Several scholars have asserted strategic fit to nonmarket factors is positively related to economic performance. Political strategic fit has traditionally been conceptualized as an incremental decision: firms engage in political activities to the extent nonmarket factors suggest firm political actions will improve economic performance. However, the decision to engage in political activity is more of a dichotomous decision (political activity versus free riding). Both incremental and dichotomous political strategic fit are empirically evaluated in the U.S. coal industry from 1986 to 2000. Empirical evidence suggests that political strategic fit should be modeled as a dichotomous decision and that engaging in political activity is positively related to economic performance. Under investing in political activity or pursuing a free riding strategy was negatively related to economic performance.
AggarwalV. K. (2001). Corporate market and nonmarket strategies in Asia: A conceptual framework. Business and Politics, 3, 89-108.
2.
AharoniY. (1993). From Adam Smith to Schumpeterian global firms. In RugmanA.VerbekeA. (Eds.), Research in global strategic management (Vol.4, pp. 231-261).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3.
AndrewsK. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. New York, NY: Dow Jones-Irwin.
4.
BarneyJ. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
5.
BaronD. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37, 47-65.
6.
BaronD. P. (1997). Integrated strategy, trade policy, and global competition. California Management Review, 39, 145-169.
7.
BhuyanS. (2000). Corporate political activities and oligopoly loss. Review of Industrial Organization, 17, 411-426.
8.
BoddewynJ. J. (1993). Political resources and markets in international business: Beyond Porter’s generic strategies. In RugmanA.VerbekeA. (Eds.), Research in global strategic management (Vol.4, pp. 162-184). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9.
BoiesJ. L. (1989). Money, business and the state: Material interests, Fortune 500 corporations, and the size of political action committees. American Sociological Review, 54, 821-833.
10.
BonardiJ. M.HillmanA. J.KeimG. D. (2005). The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30, 397-413.
11.
EstyD.CavesR. (1983). Market structure and political influence. Economic Inquiry, 21, 24-38.
12.
GinsbergA.VenkatramanN. (1985). Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of empirical research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 421-434.
13.
GrierK. B.MungerM. C.RobertsB. E. (1994). The determinants of industrial political activity, 1978-1986. American Political Science Review, 88, 911-926.
14.
HansenW.MitchellN. (2000). Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: Domestic and foreign corporations in national politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 891-903.
15.
HartD. M. (2001). Why do some firms give? Why do some give a lot? High-tech PACs, 1977-1996. Journal of Politics, 63, 1230-1249.
16.
HillmanA. J.HittM. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 825-842.
17.
HillmanA. J.KeimG. D.SchulerD. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30, 837-858.
18.
LuxS.CrookT. R.WoeherD. J. (2011). Mixing business with politics: A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activities. Journal of Management, 37, 223-247.
19.
MahonJ. (1993). Shaping issues/manufacturing agents: Corporate political sculpting. In MitnickB. (Ed.), Corporate political agency (pp. 22-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
MartinC. (1995). Nature or nurture? Sources of preference for National Health Reform. American Political Science Review, 89, 898-913.
21.
MastersM. F.KeimG. D. (1985). Determinants of PAC participation among large corporations. Journal of Politics, 47, 1158-1173.
22.
MilesR. E.SnowC. C. (1984). Fit, failure, and the hall of fame. New York, NY: Macmillan.
23.
MilesR. H. (1987). Managing the corporate social environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24.
MitchellN.HansenW.JepsenE. (1997). The determinants of domestic and foreign corporate political activity. Journal of Politics, 59, 1096-1113.
25.
NorthD. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional chance, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
26.
OliverC.HolzingerI. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33, 496-520.
27.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R.1978. The external control of organizations. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
29.
PittmanR. (1976). The effects of industry concentration and regulation on contributions in three 1972 U.S. Senate campaigns. Public Choice, 27, 71-80.
30.
PittmanR. (1977). Market structure and campaign contributions. Public Choice, 31, 37-51.
31.
QuinnJ. B. (1980). Strategies for change: Logical instrumentalism. New York, NY: Macmillan.
32.
SawantR. J. (2012). Asset specificity and corporate political activity in regulated industries. Academy of Management Review, 37, 194-210.
33.
SchendelD. E.HoferC. W. (1979). Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
34.
SchulerD. (1996). Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 720-737.
35.
SchulerD. A. (1999). Corporate political action: Rethinking the economic and institutional influences. Business and Politics, 1, 83-97.
36.
SchulerD. A.RehbeinK. (1997). The filtering role of the firm in corporate political involvement. Business & Society, 36, 116-139.
37.
SchulerD. A.RehbeinK.CramerR. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 659-672.
38.
StiglerG. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 2, 3-21.
39.
Van de VenA. H.DrazinR. (1985). The concept of fit in contingency theory. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 333-365). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40.
VenkatramanN. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14, 423-444.
41.
YoffieD. (1987). Corporate strategies for political action: A rational model. InMarcusA.KaufmanA.BeamB. (Eds.), Business strategy and public policy (pp. 92-111). New York, NY: Quorum.
42.
ZajacE. J.KraatzM. S.BresserR. K. F. (2000). Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 429-453.
