 301-318.
SeawrightJ.GerringJ. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 294-308.
80.
ShihV. C. (2008). Factions and finance in china. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
ShirkS. L. (1993). The political logic of economic reform in China (Vol. 24). Berkeley: University of California Press.
82.
SnyderF. (2015). Food Safety Law in China: Making transnational law. Boston, MA: Brill.
SvolikM. W. (2009). Power sharing and leadership dynamics in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 477-494.
86.
SvolikM. W. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
87.
TamW.YangD. (2005). Food safety and the development of regulatory institutions in China. Asian Perspective, 29, 5-36.
88.
TannerM. S. (1995). How a bill becomes a law in China: Stages and processes in lawmaking. The China Quarterly, 141, 39-64.
89.
TannerM. S. (1999). The politics of lawmaking in post-Mao China: Institutions, processes, and democratic prospects. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Catalogue.
90.
TruexR. (2016). Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Making autocracy work: Representation and responsiveness in modern China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
91.
TruexR. (2017). Consultative authoritarianism and its limits. Comparative Political Studies, 50, 329-361.
92.
TsebelisG. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 289-325.
93.
TsebelisG. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
94.
Van RooijB. (2006). Regulating land and pollution in China: Lawmaking, compliance, and enforcement: Theory and cases. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
WuB. (2008b). Speech at the 6th Meeting of the National People’s Congress Standing Committee of the 11th National People’s Congress [在第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第六次会议上的讲话]. In National people’s congress standing committee gazette. Retrieved from http://www.cqvip.com/QK/85506X/200901/30425332.html
