Under what conditions can cabinet ministers affect the government’s policy agenda? Existing literature provides conflicting answers to this question. In this article, I show that some politicians are more likely than others to influence policy. Specifically, I consider three types of ministers: loyalists, who are loyal to their party leader and prioritize office over policy; partisans, who are party heavyweights and aspiring leaders; and ideologues, who have fixed policy ideas and are unwilling to compromise over office perks. I argue that ideologues and partisans will affect policy more than loyalists do. Using a novel data set on ministerial backgrounds, and examining the area of social welfare policy in 18 countries, I find support for my theoretical expectations.
AdolphC. (2013). Bankers, bureaucrats, and central bank politics: The myth of neutrality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AllanJ. P.ScruggsL. (2004). Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 496-512.
4.
ArmingeonK.WeisstannerD.EnglerS.PotolidisP.GerberM. (2012). Comparative Political Dataset I 1960-2010. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
5.
Austen-SmithD.BanksJ. S. (1988). Elections, coalitions and legislative outcomes. American Political Science Review, 82, 405-422.
6.
BackH.DebusM.DumontP. (2011). Who gets what in coalition governments? Predictors of portfolio allocation in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 441-478.
7.
BaldwinP. (1992). The politics of social solidarity: Class bases of the European welfare state 1875-1975. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BaraJ. (2005). A question of trust: Implementing party manifestos. Parliamentary Affairs, 58, 585-599.
9.
BecherM. (2010). Constraining ministerial power: The impact of veto players on labor market reforms in industrial democracies, 1973-2000. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 33-60.
10.
BergmanT.MullerW. C.StromK.BlomgrenM. (2003). Democratic delegation and accountability: Cross-national patterns. In StromK.MullerW. C.BergmanT. (Eds.), Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies (pp. 109-220). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
BesleyT. (2004). Paying politicians: Theory and evidence. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 193-215.
12.
BlondelJ. (1993). Individual ministers and their role in cabinet decision-making. In BlondelJ.Muller-RommelF. (Eds.), Governing together: The extent and limits of joint decision-making in Western European cabinets (pp. 179-206). London, England: St. Martin’s Press.
13.
BlythM. (2005). Domestic institutions and the possibility of social democracy. Comparative European Politics, 3(4), 379-407.
14.
BoefS. D.KeeleL. (2008). Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 184-200.
15.
BradleyD.HuberE.MollerS.NielsenF.StephensJ. (2003). Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics, 55, 193-228.
16.
BudgeI.KemanH. (1990). Parties and democracy: Coalition formation and government functioning in twenty states. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
BushwayS.JohnsonB. D.SlocumL. A. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 151-178.
18.
CareyJ. M.ShugartM. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14, 417-439.
19.
CarrollR.CoxG. W. (2012). Shadowing ministers: Monitoring partners in coalition governments. Comparative Political Studies, 45, 220-236.
20.
ChwierothJ. (2007). Neoliberal economists and capital account liberalization in emerging markets. International Organization, 61, 4443-4463.
21.
ClarkW. R. (2003). Capitalism, not globalism: Capital mobility, central bank independence, and the political control of the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22.
DesmondB. (2000). Finally and in conclusion: A political memoir. Dublin, Ireland: New Island.
23.
DewanT.Hortala-VallveR. (2011). The three As of government formation: Appointment, allocation, and assignment. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 610-627.
24.
DowdingK.DumontP. (2009). Structural and strategic factors affecting the hiring and firing of ministers. In DowdingK.DumontP. (Eds.), The selection of ministers in Europe: Hiring and firing (pp. 1-20). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
26.
DreherA.GastonN.MartensP. (2008). Measuring globalization: Gauging its consequence. New York, NY: Springer.
27.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
FitzgeraldG. (2010). Just garret: Life from the political front line. Dublin, Ireland: Liberties Press.
29.
FranzeseR. J. (2002). Macroeconomic policies of developed democracies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
GalassoV.NanniciniT. (2011). Competing on good politicians. American Political Science Review, 105, 79-99.
31.
GallagherM.LaverM.MairP. (2006). Representative government in modern Europe. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
32.
GoodhartL. M. (2013). Who decides? Coalition governance and ministerial discretion. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8, 205-237.
33.
Green-PedersenC.KersbergenK. V.HemerijckA. (2001). Neo-liberalism, the “third-way” or what? Recent social democratic welfare policies in Denmark and the Netherlands. Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 307-325.
34.
HallerbergM.StrauchR. R.HagenJ. V. (2009). Fiscal governance in Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HausermannS. (2010). The politics of welfare state reform in continental Europe: Modernization in hard times. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
HeadeyB. W. (1974). British cabinet ministers: The role of politicians in executive office. London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
37.
HibbsD. (1978). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71, 1467-1487.
38.
HuberJ. D. (1996). The vote of confidence in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 90, 269-282.
39.
HuberJ. D.Martinez-GallardoC. (2008). Replacing cabinet ministers: Patterns of ministerial stability in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 102, 169-180.
40.
IversenT.SoskiceD. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100, 165-181.
41.
IversenT.StephensJ. D. (2008). Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 600-637.
42.
KamC.IndridasonI. H. (2005). The timing of cabinet reshuffles in five Westminster parliamentary systems. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30, 327-363.
43.
KatzensteinP. J. (1985). Small states in world markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
44.
KersbergenK. V.VisB. (2014). Comparative welfare state politics: Development, opportunities and reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (2003). New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975-95. American Political Science Review, 97, 425-446.
46.
LangeS. (2009). Politikaward: Walter Riester [Politics Award: Walter Riester]. Politik & Kommunikation.
47.
LaverM.ShepsleK. A. (1996). Making and breaking governments: Cabinets and legislatures in parliamentary democracies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
LaverM.ShepsleK. A. (1999). How political parties emerged from the primeval slime: Party cohesion, party discipline, and the formation of governments. In BowlerS.FarrellD. M.KatzR. S. (Eds.), Party discipline and parliamentary government. Columbus (pp. 23-52): Ohio State University Press.
49.
LipsmeyerC. S.PierceH. N. (2011). The eyes that bind: Junior ministers as oversight mechanisms in coalition governments. Journal of Politics, 73, 1152-1164.
50.
MaresI. (2006). Taxation, wage bargaining and unemployment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
51.
MartinL. W.VanbergG. (2011). Parliaments and coalitions: The role of legislative institutions in multiparty governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
MartinL. W.VanbergG. (2014). Parties and policymaking in multiparty governments: The legislative median, ministerial autonomy, and the coalition compromise. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 979-996.
53.
MeltzerA. H.RichardS. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914-927.
54.
MoeneK. O.WallersteinM. (2003). Earnings inequality and welfare spending. World Politics, 55, 485-516.
55.
MouryC. (2013). Coalition government and party mandate: How coalition agreements constrain ministerial action. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
56.
MullerW. C.StromK. (2000). Coalition governments in Western Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
O’MalleyE. (2006). Ministerial selection in Ireland: Limited choice in a political village. Irish Political Studies, 21, 319-336.
59.
PanebiancoA. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
PiersonP. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
PiersonP. (2001). Investigating the welfare state at century’s end. In PiersonP. (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 1-16). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
62.
PowellJ. (2011). The new Machiavelli. London, England: Vintage Books.
63.
QuinnR. (2005). Straight left: A journey in politics. Dublin, Ireland: Hodder Headline.
64.
RodrikD. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments?Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997-1032.
65.
RomerT.RosenthalH. (1978). Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. Public Choice, 33, 27-43.
66.
RuedaD. (2007). Social democracy inside out: Partisanship & labour market policy in industrialized democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
67.
SavoieD. J. (2011). Steering from the centre: The Canadian way. In DahlstromC.Guy PetersB.PierreJ. (Eds.), Steering from the centre: Strengthening political control in western democracies (pp.147-165). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
68.
SchumacherG. (2012). “Marx” or the market? Intra-party power and social democratic welfare state retrenchment. West European Politics, 35, 1024-1043.
69.
SchumacherG.de VriesC. E.VisB. (2013). Why do parties change position? Party organization and environmental incentives. Journal of Politics, 75, 464-477.
70.
ScruggsL. (2006). The generosity of social insurance, 1971-2002. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22, 349-364.
71.
ScruggsL.AllanJ. (2006). Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD countries: A replication and revision. Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 55-72.
72.
StromK. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 77, 261-289.
73.
ThiesM. (2001). Keeping tabs on one’s partners: The logic of delegation in coalition formation. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 580-598.
74.
VisserJ. (2013). ICTWSS: Database on institutional characteristics of trade unions, wage setting, state intervention and social pacts in 34 countries between 1960 and 2012. Amsterdam: Amsterdam institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
75.
VisserJ.HemerijckA. (1997). A Dutch miracle: Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
76.
WarwickP. V. (2001). Coalition policy in parliamentary democracies: Who gets how much and why. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 1212-1236.
77.
WarwickP. V.DruckmanJ. N. (2006). The paradox of portfolio allocation: An investigation in the nature of a very strong but puzzling relationship. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 635-665.
78.
WesternB.RosenfeldJ. (2011). Unions, norms, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. American Sociological Review, 76, 513-537.
79.
WilenskyH. L. (2002). Rich democracies: Political economy, public policy, and performance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
80.
WilsonS. E.ButlerD. M. (2007). A lot more to do: The sensitivity of time-series cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications. Political Analysis, 15, 101-123.
81.
WoldendorpJ.KemanH.BudgeI. (2000). Party government in 48 democracies (1945-1998). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
82.
WoonJ. (2008). Bill sponsorship in Congress: The moderating effect of agenda positions on legislative proposals. Journal of Politics, 70, 201-216.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
