The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (UN-SDGs) offer a comprehensive framework for global sustainable development, embraced by both UN member states and multinational enterprises (MNEs). The SDGs take a holistic approach and emphasize the need to align public- and private-sector actions. However, understanding the effectiveness of the SDG framework in coordinating stakeholder actions remains a challenge. This study explores how MNEs engage with the SDGs as a function of their home countries’ SDG profiles. Leveraging institutional theory, we test competing mechanisms by analyzing sustainability reports from 150 MNEs across 23 countries. Our results suggest that MNEs’ engagement with the SDGs aligns most closely with a “liability of origin” explanation, with firms showing greater SDG engagement when their home countries have lower progress on the SDGs. However, at the individual SDG level, the engagement patterns are more nuanced. Our findings have important implications for both theory and practice, providing insights into the complex dynamics that shape MNEs’ engagement with the SDGs and offering guidance for policymakers and businesses seeking to enhance their contributions to sustainable development.
AguileraR. V.RuppD. E.WilliamsC. A.GanapathiJ. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.
2.
Aguilera-CaracuelJ.Aragón-CorreaJ. A.Hurtado-TorresN. E.RugmanA. M. (2012). The effects of institutional distance and headquarters’ financial performance on the generation of environmental standards in multinational companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(4), 461–474.
3.
AldaM. (2019). Corporate sustainability and institutional shareholders: The pressure of social responsible pension funds on environmental firm practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1060–1071.
4.
Amor-EstebanV.Galindo-VillardónM. P.García-SánchezI. M. (2018). Industry mimetic isomorphism and sustainable development based on the X-STATIS and HJ-biplot methods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 26192–26208.
5.
Amor-EstebanV.Galindo-VillardónM. P.García-SánchezI. M.DavidF. (2019). An extension of the industrial corporate social responsibility practices index: New information for stakeholder engagement under a multivariate approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 127–140.
6.
ArenekeG.KimaniD. (2019). Value relevance of multinational directorship and cross-listing on MNEs national governance disclosure practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of World Business, 54(4), 285–306.
7.
BansalP.SongH. C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149.
8.
Barin CruzL.BoeheD. M. (2010). How do leading retail MNCs leverage CSR globally? Insights from Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 243–263.
9.
BartlettC. A.GhoshalS. (1988). Organizing for worldwide effectiveness: The transnational solution. California Management Review, 31(1), 54–74.
10.
BaumJ. A. C.SinghJ. V. (1994). Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. Oxford University Press.
11.
BebbingtonJ.UnermanJ. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 2–24.
BerryH.GuillénM. F.ZhouN. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480.
14.
BoeheD. (2011). Exploiting the liability of foreignness: Why do service firms exploit foreign affiliate networks at home?Journal of International Management, 17(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.011
15.
BoiralO. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth?Organization Science, 18(1), 127–146.
16.
BoiralO. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.
17.
BoiralO.Heras-SaizarbitoriaI. (2020). Sustainability reporting assurance: Creating stakeholder accountability through hyperreality?Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118596.
18.
BoseS.KhanH. Z. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) reporting and the role of country-level institutional factors: An international evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 130290.
19.
BoubakriN.CossetJ. C.GuedhamiO. (2005). Postprivatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 369–399.
20.
BuchananS.MarquesJ. C. (2018). How home country industry associations influence MNE international CSR practices: Evidence from the Canadian mining industry. Journal of World Business, 53(1), 63–74.
21.
CantwellJ.DunningJ. H.LundanS. M. (2010). An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 567–586.
22.
ChoC. H.PattenD. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7), 639–647.
23.
Cubilla-MontillaM. I.Galindo-VillardónP.Nieto-LibreroA. B.Vicente GalindoM. P.García-SánchezI. M. (2020). What companies do not disclose about their environmental policy and what institutional pressures may do to respect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1181–1197.
24.
Cuervo-CazurraA.CiravegnaL.MelgarejoM.LopezL. (2018). Home country uncertainty and the internationalization-performance relationship: Building an uncertainty management capability. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 209–221.
25.
DauL. A.MooreE. M.NewburryW. (2020). The grass is always greener: The impact of home and host country CSR reputation signaling on cross-country investments. Journal of International Business Policy, 3, 154–182.
26.
DeliosA.HeniszW. J. (2003). Policy uncertainty and the sequence of entry by Japanese firms, 1980-1998. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3), 227–241.
27.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
28.
Di VaioA.VarrialeL. (2020). SDGs and airport sustainable performance: Evidence from Italy on organisational, accounting and reporting practices through financial and non-financial disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119431.
29.
DohJ.RodriguesS.Saka-HelmhoutA.MakhijaM. (2017). International business responses to institutional voids. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 293–307.
30.
DonaldsonT.DunfeeT. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Harvard University Press.
31.
DonoherW. J. (2017). The multinational and the legitimation of sustainable development. Transnational Corporations, 24(3), 49–60.
32.
DozY.PrahaladC. K. (1986). Controlled variety: A challenge for human resource management in the MNC. Human Resource Management, 25(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930250105
33.
DyllickT.MuffK. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156–174.
34.
EangM.ClarkeA.Ordonez-PonceE. (2023). The roles of multinational enterprises in implementing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals at the local level. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 26(1), 79–97.
35.
El BarachiM.AlKhatibM.MathewS.OroumchianF. (2021). A novel sentiment analysis framework for monitoring the evolving public opinion in real-time: Case study on climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127820.
36.
ElderM.BartaliniA. (2019). Assessment of the G20 countries concrete SDG implementation efforts: Policies and budgets reported in their 2016-2018 voluntary national reviews. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
37.
EstrinS.MeyerK. E.NielsenB. B.NielsenS. (2016). Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: A cross-country analysis. Journal of World Business, 51(2), 294–307.
38.
EstrinS.MeyerK. E.PelletierA. (2018). Emerging economy MNEs: How does home country munificence matter?Journal of World Business, 53(4), 514–528.
FiaschiD.GiulianiE.NieriF. (2017). Overcoming the liability of origin by doing no-harm: Emerging country firms’ social irresponsibility as they go global. Journal of World Business, 52(4), 546–563.
41.
GaffuriJ. (2020). The sustainability yearbook 2020. RobecoSAM and S&P Global.
42.
GhemawatP. (2001, September). Distance still matters—The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, p. 137.
43.
GhoulS. E.GuedhamiO.KimY. (2017). Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 360–385.
44.
Global Reporting Initiative, United Nations Global Compact, & World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2015). SDG Compass: The guide for business action on the SDGs. https://sdgcompass.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/
45.
GrayR.HerremansI. M. (2012). Sustainability and social responsibility reporting and the emergence of the external social audits: The struggle for accountability? In BansalP.HoffmanA. J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment (pp. 405–424). Oxford University Press.
46.
HahnR.KühnenM. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.
47.
HansmannH.KraakmanR. (2000). End of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law Journal, 89, 439–468.
48.
HaunschildP. R.MinerA. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 472–500.
49.
HawnO.ChatterjiA. K.MitchellW. (2018). Do investors actually value sustainability? New evidence from investor reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Strategic Management Journal, 39(4), 949–976.
50.
HelmigB.SpraulK.IngenhoffD. (2016). Under positive pressure: How stakeholder pressure affects corporate social responsibility implementation. Business & Society, 55(2), 151–187.
51.
HeniszW. J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics & Politics, 12(1), 1–31.
52.
HustedB. W.AllenD. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 838–849.
53.
JensenJ. C.BergN. (2012). Determinants of traditional sustainability reporting versus integrated reporting. An institutionalist approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(5), 299–316.
54.
JiangY.García-MecaE.Martinez-FerreroJ. (2023). Do board and ownership factors affect Chinese companies in reporting sustainability development goals?Management Decision, 61(12), 3806–3834.
55.
KangM.-P.MahoneyJ. T.TanD. (2009). Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: The case of OEM suppliers. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 117–135.
56.
KimH.ParkK.RyuD. (2017). Corporate environmental responsibility: A legal origins perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 381–402.
57.
KinderytėL. (2008). Analysis and comparison of methodologies for corporate sustainability assessment. Environmental Research, Engineering & Management, 46(4), 66–75.
58.
KolkA. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51, 23–34.
59.
KostovaT.RothK.DacinM. T. (2009). Theorizing on MNCs: A promise for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 171–173.
60.
KostovaT.ZaheerS. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.
61.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
62.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 15, 222–279.
LepoutreJ.DentchevN. A.HeeneA. (2007). Dealing with uncertainties when governing CSR policies. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 391–408.
65.
Leyva-de la HizD. I.Hurtado-TorresN.Bermúdez-EdoM. (2019). The heterogeneity of levels of green innovation by firms in international contexts: A study based on the home-country institutional profile. Organization & Environment, 32(4), 508–527.
66.
LiJ.YueD. R. (2008). Market size, legal institutions, and international diversification strategies: Implications for the performance of multinational firms. Management International Review, 48(6), 667–688.
67.
LiouR.-S.Rao-NicholsonR. (2021). Multinational enterprises and Sustainable Development Goals: A foreign subsidiary perspective on tackling wicked problems. Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 136–151.
68.
LuoY.TungR. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498.
69.
MaranoV.TashmanP.KostovaT. (2017). Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 386–408.
70.
MarchJ.OlsenJ. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organisational basis of politics. Free Press.
71.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
72.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
73.
MeyerK. E.DingY.LiJ.ZhangH. (2018). Overcoming distrust: How state-owned enterprises adapt their foreign entries to institutional pressures abroad. In Cuervo-CazurraA. (Ed.), State-owned multinationals: Governments in global business (pp. 211–251). Springer.
74.
MeyerK. E.PengM. W. (2016). Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1), 3–22.
75.
MioC.PanfiloS.BlundoB. (2020). Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3220–3245.
76.
MontielI.Cuervo-CazurraA.ParkJ.Antolín-LópezR.HustedB. W. (2021). Implementing the United Nations’ sustainable development goals in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(5), 999–1030.
77.
MullerA. (2006). Global versus local CSR strategies. European Management Journal, 24(2–3), 189–198.
78.
NaH. J.LeeK. C.ChoiS. U.KimS. T. (2020). Exploring CEO messages in sustainability management reports: Applying sentiment mining and sustainability balanced scorecard methods. Sustainability, 12(2), 590.
79.
Navarro GaleraA.de los Ríos BerjillosA.Ruiz LozanoM.Tirado ValenciaP. (2014). Transparency of sustainability information in local governments: English-speaking and Nordic cross-country analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 495–504.
80.
Ordonez-PonceE.TalbotD. (2023). Multinational enterprises’ sustainability practices and focus on developing countries: Contributions and unexpected results of SDG implementation. Journal of International Development, 35(2), 201–232.
81.
PedregosaF.VaroquauxG.GramfortA.MichelV.ThirionB.GriselO.BlondelM.PrettenhoferP.WeissR.DubourgV.VanderplasJ.PassosA.CournapeauD.BrucherM.PerrotM.DuchesnayÉ. (2011). Scikit-Learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(85), 2825–2830.
82.
PistorK. (2006). Legal ground rules in coordinated and liberal market economies. In HoptK. J.WymeerschE.KandaH.BaumH. (Eds.), Corporate governance in context: Corporations, states, and markets in Europe, Japan, and the US (pp. 249–280). Oxford University Press.
83.
PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
84.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2015). Making it your business: Engaging with the Sustainable Development Goals.
85.
ReynoldsM.YuthasK. (2008). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1), 47–64.
86.
RosatiF.FariaL. G. D. (2019). Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 1312–1326.
87.
RugmanA. M.OhC. H. (2013). Why the home region matters: Location and regional multinationals. British Journal of Management, 24(4), 463–479.
88.
SachsJ. D. (2015). Goal-based development and the SDGs: Implications for development finance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 31(3/4), 268–278. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43741330
89.
SachsJ. D.Schmidt-TraubG.KrollC.LafortuneG.FullerG. (2019). Sustainable development report 2019. Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
90.
SachsJ. D.Schmidt-TraubG.MazzucatoM.MessnerD.NakicenovicN.RockströmJ. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 805–814.
91.
SchneiderB. R. (2009). Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 41(3), 553–575. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27744166
ScottA.LucciP. (2015). Universality and ambition in the post-2015 development agenda: A comparison of global and national targets. Journal of International Development, 27(6), 752–775.
94.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage.
95.
SearcyC.ElkhawasD. (2012). Corporate sustainability ratings: An investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 79–92.
96.
SharmaS. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681–697.
97.
ShinkleG. A. (2012). Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: Building on the past and aiming for the future. Journal of Management, 38(1), 415–455.
98.
ShinkleG. A.SpencerJ. W. (2012). The social construction of global corporate citizenship: Sustainability reports of automotive corporations. Journal of World Business, 47(1), 123–133.
99.
SiewR. Y. (2015). A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). Journal of Environmental Management, 164, 180–195.
100.
SmithH.DiscettiR.BellucciM.AcutiD. (2022). SMEs engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals: A power perspective. Journal of Business Research, 149, 112–122.
TanY.OchoaJ. J.LangstonC.ShenL. (2015). An empirical study on the relationship between sustainability performance and business competitiveness of international construction contractors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, 273–278.
103.
TashmanP.MaranoV.KostovaT. (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 153–171.
104.
TihanyiL.GriffithD. A.RussellC. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 270–283.
105.
TungR. L.VerbekeA. (2010). Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1259–1274.
United Nations. (2015a). Sustainable development goals. In Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Ed.), Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
van der WaalJ. W.ThijssensT. (2020). Corporate involvement in sustainable development goals: Exploring the territory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119625.
110.
van TulderR.RodriguesS. B.MirzaH.SexsmithK. (2021). The UN’s sustainable development goals: Can multinational enterprises lead the decade of action?Journal of International Business Policy, 4, 1–21.
111.
van TulderR.van der ZwartA. (2006). International business-society management: Linking corporate responsibility and globalization. Routledge.
112.
van ZantenJ. A.van TulderR. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3), 208–233.
113.
Vazquez-BrustD.PiaoR. S.de MeloM. F. D. S.YarydR. T.CarvalhoM. M. (2020). The governance of collaboration for sustainable development: Exploring the “black box.”Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120260.
114.
VolberdaH. W.LewinA. Y. (2003). Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2111–2136. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00414.x
115.
WhitleyP. R. (1992). Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets and societies. Sage.
116.
WhittinghamK.EarleA.Leyva-delaHizD.ArgiolasA. (2023). The impact of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals on corporate sustainability reporting. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 26(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444221085585
117.
WijenF. (2014). Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. The Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0218
118.
WittM. A.LewinA. Y. (2007). Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 579–594.
119.
XuK.HittM. A.BrockD.PisanoV.HuangL. S. R. (2021). Country institutional environments and international strategy: A review and analysis of the research. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100811.
120.
ZhangH.YoungM. N.TanJ.SunW. (2018). How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies. Journal of World Business, 53(5), 752–767.
121.
ZhuQ.GengY. (2013). Drivers and barriers of extended supply chain practices for energy saving and emission reduction among Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 6–12.
122.
ZhuY.SardanaD. (2020). Multinational enterprises’ risk mitigation strategies in emerging markets: A political coalition perspective. Journal of World Business, 55(2), 101044.
123.
ZuckerL. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443–464.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
