The paper describes the professional development policy of a small but geographically widespread education system in New South Wales. The policy has particular features. Notably it allows control of the content of staff development at three levels — the system, the school and the individual. The policy identifies a rationale and an aim, a set of assumptions, principles of procedure and characteristics of a healthy professional learning environment. These are used as guides for officers of the system in their choice of implementation models and in the processes they use. The process of implementation of the policy is described, including administrative structures and some models of inservice. Some similarities are commented on between the policy and Stenhouse's process model of curriculum development. Suggestions are made regarding the implementation of the Scott report in New South Wales. The conceptual framework of policy analysts, Hogwood and Gunn (1984), was particularly useful in the analysis.
AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS. (1985). Schools: New South Wales—1985. Sydney: Author.
2.
BarcanA. (1982). The quality of the curriculum: What happened to the curriculum in Australian schools. Bentleigh, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Standards.
3.
BassettG.W.JackaB.LoganL. (1982). The modern primary school in Australia. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.
4.
BatchlerM.MaxwellT.W. (1987). Action evaluation: A strategy for producing change in schools. New Education, 9(1/2), 70–77.
5.
BeesonG.W.GunstoneR.F. (1978). School-based curriculum decisions: Some issues and suggestions. Unicorn, 4(2), 176–189.
6.
BennisW.G.BenneK.D.ChinR. (1969). The planning of change. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7.
BoomerG. (1987). Changing hearts and minds or changing structures? Current models/practices of inservice education: Limitations and assumptions. Paper presented at the conference entitled ‘Inservice education, trends of the past, themes for the future’, Darling Downs Institute of Advanced Education, 19–22 February, 1987.
ChapmanJ.D. (1987). Professional development through participation in school-focussed curriculum development and implementation. In HughesP. (Ed.), Better teachers for better schools. Carlton, Vic.: Australian College of Education.
12.
CohenD. (1987). Raising curriculum issues: What they are and how are they created. Paper presented at ‘Curriculum '87’, the Biennial Conference of the Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Macquarie University, Sydney, July 1987.
13.
CohenD.MaxwellT.W. (1985). Blocked at the entrance: Context, cases and commentary on curriculum change. Armidale: Entrance Publications.
14.
COMMONWEALTH SCHOOLS COMMISSION. (1985). Specific purpose programs 1985. Canberra: Govt Pr.
15.
CooperC.M.JonesE.V. (1984). The state of the art in inservice education: A review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of States on Inservice Education, Orlando, Florida, November 16–20. (ED258343).
16.
ErautM. (1977). Strategies for promoting teacher development. British Journal of Inservice Education, 4(1/2), 10–17.
17.
FullanM. (1985). Change process and strategies at the local level. Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 391–421.
18.
GrundyS.KemmisS. (1982). Educational action research in Australia: The state of the art. In The Action Research Planner. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.
19.
GuskeyT.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.
20.
HavelockR.G. (1973). The change agent's guide to innovation in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
21.
HogwoodB.W.GunnL.A. (1984). Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HubermanM. (1988). Teacher careers and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(2), 119–132.
23.
IngvarsonL. (1987). Models of inservice education and their implications for professional development policy. Independent Education, 17(2), 23–32.
24.
KaufmanB.A. (1978). Piaget, Marx, and the political ideology of schooling. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 11(1), 19–44.
25.
MaxwellT.W. (1987). ‘Anything's possible …’: A review of Staff Development Programme activities in the Armidale Diocese during 1987 (Occasional Paper No. 1). Armidale: CEO.
26.
MaxwellT.W. (1988a). Executive development programme papers, 1987 (Occasional Paper No. 3). Armidale: CEO.
27.
MaxwellT.W. (1988b). Inservice: Four innovatory programs in a small rural education system. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association of Research in Education, Armidale, 30 November–4 December 1988.
28.
MaxwellT.W.BennettA.J.FreebodyP.GrundyS.SancheR.P. (1988). The Early Literacy Inservice Course (ELIC) and literacy teaching practices. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 16(1), 13–35.
29.
MorganR. (1978). The maladministration of innovation. Journal of Educational Administration, 16(2), 187–199.
30.
NealW.D. (1987). Summary and implications. In HughesP. (Ed.), Better teachers for better schools. Carlton, Vic.: Australian College of Education.
31.
ScheinE.H. (1969). Process consultancy: Its role in organisational development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
ScottB.W. (1989). Schools renewal: A strategy to revitalise schools within the New South Wales State Education System. Sydney: Education Portfolio.
33.
SheridanG. (1985, February 2–3). The lies they tell our children. Australian, pp. 1, 12.
34.
SkilbeckM. (1975). School-based curriculum development and teacher education policy. Unpublished paper, New University of Ulster, Ireland.
35.
StenhouseL. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
36.
WhitesideT. (1978). The sociology of educational innovation. London: Methuen.
