This article examines factors that shape people’s perceptions of government corruption in mainland China. We are particularly interested in how people acquire information on local corruption, given the general lack of pertinent firsthand experience. We combine data from a national survey in mainland China with a compiled data set on the number of local corruption cases reported in Chinese local newspapers. The results of both probit and Heckman selection models show that indirect formal and indirect informal information sources have diverging effects. Although coverage of corruption by newspapers controlled by the authoritarian regime reduces people’s perceptions of corruption, exposure to grapevine news significantly increases perceived corruption. Moreover, access to government-controlled media can significantly dilute the negative impact of grapevine news on popular perceptions of corruption.
AndersonC.TverdovaY. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91-109.
2.
BaileyJ.ParasP. (2006). Perceptions and attitudes about corruption and democracy in Mexico. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, 22(1), 57-81.
3.
BallS. (1987). The micropolitics of the school. London, UK: Routledge Kegan Paul.
4.
BallS.VincentC. (1998). “I heard it on the grapevine”: “Hot” knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377-400.
5.
BartelsL. M. (1993). Message received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 267-285.
6.
BoothJ. A.SeligsonM. A. (2009). The legitimacy puzzle in Latin America: Political support and democracy in eight nations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BowserD. (2001). Corruption, trust, and the danger to democratization in the former Soviet Union. In LovellD. (Ed.), The transition: Evaluating the postcommunist experience (pp. 80-95). London, UK: Ashgate.
BraumoellerB. (2004). Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction items. International Organization, 58, 807-820.
10.
BrunettiA.WederB. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1801-1824.
11.
CanacheD.AllisonM. E. (2005). Perceptions of political corruption in Latin American democracies. Latin American Politics and Society, 47(3), 91-111.
12.
ChangE. C. C.ChuY.-H. (2006). Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies?Journal of Politics, 68(2), 259-271.
13.
ChenH.ChanJ. M. (1998). Bird-caged press freedom in China. In ChengJ. (Ed.), China in the post-Deng era. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Chinese University Press.
14.
Della PortaD. (2000). Social capital, beliefs in government, and political corruption. In PharrS. J.PutnamR. D. (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries (pp. 202-230). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
DruckmanJ. N.NelsonK. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729-745.
16.
EsareyA. (2005). Cornering the market: State strategies for controlling China’s commercial media. Asian Perspective, 29(4), 37-83.
17.
FoxA. (1997). Rumor, news and popular political opinion in Elizabethan and early Stuart England. Historical Journal, 40(3), 597-620.
18.
GangQ.BandurskiD. (2011). China’s emerging public sphere: The impact of media commercialization, professionalism, and the Internet in an era of transition. In ShirkS. L. (Ed.), Changing media, changing China (pp. 38-76). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
GerbnerG.GrossL.MorganM.SignorielliN.ShanahanJ. (2002). Growing up with television: The cultivation processes. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 43-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
GrovesR. M.DillmanD. A.EltingeJ. L.LittleR. J. A. (Eds.). (2001). Survey nonresponse. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
21.
GuoY. (2008). Corruption in transitional China: An empirical analysis. China Quarterly, 194, 349-364.
22.
HartR. (1994). Seducing America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
HassidJ. (2008). Controlling the Chinese media. Asian Survey, 48(3), 414-430.
24.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-161.
25.
JamiesonK. (1992). Dirty politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
KernH. L.HainmuellerJ. (2009). Opium for the masses: How foreign media can stabilize authoritarian regimes. Political Analysis, 17, 377-399.
27.
KinderD. R.SandersL. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of White opinion on affirmative action for Blacks. Social Cognition, 8(1), 73-103.
28.
KingG.HonakerJ.JosephA.ScheveK. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 49-69.
29.
LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsonB. R.GaudetH. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
30.
LiL. (2008). Political trust and petitioning in the Chinese countryside. Comparative Politics, 40(2), 209-226.
31.
LiL. (2011). Distrust in government leaders, demand for leadership change, and preference for popular elections in rural China. Political Behavior, 33(3), 291-311.
32.
LiL.O’BrienK. J. (2008). Protest leadership in rural China. China Quarterly, 193, 1-23.
33.
LipsetS. M.LenzB. (2000). Corruption, culture and markets. In HarrisonL.HuntingtonS. P. (Eds.), Culture matters (pp. 112-125). New York, NY: Basic Books.
34.
ManheimJ. B. (1991). All of the people, all the time: Strategic communication and American politics. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
35.
ManionM. (2004). Corruption by design: Building clean government in mainland China and Hong Kong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
NelsonT. E.OxleyZ. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040-1067.
37.
NewtonK. (1999). Mass media effects: Mobilization or media malaise. British Journal of Political Science, 29, 577-599.
38.
NorrisP. (2000). The impact of television on civic malaise. In PharrS. J.PutnamR. D. (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 231-251). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2009). Cosmopolitan communications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
PartaR. E. (2007). Discovering the hidden listener: An assessment of radio liberty and Western broadcasting to the USSR during the cold war. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
41.
PericeG. A. (1997). Rumors and politics in Haiti. Anthropological Quarterly, 70(1), 1-10.
42.
PharrS. J.PutnamR. D. (Eds.). (2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
PuhaniP. (2000). The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(1), 53-68.
44.
PutnamR. D. (1995). Turning in, turning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664-683.
45.
RenL. (2009). Surveying public opinion in transitional China: An examination of survey response (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
46.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley.
47.
SchudsonM. (1995). The power of news. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
ScottJ. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
SeligsonM. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408-433.
50.
SharafutdinovaG. (2010). What explains corruption perceptions? The dark side of political competition in Russia’s regions. Comparative Politics, 42(2), 147-166.
51.
ShirkS. L. (2011a). Changing media, changing China. In ShirkS. L. (Ed.), Changing media, changing China (pp. 1-37). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
ShirkS. L. (2011b). Changing media, changing foreign policy. In ShirkS. L. (Ed.), Changing media, changing China (pp. 225-252). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
53.
StockmannD. (2009). One size doesn’t fit all: Measuring news reception East and West. Chinese Journal of Communication, 2(2), 140-157.
54.
StockmannD. (2011). What kind of information does the public demand? Getting the news during the 2005 anti-Japanese protests. In ShirkS. L. (Ed.), Changing media, changing China (pp. 175-201). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
StockmannD.GallagherM. (2011). Remote control: How the media sustain authoritarian rule in China. Comparative Political Studies, 44(4), 436-467.
56.
TourangeauR.RipsL. J.RasinskiK. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57.
WedemanA. (2005). Anticorruption campaigns and the intensification of corruption in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 14(42), 93-116.
58.
YanJ. (2008). Distribution of non-response in Chinese political survey research. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 61(2), 225-231.
59.
ZhaoY. (2000). Watchdogs on party leashes? Contexts and implications of investigative journalism in post-Deng China. Journalism Studies, 1(2), 577-596.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
