This article contributes to the vast literature concerning extreme right parties in Western Europe by examining the effects of crime on the electoral success of these parties. Utilizing theories of issue ownership and political opportunity, this article argues that populist right parties appeal to voters who feel a sense of physical and social insecurity because of higher levels of crime. This hypothesis is tested using a data set covering 18 Western European countries between 1970 and 2005. The results indicate that populist right parties benefit from higher levels of crime as well as linking crime with higher levels of immigration. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of this analysis.
Abedi, A. ( 2002). Challenges to established parties: The effects of party system features on the electoral fortunes of anti-political-establishment parties. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 551-583.
2.
Adams, J., & Somer-Topcu, Z. (in press). Do parties adjust their policies in response to rival parties’ policy shifts? Spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five postwar democracies. British Journal of Political Science.
3.
Albrecht, H.-J. ( 2002). Immigration, crime and unsafety. In A. Crawford (Ed.), Crime and insecurity: The governance of safety in Europe (pp. 159-185). Portland, OR: Willan.
4.
Anderson, C.J. ( 1996). Economics, politics and foreigners: Populist party support in Denmark and Norway. Electoral Studies, 15, 497-511.
5.
Arter, D. ( 1992). Black faces in the blond crowd: Populist racialism in Scandinavia. Parliamentary Affairs, 45, 357-372.
6.
Arzheimer, R., & Carter, E. ( 2006). Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 419-443.
7.
Beck, N., & Katz, J.N. ( 1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89, 634-647.
8.
Betz, H.-G. ( 1990). Politics of resentment: Right-wing radicalism in West Germany. Comparative Politics, 23, 45-60.
9.
Betz, H.-G. ( 1993a). The new politics of resentment: Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe. Comparative Studies, 25, 413-427.
10.
Betz, H.-G. ( 1993b). The two faces of radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Review of Politics, 55, 662-683.
11.
Betz, H.-G. ( 1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
12.
Blomquist, P., & Green-Pedersen, C. (2004). Defeat at home? Issue-ownership and social democratic support in Scandinavia. Government and Opposition, 39, 587-613.
13.
Bohrer, R.E., Krohn, L.A., & Tan, A.C. ( 2001, April). Taking advantage: Far-right parties in post-Maastricht Europe. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL .
14.
Bréchon, P., & Mitra, S.K. ( 1992). The national front in France: The emergence of an extreme right protest movement. Comparative Studies, 25, 63-82.
15.
Budge, I., & Farlie, D.J. ( 1983). Explaining and predicting elections. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
16.
Budge, I., Robertson, D., & Hearl, D. (Eds.). (1987). Ideology, strategy and party change: Spatial analysis of election programmes in nineteen democracies. London , UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Canovan, M. ( 1981). Populism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
18.
Canovan, M. ( 1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy . Political Studies, 47, 2-16.
19.
Carter, E.L. ( 2002). Proportional representation and the fortunes of right-wing extremist parties. West European Politics, 25, 125-146.
20.
Chapin, W.D. ( 1997). Explaining the electoral success of the new right: The German case. West European Politics, 20, 53-72.
21.
Clarke, K.A. ( 2005). The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 22, 341-352.
22.
Dalton, R. J., Flanagan, S. C., & Beck, P. (Eds.). (1984). Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies: Realignment or dealignment?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Dalton, R.J., & Wattenberg, M.P. (2000). Partisan change and the democratic process. In R. J. Dalton & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies (pp. 261-285). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
Downs, A. ( 1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
25.
Downs, W.M. ( 2001). Pariahs in their midst: Belgian and Norwegian parties react to extremist threats. West European Politics, 24, 23-48.
26.
Eatwell, R. ( 2003). Ten theories of the extreme right. In P. H. Merkl and L. Weinberg (Eds.), Right-wing extremism in the twenty-first century (pp. 47-73). London: Frank Cass.
27.
Fitzmaurice, J. ( 1992). The extreme-right in Belgium: Recent developments. Parliamentary Affairs, 45, 300-308.
28.
Furlong, P. ( 1992). The extreme right in Italy: Old orders and dangerous novelties. Parliamentary Affairs, 45, 345-356.
29.
Fysh, P., & Wolfreys, J. ( 1992). Le pen, the National Front and the extreme right in France . Parliamentary Affairs, 45, 309-326.
30.
Geddes, B. ( 1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis , 2, 131-150.
31.
Gibson, R. ( 2002). The growth of anti-immigrant parties in western Europe . Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press .
32.
Givens, T. ( 2005). Voting radical right in Europe. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Golder, M. ( 2003a). Electoral institutions, unemployment and extreme right parties: A correction. British Journal of Political Science , 33, 525-534.
34.
Golder, M. ( 2003b). Explaining variation in the success of extreme right parties in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 36, 432-466.
35.
Harmel, R. ( 1997). The impact of new parties on party systems: Lessons for America from European multiparty systems. In P. S. Herrnson & J. C. Green (Eds.), Multiparty politics in America (pp. 43-58). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
36.
Heckman, J. ( 1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
37.
Hiatt, K.D. ( 2007). Immigrant danger? Immigration and increased crime in Europe. Retrieved from http://repositories.cdlib.org/iir/imm06/
38.
Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. ( 2007). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Unpublished typescript , Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
39.
Ignazi, P. ( 1992). The silent counter-revolution: Hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right-wing parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22, 3-34.
40.
Ignazi, P. ( 1997). New challenges: Post-materialism and the extreme right . In M. Rhodes, P. Heywood, & V. Wright (Eds.), Developments in west European politics (pp. 300-319). New York, NY : St Martin’s.
41.
Interpol. (1971, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1981, 1983, 1985, 1987, 1989, 1991, 1993, 1995-2005). International crime statistics. New York, NY: Author .
42.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D.R. ( 1987). News that matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Jackman, R.W., & Volpert, K. ( 1996). Conditions favouring parties of the extreme right in Western Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 26, 501-521.
44.
King, G. ( 1997). A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
45.
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. ( 2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95, 49-69.
46.
Kleinnijenhuis, J., & de Ridder, J.A. (1998). Issue new and electoral volatility: A comparative analysis of media effects during the 1994 election campaigns in Germany and the Netherlands. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 413-437.
47.
Knigge, P. ( 1998). The ecological correlates of extreme-right extremism in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research , 34, 249-279.
48.
Knight, R. ( 1992). Haider, the Freedom Party and the extreme right in Austria . Parliamentary Affairs, 45, 285-299.
49.
Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. ( 1979). "Effective" number of parties: A measure with application to west Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12, 3-27.
50.
Lewis-Beck, M., & Mitchell, G.E. , II. (1993). French electoral theory: The National Front test. Electoral Studies, 12, 112-127.
51.
Lijphart, A. ( 1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. ( 1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments . In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1-64). New York, NY: Free Press.
53.
Lubbers, M., & Scheepers, P. ( 2000). Individual and contextual characteristics of the German extreme right-wing vote in the 1990s: A test of complimentary theories. European Journal of Political Research, 38, 63-94.
54.
Mackie, T.T., & Rose, R. ( 1991). The international almanac of electoral history. London, UK: Macmillan.
55.
Mackie, T.T., & Rose, R. ( 1997). A decade of election results: Updating the international almanac. Glasgow, UK: University ofStrathclyde, Centre for the Study of Public Policy.
56.
Mair, P. ( 1995). Political parties, popular legitimacy and public privilege . West European Politics, 18, 40-57.
57.
Mayer, N. ( 1998). The French national front. In H.-G. Betz & S. Immerfall (Eds.), The new politics of the right: Neo-populist parties and movements in established democracies (pp. 11-25). London, UK: Macmillan .
58.
Mayer, N., & Perrineau, P. ( 1989). Le front national à découvert [The national front uncovered]. Paris, France: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.
59.
Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. ( 2002). Democracies and the populist challenge. New York, NY: Palgrave.
60.
Meyer, D.S., & Minkoff, D.C. ( 2004). Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces, 82, 1457-1492.
61.
Minkenberg, M. ( 1992). The new right in Germany: The transformation of conservatism and the extreme right. European Journal of Political Research , 22, 55-82.
62.
Mudde, C. ( 1999). The single-issue party thesis: Extreme right and the immigration issue. West European Politics, 22, 182-197.
63.
Mudde, C. ( 2000). The ideology of the extreme right. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
64.
Norris, P. ( 1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
65.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. ( 1992, 1993, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2004). Trends in international migration. SOPEMI. New York, NY: Author.
66.
Petrocik, J.R. ( 1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.
67.
Pharr, S., & Putnam, R. ( 2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
Poguntke, T., & Scarrow, S. ( 1996). Anti-party sentiment. Journal of Political Research, 29, 319-344.
69.
Powell, G.B., Jr. ( 1986). Extremist parties and political turmoil: Two puzzles . American Journal of Political Science, 30, 357-378.
70.
Powell, G.B., Jr., & Vanberg, G.S. ( 2000). Election laws, disproportionality and median correspondence: Implications for two visions of democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 383-411.
71.
Sidoti, F. ( 1992). The extreme right in Italy: Ideological orphans and counter-mobilization . In P. Hainsworth (Eds.), The extreme right in Europe and the USA (pp. 151-174). New York, NY : St. Martin’s.
72.
Stokes, D.E. ( 1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review, 57, 368-377.
73.
Swank, D., & Betz, H.-G. ( 2003). Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 215-245.
74.
Swyngedouw, M. ( 1998). The extreme right in Belgium: Of a non-existent front national and an omnipresent Vlaams Blok. In H.-G. Betz & S. Immerfall (Eds.), The new politics of the right: Neo-populist parties and movements in established democracies (pp. 59-75). New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
75.
Taguieff, P.-A. ( 1995, Spring). Political science confronts populism: From conceptual mirage to a real problem. Telos, 103, 9-43.
76.
Tarrow, S. ( 1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
77.
van der Brug, W. ( 2004). Issue ownership and party choice. Electoral Studies, 23, 209-233.
78.
Voerman, G., & Lucardie, P. ( 1992). The extreme right in the Netherlands: The centrists and the radical rivals. European Journal of Political Research , 22, 35-54.
79.
Westle, B., & Niedermayer, O. (1992). Contemporary right-wing extremism in West Germany: The "republicans" and their electorate. European Journal of Political Research, 22, 83-100.
