This study examines public perceptions of state level political corruption in the United States using original data from two national public opinion surveys conducted in 2014 and 2022. Our analyses reveal several important insights about the underpinnings of state corruption perceptions. First, we find that perceptions of state corruption are modestly related to the actual state corruption context—people are able to connect their perceptions to reality. Second, consistent with previous research on partisanship, partisan biases play a substantial role in shaping perceptions of state level corruption, with people being much more likely to perceive corruption when the incumbent governor in their state is an out-partisan. Finally, the relationship between corruption perceptions and the state corruption context is not significantly moderated by political knowledge.
AchenC. H.BartelsL. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
3.
AdseràA.BoixC.PayneM. (2003). Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19(2), 445–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewg017
AltJ. E.LassenD. D. (2003). The political economy of institutions and corruption in American states. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803015003006
6.
AndersonC.TverdovaY. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/3186095
BartelsL. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021226224601
9.
BokayevB.NauryzbekM.DavletbayevaZ.DussipovY.RysbekovaZ.TorebekovaZ. (2023). Factors driving individual perceptions of quotidian corruption: Evidence from Kazakhstan. Public Integrity, 25(4), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2054569
10.
BoylanR. T.LongC. X. (2003). Measuring public corruption in the American states: A survey of state house reporters. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3(4), 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000300300405
11.
CampbellA. A.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
CanacheD.CawveyM.HayesM.MondakJ. J. (2019). Who sees corruption? The bases of mass perceptions of political corruption in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 11(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x19876462
14.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955648
15.
CharronN. (2016). Do corruption measures have a perception problem? Assessing the relationship between experiences and perceptions of corruption among citizens and experts. European Political Science Review, 8(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773914000447
16.
CitrinJ.GreenD. P. (1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400004518
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
19.
DepkenC. A.LafountainC. L. (2006). Fiscal consequences of public corruption: Empirical evidence from state bond ratings. Public Choice, 126(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-4315-0
20.
DincerO.JohnstonM. (2017). Political culture and corruption issues in state politics: A new measure of corruption issues and a test of relationships to political culture. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjw026
21.
DincerO.JohnstonM. (2018). Measuring illegal and legal corruption in American states: Some results from 2018 corruption in America survey. Institute for Corruption Studies. https://greasethewheels.org/cpi
22.
DolanK.McKeownB.CarlsonJ. M. (1988). Popular conceptions of political corruption: Implications for the empirical study of political ethics. Corruption and Reform, 3(3), 3–24.
23.
DuchR. M.PalmerH. D.AndersonC. J. (2000). Heterogeneity in perceptions of national economic conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669272
24.
EriksonR.WlezienC. (2012). The objective and subjective economy and the presidential vote. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(4), 620–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096512000881
25.
FischleM. (2000). Mass response to the Lewinsky scandal: Motivated reasoning or Bayesian updating?Political Psychology, 21(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00181
GazianoC. (2013). Knowledge gaps, belief gaps, ideology, and culture wars. Open Journal of Political Science, 3(4), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2013.34017
28.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A. (2010). Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00424.x
GoelR. K.NelsonM. A. (2011). Measures of corruption and determinants of US corruption. Economics of Governance, 12(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-010-0091-x
31.
GonzalezR.MackennaB.MuñozE. (2019). The experience and perception of corruption: A comparative study in 34 societies. International Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2019.1605030
Handan‐NaderC.MyersA. C.HallA. B. (2025). Polarization and state legislative elections. American Journal of Political Science, 650(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12973
34.
HillK. Q. (2003). Democratization and corruption: Systematic evidence from the American states. American Politics Research, 31(6), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x03255178
35.
HolbrookT.HeidemanA.WeinschenkA. (2023). Objective conditions, political knowledge, and perceptions of electoral competition in US mayoral elections. Social Science Quarterly, 104(6), 1282–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13314
HolbrookT.HeidemanA.WeinschenkA. (2024). Perceptions of local political corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 77(4), 1230–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129241265960
38.
HolbrookT. M.WeinschenkA. C. (2020a). Are perceptions of local conditions rooted in reality? Evidence from two large-scale local surveys. American Politics Research, 48(4), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x19885863
39.
HolbrookT. M.WeinschenkA. C. (2020b). Information, political bias, and public perceptions of local conditions in US cities. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919892627
JesseeS. A. (2010). Partisan bias, political information and spatial voting in the 2008 presidential election. The Journal of Politics, 72(2), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609990764
42.
JohnsonN. D.LaFountainC. L.YamarikS. (2011). Corruption is bad for growth (even in the United States). Public Choice, 147(3-4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9634-5
KrupnikovY.RyanJ. B. (2022). The other divide. Cambridge University Press.
45.
KwakN. (1999). Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis: Education, motivation, and media use. Communication Research, 26(4), 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004002
McCannJ. A.LawsonC. (2006). Presidential campaigns and the knowledge gap in three transitional democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 59(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900102
48.
MeierK. J.HolbrookT. M. (1992). I seen my opportunities and I took ’em: Political corruption in the American states. The Journal of Politics, 54(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131647
49.
MendilowJ.BroganM. (2016). Perceptions of corruption and trust in government in the United States. Corruption and government legitimacy: A Twenty-First Century Perspective (pp. 59–92): Lexington Books.
50.
MitchellD. T.CampbellN. D. (2009). Corruption’s effect on business venturing within the United States. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 68(5), 1135–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2009.00665.x
MontinolaG. R.JackmanR. W. (2002). Sources of corruption: A cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123402000066
MooreD. W. (1987). Political campaigns and the knowledge-gap hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1086/269028
55.
MoskowitzD. J. (2021). Local news, information, and the nationalization of US elections. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000829
NiceD. C. (1986). The policy consequences of political corruption. Political Behavior, 8(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01002102
58.
PellegataA.MemoliV. (2016). Can corruption erode confidence in political institutions among European countries? Comparing the effects of different measures of perceived corruption. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1036-0
59.
PersilyN.LammieK. (2004). Perceptions of corruption and campaign finance: When public opinion determines constitutional law. U. Pa. L. Rev, 153(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150623
60.
PriorM. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/3647733
61.
RedlawskD. P.McCannJ. A. (2005). Popular interpretations of ‘corruption’ and their partisan consequences. Political Behavior, 27(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-4469-3
RogersS. (2023). What Americans know about statehouse democracy. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 23(4), 420–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2023.19
65.
RosensonB. A. (2009). The effect of political reform measures on perceptions of corruption. Election Law Journal, 8(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2008.0006
66.
SchlesingerT.MeierK. J. (2002). Variations in corruption among the American states. In HeidenheimerA.JohnstonM. (Eds.), Political corruption (pp. 627–644). Transaction Publishers.
67.
ShahP.WeinschenkA.YianniasZ. (2024). Schoolhouse rocked: Pandemic politics and the nationalization of school board elections. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 24(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2023.28
TayL.HerianM. N.DienerE. (2014). Detrimental effects of corruption and subjective well-being: Whether, how, and when. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614528544
TreismanD. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418
72.
TverdovaY. V. (2011). See no evil: Heterogeneity in public perceptions of corruption. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423910001101
73.
TyburskiM.EganP.SchneiderA. (2020). Deep determinants of corruption? A subnational analysis of resource curse dynamics in American states. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919878264
WoodsN. D. (2008). The policy consequences of political corruption: Evidence from state environmental programs. Social Science Quarterly, 89(1), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00531.x
WrightG. C.SchaffnerB. F. (2002). The influence of party: Evidence from the state legislatures. American Political Science Review, 96(2), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402000229
