A popular view of nondemocratic regimes is that they draw followers mainly from those with an illiberal, authoritarian mind-set. We challenge this view by arguing that there exist a different class of autocracies that rule with a relatively enlightened base. Leveraging multiple nationally representative surveys from China over the past decade, we substantiate this claim by estimating and comparing the ideological preferences of Chinese Communist Party members and ordinary citizens. We find that party members on average hold substantially more modern and progressive views than the public on issues such as gender equality, political pluralism, and openness to international exchange. We also explore two mechanisms that may account for this party–public value gap—selection and socialization. We find that while education-based selection is the most dominant mechanism overall, socialization also plays a role, especially among older and less educated party members. Our findings caution against the simple, dichotomous characterization of political regimes and underscore an important tension between modernization and democratization in developing societies.
AltemeyerRobert. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7.
AnsolabehereStephenRoddenJonathanSnyderJames M.2006. “Purple America.” Journal of Economic Perspectives20 (2): 97–118.
8.
ApterDavid E.1965. The Politics of Modernization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
9.
ArendtHannah. 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
10.
AtabakiTourajZürcherErik Jan. 2004. Men of Order: Authoritarian Modernization under Ataturk and Reza Shah. London: I.B. Tauris.
11.
BirnbaumA. Lord. 1968. Some Latent Trait Models and Their Use in Inferring an Examinee’s Ability. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
12.
BondRobertMessingSolomon. 2015. “Quantifying Social Media’s Political Space: Estimating Ideology from Publicly Revealed Preferences on Facebook.” American Political Science Review109 (1): 62–78.
13.
BonicaAdam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science58 (2): 367–86.
14.
CaugheyDevinWarshawChristopher. 2018. “Policy Preferences and Policy Change: Dynamic Responsiveness in the American States, 1936–2014.” American Political Science Review112 (2): 249–66.
15.
ChenJie. 1999. “Comparing Mass and Elite Subjective Orientations in Urban China.” The Public Opinion Quarterly63 (2): 193–219.
16.
ConversePhilip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter E. David, 206-261. New York: Free Press.
17.
ConversePhilip E.PierceRoy. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18.
CrokeKevinGrossmanGuyLarreguyHoracio A.MarshallJohn. 2016. “Deliberate Disengagement: How Education Can Decrease Political Participation in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes.” American Political Science Review110 (3): 579–600.
19.
DaltonlRussell J.1985. “Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations.” Comparative Political Studies18 (3): 267–99.
20.
DevilleJean-ClaudeSärndalCarl-Erik. 1992. “Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling.” Journal of the American Statistical Association87 (418): 376–82.
21.
DicksonBruce J.1997. Democratization in China and Taiwan: The Adaptability of Leninist Parties. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
DicksonBruce J.2014. “Who Wants to Be a Communist? Career Incentives and Mobilized Loyalty in China.” The China Quarterly217:42–68.
23.
DicksonBruce J.2016. The Dictator’s Dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s Strategy for Survival. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
DicksonBruce J.RubleeMaria Rost. 2000. “Membership Has Its Privileges: The Socioeconomic Characteristics of Communist Party Members in Urban China.” Comparative Political Studies33 (1): 87–112.
25.
EvansPeter B.1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
EysenckHans J.1998. The Psychology of Politics. London: Routledge.
27.
GandhiJennifer. 2010. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Gang Guo.2007. “Organizational Involvement and Political Participation in China.” Comparative Political Studies40 (4): 457–82.
GerschenkronAlexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31.
HuntingtonSamuel P.1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
32.
HuntingtonSamuel P.MooreClement Henry, eds. 1970. Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems. New York: Basic Books.
33.
ImaiKosukeKeeleLukeTingleyDustinYamamotoTeppei. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review105 (4): 765–89.
34.
InglehartRonald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35.
InglehartRonaldWelzelChristian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
JacobsonGary C.2000. “Partisan Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, edited by BondJon R.FleisherRichard, 9-30. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
37.
JenningsM. Kent. 1992. “Ideological Thinking among Mass Publics and Political Elites.” Public Opinion Quarterly56 (4): 419–41.
38.
JiangJunyanYangDali L.2016. “Lying or Believing? Measuring Preference Falsification from a Political Purge in China.” Comparative Political Studies49 (5): 600–34.
39.
JiangZemin. 2013. Selected Works of Jiang Zemin. Vol. 3.Beijing: Foreign Language Press.
40.
JohnsonKay Ann. 1985. Women, the Family and Peasant Revolution in China. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
41.
KohliAtul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
KonrádGyörgySzelényiIván. 1979. The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
43.
KossDaniel. 2018. Where the Party Rules: The Rank and File of China’s Communist State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
KraussStephen W.2002. “Romanian Authoritarianism 10 Years after Communism.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28 (9): 1255–64.
45.
KuranTimur. 1991. “Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics44 (1): 7–48.
46.
KuranTimur. 1997. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
47.
LeeMing-Hsuan. 2012. “The One-Child Policy and Gender Equality in Education in China: Evidence from Household Data.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues33 (1): 41–52.
48.
LiHongbinLiuPak WaiZhangJunsenMaNing. 2007. “Economic Returns to Communist Party Membership: Evidence from Urban Chinese Twins.” The Economic Journal117 (523): 1504–20.
49.
LinzJuan J.2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
50.
LipsetSeymour Martin. 1959. “Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism.” American Sociological Review24 (4): 482–501.
51.
LupuNoamWarnerZach. 2017. “Mass-Elite Congruence and Representation in Argentina.” In Malaise in Representation in Latin American Countries, edited by JoignantAlfredoMoralesMauricioFuentesClaudio, 281–302. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
52.
MagaloniBeatriz. 2008. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
MauzyDiane K.MilneR. S.2002. Singapore Politics under the People’s Action Party. London: Routledge.
54.
McFarlandSam G.AgeyevVladimir S.Abalakina-PaapMarina A.1992. “Authoritarianism in the Former Soviet Union.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63 (6): 1004–10.
55.
MillerArthur H.HesliVicki L.ReisingerWilliam M.1995. “Comparing Citizen and Elite Belief Systems in Post-Soviet Russia and Ukraine.” Public Opinion Quarterly59 (1): 1–40.
56.
MillerArthur H.HesliVicki L.ReisingerWilliam M.1997. “Conceptions of Democracy among Mass and Elite in Post-Soviet Societies.” British Journal of Political Science27 (2): 157–90.
57.
MillerMichael K.2014. “Elections, Information, and Policy Responsiveness in Autocratic Regimes.” Comparative Political Studies48 (6): 691–727.
58.
MooreBarringtonJr.1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
59.
NathanAndrew J.2015. “China’s Challenge.” Journal of Democracy26:156–70.
60.
NathanAndrew J.ShiTianjian. 1996. “Left and Right with Chinese Characteristics: Issues and Alignments in Deng Xiaoping’s China.” World Politics48 (4): 522–50.
61.
O’DonnellGuillermo A.SchmitterPhilippe C.1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
62.
PanJenniferXuYiqing. 2017. “China’s Ideological Spectrum.” The Journal of Politics80 (1): 254–73. doi:10.1086/694255.
63.
PepinskyThomas. 2014. “The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism.” British Journal of Political Science44 (3): 631–53.
64.
PyeLucian. 1981. The Mandarin and the Cadre. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
65.
ReisingerWilliam M.MelvilleAndrei YuMillerArthur H.HesliVicki L.1996. “Mass and Elite Political Outlooks in Post-Soviet Russia: How Congruent?” Political Research Quarterly49 (1): 77–101.
66.
RohdeDavid W.1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
67.
RuncimanDavid. 2018. “China’s Challenge to Democracy.” The Wall Street Journal, April26. https://on.wsj.com/2Hy8yZr.
68.
SaieghSebastián M.2015. “Using Joint Scaling Methods to Study Ideology and Representation: Evidence from Latin America.” Political Analysis23 (3): 363–84.
69.
SchurmannFranz. 1968. Ideology and Organization in Communist China. Oakland: University of California Press.
70.
ShilsEdward. 1966. Political Development in the New States. France: Mouton & Co.
71.
ShirkSusan L.2018. “China in Xi’s ‘New Era’: The Return to Personalistic Rule.” Journal of Democracy29 (2): 22–36.
72.
SvolikMilan W.2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
TangWenfang. 2016a. Populist Authoritarianism: Chinese Political Culture and Regime Sustainability. New York: Oxford University Press.
74.
TangWenfang. 2016b. “Same Bed, Different Dreams: The Bifurcation of the Chinese Communist Party.” In The Rising Civil Society and State Society Relations in China, edited by ShanWeiYangLijun, 123–51. London: World Scientific.
75.
TreierShawnHillygusD. Sunshine. 2009. “The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate.” Public Opinion Quarterly73 (4): 679–703.
76.
TreierShawnJackmanSimon. 2008. “Democracy as a Latent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 201–17.
77.
TsaiLily L.XuYiqing. 2018. “Outspoken Insiders: Political Connections and Citizen Participation in Authoritarian China.” Political Behavior40 (3): 629–57.
78.
U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services. 2019. “United States Indo-Pacific Command and United States Forces Korea.” Washington, DC. https://bit.ly/2tfqH8X.
79.
WalderAndrew G.LiBobaiTreimanDonald J.2000. “Politics and Life Chances in a State Socialist Regime: Dual Career Paths into the Urban Chinese Elite, 1949 to 1996.” American Sociological Review65 (2): 191–209.
80.
YangHongxingZhaoDingxin. 2015. “Performance Legitimacy, State Autonomy and China’s Economic Miracle.” Journal of Contemporary China24 (91): 64–82.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
