This article examines the relationship between an aspect of a firm’s corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate community programs (CCPs), and the effectiveness of its corporate political activity (CPA). Developing a conceptual model based on resource-based view of the firm, the authors argue that the mechanism linking a firm’s CCP to CPA mechanism is the effect of CCPs on the development of firm level resources. Specifically, the intensity of a firm’s CCPs enhances a firm’s human capital, organizational capital, and geographic resources, which in turn improve the effectiveness of two key aspects of CPA: information and constituency-building political strategies. This linkage of CCPs to CPA effectiveness may be particularly relevant when the firm faces unfavorable political markets.
AdlerP. S.KwonS.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40.
2.
AnastasiadisS. (2010). An investigation into corporate citizenship, policy message, political action and climate change in the European auto sector: Forked tongues or tongue-tied? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nottingham University Business School, International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility (ICCSR), Nottingham, UK.
3.
AttarçaM. (2005). A contribution to the modeling of corporate political environment dynamics. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35(3), 25-49.
4.
AustinJ. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69-97.
5.
BarnettM. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794-816.
6.
BarneyJ. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
7.
BaronD. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 39(2), 47-65.
8.
BaronD. P. (2010). Business and its environment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
BaronD. P.YurdayE. (2004). Strategic activism: The rainforest action network (Case P-44). Stanford, CA: Stanford Graduate School of Business.
10.
BaumgartnerF. R.BerryJ. M.HojnackiM.KimballD. C.LeechB. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why?Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
BonardiJ.-P. (2011). Corporate political resources and the resource based view of the firm. Strategic Organization, 9, 247-255.
12.
BonardiJ.-P.HillmanA. J.KeimG. D. (2005). The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30, 397-413.
13.
Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship. (2009). Weathering the storm: The state of corporate citizenship in the United States. Boston, MA: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship.
14.
Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship. (2010). Profile of the practice 2010: Managing corporate citizenship as a business strategy. Boston, MA: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship.
15.
BrammerS.MillingtonA. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 29-44.
16.
CapronL.ChatainO. (2008). Competitor’s resource oriented strategies: Acting in competitors’ resources through interventions in factor markets and political markets. Academy of Management Review, 33, 97-121.
17.
CastellblanchR. (2003). Challenging pharmaceutical industry political power in Maine and Vermont. Journal of Health Politics, 28, 109-132.
18.
CreyerE. H.RossW. T. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics?Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14, 421-432.
19.
DahanN. (2005). A contribution to the conceptualization of political resources utilized in corporate political action. Journal of Public Affairs, 5, 43-54.
20.
DahanN.LecaB. (2008, May22-24). Engaging activist groups for corporate political activity: An exploration of some of the determinants. Paper presented at the Third Colloquium on Corporate Political Activity, Paris, France.
21.
De FigueiredoR. J.SpillerP. T.UrbiztondoS. (1999). An informational perspective on administrative procedures. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 15, 283-305.
22.
De PelsmackerP.DriesenL.RaypG. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39, 363-385.
23.
ElsbachK. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57-88.
24.
FennoR. (2003). Home style: House members in their districts. New York, NY: Longman.
25.
FroomanJ.MurrellA. J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: The roles of structural and demographic determinants. Business & Society, 44, 3-31.
26.
GooginsB.MirvisP.RochlinS. (2007). Beyond good company: Next generation of corporate citizenship. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
27.
GrayV.LoweryD. (1997). Reconceptualizing PAC formation: It’s not a collective action problem, and itmaybe an arms race. American Politics Quarterly, 25, 319-346.
28.
HadaniM.CoombesS. (2012). Complementary relationships between corporate philanthropy and corporate political activity: An exploratory study of political marketplace contingencies. Business & Society, 54, 859-881.
29.
HadaniM.SchulerD. A. (2013). In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns of corporate political investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 165-181.
30.
HansenW.MitchellN. (2000). Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: Domestic and foreign corporations in national politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 891-903.
HeinzJ. P.LaumannE. O.NelsonR. L.SalisburyR. H. (1993). The hollow core: Private interests in national policy making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
HeugensP.Van Den BoschF. A.Van RielC. B. (2002). Stakeholder integration. Business & Society, 41, 36-60.
34.
HillmanA.HittM. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 825-842.
35.
HillmanA. J.KeimG.SchulerD. A.2004. Corporate political strategies: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30, 837-857.
36.
HojnackiM.KimballD. (1998). Organized interests and the decision of whom to lobby in Congress. American Political Science Review, 92, 775-790.
37.
InkpenA. C. (2000). A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 775-779.
38.
JacometD. (2005). The collective aspect of corporate political strategies: The case of U.S. and European business participation in textile international trade negotiations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35, 78-93.
39.
JonesT. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-437.
40.
JonesT. M.FelpsW.BigleyG. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32, 137-155.
41.
KeimG.ZeithamlC. (1986). Corporate political strategies and legislative decision making: A review and contingency approach. Academy of Management Review, 11, 828-843.
42.
LadoA. A.BoydN. G.WrightP. (2001). A competency-based model of sustainable competitive advantage: Toward a conceptual integration. Journal of Management, 18, 77-91.
43.
LenwayS. A.RehbeinK. (1991). Leaders, followers, and free riders: An empirical test of variation in corporate political involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 893-905.
44.
LevineB. (2009). The art of lobbying. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
45.
LordM. (2003). Constituency building as the foundation for corporate political strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 112-124.
46.
MattinglyJ. E. (2004). Stakeholder salience structural development and firm performance: Structural and performance correlates of sociopolitical stakeholder management strategies. Business & Society, 43, 97-114.
47.
MirvisP.GooginsB. (2006). Stages of corporate citizenship. California Management Review, 48(2), 104-126.
48.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
49.
NavarroP. (1998). Why do corporations give to charity?Journal of Business, 61, 65-93.
50.
ObermanW. D. (1993). Strategy and tactic choice in an institutional resource context. In MitnickB. M. (Ed.), Corporate political agency: The construction of competition in public affairs (pp. 213-241). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
OliverC. Y.HolzingerI. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33, 496-520.
52.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
PelozaJ. (2006). Using social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52-72.
54.
PelozaJ.FalkenbergL. (2009). The role of collaboration in achieving corporate social responsibility objectives. California Management Review, 51(3), 95-113.
55.
PeterafM. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191.
56.
PetersonK.PfitzerM. (2009). Lobbying for good. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(1), 44-49.
57.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2002, December). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 5-16.
58.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2006, December). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
RindovaV. P.PollockT. G.HaywardM. L. A. (2006). Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31, 50-71.
61.
RondinelliD. A.LondonT. (2003). How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1), 61-76.
62.
RowleyT. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-910.
63.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096-1120.
64.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899-931.
65.
SchulerD. A.ChristmannP. (2011). The effectiveness of market-based social certification schemes: The case of fair trade coffee. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 133-156.
66.
SchulerD. A.RehbeinK. (2011). Determinants of access to legislative and executive branch officials: Business firms and trade policymaking in the U.S. Business and Politics, 13(3), Article 4.
67.
SchulerD. A.RehbeinK. A.CramerR. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political Means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 659-673.
68.
ShafferB.OstasD. (2001). Exploring the political economy of consumer legislation: The development of automobile lemon laws. Business and Politics, 3, 65-76.
69.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
70.
ValenteM.CraneA. (2010). Public responsibility and private enterprise in developing countries. California Management Review, 52(3), 52-78.
71.
WaddockS. A.GravesS. B. (1997). The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.
72.
WangH.QianC. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1159-1181.
73.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
74.
WilsonJ. Q. (1980). The politics of regulation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
75.
WoodD. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
76.
YazijiM. (2004, February). Turning gadflies into allies. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 110-115.
