To cope with the disruption of the Earth system, several Business and Society scholars call for a move beyond anthropocentrism—value systems centered on human needs and wants. On the contrary, I contend that calling for “sight-corrected” anthropocentrism is better suited to mobilize and guide key economic actors toward much-needed change.
FolkeC.BiggsR.NorströmA. V.ReyersB.RockströmJ. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341
2.
FrankE. G. (2024). The economic impacts of ecosystem disruptions: Costs from substituting biological pest control. Science, 385(6713), eadg0344. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg0344
3.
KopninaH.WashingtonH.TaylorB.PiccoloJ. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1
4.
RenouardC.BeauR.GoupilC.KoenigC. (Eds.) (2020). Manuel de la grande transition [Handbook of the great transition]. Les liens qui libèrent.
5.
TallbergL.García-RosellJ.-C.HaanpääM. (2022). Human–animal relations in business and society: Advancing the feminist interpretation of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04840-1
