In almost all European welfare states, immigrants face a higher risk of poverty than natives, but the gap between the two groups varies. In examining this variation, our article contributes to the nascent literature on the impact of welfare states on immigrants. We hypothesize that whether immigrants benefit from welfare generosity depends on three intervening factors: immigration policy, labor market regulation, and welfare eligibility rules. We use fuzzy-set analysis to examine the interplay of these determinants in 16 West-European states. The findings show that in most countries a high migrant disadvantage results from the combination of a large share of humanitarian and family immigrants and generous social policies. The underlying mechanism is that “unwanted” immigrants are institutionally impeded from full access to generous welfare states.
AlesinaA. F.GlaeserE. L. (2004). Fighting poverty in the U.S. and Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlganY.DustmannC.GlitzA.ManningA. (2010). The economic situation of first and second-generation immigrants in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. The Economic Journal, 120(February), F4-F30.
3.
AllanJ. P.ScruggsL. (2004). Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 493-512.
4.
BantingK. (2000). Looking in three directions: Migration and the European welfare state in comparative perspective. In BommesM.GeddesA. (Eds.), Immigration and welfare: Challenging the borders of the welfare state (pp. 13-33). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BantingK.KymlickaW. (Eds.). (2006). Multiculturalism and the welfare state. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BarrettA.DuffyD. (2008). Are Ireland’s immigrants integrating into its labor market?International Migration Review, 42, 597-619.
7.
BarrettA.MaîtreB. (2013). Immigrant welfare receipt across Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 34, 8-23.
8.
BarrettA.McCarthyY. (2007). Immigrants in a booming economy: Analysing their earnings and welfare dependence. Labour, 21, 789-808.
9.
BevelanderP.PendakurR. (2014). The labour market integration of refugee and family reunion immigrants: A comparison of outcomes in Canada and Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40, 689-709.
10.
BjerreL.HelblingM.RömerF.ZobelM. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring immigration policies: A comparative perspective. International Migration Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/imre.12100
11.
BlumeK.GustafssonB.PedersenP. J.VernerM. (2007). At the lower end of the table: Determinants of poverty among immigrants to Denmark and Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 373-396.
12.
BonoliG. (1997). Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26, 351-372.
13.
BorängF. (2012). National institutions, international migration: Labour markets, welfare states, and immigration policy (Doctoral thesis). University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
14.
BradyD. (2003). The politics of poverty: Left political institutions, the welfare state, and poverty. Social Forces, 82, 557-588.
15.
BrubakerW. R. (1989). Immigration and the politics of citizenship in Europe and North America. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
16.
BüchelF.FrickJ. R. (2005). Immigrants’ economic performance across Europe—Does immigration policy matter?Population Research and Policy Review, 24, 175-212.
17.
CastlesS.SchierupC. (2010). Migration and ethnic minorities. In PiersonC.ObingerH.LewisJ.LeibfriedS.CastlesF. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (pp. 278-291). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
ConnorP. (2010). Explaining the refugee gap: Economic outcomes of refugees versus other immigrants. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23, 377-397.
19.
ConstantA.ZimmermanK. F. (2005). Immigrant performance and selective immigration policy: A European perspective. National Institute Economic Review, 194, 94-105.
20.
DörrS.FaistT. (1997). Institutional conditions for the integration of immigrants in welfare states: A comparison of the literature on Germany, France, Great Britain, and the Netherlands. European Journal of Political Research, 31, 401-426.
21.
DustmannC.FrattiniT. (2013). Immigration: The European experience. In CardD.RaphaelS. (Eds.), Immigration, poverty, and socioeconomic inequality (pp. 423-456). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
EmmeneggerP.CarejaR. (2012). From dilemma to dualization: Social and migration policies in the “reluctant countries of immigration.” In EmmeneggerP.HäusermannS.PalierB.Seeleib-KaiserM. (Eds.), The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies (pp. 124-150). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
EmmeneggerP.HäusermannS.PalierB.Seeleib-KaiserM. (Eds.). (2012). The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
EmmeneggerP.KvistJ.SkaaningS.-E. (2013). Making the most of configurational comparative analysis: An assessment of QCA applications in comparative welfare state research. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 185-190.
25.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
FerreraM. (2005). The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
FerreraM. (2010). The South European countries. In PiersonC.ObingerH.LewisJ.LeibfriedS.CastlesF. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (pp. 616-629). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
FreemanG. P. (2004). Immigrant incorporation in Western democracies. International Migration Review, 38, 945-969.
31.
GeddesA. (2003). Migration and the welfare state in Europe. The Political Quarterly, 74(Suppl. s1), 150-162.
32.
HuberE.StephensJ. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
IversenT.SoskiceD. (2015). Democratic Limits to Redistribution: Inclusionary versus Exclusionary Coalitions in the Knowledge Economy. World Politics, 67(2), 185-225.
34.
JakobsenV.KorpiT.LorentzenT. (December2014). Immigration and integration policy and labour market attainment among Scandinavian immigrants (Working Paper 11). SFI Danish National Centre for Social Research.
35.
JoppkeC. (1998). Why liberal states accept unwanted immigration. World Politics, 50, 266-293.
36.
KingD.RuedaD. (2008). Cheap labor: The new politics of “bread and roses” in industrial democracies. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 279-297.
37.
KoganI. (2006). Labor markets and economic incorporation among recent immigrants in Europe. Social Forces, 85, 697-721.
38.
KoopmansR. (2010). Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 1-26.
39.
LindbeckA.SnowerD. J. (1988). The insider-outsider theory of employment and unemployment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
ManowP. (2009). Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan. Socio-Economic Review, 7, 101-121.
41.
McCashinA.O’SheaJ. (2009). The Irish welfare system. In SchuberK.HegelichS.BazantU. (Eds.), The handbook of European welfare systems (pp. 260-276). London, UK: Routledge.
42.
McGinnityF.QuinnE.KingstonG.O’ConnellP. (2013). Annual monitoring report on integration in 2012. Dublin, Ireland: Economic and Social Research Institute and The Integration Centre.
43.
MessinaA. M. (2007). The logics and politics of post-WWII migration to Western Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MollerS.HuberE.StephensJ. D.BradleyD.NielsenF. (2003). Determinants of relative poverty in advanced capitalist democracies. American Sociological Review, 68, 22-51.
45.
MoodC. (2011). Lagging behind in good times: Immigrants and the increased dependence on social assistance in Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 55-65.
46.
MorissensA.SainsburyD. (2005). Migrants’ social rights, ethnicity and welfare regimes. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 637-660.
47.
OostindieG. (2011). Postcolonial Netherlands: Sixty-five years of forgetting, commemorating, silencing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
48.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2007a). Jobs for immigrants (Vol. 1): Labour market integration in Australia, Denmark, Germany and Sweden. Paris, France: OECD.
49.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2007b). OECD economic surveys: Sweden 2007. Paris, France: OECD.
50.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Jobs for immigrants (Vol. 2): Labour market integration in Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Portugal. Paris, France: OECD.
PicotG. (2012). Politics of segmentation: Party competition and social protection in Europe. London, UK: Routledge.
53.
RaginC. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
SainsburyD. (2012). Welfare states and immigrant rights: The politics of inclusion and exclusion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
SchnapperD.KriefP.PeignardE. (2003). French immigration and integration policy. A complex combination. In HeckmannF.SchnapperD. (Eds.), The integration of immigrants in European societies: National differences and trends of convergence (pp. 15-44). Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius.
56.
SchneiderC. Q.RohlfingI. (2013). Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research. Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 559-597.
57.
SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58.
ScruggsL. (2004). Welfare state entitlements data set: A comparative institutional analysis of eighteen welfare states (Version 1.2). Retrieved from http://sp.uconn.edu/~scruggs/
59.
SoysalY. (1994). Limits of citizenship. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
60.
ThelenK. (2014). Varieties of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
TimonenV.DoyleM. (2009). In search of security: Migrant workers’ understandings, experiences and expectations regarding “social protection” in Ireland. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 157-175.
62.
van HoorenF. J. (2012). Varieties of migrant care work: Comparing patterns of migrant labour in social care. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 133-147.
63.
van KersbergenK. (1995). Social capitalism: A study of Christian democracy and the welfare state. London, UK: Routledge
64.
VisB. (2012). The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-n analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 168-198.
65.
WalshF. (2013). Labour market regulation and migration in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 44, 85-102.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
