Mathematics teacher coaching is a promising but largely overlooked form of professional development (PD) for supporting mathematics teachers’ learning of justice-oriented teaching. In this article, we critically review the literature to illuminate what we currently know about mathematics teacher coaching and to highlight studies’ contributions and limitations to inform future work. Broadly, we find that four programs of research have developed, investigating: (a) coaches’ activities and relationships, (b) the effects of coaching on student assessment scores, (c) the effects of coaching on teachers’ practices or behaviors, and (d) the effects of coaching on teachers’ knowledge or beliefs. From this analysis, we argue that justice-oriented perspectives of teaching, in tandem with sociocultural theories of teachers’ learning, could allow for more nuanced investigations of coaching and could support design of learning experiences for teachers that bring us closer to educational justice.
AnnammaS. A.JacksonD.MorrisonD. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and beyond. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162.
2.
AuW. (2009). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. Routledge.
3.
AverillR.AndersonD.EastonH.Te MaroP.SmithD.HyndsA. (2009). Culturally responsive teaching of mathematics: Three models from linked studies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 157–186.
4.
Baker-BellA.ParisD.JacksonD. (2017). Learning Black language matters: Humanizing research as culturally sustaining pedagogy. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(4), 360–377.
5.
BangM. (2015). Culture, learning, and development and the natural world: The influences of situative perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 220–233.
6.
BatteyD.FrankeM. (2015). Integrating professional development on mathematics an equity: Countering deficit views of students of color. Education and Urban Society, 47(4), 433–462.
7.
BeanR. M.DraperJ. A.HallV.VandermolenJ.ZigmondN. (2010). Coaches and coaching in reading first schools: A reality check. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 87–114.
8.
BengoP. (2016). Secondary mathematics coaching: The components of effective mathematics coaching and implications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 88–96.
9.
BennettC. A. (2010). “It’s hard getting kids to talk about math”: Helping new teachers improve mathematical discourse. Action in Teacher Education, 32(3), 79–89.
BocalaC. (2015). From experience to expertise: The development of teachers’ learning in lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), 349–362.
12.
BottianiJ. H.LarsonK. E.DebnamK. J.BischoffC. M.BradshawC. P. (2018). Promoting educators’ use of culturally responsive practices: A systematic review of inservice interventions. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(4), 367–385.
13.
BruceC. D.RossJ. A. (2008). A model for increasing reform implementation and teacher efficacy: Teacher peer coaching in grades 3 and 6 mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 346–370.
14.
BrunsB.CostaL.CunhaN. (2018). Through the looking glass: Can classroom observation and coaching improve teacher performance in Brazil?Economics of Education Review, 64, 214–250.
15.
BullockE. C.MeinersE. R. (2019). Abolition by the numbers mathematics as a tool to dismantle the carceral state (and build alternatives). Theory Into Practice, 58(4), 338–346.
16.
BuntonZ.CookC.TamburiniM. (2018). Centering students’ mathematical agency at Northwest Indian College. In GoffneyI.GutiérrezR.BostonM. (Eds.), Rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students (pp. 107–120). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
17.
ButlerA.SinclairK. A. (2020). Place matters: A critical review of place inquiry and spatial methods in education research. Review of Research in Education, 44, 64–96.
18.
CampbellP. F.GriffinM. J. (2017). Reflections on the promise and complexity of mathematics coaching. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 163–176.
19.
CampbellP. F.MalkusN. N. (2011). The impact of elementary mathematics coaches on student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 111(3), 430–454.
20.
CazdenC.LegettE. (1976). Culturally responsive education: A discussion of LAU remedies II. National Institute of Education.
21.
Charity HudleyA. H.MallinsonC. (2017). “It’s worth our time”: A model of culturally and linguistically supportive professional development for K-12 STEM educators. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(3), 637–660.
22.
ChenG. A. (2018). What/where is the Los Angeles in math for Los Angeles? In PiersonA.VogelsteinL. (Eds.), Designing the learning sciences: Thinking deeply about the relationship between theory and design (pp. 72–73). Learning Sciences Graduate Student Conference.
23.
ChenG. A.BuellJ. Y. (2018). Of models and myths: Asian(Americans) in STEM and the neoliberal racial project. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(5), 607–625.
24.
ChenG. A.MarshallS. A. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ learning to enact change in oppressive systems. In RichardsonS.DavisA.LewisC. W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Urban Education (pp. 52–64). Urban Education Collaborative.
25.
ColeM. (1988). Cross-cultural research in the sociohistorical tradition. Human Development, 31, 137–157.
26.
Copur-GencturkY.CimpianJ. R.LubienskiS. T.ThackerI. (2019). Teachers’ bias against the mathematical ability of female, Black, and Hispanic students. Educational Researcher, 49(1), 30–43.
27.
de FreitasE. (2008). Troubling teacher identity: Preparing mathematics teachers to teach for diversity. Teaching Education, 19(1), 43–55.
28.
DuchaineE. L.JolivetteK.FredrickL. D. (2011). The effect of teacher coaching with performance feedback on behavior-specific praise in inclusion classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(2), 209–227.
29.
Duncan-AndradeJ. M.MorrellE. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. Peter Lang.
30.
EickC. J.WareF. N.WilliamsP. G. (2003). Coteaching in a science methods course: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 74–85.
31.
ErchickD. B.TysonC. A. (2011). Social justice in a mathematics coaching program: Coach growth progressions. In WiestL. R.LambergT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 173–181). University of Nevada, Reno.
32.
EsmondeI. (2017). Power and sociocultural theories of learning. In EsmondeI.BookerA. N. (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 6–27). Routledge.
33.
FenstermacherG. D.RichardsonV. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186–213.
34.
FrankeM. L.WebbN. M.ChanA. G.IngM.FreundD.BatteyD. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380–392.
35.
FrankensteinM. (1983). Critical mathematics education: An application of Paolo Freire’s epistemology. The Journal of Education, 165(4), 315–339.
36.
FreireP. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th Anniversary ed., Vol. 14). Continuum International.
37.
GarciaE. (1993). Language, culture, and education. Review of Research in Education, 19(1), 51–98.
38.
GarciaS. G.JonesD.HollandG.MundyM.-A. (2013). Instructional coaching at selected middle schools in south Texas and effects on student achievement. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 11, 1–11.
GayG. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 106–116.
41.
GiamellaroM.SiegelD. R. (2018). Coaching teachers to implement innovations in STEM. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76(1), 25–38.
42.
GibbonsL. K.CobbP. A. (2016). Content-focused coaching: Five key practices. The Elementary School Journal, 117(2), 237–260.
43.
GibbonsL. K.KazemiE.LewisR. M. (2017). Developing collective capacity to improve mathematics instruction: Coaching as a lever for school-wide improvement. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 231–250.
44.
GoffneyI. (2016). Challenging deficit language. In WhiteD. Y.CrespoS.CivilM. (Eds.), Cases for teacher educators: Facilitating conversations about inequities in mathematics classrooms (pp. 389–394). Information Age.
45.
GreenoJ. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.
46.
GrossmanP. L.WineburgS. (2018). Creating a community of learners among high school teachers. The Phi Delta Kappan, 79(5), 350–353.
47.
GutiérrezR. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364.
48.
GutiérrezR. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.
49.
GutiérrezR. (2018). Introduction: The need to rehumanize mathematics. In GoffneyI.GutiérrezR.BostonM. (Eds.), Rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students (pp. 1–12). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
50.
GutsteinE. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.
51.
HammerstrømK.WadeA.JørgensenA. (2010). Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell Systematic Reviews. Campbell Collaboration.
52.
HopkinsM.OzimekD.SweetT. M. (2017). Mathematics coaching and instructional reform: Individual and collective change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 215–230.
53.
HopkinsM.SpillaneJ. P.JakopovicP.HeatonR. M. (2013). Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics: Formal structure and teacher leadership. The Elementary School Journal, 114(2), 200–224.
54.
HornI. S. (2020, June12). Carceral pedagogies, as I have explained, emphasize dominance and control over children instead of emphasizing their flourishing, let alone their liberation. These methods are prevalent in schools serving Black and Brown kids in the US. TLAC is their Bible [Twitter Post]. https://twitter.com/ilana_horn/status/1271402003936272384?s=20
55.
JacksonK.GibbonsL.SharpeC. (2017). Teachers’ views of students’ mathematical capabilities: Challenges and possibilities for ambitious reform. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–43.
56.
JosephN. M.FrankT. J. (in press). The affordances of history in understanding contemporary critical issues in mathematics education: A case analysis of Black students and teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
57.
JosephN. M.HailuM. F.MatthewsJ. S. (2019). Normalizing Black girls’ humanity in mathematics classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 89(1), 132–155.
58.
KennedyM. M. (2019). How we learn about teacher learning. Review of Educational Research, 43, 138–162.
59.
KnappA. K.BarrettJ. E.MooreC. J. (2016). Prompting teacher geometric reasoning through coaching in a dynamic geometry software context. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12184
60.
KohlerF. W.McCullough CrilleyK.ShearerD. D.GoodG. (1997). Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(4), 240–250.
61.
KokkaK. (2019). Healing-informed social justice mathematics: Promoting students’ sociopolitical consciousness and well-being in mathematics class. Urban Education, 54, 1179–1209.
62.
KretlowA. G.CookeN. L.WoodC. L. (2012). Using in-service and coaching to increase teachers’ accurate use of research-based strategies. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 348–361.
63.
KretlowA. G.WoodC. L.CookeN. L. (2010). Using in-service and coaching to increase kindergarten teachers’ accurate delivery of group instructional units. Journal of Special Education, 44(4), 234–246.
64.
KrupaE. E.ConfreyJ. (2012). Using instructional coaching: Customized professional development in an integrated high school mathematics program. In Bay-WilliamsJ. M.SpeerW. R. (Eds.), Professional collaborations in mathematics teaching and learning: Seeking success for all (pp. 161–174). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
65.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
66.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2000). Preparing teachers to teach African American students. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 206–214.
67.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2017). The (r)evolution will not be standardized: Teacher education, hip hop pedagogy, and culturally relevant pedagogy. In ParisD.AlimH. S. (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 141–156). Teachers College Press.
68.
LamboyL.LuA. (2017). The pursuit of college for all: Ends and means in “no excuses” charter schools. Theory and Research in Education, 15(2), 202–229.
69.
LampertM.GrazianiF. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491–509.
70.
LandC. L. (2018). Examples of c/Critical coaching: An analysis of conversation between cooperating and preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 493–507.
71.
LarnellG. V.BullockE. C.JettC. C. (2016). Rethinking teaching and learning mathematics for social justice from a critical race perspective. Journal of Education, 196(1), 19–29.
72.
LemovD. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college (K-12). John Wiley.
73.
LeonardJ.BrooksW.Barnes-JohnsonJ.BerryR. Q. (2010). The nuances and complexities of teaching mathematics for cultural relevance and social justice. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(3), 261–270.
74.
LesseigK. (2016). Fostering teacher learning of conjecturing, generalizing, and justifying through mathematics studio. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 18(1), 100–119.
75.
LotterC.YowJ. A.PetersT. T. (2014). Building a community of practice around inquiry instruction through a professional development program. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–23.
76.
LouieN. L. (2017). The culture of exclusion in mathematics education and its persistence in equity-oriented teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(5), 488–519.
77.
MartinD. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. The Teachers College Record, 111, 295–338.
78.
MartinD. B. (2019). Equity, inclusion, and antiblackness in mathematics education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 459–478.
79.
MartinD. B.GholsonM.LeonardJ. (2010). Mathematics as gatekeeper: Power and privilege in the production of knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12–24.
80.
McGathaM. (2008). Levels of engagement in establishing coaching relationships. Teacher Development, 12(2), 139–150.
81.
MilnerH. R. (2006). Preservice teachers’ learning about cultural and racial diversity: Implications for Urban education. Urban Education, 41(4), 343–375.
82.
Morales-DoyleD. (2017). Justice-centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation. Science Education, 101, 1034–1060.
83.
MorrellE. (2004). Becoming critical researchers: Literacy and empowerment for urban youth. Peter Lang.
84.
MorrisM. W. (2016). Pushout: The criminalization of Black girls in schools. New Press.
85.
MosesR. P.CobbC. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the algebra project. Beacon Press.
86.
MudzimiriR.BurroughsE. A.LuebeckJ.SuttonJ.YoppD. (2014). A look inside mathematics coaching: Roles, content, and dynamics. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(53), 1–32.
87.
MunsonJ. (2020). Noticing aloud: Uncovering mathematics teacher noticing in the moment. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 8(2), 25–36.
88.
MunterC.CorrentiR. (2017). Examining relations between mathematics teachers’ instructional vision and knowledge and change in practice. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 171–202.
89.
NasirN. S.HandV.TaylorE. V. (2008). Culture and mathematics in school: Boundaries between “cultural” and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 187–240.
90.
NasirN. S.LeeC. D.PeaR.McKinneydeRoystonM. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning. Routledge.
91.
NasirN. S.McKinney de RoystonM. (2013). Power, identity, and mathematical practices outside and inside school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 264–287.
92.
NeubergerJ. (2012). Benefits of a teacher and coach collaboration: A case study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(2), 290–311.
93.
NietoS. (2008). Nice is not enough: Defining caring for students of color. In PollockM. (Ed.), Everyday antiracism: Getting real about race in school (pp. 27–31). New Press.
94.
ObaraS. (2010). Mathematics coaching: A new kind of professional development. Teacher Development, 14(2), 241–251.
95.
ObaraS.SloanM. (2009). The evolving role of a mathematics coach during the implementation of performance standards. Professional Educator, 33(2), 1–13.
96.
OlsonJ.BarrettJ. (2004). Coaching teachers to implement mathematics reform recommendations. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 6, 63–78.
97.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
98.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
99.
ParsonsE. R. C. (2017). Interfaces between critical race theory and sociocultural perspectives. In EsmondeI.BookerA. N. (Eds.) Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 28–49). Routledge.
100.
PhilipT. M.Souto-ManningM.AndersonL.HornI. S.Carter AndrewsD. J.StillmanJ.VargheseM. (2018). Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as “core”: How the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 251–264.
101.
PollockM. (Ed.). (2008). Everyday antiracism: Getting real about race in school. New Press.
102.
PollyD. (2012). Supporting mathematics instruction with an expert coaching model. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(1), 78–93.
103.
PowellR.CantrellS. C.Malo-JuveraV.CorrellP. (2016). Operationalizing culturally responsive instruction: Preliminary findings of CRIOP research. Teachers College Record, 118(1), 1–46.
104.
ReichenbergJ. S. (2020). Literacy coaching with teachers of adolescent English learners: Agency, sustainability, and transformation for equity. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 64(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1056
105.
RodríguezL. F. (2013). Moving beyond test-prep pedagogy: Dialoguing with multicultural preservice teachers for a quality education. Multicultural Perspectives, 15(3), 133–140.
106.
RubelL. H. (2017). Equity-directed instructional practices: Beyond the dominant perspective. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 10(2), 66–105.
107.
SacksP. (2009). Standardized testing: Meritocracy’s crooked yardstick. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 29(2), 24–31.
108.
ShahN. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–42.
109.
SolórzanoR. W. (2008). High stakes testing: Issues, implications, and remedies for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 260–329.
110.
TurnerE. E. (2003). Critical mathematical agency: Urban middle school students engage in mathematics to investigate, critique, and act upon their world [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Texas at Austin.
111.
ValentiK. S. (2019). A CRT Analysis of Teach Like a Champion 2.0 (Doctoral dissertation, Loyola University Chicago).
112.
van EsE. A. (2012). Using video to collaborate around problems of practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39, 103–116.
113.
VassG. (2017). Preparing for culturally responsive schooling: Initial teacher educators into the fray. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(5), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702578
114.
ViescaK. M.StromK.HammerS.MastersonJ.LinzellC. H.Mitchell-McColloughJ.FlynnN. (2019). Developing a complex portrait of content teaching for multilingual learners via nonlinear theoretical understandings. Review of Educational Research, 43, 304–335.
115.
WarrenC. A. (2018). Empathy, teacher dispositions, and preparation for culturally responsive pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(2), 169–183.
116.
WeinerL. (1993). Preparing teachers for urban schools: Lessons from thirty years of school reform. Teachers College Press.
117.
WhippJ. L. (2013). Developing socially just teachers: The interaction of experiences before, during, and after teacher preparation in beginning urban teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 454–467.
118.
WilderP. (2014). Coaching heavy as a disciplinary outsider: Negotiating disciplinary literacy for adolescents. The High School Journal, 97(3), 159–179.
119.
ZwickR. (2013). Is the SAT a “wealth test?” The link between educational achievement and socioeconomic status. In ZwickR. (Ed.), Rethinking the SAT: The future of standardized testing in university admissions (pp. 203–216). RoutledgeFalmer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
