Perceptions of Political Corruption in State Government

Abstract

This study examines public perceptions of state level political corruption in the United States using original data from two national public opinion surveys conducted in 2014 and 2022. Our analyses reveal several important insights about the underpinnings of state corruption perceptions. First, we find that perceptions of state corruption are modestly related to the actual state corruption context—people are able to connect their perceptions to reality. Second, consistent with previous research on partisanship, partisan biases play a substantial role in shaping perceptions of state level corruption, with people being much more likely to perceive corruption when the incumbent governor in their state is an out-partisan. Finally, the relationship between corruption perceptions and the state corruption context is not significantly moderated by political knowledge.

Keywords

corruption state politics state government political corruption perceptions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abernathy

P. M.

(2020). Will local news survive? News deserts and ghost newspapers. https://www.usnewsdeserts.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2020_News_Deserts_and_Ghost_Newspapers.pdf

Achen

C. H.

Bartels

L. M.

(2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.

Adserà

Boix

Payne

(2003). Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19(2), 445–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewg017

Agerberg

(2022). Corrupted estimates? Response bias in citizen surveys on corruption. Political Behavior, 11, 653–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09630-5

Alt

J. E.

Lassen

D. D.

(2003). The political economy of institutions and corruption in American states. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803015003006

Anderson

Tverdova

(2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/3186095

Ansolabehere

Rivers

(2013). Cooperative survey research. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-022811-160625

Bartels

L. M.

(2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021226224601

Bokayev

Nauryzbek

Davletbayeva

Dussipov

Rysbekova

Torebekova

(2023). Factors driving individual perceptions of quotidian corruption: Evidence from Kazakhstan. Public Integrity, 25(4), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2054569

10.

Boylan

R. T.

Long

C. X.

(2003). Measuring public corruption in the American states: A survey of state house reporters. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3(4), 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000300300405

11.

Campbell

A. A.

Converse

P. E.

Miller

W. E.

Stokes

D. E.

(1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.

12.

Canache

Allison

M. E.

(2005). Perceptions of political corruption in Latin American democracies. Latin American Politics and Society, 47(3), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2005.tb00320.x

13.

Canache

Cawvey

Hayes

Mondak

J. J.

(2019). Who sees corruption? The bases of mass perceptions of political corruption in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 11(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x19876462

14.

Carmines

E. G.

Stimson

J. A.

(1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955648

15.

Charron

(2016). Do corruption measures have a perception problem? Assessing the relationship between experiences and perceptions of corruption among citizens and experts. European Political Science Review, 8(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773914000447

16.

Citrin

Green

D. P.

(1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400004518

17.

Cooray

Dzhumashev

(2018). The effect of corruption on labour market outcomes. Economic Modelling, 74, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.05.015

18.

Delli Carpini

M. X.

Keeter

(1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.

19.

Depken

C. A.

Lafountain

C. L.

(2006). Fiscal consequences of public corruption: Empirical evidence from state bond ratings. Public Choice, 126(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-4315-0

20.

Dincer

Johnston

(2017). Political culture and corruption issues in state politics: A new measure of corruption issues and a test of relationships to political culture. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjw026

21.

Dincer

Johnston

(2018). Measuring illegal and legal corruption in American states: Some results from 2018 corruption in America survey. Institute for Corruption Studies. https://greasethewheels.org/cpi

22.

Dolan

McKeown

Carlson

J. M.

(1988). Popular conceptions of political corruption: Implications for the empirical study of political ethics. Corruption and Reform, 3(3), 3–24.

23.

Duch

R. M.

Palmer

H. D.

Anderson

C. J.

(2000). Heterogeneity in perceptions of national economic conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669272

24.

Erikson

Wlezien

(2012). The objective and subjective economy and the presidential vote. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(4), 620–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096512000881

25.

Fischle

(2000). Mass response to the Lewinsky scandal: Motivated reasoning or Bayesian updating? Political Psychology, 21(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00181

26.

Gaziano

(1997). Forecast 2000: Widening knowledge gaps. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400202

27.

Gaziano

(2013). Knowledge gaps, belief gaps, ideology, and culture wars. Open Journal of Political Science, 3(4), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2013.34017

28.

Gerber

A. S.

Huber

G. A.

(2010). Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00424.x

29.

Glaeser

E. L.

Saks

R. E.

(2006). Corruption in America. Journal of Public Economics, 90(6–7), 1053–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.007

30.

Goel

R. K.

Nelson

M. A.

(2011). Measures of corruption and determinants of US corruption. Economics of Governance, 12(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-010-0091-x

31.

Gonzalez

Mackenna

Muñoz

(2019). The experience and perception of corruption: A comparative study in 34 societies. International Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2019.1605030

32.

Greene

(2004). Social identity theory and party identification. Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501010.x

33.

Handan‐Nader

Myers

A. C.

Hall

A. B.

(2025). Polarization and state legislative elections. American Journal of Political Science, 650(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12973

34.

Hill

K. Q.

(2003). Democratization and corruption: Systematic evidence from the American states. American Politics Research, 31(6), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x03255178

35.

Holbrook

Heideman

Weinschenk

(2023). Objective conditions, political knowledge, and perceptions of electoral competition in US mayoral elections. Social Science Quarterly, 104(6), 1282–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13314

36.

Holbrook

T. M.

(2002). Presidential campaigns and the knowledge gap. Political Communication, 19(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600290109997

37.

Holbrook

Heideman

Weinschenk

(2024). Perceptions of local political corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 77(4), 1230–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129241265960

38.

Holbrook

T. M.

Weinschenk

A. C.

(2020a). Are perceptions of local conditions rooted in reality? Evidence from two large-scale local surveys. American Politics Research, 48(4), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x19885863

39.

Holbrook

T. M.

Weinschenk

A. C.

(2020b). Information, political bias, and public perceptions of local conditions in US cities. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919892627

40.

Jerit

Barabas

Bolsen

(2006). Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00183.x

41.

Jessee

S. A.

(2010). Partisan bias, political information and spatial voting in the 2008 presidential election. The Journal of Politics, 72(2), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609990764

42.

Johnson

N. D.

LaFountain

C. L.

Yamarik

(2011). Corruption is bad for growth (even in the United States). Public Choice, 147(3-4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9634-5

43.

Johnston

(1983). Corruption and political culture in America: An empirical perspective. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 13(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037419

44.

Krupnikov

Ryan

J. B.

(2022). The other divide. Cambridge University Press.

45.

Kwak

(1999). Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis: Education, motivation, and media use. Communication Research, 26(4), 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004002

46.

Lewis-Beck

M. S.

Martini

N. F.

Kiewiet

D. R.

(2013). The nature of economic perceptions in mass publics. Electoral Studies, 32(3), 524–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.026

47.

McCann

J. A.

Lawson

(2006). Presidential campaigns and the knowledge gap in three transitional democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 59(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900102

48.

Meier

K. J.

Holbrook

T. M.

(1992). I seen my opportunities and I took ’em: Political corruption in the American states. The Journal of Politics, 54(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131647

49.

Mendilow

Brogan

(2016). Perceptions of corruption and trust in government in the United States. Corruption and government legitimacy: A Twenty-First Century Perspective (pp. 59–92): Lexington Books.

50.

Mitchell

D. T.

Campbell

N. D.

(2009). Corruption’s effect on business venturing within the United States. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 68(5), 1135–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2009.00665.x

51.

Mocan

(2008). What determines corruption? International evidence from microdata. Economic Inquiry, 46(4), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00107.x

52.

Montinola

G. R.

Jackman

R. W.

(2002). Sources of corruption: A cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123402000066

53.

Moodie

(1980). On political scandals and corruption. Government and Opposition, 15(2), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1980.tb00272.x

54.

Moore

D. W.

(1987). Political campaigns and the knowledge-gap hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1086/269028

55.

Moskowitz

D. J.

(2021). Local news, information, and the nationalization of US elections. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000829

56.

Nice

D. C.

(1983). Political corruption in the American states. American Politics Quarterly, 11(4), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/004478083011004007

57.

Nice

D. C.

(1986). The policy consequences of political corruption. Political Behavior, 8(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01002102

58.

Pellegata

Memoli

(2016). Can corruption erode confidence in political institutions among European countries? Comparing the effects of different measures of perceived corruption. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1036-0

59.

Persily

Lammie

(2004). Perceptions of corruption and campaign finance: When public opinion determines constitutional law. U. Pa. L. Rev, 153(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150623

60.

Prior

(2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/3647733

61.

Redlawsk

D. P.

McCann

J. A.

(2005). Popular interpretations of ‘corruption’ and their partisan consequences. Political Behavior, 27(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-4469-3

62.

Richey

(2010). The impact of corruption on social trust. American Politics Research, 38(4), 676–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x09341531

63.

Rivera

Seira

Jha

(2024). Democracy corrupted: Apex corruption and the erosion of democratic values. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm?abstractid=4828243

64.

Rogers

(2023). What Americans know about statehouse democracy. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 23(4), 420–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2023.19

65.

Rosenson

B. A.

(2009). The effect of political reform measures on perceptions of corruption. Election Law Journal, 8(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2008.0006

66.

Schlesinger

Meier

K. J.

(2002). Variations in corruption among the American states. In Heidenheimer

Johnston

(Eds.), Political corruption (pp. 627–644). Transaction Publishers.

67.

Shah

Weinschenk

Yiannias

(2024). Schoolhouse rocked: Pandemic politics and the nationalization of school board elections. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 24(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2023.28

68.

Tajfel

(1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96

69.

Tay

Herian

M. N.

Diener

(2014). Detrimental effects of corruption and subjective well-being: Whether, how, and when. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614528544

70.

Treisman

(2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(99)00092-4

71.

Treisman

(2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418

72.

Tverdova

Y. V.

(2011). See no evil: Heterogeneity in public perceptions of corruption. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423910001101

73.

Tyburski

Egan

Schneider

(2020). Deep determinants of corruption? A subnational analysis of resource curse dynamics in American states. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919878264

74.

Weinschenk

A. C.

(2012). Partisan pocketbooks: The politics of personal financial evaluations. Social Science Quarterly, 93(4), 968–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00856.x

75.

Woods

N. D.

(2008). The policy consequences of political corruption: Evidence from state environmental programs. Social Science Quarterly, 89(1), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00531.x

76.

Wright

G. C.

(2008). Charles adrian and the study of nonpartisan elections. Political Research Quarterly, 61(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907311743

77.

Wright

G. C.

Schaffner

B. F.

(2002). The influence of party: Evidence from the state legislatures. American Political Science Review, 96(2), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402000229

78.

Xin

Rudel

T. K.

(2004). The context for political corruption: A cross‐national analysis. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08502005.x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.48 MB

0.00 MB